Mismatch Repair Deficiency as a Predictive and Prognostic Biomarker in Molecularly Classified Endometrial Carcinoma

A collaborative review of the microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair phenotype in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To perform a collaborative review of the literature exploring the microsatellite instability/deficient mismatch repair (MSI/dMMR) phenotype in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHOD

A collaborative review of the literature available on Medline was conducted by the Cancer Committee of the French Association of Urology to report studies describing the genetic mechanisms, investigation, prevalence and impact of the MSI/dMMR phenotype in UTUC patients.

RESULTS

The predominant genetic mechanism leading to the MSI/dMMR phenotype in UTUC patients is related to the constitutional mutation of one allele of the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 within Lynch syndrome. Indications for its investigation currently remain limited to patients with a clinical suspicion for sporadic UTUC to refer only those with a positive testing for germline DNA sequencing to screen for this syndrome. With regard to technical aspects, despite the interest of MSIsensor, only PCR and immunohistochemistry are routinely used to somatically investigate the MSI and dMMR phenotypes, respectively. The prevalence of the MSI/dMMR phenotype in UTUC patients ranges from 1.7% to 57%, depending on the study population, investigation method and definition of a positive test. Younger age and a more balanced male to female ratio at initial diagnosis are the main specific clinical characteristics of UTUC patients with an MSI/dMMR phenotype. Despite the conflicting results available in the literature, these patients may have a better prognosis, potentially related to more favourable pathological features. Finally, they may also have lower sensitivity to chemotherapy but greater sensitivity to immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our collaborative review summarises the available data from published studies exploring the MSI/dMMR phenotype in UTUC patients, the majority of which are limited by a low level of evidence.

The impact of estrogen receptor and L1 cell adhesion molecule expression on endometrial cancer outcome correlates with clinicopathological risk group and molecular subgroup

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk stratification of clinicopathologically and molecularly classified endometrial cancer based on estrogen receptor (ER) and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent primary treatment at a single tertiary center. Carcinomas were classified into 5 clinicopathological risk groups, as per European guidelines. Immunohistochemistry and polymerase-ϵ sequencing were conducted for molecular classification and determination of ER and L1CAM expression.

RESULTS

Data from 1044 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 67.5 months. In univariable analyses, ER expression correlated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS) in the "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) (P < 0.001) and mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) (P = 0.002) subgroups. Negative L1CAM expression was associated with enhanced DSS in the NSMP subgroup alone (P < 0.001). ER (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18), but not L1CAM, exhibited prognostic significance within NSMP when controlling for parameters available at the time of diagnosis (tumor histotype, grade, age). ER and L1CAM were not independently associated with DSS within NSMP when controlling for parameters available after surgery (clinicopathological risk groups, age, adjuvant therapy). However, in high-risk-advanced-metastatic cases, both ER (HR 0.26) and L1CAM (HR 3.9) independently correlated with DSS. Similarly, within MMRd, ER was associated with improved DSS in high-risk-advanced-metastatic carcinomas (HR 0.42).

CONCLUSION

The prognostic significance of ER and L1CAM varies across clinicopathological risk groups and molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer. Notably, risk assessment for high-risk-advanced-metastatic NSMP and MMRd subtype carcinomas can be refined by ER status.

Asparaginase-like protein 1 as a prognostic tissue biomarker in clinicopathologically and molecularly characterized endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Prognostic stratification of endometrial cancer involves the assessment of stage, uterine risk factors, and molecular classification. This process can be further refined through annotation of prognostic biomarkers, notably L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) and hormonal receptors. Loss of asparaginase-like protein 1 (ASRGL1) has been shown to correlate with poor outcome in endometrial cancer. Our objective was to assess prognostication of endometrial cancer by ASRGL1 in conjunction with other available methodologies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent primary treatment at a single tertiary center. Tumors were molecularly classified by the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer. Expression of ASRGL1, L1CAM, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor was determined by immunohistochemistry. ASRGL1 expression intensity was scored into four classes.

RESULTS

In a cohort of 775 patients, monitored for a median time of 81 months, ASRGL1 expression intensity was related to improved disease-specific survival in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.001). Low expression levels were associated with stage II-IV disease and presence of uterine factors, i.e. high grade, lymphovascular space invasion, and deep myometrial invasion (P < 0.001 for all). Among the molecular subgroups, low expression was most prevalent in p53 abnormal carcinomas (P < 0.001). Low ASRGL1 was associated with positive L1CAM expression and negative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.001 for all). After adjustment for stage and uterine factors, strong ASRGL1 staining intensity was associated with a lower risk for cancer-related deaths (hazard ratio 0.56, 95 % confidence interval 0.32-0.97; P = 0.038). ASRGL1 was not associated with the outcome when adjusted for stage, molecular subgroups, L1CAM, and hormonal receptors. When analyzed separately within the different molecular subgroups, ASRGL1 showed an association with disease-specific survival specifically in "no specific molecular profile" subtype carcinomas (P < 0.001). However, this association became nonsignificant upon controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Low ASRGL1 expression intensity correlates with poor survival in endometrial cancer. ASRGL1 contributes to more accurate prognostication when controlled for stage and uterine factors. However, when adjusted for stage and other biomarkers, including molecular subgroups, ASRGL1 does not improve prognostic stratification.

