Radiomic Based Machine Learning Performance for a Three Class Problem in Neuro-Oncology: Time to Test the Waters?

Radiomics-Based Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Metastatic Disease: Impact of Different T1-Contrast-Enhanced Sequences on Radiomics Features and Model Performance

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Even though glioblastoma (GB) and brain metastases (BM) can be differentiated using radiomics, it remains unclear if the model performance may vary based on the contrast-enhanced sequence used. Our aim was to evaluate the radiomics-based model performance for differentiation between GB and brain metastases BM using MPRAGE and volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1-contrast-enhanced sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

T1 contrast-enhanced (T1-CE) MPRAGE and VIBE sequences acquired in 108 patients (31 GBs and 77 BM) during the same MRI session were retrospectively evaluated. After standardized image preprocessing and segmentation, radiomics features were extracted from necrotic and enhancing tumor components. Pearson correlation analysis of radiomics features from tumor subcomponents was also performed. A total of 90 machine learning pipelines were evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was measured by mean area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristic (ROC), log loss, and Brier scores.

RESULTS

A feature-wise comparison showed that the radiomics features between sequences were strongly correlated, with the highest correlation for shape-based features. The mean AUC across the top 10 pipelines ranged between 0.851 and 0.890 with T1-CE MPRAGE and between 0.869 and 0.907 with the T1-CE VIBE sequence. The top-performing models for the MPRAGE sequence commonly used support vector machines, while those for the VIBE sequence used either support vector machines or random forest. Common feature-reduction methods for top-performing models included linear combination filter and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator for both sequences. For the same machine learning feature-reduction pipeline, model performances were comparable (AUC-ROC difference range, -0.078-0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics features derived from T1-CE MPRAGE and VIBE sequences are strongly correlated and may have similar overall classification performance for differentiating GB from BM.

Impact of SUSAN Denoising and ComBat Harmonization on Machine Learning Model Performance for Malignant Brain Neoplasms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Feature variability in radiomics studies due to technical and magnet strength parameters is well-known and may be addressed through various preprocessing methods. However, very few studies have evaluated the downstream impact of variable preprocessing on model classification performance in a multiclass setting. We sought to evaluate the impact of Smallest Univalue Segment Assimilating Nucleus (SUSAN) denoising and Combining Batches harmonization on model classification performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 493 cases (410 internal and 83 external data sets) of glioblastoma, intracranial metastatic disease, and primary CNS lymphoma underwent semiautomated 3D-segmentation post-baseline image processing (BIP) consisting of resampling, realignment, coregistration, skull-stripping, and image normalization. Post-BIP, 2 sets were generated, one with and another without SUSAN denoising. Radiomics features were extracted from both data sets and batch-corrected to produce 4 data sets: (a) BIP, (b) BIP with SUSAN denoising, (c) BIP with Combining Batches, and (d) BIP with both SUSAN denoising and Combining Batches harmonization. Performance was then summarized for models using a combination of 6 feature-selection techniques and 6 machine learning models across 4 mask-sequence combinations with features derived from 1 to 3 (multiparametric) MRI sequences.

RESULTS

Most top-performing models on the external test set used BIP+SUSAN denoising-derived features. Overall, the use of SUSAN denoising and Combining Batches harmonization led to a slight but generally consistent improvement in model performance on the external test set.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of image-preprocessing steps such as SUSAN denoising and Combining Batches harmonization may be more useful in a multi-institutional setting to improve model generalizability. Models derived from only T1 contrast-enhanced images showed comparable performance to models derived from multiparametric MRI.

Application of Machine Learning for Classification of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Classifying brain tumors accurately is crucial for treatment and prognosis. Machine learning (ML) shows great promise in improving tumor classification accuracy. This study evaluates ML algorithms for differentiating various brain tumor types.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 14, 2023. Studies that only investigated image segmentation accuracy or brain tumor detection instead of classification were excluded. We extracted binary diagnostic accuracy data, constructing contingency tables to derive sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included. The pooled area under the curve for glioblastoma versus lymphoma and low-grade versus high-grade gliomas were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.00) and 0.89, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for benign versus malignant tumors were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for low-grade versus high-grade gliomas were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00) and 0.94, (95% CI: 0.79-0.99), respectively. Primary versus metastatic tumor identification yields sensitivity and specificity of 0.89, (95% CI: 0.83-0.93) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.91), correspondingly. The differentiation of gliomas from pituitary tumors yielded the highest results among primary brain tumor classifications: sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00) and specificity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

ML demonstrated excellent performance in classifying brain tumor images, with near-maximum area under the curves, sensitivity, and specificity.

