Repetitively Administered Low-Dose Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Prevention of Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Acute Leukemia

A multicenter study of posttransplantation low-dose inotuzumab ozogamicin to prevent relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

ABSTRACT

The curative potential of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is hampered by relapse. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is an anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody bound to calicheamicin, which has significant activity against ALL. We hypothesized that low-dose INO would be safe and feasible after allo-HCT. Therefore, we conducted a phase 1 study to determine the dose and safety in this setting. Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 to 75 years, had undergone allo-HCT for CD22+ ALL, were in complete remission (CR) after allo-HCT, had high risk of recurrence, were between day 40 and 100 after allo-HCT with adequate graft function, and did not have a history of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS). The objectives of this trial were to define INO maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to determine post-allo-HCT INO safety, and to measure 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The trial design followed a "3+3" model. The treatment consisted of INO given on day 1 of 28-day cycles. Dose levels were 0.3 mg/m2, 0.4 mg/m2, 0.5 mg/m2, and 0.6 mg/m2. Median age was 44 years (range, 17-66 years; n = 18). Disease status at transplantation was first CR (n = 14) or second CR or beyond (n = 4). Preparative regimen was of reduced intensity in 72% of patients who received transplantation. Most common toxicity was thrombocytopenia. There were no instances of SOS; the MTD was 0.6 mg/m2. One-year nonrelapse mortality was 5.6%. With a median follow-up of 18.1 months (range, 8.6-59 months) 1-year post-allo-HCT PFS and overall survival is 89% and 94%, respectively. Low-dose INO has a favorable safety profile and was associated with high rates of 1-year PFS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03104491.

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is equally effective in relapse prevention but safer compared to spontaneous graft-versus-host disease

Therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (tDLI) are used to reinforce the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect in relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In contrast, the role of prophylactic DLI (proDLI) in preventing leukemia relapse has been less clearly established, although supported by retrospective, case-control, and registry analyses. We report a prospective, monocentric, ten year cohort of patients with high risk acute leukemias (AL) or myelodysplasia (MDS) in whom proDLI were applied beyond day +120 post alloSCT to compensate for lack of GvL.272 consecutive allotransplanted AL or MDS patients in complete remission and off immunosuppression at day +120 were stratified according to the prior appearance of relevant GvHD (acute GvHD °II-IV or extensive chronic GvHD) as a clinical indicator for GvL. Escalating doses of unmodified proDLI were applied to 72/272 patients without prior relevant GvHD. Conversely, 157/272 patients with prior spontaneous GvHD did not receive proDLI, nor did 43/272 patients with contraindications (uncontrolled infections, patient refusal, DLI unavailability).By day 160-landmark analysis (median day of first DLI application), proDLI recipients had significantly higher five-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (77% and 67%) than patients with spontaneous GvHD (54% and 53%) or with contraindications (46% and 45%) (p=0.003). Relapse incidence for patients with proDLI (30%) or spontaneous GvHD (29%) was significantly lower than in patients with contraindications (39%; p=0.021). With similar GvHD incidence beyond day +160, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was less with proDLI (5%) than without proDLI (18%; p=0.036).In conclusion, proDLI may be able to compensate for lack of GvL in alloSCT recipients with high risk AL or MDS.

Venetoclax is safe and tolerable as post-transplant maintenance therapy for AML patients at high risk for relapse

Relapse is the most common cause of mortality in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Post-SCT maintenance strategies that prevent relapse are desirable but must be well tolerated and convenient to administer. We hypothesized single agent venetoclax (ven) may be an effective maintenance therapy among high relapse risk patients. Between February 2019 and December 2021, we administered post-SCT ven maintenance to 49 AML patients at high-risk for relapse as a prospectively defined off-label practice at our institution. Ven was planned to be administered until 1-year post-SCT. While temporary interruptions were common (67.3% of all patients), of those with >1 year follow up, 22/25 (88%) completed the full year of planned therapy. Cytopenias (40.8%) and gastrointestinal adverse events (34.7%) were the most common toxicities. At 1-year post-SCT, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 70% and 67% respectively. Our experience demonstrates single agent ven is a safe, tolerable, and feasible maintenance therapy that may improve RFS and OS in high relapse risk post-SCT patients.

Novel strategies to prevent and overcome relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The outcome of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has improved over time with the incorporation of multi-agent chemotherapy in the treatment landscape as well as the recent approval of immunotherapeutic agents allowing a larger proportion of patients to undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) which is still considered a potential curative approach. However, relapse post-transplant is still occurring and constitutes a common cause of treatment failure in B-ALL. The present review aims to discuss the novel strategies and therapies used to prevent and overcome relapse post allo-HCT in patients with ALL, focusing on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Philadelphia chromosome positive B-ALL, the role of innovative agents such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin, and finally the role of cellular therapy.

Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an allogenic immunotherapy used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DLI takes advantage of the graft-versus-tumor effect induced by the infused CD3 + T cells, but may induce graft-versus-host disease. To date, DLI has been attempted to prevent hematological relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with mixed chimerism and molecular relapse (pre-emptive DLI), and as maintenance therapy in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies (prophylactic DLI). DLI response and efficacy depend on patient, disease, and DLI factors. This review discusses the efficacy and risks of DLI, with a focus on pre-emptive and prophylactic use.

Editorial: Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Cancer Therapy

Over the last 10 to 20 years, there have been significant improvements in the fields of both autologous and allogenic transplantation [...].

How I treat high-risk acute myeloid leukemia using preemptive adoptive cellular immunotherapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemias, but unfortunately disease recurrence remains the major cause of death in these patients. Infusion of donor lymphocytes (DLI) has the potential to restore graft-versus-leukemia immunologic surveillance; however, efficacy varies across different hematologic entities. Although relapsed chronic myeloid leukemia, transplanted in chronic phase, has proven remarkably susceptible to DLI, response rates are more modest for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. To prevent impending relapse, a number of groups have explored administering DLI preemptively on detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) or mixed chimerism. Evidence for the effectiveness of this strategy, although encouraging, comes from only a few, mostly single-center retrospective, nonrandomized studies. This article seeks to (1) discuss the available evidence supporting this approach while highlighting some of the inherent challenges of MRD-triggered treatment decisions post-transplant, (2) portray other forms of postremission cellular therapies, including the role of next-generation target-specific immunotherapies, and (3) provide a practical framework to support clinicians in their decision-making process when considering preemptive cellular therapy for this difficult-to-treat patient population.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Transplant and Post-Transplant Options in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is a potentially curative treatment approach for patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite development of several novel therapies targeting B-cell ALL, alloHCT continues to play an essential role in management, but the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from alloHCT in first or subsequent remissions continues to evolve. Broader donor options, including haploidentical donors and umbilical cord blood, have enabled alloHCT for more patients, but improvements in front-line therapy and increasing use of high-sensitivity measurable residual disease (MRD) quantification continue to modify the calculus for selecting which patients require transplantation. MRD quantification has become increasingly important as a prognostic indicator, as well as a trigger for therapeutic intervention, since the achievement of MRD negative complete remission is well-established to be associated with improved transplant outcomes. ALL remains the only malignancy with approved therapy for MRD positivity after achievement of remission, and use of Blinatumomab in this setting currently appears to be most effective when used as a bridge-to-transplant, rather than a destination or purely consolidative therapy. Expanding options for those with relapsed/refractory disease, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, also render more patient in suitably deep remissions to enable alloHCT with a high likelihood of success. It remains unclear whether CAR-T cell therapies may obviate the need for alloHCT in some patients, and currently available data suggest there remains a role for alloHCT after CAR-T. Together, these therapeutic advances appear to be improving post-transplant outcomes. Nevertheless, more remains to be studied regarding how to optimize use of available and emerging cellular and immune modulating therapies to maximize the likelihood of long-term post-alloHCT remission in high-risk ALL.

Pharmacologic Strategies for Post-Transplant Maintenance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: It Is Time to Consider!

Patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia are offered allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first remission to reduce risk of relapse. However, disease recurrence remains the major reason of allo-HCT failure, occurring in around 35-45% of patients, and leading to dismal outcomes. Strategies to reduce the risk of relapse are greatly needed, especially in the early post-transplant phase where the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect is not yet activated. Some practices include the use of myeloablative conditioning regimens, close monitoring of measurable residual disease and donor chimerism, rapid tapering of immunosuppression, and implementation of pre-emptive strategies as the use of donor lymphocyte infusion. However, it's time to consider prophylactic pharmacologic interventions post allo-HCT that aim at maintaining leukemic clones under control by both direct cytotoxic activity and by enhancing the GVL effect. In this current review, available data on drugs targeting epigenetic pathways like azacitidine, or actionable mutations like FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors used as maintenance post allo-HCT, will be discussed.

Is It Possible to Separate the Graft-Versus-Leukemia (GVL) Effect Against B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia From Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) After Hematopoietic Cell Transplant?

Hematopoietic cell transplant is a curative therapy for many pediatric patients with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Its therapeutic mechanism is primarily based on the generation of an alloreactive graft-versus-leukemia effect that can eliminate residual leukemia cells thus preventing relapse. However its efficacy is diminished by the concurrent emergence of harmful graft-versus-host disease disease which affects healthly tissue leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to describe the interventions that have been trialed in order to augment the beneficial graft-versus leukemia effect post-hematopoietic cell transplant while limiting the harmful consequences of graft-versus-host disease. This includes many emerging and promising strategies such as ex vivo and in vivo graft manipulation, targeted cell therapies, T-cell engagers and multiple pharmacologic interventions that stimulate specific donor effector cells.