Drug Resistance and Novel Therapies in Cancers in 2019

In vitro siRNA-mediated GPX4 and AKT1 silencing in oxaliplatin resistance cancer cells induces ferroptosis and apoptosis

Oxaliplatin is a member of platinum-based chemotherapy drugs frequently used in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, resistance to oxaliplatin causes tumor progression and metastasis. Akt1 and Gpx4 are essential regulator genes of apoptosis and ferroptosis pathways. Inhibition of these genes might eradicate oxaliplatin resistance in resistant CRC cells. We compared two cell death strategies to reverse drug resistance in Caco-2 and HT-29 oxaliplatin-resistant cell lines. We used the AKT1-specific siRNA to induce apoptosis. Also, GPX4-specific siRNA and FIN56 were utilized to generate ferroptosis. The effect of these treatments was assessed by reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, cell viability, and protein expression level assays. Besides, the expression of GPX4, CoQ10, and NRF2 was assessed in both cell lines after treatments. Correctly measuring the expression of these responsible genes and proteins confirms the occurrence of different types of cell death. In addition, the ability of Akt1/ GPX4 siRNA in resensitizing HT-29 and Caco-2 oxaliplatin resistance cells was evaluated. Our finding showed that the upregulation of GPX4/siRNA caused a reduction in GPX4 and CoQ10 expressions in both cell lines. However, the expression level of NRF2 showed the same level in our cell lines, so we observed a downregulation of NRF2 in resistant CRC cell lines. Cell viability assay indicated that induction of ferroptosis by GPX4/siRNA or FIN56 and apoptosis by Akt1/siRNA in resistant cell lines could reverse the oxaliplatin resistance. We concluded that downregulation of Akt1 or Gpx4 could increase the efficacy of oxaliplatin to overcome the resistance compared to FIN56.

No Association between ABCB1 G2677T/A or C3435T Polymorphisms and Survival of Breast Cancer Patients—A 10-Year Follow-Up Study in the Polish Population

Many intensive studies are devoted to identifying novel cancer diagnostics or therapy strategies that would boost cancer therapy efficacy and recovery rates. Importantly, polymorphisms in the genes coding for ABC family proteins were considered good candidates for cancer development risk or cancer drug resistance markers. For this reason, we decided to assess the contribution of ABCB1’s most common variants (i.e., G2677T/A in exon 21/rs2032582 and C3435T in exon 26/rs1045642) to the cancer therapy response in breast cancer patients. A 10-year follow-up analysis of 157 breast cancer patients was performed. Clinical assessment, ABCB1 polymorphism status, estrogen/progesterone/human epidermal receptors status, and other characteristics were compared according to the follow-up status using the Chi-square statistic. For the analysis of overall survival curves in TCGA breast cancer patients, the Xena browser was used. We show that neither 2677 nor 3435 polymorphisms contributed to the survival of breast cancer patients. Interestingly, but not surprisingly, estrogen and progesterone receptors status were good prognostic factors and positively correlated with a disease-free survival for up to 10 years. To summarize, ABCB1 polymorphisms status may be one of the numerous factors that affect cancer development. However, they may not be the critical ones when it comes to risk or recovery assessment. Consequently, they may not be treated as reliable prognostic or predictive markers in breast cancer patients’ evaluation, which supports the previous findings and current knowledge.