AI-based classification of three common malignant tumors in neuro-oncology: A multi-institutional comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods

PURPOSE

To determine if machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) pipelines perform better in AI-based three-class classification of glioblastoma (GBM), intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) and primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective analysis included 502 cases for training (208 GBM, 67 PCNSL and 227 IMD), with external validation on 86 cases (27:27:32). Multiparametric MRI images (T1W, T2W, FLAIR, DWI and T1-CE) were co-registered, resampled, denoised and intensity normalized, followed by semiautomatic 3D segmentation of the enhancing tumor (ET) and peritumoral region (PTR). Model performance was assessed using several ML pipelines and 3D-convolutional neural networks (3D-CNN) using sequence specific masks, as well as combination of masks. All pipelines were trained and evaluated with 5-fold nested cross-validation on internal data followed by external validation using multi-class AUC.

RESULTS

Two ML models achieved similar performance on test set, one using T2-ET and T2-PTR masks (AUC: 0.885, 95% CI: [0.816, 0.935] and another using T1-CE-ET and FLAIR-PTR mask (AUC: 0.878, CI: [0.804, 0.930]). The best performing DL models achieved an AUC of 0.854, (CI [0.774, 0.914]) on external data using T1-CE-ET and T2-PTR masks, followed by model derived from T1-CE-ET, ADC-ET and FLAIR-PTR masks (AUC: 0.851, CI [0.772, 0.909]).

CONCLUSION

Both ML and DL derived pipelines achieved similar performance. T1-CE mask was used in three of the top four overall models. Additionally, all four models had some mask derived from PTR, either T2WI or FLAIR.

Differentiation Between Glioblastoma and Metastatic Disease on Conventional MRI Imaging Using 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks: Model Development and Validation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Imaging-based differentiation between glioblastoma (GB) and brain metastases (BM) remains challenging. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNN) to address this binary classification problem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

T1-CE, T2WI, and FLAIR 3D-segmented masks of 307 patients (157 GB and 150 BM) were generated post resampling, co-registration normalization and semi-automated 3D-segmentation and used for internal model development. Subsequent external validation was performed on 59 cases (27 GB and 32 BM) from another institution. Four different mask-sequence combinations were evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall and F1-scores. Diagnostic performance of a neuroradiologist and a general radiologist, both without and with the model output available, was also assessed.

RESULTS

3D-model using the T1-CE tumor mask (TM) showed the highest performance [AUC 0.93 (95% CI 0.858-0.995)] on the external test set, followed closely by the model using T1-CE TM and FLAIR mask of peri-tumoral region (PTR) [AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.834-0.986)]. Models using T2WI masks showed robust performance on the internal dataset but lower performance on the external set. Both neuroradiologist and general radiologist showed improved performance with model output provided [AUC increased from 0.89 to 0.968 (p = 0.06) and from 0.78 to 0.965 (p = 0.007) respectively], the latter being statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

3D-CNNs showed robust performance for differentiating GB from BMs, with T1-CE TM, either alone or combined with FLAIR-PTR masks. Availability of model output significantly improved the accuracy of the general radiologist.

Diffusion-weighted imaging-based radiomics model using automatic machine learning to differentiate cerebral cystic metastases from brain abscesses

OBJECTIVES

To develop a radiomics model based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) utilizing automated machine learning method to differentiate cerebral cystic metastases from brain abscesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 186 patients with cerebral cystic metastases (n = 98) and brain abscesses (n = 88) from two clinical institutions were retrospectively included. The datasets (129 from institution A) were randomly portioned into separate 75% training and 25% internal testing sets. Radiomics features were extracted from DWI images using two subregions of the lesion (cystic core and solid wall). A thorough image preprocessing method was applied to DWI images to ensure the robustness of radiomics features before feature extraction. Then the Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool (TPOT) was utilized to search for the best optimized machine learning pipeline, using a fivefold cross-validation in the training set. The external test set (57 from institution B) was used to evaluate the model's performance.

