Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: What Is Different Compared to Healthy Women?

Survivorship research in advanced gynecological cancer: A scoping review of cohort studies

BACKGROUND

Recent calls to action highlight the need to address gaps in our understanding of survivorship for those living with advanced gynecological cancer to support optimal care. To ensure future research fills these knowledge gaps, we need to understand the breadth of existing survivorship research in this patient group, including the outcomes assessed, the populations included and the duration and retention in follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic scoping review searching PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL during the month of November 2022 to identify prospective cohort studies measuring survivorship outcomes among participants with advanced (stage III-IV) gynecological cancer, or in cohorts in which ≥50% of participants had advanced cancer, or which provide results separately for patients with advanced cancer. Articles were screened, and data extracted using a standard form.

RESULTS

We assessed 33 articles from 21 unique studies, which overall included 6023 participants with gynecological cancer. Of these, 45% had cervical cancer, 44% ovarian, 10% endometrial/uterine, and 1% vaginal/vulvar cancer. The most frequently measured survivorship outcome was quality of life. Of the 33 articles, most reported on participant age (n = 31), but relatively few reported on comorbidities (n = 10), physical status (n = 6), ethnic background (n = 4), the country of birth (n = 2), or the area of participant residence (n = 2). None included details on indigenous status. Recruitment proportions ranged from 48% to 100%. Retention proportions ranged from 15% to 97%.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight gaps in survivorship research for advanced gynecological cancers and emphasize the need for future studies to include and describe the experiences of diverse and underrepresented groups.

Side effects screening and early intervention to impact in quality of life of patients with gynecological cancers (HALIS study)

BACKGROUND

Advances in the treatment of gynecological cancers have led to increased survival in patients with gynecological cancers. Nevertheless, patients may still experience prevalent long term consequences, including lower limb lymphedema, depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, malnutrition, and sarcopenia, that negatively impact their quality of life.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact on self-perceived quality of life of systematic screening and early treatment of lower limb lymphedema, anxiety and depression, sexual dysfunction, and sarcopenia and malnutrition compared with standard practice.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Systematic screening with validated questionnaires leading to early diagnosis and treatment of side effects will have a positive impact on quality of life.

TRIAL DESIGN

This prospective clinical trial will randomize candidates for surgery to either standard of care or systematic screening every 2 months for 2 years. Quality of life data will be collected every 4 months. After randomization, patients in the control group will follow standard usual care. Their screening scales will not be considered. In the experimental group, positive screenings will generate an alert to the physician, and patients will be referred to the corresponding specific area (rehabilitation unit, psycho-oncology unit, sexual health unit, or nutrition unit).

MAJOR INCLUSION AND XCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients aged ≥18 years with ovarian, cervical, or endometrial cancer who are candidates for surgery will be included.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Self-reported quality of life questionnaire score.

SAMPLE SIZE

168 patients will be randomized to detect a difference of 6 points in the questionnaires.

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

Study completion is estimated for January 2026 and the results will be presented in May 2026.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05918770.

Bibliometric analysis of hotspots and frontiers in cancer-related fatigue among ovarian cancer survivors

Objectives

To explore and analyze research hotspots and frontiers in CRF in ovarian cancer patients to provide an evidence-based basis for scholars and policymakers.

Background

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common and lethal gynecological malignancies. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is an annoying and pervasive side-effect that seriously affects the activities of daily living and decreases the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors.

Methods

The literature was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) from inception to 2021-12-31. CiteSpace was used to discuss research countries, institutions, authors, and keywords.

Results

This study ultimately included 755 valid publications, and the number of publications showed a gradual upward trend. The countries, institutions, authors, and journals that have published the most articles and cited the most frequently were the United States, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Michael Friedlander and Amit M Oza, Gynecologic Oncology, and Journal of Clinical Oncology. The top three high-frequency keywords were Ovarian cancer, chemotherapy, and clinical trial. The top three keywords with the strongest citation bursts were cyclophosphamide, double-blind, and open-label.

Conclusions

Conducting multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled clinical trials to determine whether chemotherapeutic agents have severe adverse effects and to discuss the relationship between CRF and QoL and overall survival in cancer survivors are hotspots in this field. The new trends may be applying double-blind, randomized controlled trials to clarify the causes of CRF and open-label, randomized trials to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of chemotherapeutic agents.

Testing of a health-related quality of life model in patients with heart failure: A cross-sectional, correlational study

Psychological symptoms, physical symptoms, and behavioral factors can affect health-related quality of life (HRQOL) through different pathways, but the relationships have not been fully tested in prior theoretical models. The purpose of this study was to examine direct and indirect relationships of demographic (age), biological/physiological (comorbidity), psychological (depressive symptoms), social (social support), physical (physical symptoms and functional status), and behavioral (dietary sodium adherence) factors to HRQOL. Data from 358 patients with heart failure were analyzed using structural equation modeling. There was a good model fit: Chi-square = 5.488, p = .241, RMSEA = .032, CFI = .998, TLI = .985, and SRMR = .018. Psychological symptoms, physical symptoms, and demographic factors were directly and indirectly associated, while behavioral and biological/physiological factors were indirectly associated with HRQOL through different pathways. Behavioral factors need to be included, and psychological factors and physical factors need to be separated in theoretical models of HRQOL.