Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Patients under 16 Years Old: A Single-Institution Case Series

The Role of Bone Grafting vs. Bone Cement in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Risk of Recurrence in 1,454 Patients

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) presents a challenge in management due to its invasive nature and propensity for local recurrence. While either bone grafting (BG) or bone cement (BC) can be utilized to fill defects after intralesional curettage, the optimal treatment remains contested. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of defect filling with BC compared with BG on recurrence rates in patients with GCTB following intralesional curettage.

METHODS

A random-effects model binary outcome meta-analysis was performed utilizing recurrence rate for the BC and BG groups to evaluate the risk ratio (p < 0.05 considered significant). There were 1,454 patients included.

RESULTS

Intralesional curettage with BG had a recurrence risk ratio of 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.31, p = 0.001) when compared with BC. The overall rate of recurrence for GCTB after intralesional curettage with BC was 20.05% vs. 29.74% with BG (95% CI, 0.17-0.23 vs. 0.26-0.33, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intralesional curettage with BC for the treatment of GCTB demonstrated lower recurrence rates than intralesional curettage with BG. However, the rates of recurrence remain substantial for both groups, necessitating careful consideration of the benefits and potential pitfalls associated with BC vs. BG when considering salvage options after recurrences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and recommending treatment options. This is particularly important in children, where evaluating the need for invasive procedures is balanced with the desire to avoid overtreatment. GCT have historically been considered epiphyseal lesions with potential metaphyseal extension. Therefore, GCT may be inappropriately excluded from the differential diagnosis of metaphyseal lesions in the skeletally immature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 14 patients from 1981 to 2021 at a single institution who had histologic confirmation of GCT and were less than 18 years old at diagnosis. Patient characteristics, tumor location, surgical treatment, and local recurrence rates were collected.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ten (71%) patients were female. Eleven (78.6%) were epiphysiometaphyseal (1 epiphyseal, 4 metaphyseal, 6 epiphysiometaphyseal). Five patients had an open adjacent physis, of which three (60%) had tumors confined solely to the metaphysis. Of the five patients with open physis, four (80%) developed local recurrence while only one patient (11%) with a closed physis had local recurrence (p value = 0.0023). Our results illustrate that for the skeletally immature, GCT can (and in our results more commonly did) occur in the metaphyseal location. These findings suggest that GCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary metaphyseal-only lesions in the skeletally immature.

Multicentric Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

The typical presentation of giant cell tumor of bone is a solitary lesion involving the meta-epiphyseal region of the long bones. The presence of more than one distinct giant cell tumor in the same patient is rare. This study reports on 7 patients with multicentric giant cell tumor of bone. Clinical and radiologic features were reviewed to evaluate the behavior of multicentric giant cell tumor of bone. Immunohistochemistry and genetic analysis for the H3F3A gene were performed to confirm the diagnosis. The knee was most frequently involved, and most of the lesions were in an ipsilateral extremity. All of the patients received surgical management with curettage or resection. The overall median follow-up was 194 months (interquartile range, 41-336 months). Five of 7 patients had local recurrence (71%), but considering the number of surgically treated lesions, the risk of local recurrence was 33% (5 local recurrences among 15 treated lesions). No lung metastases occurred. Multicentric giant cell tumor of bone tends to exhibit the same aggressive clinical behavior as solitary giant cell tumor of bone. Patients should be monitored for the occurrence of other lesions, especially in the ipsilateral extremity. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):e376-e380.].