RESULTS

Seven distinct TPOT models were optimized to distinguish between cerebral cystic metastases and abscesses either based on different features combination or using wavelet transform. The optimal model demonstrated an AUC of 1.00, an accuracy of 0.97, sensitivity of 1.00, and specificity of 0.93 in the internal test set, based on the combination of cystic core and solid wall radiomics signature using wavelet transform. In the external test set, this model reached 1.00 AUC, 0.96 accuracy, 1.00 sensitivity, and 0.93 specificity.

CONCLUSION

The DWI-based radiomics model established by TPOT exhibits a promising predictive capacity in distinguishing cerebral cystic metastases from abscesses.

Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors

This study delineates the pivotal role of imaging within the field of neurology, emphasizing its significance in the diagnosis, prognostication, and evaluation of treatment responses for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. A comprehensive understanding of both the capabilities and limitations inherent in emerging imaging technologies is imperative for delivering a heightened level of personalized care to individuals with neuro-oncological conditions. Ongoing research in neuro-oncological imaging endeavors to rectify some limitations of radiological modalities, aiming to augment accuracy and efficacy in the management of brain tumors. This review is dedicated to the comparison and critical examination of the latest advancements in diverse imaging modalities employed in neuro-oncology. The objective is to investigate their respective impacts on diagnosis, cancer staging, prognosis, and post-treatment monitoring. By providing a comprehensive analysis of these modalities, this review aims to contribute to the collective knowledge in the field, fostering an informed approach to neuro-oncological care. In conclusion, the outlook for neuro-oncological imaging appears promising, and sustained exploration in this domain is anticipated to yield further breakthroughs, ultimately enhancing outcomes for individuals grappling with CNS tumors.

A Short Review on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis Diseases: Role of Radiomics In Neuro-Oncology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various aspects of healthcare, including the field of diagnostics and treatment of diseases. This review article aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of AI, especially, radiomics in the diagnosis of neuro-oncology diseases. Indeed, it is a multidimensional task that requires the integration of clinical assessment, neuroimaging techniques, and emerging technologies like AI and radiomics. The advancements in these fields have the potential to revolutionize the accuracy, efficiency, and personalized approach to diagnosing neuro-oncology diseases, leading to improved patient outcomes and enhanced overall neurologic care. However, AI has some limitations, and ethical challenges should be addressed via future research.

Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

INTRODUCTION

Survival prediction in glioblastoma remains challenging, and identification of robust imaging markers could help with this relevant clinical problem. We evaluated multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-derived radiomics to assess prediction of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective, institutional review board-approved study was performed. There were 93 eligible patients, of which 55 underwent gross tumor resection and chemoradiation (GTR-CR). Overall survival and PFS were assessed in the entire cohort and the GTR-CR cohort using multiple machine learning pipelines. A model based on multiple clinical variables was also developed. Survival prediction was assessed using the radiomics-only, clinical-only, and the radiomics and clinical combined models.

RESULTS

For all patients combined, the clinical feature-derived model outperformed the best radiomics model for both OS (C-index, 0.706 vs 0.597; P < 0.0001) and PFS prediction (C-index, 0.675 vs 0.588; P < 0.001). Within the GTR-CR cohort, the radiomics model showed nonstatistically improved performance over the clinical model for predicting OS (C-index, 0.638 vs 0.588; P = 0.4). However, the radiomics model outperformed the clinical feature model for predicting PFS in GTR-CR cohort (C-index, 0.641 vs 0.550; P = 0.004). Combined clinical and radiomics model did not yield superior prediction when compared with the best model in each case.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering all patients, regardless of therapy, the radiomics-derived prediction of OS and PFS is inferior to that from a model derived from clinical features alone. However, in patients with GTR-CR, radiomics-only model outperforms clinical feature-derived model for predicting PFS.

Radiomic-Based MRI for Classification of Solitary Brain Metastases Subtypes From Primary Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis of brain metastases subtype and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is necessary for treatment decisions. The application of machine learning facilitates the classification of brain tumors, but prior investigations into primary lymphoma and brain metastases subtype classification have been limited.

