Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

Preliminary result of combined treatment with scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma

Although there is growing evidence of the efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma, reports on combined treatment with CIRT and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2008) stage II-IVA locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma who received combined scanning CIRT (sCIRT) and IGBT between April 2019 and March 2022. sCIRT consisted of whole-pelvic irradiation with 36 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 12 fractions and subsequent local boost irradiation with 19.2 Gy (RBE) in 4 fractions. Three sessions of IGBT were administered after completion of sCIRT. Concurrent chemotherapy using weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2/week) was also administered. Efficacy, toxicity and dose-volume parameters were analyzed. Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 25 months. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival and local control rates were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.8-100%), 52.5% (95% CI = 26.9-78.1%) and 84.8% (95% CI = 65.2-100%), respectively. Neither severe acute toxicity necessitating treatment cessation nor grade 3 or higher late toxicity were observed. The sigmoid D2cm3 of the patient who developed grade 2 late sigmoid hemorrhage was 65.6 Gy, which exceeded the standard deviation and target dose. The combination of sCIRT and IGBT for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma showed acceptable efficacy and safety. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 3): Chapter 3. Clinical research, Chapter 4. Future challenges, Chapter 5. Discussion, and Conclusion

Clinical studies of ion beam therapy have been performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), and Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), in addition to the development of equipment, biophysical models, and treatment planning systems. Although cancers, including brain tumors and pancreatic cancer, have been treated with the Bevalac's neon-ion beam at the LBL (where the first clinical research was conducted), insufficient results were obtained owing to the limited availability of neon-ion beams and immaturity of related technologies. However, the 184-Inch Cyclotron's helium-ion beam yielded promising results for chordomas and chondrosarcomas at the base of the skull. Using carbon-ion beams, NIRS has conducted clinical trials for the treatment of common cancers for which radiotherapy is indicated. Because better results than X-ray therapy results have been obtained for lung, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers, as well as pelvic recurrences of rectal cancer, the Japanese government recently approved the use of public medical insurance for carbon-ion radiotherapy, except for lung cancer. GSI obtained better results than LBL for bone and soft tissue tumors, owing to dose enhancement enabled by scanning irradiation. In addition, DKFZ compared treatment results of proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy for these tumors. This article summarizes a series of articles (Parts 1-3) and describes future issues of immune ion beam therapy and linear energy transfer optimization.

Evaluation of X-ray and carbon-ion beam irradiation with chemotherapy for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma cells in 2D and 3D cultures

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women and causes more than 250,000 deaths worldwide. Among these, the incidence of cervical adenocarcinomas is increasing. Cervical adenocarcinoma is not only difficult to detect and prevent in the early stages with screening, but it is also resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and its prognosis worsens significantly as the disease progresses. Furthermore, when recurrence or metastasis is observed, treatment options are limited and there is no curative treatment. Recently, heavy-particle radiotherapy has attracted attention owing to its high tumor control and minimal damage to normal tissues. In addition, heavy particle irradiation is effective for cancer stem cells and hypoxic regions, which are difficult to treat.

METHODS

In this study, we cultured cervical adenocarcinoma cell lines (HeLa and HCA-1) in two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cultures and evaluated the effects of X-ray and carbon-ion (C-ion) beams.

RESULTS

X-ray irradiation decreased the cell viability in a dose-dependent manner in 2D cultures, whereas this effect was attenuated in 3D spheroid cultures. In contrast, C-ion irradiation demonstrated the same antitumor effect in 3D spheroid cultures as in 2D cultures. In 3D spheroid cultures, X-rays and anticancer drugs are attenuated because of hypoxia inside the spheroids. However, the impact of the C-ion beam was almost the same as that of the 2D culture, because heavy-particle irradiation was not affected by hypoxia.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that heavy-particle radiotherapy may be a new therapeutic strategy for overcoming the resistance of cervical adenocarcinoma to treatment.

Visualizing Bioabsorbable Spacer Effectiveness by Confirming the Distal-Tail of Carbon-Ion Beams: First-In-Human Report

In particle therapy, bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) spacer was developed to reduce the healthy organ irradiation dose, especially in the gastrointestinal tract. The PGA spacer is safe and effective; however, there are no reports that have confirmed whether the PGA spacer which inserted in the body actually stops the carbon-ion (C-ion) beams. Here, we visualized and confirmed that the PGA spacer stops the C-ion beams in the body based on the dose distribution using auto-activation positron emission tomography (AAPET). A 59-year-old dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma patient underwent C-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) on referral. A month before C-ion RT initiation, the patient underwent PGA spacer placement. Postoperatively, the patient received 4.4 Gy (RBE) per fraction of C-ion RT, followed by AAPET. AAPET revealed lower positron emitter concentrations at the distal tissue ventral to the PGA spacer than in the planning target volume. In observing the efficacy of the PGA spacer, the AAPET images and the average count per second of the positron emitter suggested that the PGA spacer stopped the C-ion beams in the body in accordance with the dose distribution. Therefore, AAPET was useful in confirming the PGA spacer's effectiveness in this study, and the PGA spacer stopped the C-ion beams.

The value of HPV genotypes combined with clinical indicators in the classification of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma

Background

To investigate the differences in HPV genotypes and clinical indicators between cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma and to identify independent predictors for differentiating cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 319 patients with cervical cancer, including 238 patients with squamous cell carcinoma and 81 patients with adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively analysed. The clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators, including HPV genotypes, SCCAg, CA125, CA19-9, CYFRA 21–1 and parity, were analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses, and a classification model for cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was established. The model was validated in 96 patients with cervical cancer.

Results

There were significant differences in SCCAg, CA125, CA19-9, CYFRA 21–1, HPV genotypes and clinical symptoms between cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that SCCAg and HPV genotypes (high risk) were independent predictors for differentiating cervical squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma. The AUC value of the established classification model was 0.854 (95% CI: 0.804–0.904). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.846, 0.691 and 0.899, respectively. The classification accuracy was 0.823 when the model was verified.

Conclusion

The histological type of cervical cancer patients with persistent infection of high-risk HPV subtypes and low serum SCCAg levels was more prone to being adenocarcinoma. When the above independent predictors occur, the occurrence and development of cervical adenocarcinoma should be anticipated, and early active intervention treatment should be used to improve the prognosis and survival of patients.

Secondary cancers after carbon-ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies on the risk of secondary cancers after carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We assessed the incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with CIRT for cervical cancer. We also evaluated the incidence of secondary cancers in patients who received standard photon radiotherapy (RT) throughout the same period.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with cervical cancer who underwent curative RT at our hospital. All cancers discovered for the first time after RT were classified as secondary cancers. To compare the risk of secondary cancers among cervical cancer survivors to the general population, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The analysis included a total of 197 and 417 patients in the CIRT and photon RT groups, respectively. The total person-years during the observation period were 1052.4 in the CIRT group and 2481.5 in the photon RT group. The SIR for all secondary cancers was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.1) in the CIRT group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) in the photon RT group. The 10-year cumulative incidence of all secondary cancers was 9.5% (95% CI, 4.0-21.5) in the CIRT group and 9.4% (95% CI, 6.2-14.1) in the photon RT group. The CIRT and photon RT groups were not significantly different in incidence (p = 0.268).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of secondary cancers after CIRT for cervical cancer was similar to that after photon RT. Validation of our findings after long-term observation is warranted.