Predictors for the Differentiation between Glioblastoma, Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma, and Metastasis in Patients with a Solitary Enhancing Intracranial Mass

Introduction  Differentiation between glioblastoma (GBM), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and metastasis is important in decision-making before surgery. However, these malignant brain tumors have overlapping features. This study aimed to identify predictors differentiating between GBM, PCNSL, and metastasis. Materials and Methods  Patients with a solitary intracranial enhancing tumor and a histopathological diagnosis of GBM, PCNSL, or metastasis were investigated. All patients with intracranial lymphoma had PCNSL without extracranial involvement. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were analyzed to determine their associations with the tumor types. Results  The predictors associated with GBM were functional impairment ( p  = 0.001), large tumor size ( p  < 0.001), irregular tumor margin ( p  < 0.001), heterogeneous contrast enhancement ( p  < 0.001), central necrosis ( p  < 0.001), intratumoral hemorrhage ( p  = 0.018), abnormal flow void ( p  < 0.001), and hypodensity component on noncontrast cranial computed tomography (CT) scan ( p  < 0.001). The predictors associated with PCNSL comprised functional impairment ( p  = 0.005), deep-seated tumor location ( p  = 0.006), homogeneous contrast enhancement ( p  < 0.001), absence of cystic appearance ( p  = 0.008), presence of hypointensity component on precontrast cranial T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; p  = 0.027), and presence of isodensity component on noncontrast cranial CT ( p  < 0.008). Finally, the predictors for metastasis were an infratentorial ( p  < 0.001) or extra-axial tumor location ( p  = 0.035), smooth tumor margin ( p  < 0.001), and presence of isointensity component on cranial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI ( p  = 0.047). Conclusion  These predictors may be used to differentiate between GBM, PCNSL, and metastasis, and they are useful in clinical management.

Differentiating Glioblastoma Multiforme from Brain Metastases Using Multidimensional Radiomics Features Derived from MRI and Multiple Machine Learning Models

Due to different treatment strategies, it is extremely important to differentiate between glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and brain metastases (MET). It often proves difficult to distinguish between GBM and MET using MRI due to their similar appearance on the imaging modalities. Surgical methods are still necessary for definitive diagnosis, despite the importance of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting, characterizing, and monitoring brain tumors. We introduced an accurate, convenient, and user-friendly method to differentiate between GBM and MET through routine MRI sequence and radiomics analyses. We collected 91 patients from one institution, including 50 with GBM and 41 with MET, which were proven pathologically. The tumors separately were segmented on all MRI images (T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1C), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)) to form the volume of interest (VOI). Eight ML models and feature reduction strategies were evaluated using routine MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T1-CE, and FLAIR) in two methods with (second model) and without wavelet transform (first model) radiomics. The optimal model was selected based on each model’s accuracy, AUC-roc, and F1-score values. In this study, we have achieved the result of 0.98, 0.99, and 0.98 percent for accuracy, AUC-roc, and F1-score, respectively, which have yielded a better result than the first model. In most investigated models, there were significant improvements in the multidimensional wavelets model compared to the non-multidimensional wavelets model. Multidimensional discrete wavelet transform can analyze hidden features of the MRI from a different perspective and generate accurate features which are highly correlated with the model accuracy.