1
|
Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE, Shyr BU. Cell-free DNA as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in resectable distal common bile duct cancer. J Chin Med Assoc 2023; 86:835-841. [PMID: 36998178 DOI: 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as an oncological biomarker has drawn much attention in recent years, but very limited effort has been made to investigate the prognostic values of cfDNA in distal common bile duct (CBD) cancer. METHODS Plasma cfDNA was measured in 67 patients with resectable distal CBD cancer. Survival outcomes and the correlation of cfDNA with other conventional prognostic factors were determined. RESULTS cfDNA levels were significantly higher in female patients, and those with poor tumor differentiation, abnormal serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and stage III cancer. The significant prognostic factors included a high cfDNA level (>8955 copies/mL), abnormal serum CEA level, stage III cancer, and positive resection margins. Compared with patients with high cfDNA level, those with lower cfDNA level (≤8955 copies/mL) had significantly better overall survival outcomes (74.4% vs 100% and 19.2% vs 52.6%, for 1- and 5-year survival rates, respectively, p = 0.001). The cfDNA level, perineural invasion, CEA level, and radicality were identified as independent prognostic factors for distal CBD cancer after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION Circulating cfDNA levels play a significant role in predicting the prognosis and survival outcome for resectable distal CBD cancer. Furthermore, acting as a promising liquid biopsy, cfDNA could serve as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in combination with current conventional markers to improve diagnostic and prognostic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bor-Shiuan Shyr
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rettig EM, Wang AA, Tran NA, Carey E, Dey T, Schoenfeld JD, Sehgal K, Guenette JP, Margalit DN, Sethi R, Uppaluri R, Tishler RB, Annino DJ, Goguen LA, Jo VY, Haddad RI, Hanna GJ. Association of Pretreatment Circulating Tumor Tissue-Modified Viral HPV DNA With Clinicopathologic Factors in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 148:1120-1130. [PMID: 36301568 PMCID: PMC9614675 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Circulating tumor tissue-modified viral (TTMV) human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA is a dynamic, clinically relevant biomarker for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Reasons for its wide pretreatment interpatient variability are not well understood. Objective To characterize clinicopathologic factors associated with TTMV HPV DNA. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study included patients evaluated for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, Massachusetts, between December 2019 and January 2022 and who were undergoing curative-intent treatment. Exposures Clinicopathologic characteristics including demographic variables, tumor and nodal staging, HPV genotype, and imaging findings. Main Outcomes and Measures Pretreatment circulating TTMV HPV DNA from 5 genotypes (16, 18, 31, 33, and 35) assessed using a commercially available digital droplet polymerase chain reaction-based assay, considered as either detectable/undetectable or a continuous score (fragments/mL). Results Among 110 included patients, 96 were men (87%) and 104 were White (95%), with a mean (SD) age of 62.2 (9.4) years. Circulating TTMV HPV DNA was detected in 98 patients (89%), with a median (IQR) score of 315 (47-2686) fragments/mL (range, 0-60 061 fragments/mL). Most detectable TTMV HPV DNA was genotype 16 (n = 86 [88%]), while 12 patients (12%) harbored other genotypes. Circulating TTMV HPV DNA detection was most strongly associated with clinical N stage. Although few patients had clinical stage N0 disease, only 4 of these 11 patients (36%) had detectable DNA compared with 94 of 99 patients (95%) with clinical stage N1 to N3 disease (proportion difference, 59%; 95% CI, 30%-87%). Among patients with undetectable TTMV HPV DNA, more than half (7 of 12 [58%]) had clinical stage N0 disease. The TTMV HPV DNA prevalence and score increased with progressively higher clinical nodal stage, diameter of largest lymph node, and higher nodal maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. In multivariable analysis, clinical nodal stage and nodal maximum standardized uptake value were each strongly associated with TTMV HPV DNA score. Among 27 surgically treated patients, more patients with than without lymphovascular invasion had detectable TTMV HPV DNA (12 of 12 [100%] vs 9 of 15 [60%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, circulating TTMV HPV DNA was statistically significantly associated with nodal disease at HPV-positive OPSCC diagnosis. The few patients with undetectable levels had predominantly clinical stage N0 disease, suggesting assay sensitivity for diagnostic purposes may be lower among patients without cervical lymphadenopathy. Mechanisms underlying this association, and the use of this biomarker for surveillance of patients with undetectable baseline values, warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M. Rettig
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ngoc-Anh Tran
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Evan Carey
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tanujit Dey
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan D. Schoenfeld
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kartik Sehgal
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey P. Guenette
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Danielle N. Margalit
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rosh Sethi
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ravindra Uppaluri
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roy B. Tishler
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donald J. Annino
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura A. Goguen
- Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vickie Y. Jo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert I. Haddad
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Glenn J. Hanna
- Center for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|