Expression of Programmed Death Ligand 1 [PD-L1] and Mismatch Repair Status in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Cervix

Background and Objectives

To assess mismatch repair (MMR) status and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix and their association with clinicopathologic parameters.

Material and Methods

Expression of PD-L1 and MMR status (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, and PMS2) was assessed on 50 cases of SCCs of the cervix by immunohistochemistry.

Results

80% of tumor cells and 84% of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes showed PD-L1 expression. 80% of cases had a combined positive score (CPS) of > 1, whereas 20% had a CPS of < 1. 94% of cases showed pMMR proteins, while 6% showed dMMR. 94% of the SCCs were HPV associated, and 6% were HPV-independent. All HPV-independent SCCs of the cervix showed PD-L1 expression, and all HPV-associated SCCs showed MMR deficiency. Between PD-L1 expression in the tumor and the grade of the tumor, a statistically significant association was noted (p = 0.022). All MMR-deficient SCCs were HPV-independent.

Conclusion

This research highlighted the HPV association in cervical SCCs in the Indian population. Most of the cervical SCCs were HPV-associated. Furthermore, most of the HPV-associated SCCs were MMR stable. This study found no significant association between MMR status and PD-L1 expression in cervical SCCs.

Stage distribution and prognostic accuracy of the 2023 FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics) staging system for endometrial cancer: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the stage distribution and stage-related disease-specific survival rates for endometrial cancer using the FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology & Obstetrics) 2009 and 2023 staging systems. Further, we sought to evaluate the prognostic utility of additional covariates beyond the FIGO 2023 stage.

METHODS

Endometrial carcinomas were molecularly classified by the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer and staged according to FIGO 2009 and 2023 criteria. Disease-specific survival was calculated as the time from surgery to death from endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

Data from 604 patients were analyzed. Median follow-up time was 81 months. A total of 118 stage shifts (19.5%) occurred between the FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2023 systems, with upshifts accounting for 107 (90.7%) of these changes. Within the FIGO 2023 system, molecular classification resulted in restaging of 69 patients (11.4%). Shifts that could alter adjuvant therapy decisions were identified in 23 patients (3.8%). The FIGO 2023 system effectively categorized endometrial cancers into prognostic subgroups. The FIGO 2023 stage, tumor size, positive peritoneal cytology, and mismatch repair deficiency were associated with disease-specific survival in a multivariable analysis, whereas age and adjuvant therapy were not.

CONCLUSION

The FIGO 2023 staging system for endometrial cancer appears highly prognostic. Prognostic assessment of the patients can be further enhanced by readily accessible covariates. A stage shift between the FIGO 2009 and 2023 systems occurs in about one-fifth of patients. The implementation of molecular classification within the FIGO 2023 system bears implications for decisions regarding adjuvant therapy.

Clinicopathological Implications of Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Duhok City

BACKGROUND

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a specialized system that corrects errors in DNA replication, namely, base substitution mismatches and minor insertion-deletion mismatches. The deficient mismatch repair (d-MMR) protein plays a vital role in predicting the prognosis of endometrioid carcinoma. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of MMR errors in endometrial cancer (EC) and their correlation with clinicopathological features.

METHODS

We examined the immunohistochemistry presence of four MMR proteins in 50 samples of EC tissues that were preserved in formalin and embedded in paraffin. The proteins identified were MutL homolog 1 (MLH1), post-meiotic segregation increased 2 (PMS2), MutS homolog 2 (MSH2), and MutS homolog 6 (MSH6). The study examined several clinicopathological characteristics and conducted MMR phenotyping.

RESULTS

The findings revealed that among the 50 cases of EC, 40% of patients had grade I disease and 78% had stage I malignancy. Furthermore, among the 50 individuals evaluated, 56% exhibited competence in MMR, whereas 44% displayed loss in nuclear expression of MMR. The rate of MLH1 and PMS2 protein loss was recorded as the greatest, at 18%, while the loss of MSH2 and MSH6 was documented at 6%. Within the same range, the majority of patients with d-MMR were above the age of 50 years.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the recruited EC patients in this study showed advanced age and a high percentage of d-MMR status.

Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers

BACKGROUND

Mismatch-repair (MMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) status has therapeutic implications in endometrial cancer (EC). The authors evaluated the concordance of testing and factors contributing to MMR expression heterogeneity.

METHODS

Six hundred sixty-six ECs were characterized using immunohistochemistry (IHC), MSI testing, and mut-L homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation. Select samples underwent whole-transcriptome analysis and next-generation sequencing. MMR expression of metastatic/recurrent sites was evaluated.

RESULTS

MSI testing identified 27.3% of cases as MSI-high (n = 182), MMR IHC identified 25.1% cases as MMR-deficient (n = 167), and 3.8% of cases (n = 25) demonstrated discordant results. A review of IHC staining explained discordant results in 18 cases, revealing subclonal loss of MLH1/Pms 1 homolog 2 (PMS2) (n = 10) and heterogeneous MMR IHC (mut-S homolog 6 [MSH6], n = 7; MLH1/PMS2, n = 1). MSH6-associated Lynch syndrome was diagnosed in three of six cases with heterogeneous expression. Subclonal or heterogeneous cases had a 38.9% recurrence rate (compared with 16.7% in complete MMR-deficient cases and 9% in MMR-proficient cases) and had abnormal MMR IHC results in all metastatic recurrent sites (n = 7). Tumors with subclonal MLH1/PMS2 demonstrated 74 differentially expressed genes (determined using digital spatial transcriptomics) when stratified by MLH1 expression, including many associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

CONCLUSIONS

Subclonal/heterogeneous MMR IHC cases showed epigenetic loss in 66.7%, germline mutations in 16.7%, and somatic mutations in 16.7%. MMR IHC reported as intact/deficient missed 21% of cases of Lynch syndrome. EC with subclonal/heterogeneous MMR expression demonstrated a high recurrence rate, and metastatic/recurrent sites were MMR-deficient. Transcriptional analysis indicated an increased risk for migration/metastasis, suggesting that clonal MMR deficiency may be a driver for tumor aggressiveness. Reporting MMR IHC only as intact/deficient, without reporting subclonal and heterogeneous staining, misses opportunities for biomarker-directed therapy.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer, and 20%-40% of tumors have a defect in DNA proofreading known as mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency. These results can be used to guide therapy. Tests for this defect can yield differing results, revealing heterogeneous (mixed) proofreading capabilities. Tumors with discordant testing results and mixed MMR findings can have germline or somatic defects in MMR genes. Cells with deficient DNA proofreading in tumors with mixed MMR findings have DNA expression profiles linked to more aggressive characteristics and cancer spread. These MMR-deficient cells may drive tumor behavior and the risk of spreading cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor as Single-Agent Immunotherapy in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway plays a crucial role in the immune escape mechanism and growth of cancer cells in endometrial cancer (EC). Clinical trials investigating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor have shown promising results in other cancers, but their efficacy in EC still remains uncertain. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to provide an updated and robust analysis of the effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PDL1 inhibitor as single-agent immunotherapy in EC, focusing on the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). This meta-analysis utilized STATA version 17 and RevMan version 5.4 software to pool the results of relevant studies. Five studies conducted between 2017 and 2022, comprising a total of 480 EC patients enrolled for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy met the inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of EC patients who achieved ORR through PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment was 26.0% (95% CI: 16.0-36.0%; p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis based on mismatch repair (MMR) status showed an ORR of 44.0% (95% CI: 38.0-50.0%; p = 0.32) for the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group and 8.0% (95% CI: 0.0-16.0%; p = 0.07) for the proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group. Pooled proportion analysis by DCR demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 41.0% (95% CI: 36.0-46.0%, p = 0.83) for patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. Subgroup analysis based on MMR status revealed DCR of 54.0% (95% CI: 47.0-62.0%; p = 0.83) for the dMMR group, and 31.0% (95% CI: 25.0-39.0%; p = 0.14) for the pMMR group. The efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors was significantly higher in the dMMR group compared to the pMMR group, in terms of both ORR (OR = 6.30; 95% CI = 3.60-11.03; p < 0.05) and DCR (OR = 2.57; 95% CI = 1.66-3.99; p < 0.05). In terms of safety issues, the pooled proportion of patients experiencing at least one adverse event was 69.0% (95% CI: 65.0-73.0%; p > 0.05), with grade three or higher AEs occurring in 16.0% of cases (95% CI: 12.0-19.0%; p > 0.05). Based on the subgroup analysis of MMR status, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy showed significantly better efficacy among dMMR patients. These findings suggest that patients with dMMR status may be more suitable for this treatment approach. However, further research on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor immunotherapy strategies is needed to fully explore their potential and improve treatment outcomes in EC.

Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 and Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrial Carcinomas

Background and Aims

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a co-regulatory molecule that suppresses local immunity, and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (dMMR) is reported to influence the response to anti-PD-L1-targeted therapy. This study was conducted to find the PD-L1 status, the occurrence of dMMR in endometrial carcinomas, and the association between them.

Materials and Methods

The study included 35 resected specimens of endometrial carcinomas represented on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections from January 2016 to July 2020. The clinicopathologic information including patient age, tumor histologic type, grade, stage, lymphovascular invasion, the extent of myometrial invasion, and the percentage of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were obtained in all cases. The expression of PD-L1 and MMR antibodies including mutS homolog 2 (MSH-2), MSH-6, mutL homolog 1 (MLH-1) and MLH-3, and postmeiotic segregation 2 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.

Results

PD-L1 expression was noted in 48.6% of the cases in tumor cells and 65.7% of the cases in TILs and MMR was deficient in 28.6% of endometrial carcinomas. A statistically significant relation was noted between dMMR and TILs, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, and extent of myometrial invasion. Although there was no statistically significant association between MMR status and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells or TILs, 60% of patients with dMMR were PD-L1 positive.

Conclusion

Sixty percent of dMMR cases showed PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. We conclude, ECs that are MMR deficient might get better response to anti-PD-L1 therapy. This study also revealed the prognostic use of TILs in PD-L1-expressed tumors.

Epigenetic MMR defect identifies a risk group not accounted for through traditional risk stratification algorithms in endometrial cancer

Purpose

We sought to evaluate the contribution of mismatch repair (MMR) status to traditional risk stratification algorithms used to predict nodal involvement and recurrence in a large single-institution cohort.

Methods

Endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) cases from 2014-2020 were evaluated. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed universally. Uterine factors assessed in the Mayo criteria were used to retrospectively classify patients as low or high risk for lymphatic spread. Patients were classified according to risk for recurrence using GOG 99 and PORTEC criteria. Associations were evaluated using chi-square and t-tests and contributing factors assessed using logistic regression models.

Results

1,514 endometrioid EC were evaluated; 392 (25.9%) were MMR (MMR) deficient of which 80.4% of MMR defects were associated with epigenetic silencing of MLH1. Epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be high risk for lymph node (LN) metastasis based on Mayo criteria (74.9% vs 60.6%, p=<0.001) and with the presence of LN metastasis (20.3 vs 10.5%, p=0.003) compared to MMR proficient tumors. Tumors with epigenetic MMR defects were significantly more likely to be classified as high or high intermediate risk using GOG99 and PORTEC criteria. Furthermore, cases with epigenetic MMR defects classified as low or low intermediate risk were significantly more likely to recur (GOG99 p=0.013; PORTEC p=0.008) and independently associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS). MMR status was found to be independently associated with worse DFS (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.34-2.70; p=0.003) but not overall survival.

Conclusion

While MMR deficient EC has been associated with poor prognostic features in prior reports; we demonstrate that only epigenetic MMR defects have poorer outcomes. Epigenetic MMR defect were independently associated with lymph node metastasis after controlling for risk criteria. Epigenetic MMR deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence beyond the factors considered in traditional risk stratification algorithms. Traditional uterine-based risk stratification algorithms may not fully reflect the risk for recurrence in MMR deficient tumors. Consideration should be given to implementing MMR status and MLH1 hypermethylation alongside traditional risk stratification algorithms. Performing MMR IHC on preoperative pathologic specimens may aid in risk stratification and patient counseling.

Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma: a clinically oriented review

The Cancer Genome Atlas research network performed a genome-wide analysis of endometrial carcinomas in 2013 and classified tumours into four distinct subgroups: polymerase-ϵ ultramutated, microsatellite unstable hypermutated, copy-number low and copy-number high. These molecular alterations are mostly mutually exclusive as only about 3% of tumours exhibit more than one molecular signature. Apart from the polymerase-ϵ ultramutated subgroup, molecular classification can be reproduced by using surrogate markers. This has facilitated the implementation of molecular diagnostics into routine patient care. Molecular subgroups are associated with different prognoses; thus, improved risk assessment is their most obvious clinical application. However, based on their unique molecular architectures, molecular subgroups should not be regarded simply as risk groups but rather as distinct diseases. This has prompted us and others to examine the role of molecular subgroups in modifying the prognostic effect of traditional risk factors, including clinical factors, uterine factors and tissue biomarkers, and in predicting the response to adjuvant therapies. In the following review, we summarise the current knowledge of molecularly classified endometrial carcinoma and present, based on our own experience, a proposal for implementing molecular classification into daily practice in pathology laboratories.