Clinical and Molecular Features of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): Predictive and Prognostic Role of Co-Mutations

Pulmonary Low Malignant Potential Adenocarcinoma: A Validation of the Proposed Criteria for This Novel Subtype

Adenocarcinoma (ADC) is the most common histologic type of lung cancer, including in situ (lepidic), minimally invasive, and invasive forms. While the former 2 types are associated with a favorable outcome, the latter includes tumors with variable behavior, often tumor stage-related. A recent study proposed strict morphologic criteria defining a new subgroup of resected stage I invasive ADC (16% of cases) with favorable outcomes (100% disease-specific survival), named "ADC of low malignant potential (LMP-ADC)." The following criteria were met: ≤3 cm size, nonmucinous histotype, ≥15% lepidic growth, and the absence of the following: high-grade patterns, >1 mitosis/2 mm 2 , necrosis, and vascular/pleural invasion. The aim of the present study was to validate the performance of such criteria to identify LMP-ADC in a series of 274 stage IA resected lung ADCs from a single institution. Thirty-four tumors (12.4%) met the proposed criteria for LMP-ADC, as confirmed by additional stains for mitotic figures, Ki67 index, and elastic fibers (helpful to assess alveolar wall invasion). Minor differences between the lepidic and invasive components were observed regarding cell atypia and proliferation. p53 was normally expressed by invasive tumor cells. Mutations occurred in known lung cancer genes (mostly KRAS and EGFR). Five patients (14.7%) developed disease progression and 2 of them (5.9%) died of the disease. In our series, the disease-specific survival was 94.1%. In conclusion, in resected invasive lung ADC, a subgroup presenting low-grade morphologic features and associated with favorable prognosis does exist. Morphologic criteria for LMP-ADC supported by ancillary techniques represent a valid tool to better define this novel subgroup and to refine the stratification of invasive lung ADC, possibly suggesting modified follow-up protocols, based on the observed indolent behavior in most cases.

The impact of genomic context on outcomes of solid cancer patients treated with genotype-matched targeted therapies: a comprehensive review

INTRODUCTION

A critical need in the field of genotype-matched targeted therapy in cancer is to identify patients unlikely to respond to precision medicines. This will manage expectations of individualised therapies and avoid clinical progression to a point where institution of alternative treatments might not be possible. We examined the evidence base of the impact of genomic context on which targeted alterations are inscribed to identify baseline biomarkers distinguishing those obtaining the expected response from those with less benefit from targeted therapies.

METHODS

A comprehensive narrative review was conducted: scoping searches were undertaken in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PROSPERO. Outcomes included in meta-analysis were progression-free and overall survival. Data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier and used to calculate hazard ratios. Studies presenting data on two molecular subcohorts (e.g. co-mutation versus no co-mutation) were included in fixed meta-analysis. Other studies were used for descriptive purposes.

RESULTS

The presence of concomitant driver mutations, higher tumour mutational burden (TMB), greater copy number burden, and APOBEC signatures significantly reduces benefits of targeted therapy in lung cancers in never smokers (LCINS - less than 100 cigarettes per lifetime) and breast cancer, cancers with low TMB. LCINS have significantly poorer outcomes if their cancers harbour p53 co-mutations, an effect also seen in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients (trastuzumab) and head and neck cancer patients [phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition]. PI3K co-alterations have less impact when targeting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions, but significantly reduce the impact of targeting HER2 and MET amplifications. SMARCA4 co-mutations predict for poor outcome in patients treated with osimertinib and sotorasib. In BRAF-mutant melanoma, whilst there are no genomic features distinguishing exceptional responders from primary progressors, there are clear transcriptomic features dichotomising these outcomes.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive review to date of the impact of genomic context on outcomes with targeted therapy. It represents a valuable resource informing progress towards contextualised precision medicine.

Update in Lung Cancer Molecular Pathology: Technological Advances and Clinical Practice

This Special Issue of eleven articles, including six original works and five reviews, demonstrates the modern heterogenous approach to lung cancer by means of various methodologies from international experts from various countries [...].

Effect of EGFR amplification on the prognosis of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification refers to the copy number increase of EGFR gene, and is often identified as a "bypass" way of Epidermal growth factor receptor Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) resistance. We aimed to explore the effect of EGFR amplification on EGFR mutation treatment-naive advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in single center, enrolling advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) between March 3, 2019, and February 1, 2022. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to detect genetic alterations in tumor tissue samples. Progression-free survival (PFS) curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate factors affecting the efficacy of TKIs.

RESULTS

A total of 117 treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients were identified in this study. EGFR amplification was found in 22 of 117 (18.8%) patients with EGFR mutations. Of 22 patients with EGFR amplification, 10 patients harbored EGFR 19 del, 11 patients with 21-L858R. The median follow-up time was 22.47 months. The median PFS of the patients with or without EGFR amplification was 8.25 months and 10.67 months, respectively (log-rank test, P = 0.63). In multivariate analysis, EGFR amplification was not an independent prognosis factor for the patients receiving first-line TKIs [HR = 1.38, 95%CI (0.73-2.58), P = 0.321]. Subgroup analysis revealed that EGFR amplification is a risk factor for progression in the brain metastasis population. [HR = 2.28, 95%CI (1.01, 5.14), P = 0.047].

CONCLUSION

EGFR amplification is not an independent prognosis factor for PFS in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients receiving first-line TKIs. However, it is an independent risk factor for PFS in the brain metastasis population.

ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in 2021. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 34 leading experts in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the consensus was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where the available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) tissue and biomarkers analyses; (ii) early and locally advanced disease; (iii) metastatic disease and (iv) clinical trial design, patient's perspective and miscellaneous. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Deep Radiotranscriptomics of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma for Assessing Molecular and Histology Subtypes with a Data-Driven Analysis

Radiogenomic and radiotranscriptomic studies have the potential to pave the way for a holistic decision support system built on genomics, transcriptomics, radiomics, deep features and clinical parameters to assess treatment evaluation and care planning. The integration of invasive and routine imaging data into a common feature space has the potential to yield robust models for inferring the drivers of underlying biological mechanisms. In this non-small cell lung carcinoma study, a multi-omics representation comprised deep features and transcriptomics was evaluated to further explore the synergetic and complementary properties of these diverse multi-view data sources by utilizing data-driven machine learning models. The proposed deep radiotranscriptomic analysis is a feature-based fusion that significantly enhances sensitivity by up to 0.174 and AUC by up to 0.22, compared to the baseline single source models, across all experiments on the unseen testing set. Additionally, a radiomics-based fusion was also explored as an alternative methodology yielding radiomic signatures that are comparable to several previous publications in the field of radiogenomics. Furthermore, the machine learning multi-omics analysis based on deep features and transcriptomics achieved an AUC performance of up to 0.831 ± 0.09/0.925 ± 0.04 for the examined molecular and histology subtypes analysis, respectively. The clinical impact of such high-performing models can add prognostic value and lead to optimal treatment assessment by targeting specific oncogenes, namely the response of tyrosine kinase inhibitors of EGFR mutated or predicting the chemotherapy resistance of KRAS mutated tumors.