PURPOSE

To develop a machine-learning model to classify PCNSL, brain metastases with primary lung and non-lung origin.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 211 subjects with pathologically confirmed PCNSL or brain metastases (training cohort 168 and testing cohort 43).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo inversion recovery sequence (T1WI-CE), axial T2-weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery sequence (T2FLAIR) ASSESSMENT: Several machine-learning models (support vector machine, random forest, and K-nearest neighbors) were built with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) using features from T1WI-CE, T2FLAIR, and clinical. The model with the highest performance in the training cohort was selected to differentiate lesions in the testing cohort. Then, three radiologists conducted a two-round classification (with and without model reference) using images and clinical information from testing cohorts.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Five-fold cross-validation was used for model evaluation and calibration. Model performance was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Twenty-five image features were selected by LASSO analysis. Random forest classifier was selected for its highest performance on the training set with an AUC of 0.73. After calibration, this model achieved an accuracy of 0.70 on the testing set. Accuracies of all three radiologists improved under model reference (0.49 vs. 0.70, 0.60 vs. 0.77, 0.58 vs. 0.72, respectively).

DATA CONCLUSION

The random forest model based on conventional MRI and clinical data can diagnose PCNSL and brain metastases subtypes (lung and non-lung origin). Model classification can help foster the diagnostic accuracy of specialists and streamline prognostication workflow.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

An integrative non-invasive malignant brain tumors classification and Ki-67 labeling index prediction pipeline with radiomics approach

BACKGROUND

The histological sub-classes of brain tumors and the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) of tumor cells are major factors in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment management of patients. Many existing studies primarily focused on the classification of two classes of brain tumors and the Ki-67LI of gliomas. This study aimed to develop a preoperative non-invasive radiomics pipeline based on multiparametric-MRI to classify-three types of brain tumors, glioblastoma (GBM), metastasis (MET) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and to predict their corresponding Ki-67LI.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 153 patients with malignant brain tumors were involved. The radiomics features were extracted from three types of MRI (T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI)) with three masks (tumor core, edema, and whole tumor masks) and selected by a combination of Pearson correlation coefficient (CORR), LASSO, and Max-Relevance and Min-Redundancy (mRMR) filters. The performance of six classifiers was compared and the top three performing classifiers were used to construct the ensemble learning model (ELM). The proposed ELM was evaluated in the training dataset (108 patients) by 5-fold cross-validation and in the test dataset (45 patients) by hold-out. The accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), F1-Score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicators evaluated the performance of the models.

RESULTS

The best feature sets and ELM with the optimal performance were selected to construct the tri-categorized brain tumor aided diagnosis model (training dataset AUC: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.99); test dataset AUC: 0.93) and Ki-67LI prediction model (training dataset AUC: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.98); test dataset AUC: 0.91). The CE-T1WI was the best single modality for all classifiers. Meanwhile, the whole tumor was the most vital mask for the tumor classification and the tumor core was the most vital mask for the Ki-67LI prediction.

CONCLUSION

The developed radiomics models led to the precise preoperative classification of GBM, MET, and PCNSL and the prediction of Ki-67LI, which could be utilized in clinical practice for the treatment planning for brain tumors.

Preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas: a narrative review based on MRI radiomics

Meningiomas are one of the most common intracranial primary central nervous system tumors. Regardless of the pathological grading and histological subtypes, maximum safe resection is the recommended treatment option for meningiomas. However, considering tumor heterogeneity, surgical treatment options and prognosis often vary greatly among meningiomas. Therefore, an accurate preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas is of great clinical importance as it helps develop surgical treatment strategies and improve patient prognosis. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have proved that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics has wide application values in the diagnostic, identification, and prognostic evaluations of brain tumors. The vital importance of MRI radiomics in the surgical risk assessment of meningiomas must be apprehended and emphasized in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the current research status of MRI radiomics in the preoperative surgical risk assessment of meningiomas, focusing on the applications of MRI radiomics in preoperative pathological grading, assessment of surrounding tissue invasion, and evaluation of tumor consistency. We further analyze the prospects of MRI radiomics in the preoperative assessment of meningiomas angiogenesis and adhesion with surrounding tissues, while pointing out the current challenges of MRI radiomics research.

