De Novo Carcinoma after Solid Organ Transplantation to Give Insight into Carcinogenesis in General-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Genitourinary tumors and liver transplantation: A comprehensive review

Liver transplantation is as a crucial therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease, but the persistent organ shortage emphasizes a need to explore unconventional donor sources, including individuals with a history of malignancies. This review investigates the viability of liver donation from individuals with current or past genitourinary malignancies, focusing on renal, prostate and urinary bladder cancers. The rising incidence of urogenital malignancies among potential donors is thought to result from increasing donor age. Analysis of transmission risks reveals low rates of donor-derived cancer transmission, particularly for early-stage renal and prostate cancers. Recipients with a history of genitourinary malignancy pose complex challenges regarding post-transplant immunosuppression and cancer recurrence. Nonetheless, the evidence suggests acceptable outcomes can be achieved with careful patient selection and tailored management strategies. Recommendations for pre-transplant evaluation and post-transplant surveillance are discussed, highlighting the need for individualized approaches in this patient population. Further prospective studies are warranted to refine guidelines and optimize outcomes in liver transplantation for patients with genitourinary malignancies.

Relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus vs mycophenolate after solid organ transplantation and its implications for liver transplant care

BACKGROUND

De novo malignancy is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Cumulative immunosuppression has been shown to contribute to post-transplant malignancy (PTM) risk. There is emerging evidence on the differential carcinogenic risk profile of individual immunosuppressive drugs, independent of the net effect of immunosuppression. Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus may promote tumourigenesis, whereas mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, may limit tumour progression. Liver transplantation (LT) is relatively unique among solid organ transplantation in that immunosuppression monotherapy with either tacrolimus or MPA is often achievable, which makes careful consideration of the risk-benefit profile of these immunosuppression agents particularly relevant for this cohort. However, there is limited clinical data on this subject in both LT and other solid organ transplant recipients.

AIM

To investigate the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase databases using the key terms "solid organ transplantation", "tacrolimus", "mycophenolic acid", and "carcinogenicity", in order to identify relevant articles published in English between 1st January 2002 to 11th August 2022. Related terms, synonyms and explosion of MeSH terms, Boolean operators and truncations were also utilised in the search. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed to identify any additional articles. Excluding duplicates, abstracts from 1230 records were screened by a single reviewer, whereby 31 records were reviewed in detail. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were included in this review. All studies were large population registries or cohort studies, which varied in transplant era, type of organ transplanted and immunosuppression protocol used. Overall, there was no clear difference demonstrated between tacrolimus and MPA in de novo PTM risk following solid organ transplantation. Furthermore, no study provided a direct comparison of carcinogenic risk between tacrolimus and MPA monotherapy in solid organ transplantation recipients.

CONCLUSION

The contrasting carcinogenic risk profiles of tacrolimus and MPA demonstrated in previous experimental studies, and its application in solid organ transplantation, is yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Thus, the optimal choice of immunosuppression drug to use as maintenance monotherapy in LT recipients is not supported by a strong evidence base and remains unclear.

Incidence of malignancies after lung transplantation and their effect on the outcome. 26 years' experience

Background

Malignancy is a significant, life-limiting complication after lung transplantation (LuTx) and the second common long-term cause of death. We aimed to investigate its incidence and effect on the outcome.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Between 1996 and 2022, n = 627 lung transplantations (LuTx) were performed in our department. We used our institutional database to identify recipients with malignancies after LuTx and examined the malignancies' incidence and mortality.

Results

N = 59 malignancies occurred in n = 55 (8.8%) LuTx recipients. The post-LTx malignancies incidence was 9.4% (59/627). We report the following rates based on their location: n = 17/55 (28,8% of all recipients diagnosed with malignancies) skin, n = 10/55 (16,95%) gastrointestinal, n = 9/55 (15,3%) respiratory, n = 5/55 (8,48%) lymphatic, n = 13/55 (23,6%) other, n = 5 (8,48%) multiple synchronous.During this study period, a total of n = 328 deaths after LuTx was determined. N = 29 (8,84% of all deaths) were malignancy induced, corresponding to a total malignancy-induced mortality of 4.6% (n = 29/627). The majority of deaths were attributed to GI adenocarcinoma and PTLD. Malignancies' origin, primary COPD diagnosis, type, and specific age group were significantly survival-related (p-values <0.05). The most affected organ was skin and showed the best prognosis. PTLD had the fastest and pancreatic the latest onset.

Conclusions

This is the first report of its kind in a large cohort of german LuTx recipients. The prevalence ranking of the three commonest malignancy were skin > colorectal > PTLD. Post-LTx malignancy was the second commonest cause of death. Further studies are needed, while post-LuTx malignomas remain a serious impairment of long-term LuTx survival.

Neoplastic Progression of Barrett's Esophagus Among Organ Transplant Recipients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Several small studies reported high risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients who undergo solid organ transplantation (SOT) and implied that this may be due to immunosuppressant use. However, the major shortcoming of these studies was the lack of a control population. Therefore, we aimed to determine the rates of neoplastic progression in BE patients who underwent SOT and compare to that in controls and identify the predictors of progression.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of BE patients seen in Cleveland Clinic and affiliated hospitals between January 2000 and August 2022. Demographics, endoscopic and histological findings, history of SOT and fundoplication, immunosuppressant use, and follow-up were abstracted.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3466 patients with BE, of which 115 had SOT (lung 35, liver 34, kidney 32, heart 14, and pancreas 2) and 704 patients on chronic immunosuppressants but no history of SOT. During a median follow-up of 5.1 years, there was no difference in the annual risk of progression between the three groups (SOT=0.61%, no SOT but on immunosuppressants= 0.82%, and no SOT/no immunosuppressants= 0.94%, p=0.72). On multivariate analysis, immunosuppressant use (odds ratio (OR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.82, p=0.025) but not SOT (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.15-1.01, p=0.053) was associated with neoplastic progression in BE patients.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression is a risk factor for progression of BE to HGD/EAC. Therefore, close surveillance of BE patients on chronic immunosuppressants needs to be considered.

