Text Messaging in Cancer-Supportive Care: A Systematic Review

Implementing a text-message-based intervention to increase access to naloxone for patients on chronic opioid therapy

OBJECTIVE

To implement a text-message-based intervention for primary care patients taking chronic opioid therapy to increase access to naloxone.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a hospital quality improvement initiative.

SETTING

This study was conducted with selected primary care practices affiliated with an academic medical center between March and July 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were eligible for receiving the intervention if they had chronic (≥90 days) opioid use of ≥50 morphine milligram equivalents/day and had not previously opted out of receiving text messages.

INTERVENTIONS

Text messages were sent to patients inquiring about interest in obtaining a naloxone kit, which prompted a pharmacist to contact the patient and provide the medication by mail.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We examined response rates to text messages and numbers of naloxone kits dispensed.

RESULTS

There were 243 patients identified who were sent the text message. Of these, 230 (94.7 percent) had a primary language of English, 150 (61.7 percent) were White, and 57 (23.5 percent) were Black/African American. The mean age was 57.3 years. After receiving the text messages, 64 (26.3 percent) of the 243 patients responded with "unsubscribe." Thirty-five (14.4 percent) patients responded to the message, and 18 patients (51.4 percent of those who responded or 7.4 percent of all included patients) wanted the medication and were contacted by a pharmacist who filled and mailed the prescription to them.

CONCLUSIONS

A text-message-based program to provide naloxone to patients with chronic opioid use was feasible. However, fewer than 15 percent of patients responded to the message, and just half of those wanted the medicine.

A text analytics approach for mining public discussions in online cancer forum: Analysis of multi-intent lung cancer treatment dataset

BACKGROUND

Online cancer forums (OCF) are increasingly popular platforms for patients and caregivers to discuss, seek information on, and share opinions about diseases and treatments. This interaction generates a substantial amount of unstructured text data, necessitating deeper exploration. Using time series data, our study exploits topic modeling in the novel domain of online cancer forums (OCFs) to identify meaningful topics and changing dynamics of online discussion across different lung cancer treatment intent groups.

METHODS

For this purpose, a dataset comprising 27,998 forum posts about lung cancer was collected from three OCFs: lungcancer.net, lungevity.org, and reddit.com, spanning the years 2016 to 2018.

RESULTS

The analysis reflects the public discussion on multi-intent lung cancer treatment over time, taking into account seasonal variations. Discussions on cancer symptoms and prevention garnered the most attention, dominating both curative and palliative care discussions. There were distinct seasonal peaks: curative care topics surged from winter to late spring, while palliative care topics peaked from late summer to mid-autumn. Keyword analysis highlighted that lung cancer diagnosis and treatment were primary topics, whereas cancer prevention and treatment outcomes were predominant across multi-care contexts. For the study period, curative care discussions predominantly revolved around informational support and disease syndromes. In contrast, social support and cancer prevention prevailed in the palliative care context. Notably, topics such as cancer screening and cancer treatment exhibit pronounced seasonal variations in curative care, peaking in frequency during the summers (May to August) of the study period. Meanwhile, the topic of tumor control within palliative care showed significant seasonal influence during the winters and summers of 2017 and 2018.

CONCLUSION

Our text analysis approach using OCF data shows potential for computational methods in this novel domain to gain insights into trends in public cancer communication and seasonal variations for a better understanding of improving personalized care, decision support, treatment outcomes, and quality of life.

Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: a scoping review of reviews

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote cancer care delivery via the internet and telephone, rapidly accelerating an already growing care delivery model and associated research. This scoping review of reviews characterised the peer-reviewed literature reviews on digital health and telehealth interventions in cancer published from database inception up to May 1, 2022, from PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. Eligible reviews conducted a systematic literature search. Data were extracted in duplicate via a pre-defined online survey. Following screening, 134 reviews met the eligibility criteria. 77 of those reviews were published since 2020. 128 reviews summarised interventions intended for patients, 18 addressed family caregivers, and five addressed health-care providers. 56 reviews did not target a specific phase of the cancer continuum, whereas 48 reviews tended to address the active treatment phase. 29 reviews included a meta-analysis, with results showing positive effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and screening behaviours. 83 reviews did not report intervention implementation outcomes but when reported, 36 reported acceptability, 32 feasibility, and 29 fidelity outcomes. Several notable gaps were identified in these literature reviews on digital health and telehealth in cancer care. No reviews specifically addressed older adults, bereavement, or sustainability of interventions and only two reviews focused on comparing telehealth to in-person interventions. Addressing these gaps with rigorous systematic reviews might help guide continued innovation in remote cancer care, particularly for older adults and bereaved families, and integrate and sustain these interventions within oncology.

Cancer Groundshot: Building a Robust Cancer Control Platform in Addition To Launching the Cancer Moonshot

Cancer Groundshot is a philosophy that calls for prioritization of strategies in global cancer control. The underlying principle of Cancer Groundshot is that one must ensure access to interventions that are already proven to work before focusing on the development of new interventions. In this article, we discuss the philosophy of Cancer Groundshot as it pertains to priorities in cancer care and research in low- and middle-income countries and the utility of technology in addressing global cancer disparities; we also address disparities seen in high-income countries. The oncology community needs to realign our priorities and focus on improving access to high-value cancer control strategies, rather than allocating resources primarily to the development of technologies that provide only marginal gains at a high cost. There are several "low-hanging fruit" actions that will improve access to quality cancer care in low- and middle-income countries and in high-income countries. Worldwide, cancer morbidity and mortality can be averted by implementing highly effective, low-cost interventions that are already known to work, rather than investing in the development of resource-intensive interventions to which most patients will not have access (i.e., we can use Cancer Groundshot to first save more lives before we focus on the "moonshots").