Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7T for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Characterization

Differentiation of histological calcification classifications in breast cancer using ultrashort echo time and chemical shift-encoded imaging MRI

Introduction

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases with only 14%-53% developing into invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), but currently overtreated due to inadequate accuracy of mammography. Subtypes of calcification, discernible from histology, has been suggested to have prognostic value in DCIS, while the lipid composition of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids may be altered in de novo synthesis with potential sensitivity to the difference between DCIS and IDC. We therefore set out to examine calcification using ultra short echo time (UTE) MRI and lipid composition using chemical shift-encoded imaging (CSEI), as markers for histological calcification classification, in the initial ex vivo step towards in vivo application.

Methods

Twenty female patients, with mean age (range) of 57 (35-78) years, participated in the study. Intra- and peri-tumoural degree of calcification and peri-tumoural lipid composition were acquired on MRI using UTE and CSEI, respectively. Ex vivo imaging was conducted on the freshly excised breast tumour specimens immediately after surgery. Histopathological analysis was conducted to determine the calcification status, Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), and proliferative activity marker Ki-67.

Results

Intra-tumoural degree of calcification in malignant classification (1.05 ± 0.13) was significantly higher (p = 0.012) against no calcification classification (0.84 ± 0.09). Peri-tumoural degree of calcification in malignant classification (1.64 ± 0.10) was significantly higher (p = 0.033) against no calcification classification (1.41 ± 0.18). Peri-tumoural MUFA in malignant classification (0.40 ± 0.01) was significantly higher (p = 0.039) against no calcification classification (0.38 ± 0.02). Ki-67 showed significant negative correlation against peri-tumoural MUFA (p = 0.043, ρ = -0.457), significant positive correlation against SFA (p = 0.008, ρ = 0.577), and significant negative correlation against PUFA (p = 0.002, ρ = -0.653).

Conclusion

The intra- and peri-tumoural degree of calcification and peri-tumoural MUFA are sensitive to histological calcification classes supporting future investigation into DCIS prognosis.

Multiple parameters from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions: Comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was first to assess the diagnostic performance of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters compared to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions and second to investigate the complementarity of ultrafast DCE-MRI with DWI in that task.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 142 women (mean age, 48.42 ± 11.03 [SD]) years; range: 14-78 years) with 150 breast lesions who underwent breast ultrafast DCE-MRI were prospectively recruited. Ultrafast DCE-MRI semi-quantitative parameters (maximum slope [MS], time to peak [TTP], time to enhancement [TTE], and initial area under curve in 60 s [iAUC]), ultrafast DCE-MRI quantitative parameters (K_ep, K_trans, and V_e), and the ADC were estimated and compared between benign and malignant breast lesions. Classification performances were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared using Delong test.

RESULTS

The ultrafast DCE-MRI semi-quantitative multiparameters (AUC, 0.913; 95% CI: 0.856-0.953) showed better classification performance than the quantitative multiparameters (AUC, 0.818; 95% CI: 0.747-0.876) (P = 0.022). No differences in AUC were found between ultrafast DCE-MRI semi-quantitative multiparameters and ADC (AUC, 0.912; 95% CI: 0.855-0.952) (P = 0.990). The combination of ultrafast DCE-MRI semi-quantitative multiparameters and ADC (AUC, 0.960; 95% CI: 0.915-0.985) showed better classification performance than the ultrafast DCE-MRI semi-quantitative multiparameters (P = 0.014) and quantitative multiparameters (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrafast DCE-MRI can be used as an accurate method for discriminating benign from malignant breast lesions. The combination of ultrafast DCE-MRI and DWI significantly increases the diagnostic value of ultrafast DCE-MRI.

Predictive Value of Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Imaging Features in Breast Cancer Patients with Postoperative Recurrence Time

Although the implementation of surgery has reduced the mortality of breast cancer, postoperative recurrence is still an important problem bothering patients. DCE-GMRI can not only clearly display the morphological characteristics of breast lesions but also dynamically observe the blood perfusion of the lesions. On account of this, we explored the predictive value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) imaging features in breast cancer patients on postoperative recurrence time of breast cancer. The results showed that DCE-MRI images can clearly show the hemodynamic characteristics and morphological characteristics of tumor lesions, and have important value in predicting the recurrence time of breast cancer after surgery. The prognosis of early recurrence of breast cancer is worse. DCE-MRI can predict the time of postoperative recurrence and provide important clinical references.

A Comprehensive Survey on Deep-Learning-Based Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Breast cancer is now the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women, and its percentage is gradually increasing. Optimistically, there is a good chance of recovery from breast cancer if identified and treated at an early stage. Therefore, several researchers have established deep-learning-based automated methods for their efficiency and accuracy in predicting the growth of cancer cells utilizing medical imaging modalities. As of yet, few review studies on breast cancer diagnosis are available that summarize some existing studies. However, these studies were unable to address emerging architectures and modalities in breast cancer diagnosis. This review focuses on the evolving architectures of deep learning for breast cancer detection. In what follows, this survey presents existing deep-learning-based architectures, analyzes the strengths and limitations of the existing studies, examines the used datasets, and reviews image pre-processing techniques. Furthermore, a concrete review of diverse imaging modalities, performance metrics and results, challenges, and research directions for future researchers is presented.