Antineoplastic chemotherapy and immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients: Squaring the circle?

BACKGROUND

Malignancies are a major cause of late death after liver transplantation (LT). In LT recipients presenting a malignancy, antineoplastic chemotherapy is central part of the therapeutic arsenal, but management of both immunosuppressive and antineoplastic chemotherapy can be very challenging. The aim of the present retrospective study was to describe a recent single center cohort of LT recipients treated with antineoplastic cytotoxic chemotherapy.

METHODS

All LT recipients who received antineoplastic chemotherapy in our center between 2005 and 2021 were included.

RESULTS

The study population included 72 antineoplastic chemotherapy courses in 69 patients. There was a majority of men (81.9%); median age at LT was 54.9 (range 1-68) and was 63.0 (18-79) at the diagnosis of malignancy. Lung carcinomas (23.6%), head and neck carcinomas (20.8%), lymphomas (16.7%), and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (8.3%) were the most frequent malignancies. Neoadjuvant (30.6%), adjuvant (12.5%) or palliative (54.2%) chemotherapy was performed. Immunosuppressive regimen was modified from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based to an everolimus-based regimen (63.5% of CNI discontinuation). Median survival after diagnosis of malignancy was 22.5 months and 5-year survival was 30.1%. Chemotherapy regimen was considered optimal in 81.9% of the cases. Multivariate analysis disclosed that non-PTLD N+ stage malignancy (HR = 5.52 95%CI [1.40;21.69], p = .014), non-PTLD M+ stage malignancy (HR = 10.55 95%CI [3.20;34.73], p = .0001), and suboptimal chemotherapy (HR = 2.73 95%CI [1.34;5.56], p = .005) were significantly associated with poorer prognosis. No rejection episode occurred during chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first one focused on antineoplastic chemotherapy in LT recipients. Our results suggest that immunosuppressive drugs and antineoplastic chemotherapy can be managed satisfactorily in most cases but this needs confirmation from larger cohorts.

Malignancies in adult kidney transplant candidates and recipients: current status

Posttransplant malignancies, particularly recurrent and de novo, in solid organs including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a significant complication associated with substantial mortality, largely attributed to long-term immunosuppression necessary to maintain allograft tolerance. Older age at transplantation and oncogenic virus infection along with pretransplant malignancies are among the main factors contributing to the risk of cancer in this population. As the mean age of transplant candidates rises, the rate of transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancies also increases. The eligibility criteria for transplantation in patients with prior cancer have recently changed. The overall risk of posttransplant malignancies is at least double after transplantation including KTRs relative to the general population, most pronounced for skin cancers associated with UV radiation and virally-mediated tumors. The risk of renal cell carcinoma is specifically increased in the kidney transplant population. The therapy of cancer in transplant patients is associated with risk of higher toxicity, and graft rejection and/or impairment, which poses a unique challenge in the management. Reduction of immunosuppression and the use of mTOR inhibitors are common after cancer diagnosis, although optimal immunosuppression for transplant recipients with cancer remains undefined. Suboptimal cancer treatment contributing to a worse prognosis has been reported for malignancies in this population. In this article, we focus on the prevalence and outcomes of posttransplant malignancies, cancer therapy including a short overview of immunotherapy, cancer screening and prevention strategies, and immunosuppression as a cancer risk factor. The 2020/2021 recommendations of the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Society of Transplantation (AST) for transplant candidates with a history of cancer are presented.

TNFRSF13B is a potential contributor to prostate cancer

Background

Immunodeficiencies are genetic diseases known to predispose an individual to cancer owing to defective immunity towards malignant cells. However, the link between immunodeficiency and prostate cancer progression remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of common genetic variants among eight immunodeficiency pathway-related genes on disease recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Methods

Genetic and bioinformatic analyses on 19 haplotype-tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in eight immunodeficiency pathway-related genes were conducted in 458 patients with prostate cancer after receiving radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, the TNFRSF13B was knocked down in 22Rv1 and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines via transfecting short hairpin RNAs and cell proliferation and colony formation assays were performed. The molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of TNFRSF13B were further explored by microarray gene expression profiling.

Results

TNFRSF13B rs4792800 was found to be significantly associated with biochemical recurrence even after adjustment for clinical predictors and false discovery rate correction (adjusted hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.16–2.71, p = 0.008), and the G allele was associated with higher TNFRSF13B expression (p = 0.038). Increased TNFRSF13B expression suggested poor prognosis in four independent prostate cancer datasets. Furthermore, silencing TNFRSF13B expression resulted in decreased colony formation of 22Rv1 and PC-3 cells through modulating the cell cycle and p53 signalling pathways.

Conclusions

The present study suggests the potential role of immunodeficiency pathway-related genes, primarily TNFRSF13B, in prostate cancer progression.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02590-2.