Giant cell tumor of bone: An update, including spectrum of pathological features, pathogenesis, molecular profile and the differential diagnoses

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an enigmatic tumor. Despite its benign histological appearance and clinical behavior in most cases, it is associated with recurrences, uncommonly metastasis, and rarely with a malignant transformation. During the last few years, there has been a significant evolution in the diagnosis and management of GCTB, including discoveries related to the underlying pathogenesis (RANK/RANK/OPG pathway), with treatment-related implications in the form of denosumab (approved inhibitor for targeting RANKL), leading to improved surgical resections, especially in cases of recurrent, large and borderline resectable tumors. Lately, a specific Histone mutation, namely H3.3G34W underlying almost all GCTBs has been discovered, further leading to the identification of a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical antibody marker, H3.3G34W, which is very useful for an exact diagnosis of a GCTB, including its differentiation from its various mimics, which has significant implications. This review describes clinicopathological features of a GCTB, including its variable features, recent concepts, underlying pathogenesis, post-denosumab related changes and various entities that constitute its differential diagnosis, including their molecular signatures, with treatment-related implications.

Microwave in situ inactivation in the treatment of bone giant cell tumor: a mid-term descriptive study

AIM

To evaluate the mid-term clinical efficacy of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) filling in the treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, descriptive, and analytical study. A total of 30 GCTB patients received microwave in situ inactivation from January 2012 to January 2020, whose clinical recurrence rate was evaluated at the last follow-up after microwave in situ inactivation surgery. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) function score was used to evaluate the postoperative clinical panoramic results.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up for 21 to 110 months, with an average of 63.79 months. Distal femur (40%) and proximal tibia (28%) had a higher rate of GCTB incidence. Seventeen percent of tumor patients suffered from associated pathologic fracture. The rate of Campanacci classification stage III was 60%. The average MSTS score was evaluated as 27.53 points overall at the last follow-up. In terms of complications, three, two, two and one cases developed fat liquefaction, controllable tissue rejection reaction, incision infection and degenerative changes around lesion joint, respectively, without in situ recurrences and reoperation as well as distant lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of microwave in situ inactivation combined with bone grafting or PMMA filling is prudently recommended as one of the options for the limb salvage treatment of giant cell tumor of long and periarticular bone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV: case series.

[Giant-cell tumor of bone in 2022]

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors classified as intermediate in the WHO 2020 classification, i.e. neither completely benign nor definitely malignant, due to recurrence (frequent) and pulmonary metastases (rare). They involve the end of long bones as well as the axial bones of mature skeletons. They are made of mononuclear stromal tumor cells of (pre-) osteoblastic phenotype, mononuclear cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage and osteoclast-like multinuclear giant cells responsible for tumor osteolysis. In 95% of cases, the stromal cells have a specific mutation in the H3F3A gene which encodes histone H3.3. The mutated H3.3 G34W protein (90% of cases) can be easily detected by immunohistochemistry, even on small samples. Many tumors or bone pseudotumors contain osteoclast-like giant cells, cells of the bone microenvironment, and should not be confused with GCT: mainly brown tumor of hyperparathyroidism, aneurysmal bone cyst, chondroblastoma, non-ossifying fibroma and central giant cell granuloma.

Characteristics of Giant Cell Tumor of the Bone in Pediatric Patients: Our 18-Year, Single-Center Experience

A giant cell tumor (GCT) of the bone is characteristically found in skeletally mature patients. The tumor is rare in pediatric patients, and incidence reported in literature varies from 1.8% to 10.6%. We performed a retrospective study addressing symptoms, treatment, and outcome in pediatric patients who were diagnosed with GCT between March 1997 and January 2015 at our hospital. Fourteen (11.1%) of 126 surgically treated patients with histologically proven GCT were <19 years of age. We confirmed skeletal maturity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fourteen patients from 8 to 19 years old were identified. Sixteen lesions (76.2%) were found in long bones and 5 lesions (23.8%) in short bones. The most common site was around the knee in 8 patients (38%). GCTs mostly occur at the epi-metaphysis in 11 patients (52.3%). Regardless of the openness of epiphyseal plate, we observed GCT of bone in the epiphysis. Further study will be needed to prove the association between the presence of epiphyseal plate and location of tumor. Three patients (21.4%) had multicentric lesions, and four patients (28.5%) had local recurrence. Multicentric giant cell tumor and local recurrence occur more often in pediatric patients. The characteristics of GCT in pediatric patients do not differ from what is reported for GCT in adults.