A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Gliomas can be difficult to discern clinically and radiologically from other brain lesions (either neoplastic or non-neoplastic) since their clinical manifestations as well as preoperative imaging features often overlap and appear misleading. Radiomics could be extremely helpful for non-invasive glioma differential diagnosis (DDx). However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. In this context, we aimed to summarize the current status and quality of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx in a systematic review. In total, 42 studies were selected and examined in our work. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Abstract

Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of imaging in differential diagnosis (DDx) of glioma. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current status of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for glioma DDx from 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore whether RQS was correlated with journal metrics and the characteristics of the studies. Finally, 42 articles were selected for the systematic qualitative analysis. Selected articles were grouped and summarized in terms of those on DDx between glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, those aiming at differentiating glioma from brain metastases, and those based on DDx of glioma and other brain diseases. Median RQS was 8.71 out 36, with a mean RQS of all studies of 24.21%. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Meningioma Radiomics: At the Nexus of Imaging, Pathology and Biomolecular Characterization

Simple Summary

Meningiomas are typically benign, common extra-axial tumors of the central nervous system. Routine clinical assessment by radiologists presents some limitations regarding long-term patient outcome prediction and risk stratification. Given the exponential growth of interest in radiomics and artificial intelligence in medical imaging, numerous studies have evaluated the potential of these tools in the setting of meningioma imaging. These were aimed at the development of reliable and reproducible models based on quantitative data. Although several limitations have yet to be overcome for their routine use in clinical practice, their innovative potential is evident. In this review, we present a wide-ranging overview of radiomics and artificial intelligence applications in meningioma imaging.

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most common extra-axial tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). Even though recurrence is uncommon after surgery and most meningiomas are benign, an aggressive behavior may still be exhibited in some cases. Although the diagnosis can be made by radiologists, typically with magnetic resonance imaging, qualitative analysis has some limitations in regard to outcome prediction and risk stratification. The acquisition of this information could help the referring clinician in the decision-making process and selection of the appropriate treatment. Following the increased attention and potential of radiomics and artificial intelligence in the healthcare domain, including oncological imaging, researchers have investigated their use over the years to overcome the current limitations of imaging. The aim of these new tools is the replacement of subjective and, therefore, potentially variable medical image analysis by more objective quantitative data, using computational algorithms. Although radiomics has not yet fully entered clinical practice, its potential for the detection, diagnostic, and prognostic characterization of tumors is evident. In this review, we present a wide-ranging overview of radiomics and artificial intelligence applications in meningioma imaging.

Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics Model for Predicting H3 K27M Mutant Status in Diffuse Midline Glioma: A Comparative Study Across Different Sequences and Machine Learning Techniques

Objectives

The performance of multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models for predicting H3 K27M mutant status in diffuse midline glioma (DMG) has not been thoroughly evaluated. The optimal combination of multiparametric MRI and machine learning techniques remains undetermined. We compared the performance of various radiomics models across different MRI sequences and different machine learning techniques.

Methods

A total of 102 patients with pathologically confirmed DMG were retrospectively enrolled (27 with H3 K27M-mutant and 75 with H3 K27M wild-type). Radiomics features were extracted from eight sequences, and 18 feature sets were conducted by independent combination. There were three feature matrix normalization algorithms, two dimensionality-reduction methods, four feature selectors, and seven classifiers, consisting of 168 machine learning pipelines. Radiomics models were established across different feature sets and machine learning pipelines. The performance of models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong’s test.

Results

The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models could accurately predict the H3 K27M mutant status in DMG (highest AUC: 0.807–0.969, for different sequences or sequence combinations). However, the results varied significantly between different machine learning techniques. When suitable machine learning techniques were used, the conventional MRI-based radiomics models shared similar performance to advanced MRI-based models (highest AUC: 0.875–0.915 vs. 0.807–0.926; DeLong’s test, p > 0.05). Most models had a better performance when generated with a combination of MRI sequences. The optimal model in the present study used a combination of all sequences (AUC = 0.969).

Conclusions

The multiparametric MRI-based radiomics models could be useful for predicting H3 K27M mutant status in DMG, but the performance varied across different sequences and machine learning techniques.