Targeting Replication Stress Using CHK1 Inhibitor Promotes Innate and NKT Cell Immune Responses and Tumour Regression

Signature identification based on immunogenic cell death-related lncRNAs to predict the prognosis and immune activity of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Background

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is one of the most prevalent gynecologic malignancies and requires further classification for treatment and prognosis. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and immunogenic cell death (ICD) play a critical role in tumor progression. Nevertheless, the role of lncRNAs in ICD in EC remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the role of ICD related-lncRNAs in EC via bioinformatics and establish a prognostic risk model based on the ICD-related lncRNAs. We also explored immune infiltration and immune cell function across prognostic groups and made treatment recommendations.

Methods

A total of 552 EC samples and clinical data of 548 EC patients were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) Xena, respectively. A prognostic-related feature and risk model was developed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Subtypes were classified with consensus cluster analysis and validated with t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (tSNE). Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess differences in survival. Infiltration by immune cells was estimated by single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER) algorithm. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect lncRNAs expression in clinical samples and cell lines. A series of studies was conducted in vitro and in vivo to examine the effects of knockdown or overexpression of lncRNAs on ICD.

Results

In total, 16 ICD-related lncRNAs with prognostic values were identified. Using SCARNA9, FAM198B-AS1, FKBP14-AS1, FBXO30-DT, LINC01943, and AL161431.1 as risk model, their predictive accuracy and discrimination were assessed. We divided EC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The analysis showed that the risk model was an independent prognostic factor. The prognosis of the high- and low-risk groups was different, and the overall survival (OS) of the high-risk group was lower. The low-risk group had higher immune cell infiltration and immune scores. Consensus clustering analysis divided the samples into four subtypes, of which cluster 4 had higher immune cell infiltration and immune scores.

Conclusions

A prognostic signature composed of six ICD related-lncRNAs in EC was established, and a risk model based on this signature can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with EC.

cGAS-STING pathway expression correlates with genomic instability and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer

Genomic instability, as caused by oncogene-induced replication stress, can lead to the activation of inflammatory signaling, involving the cGAS-STING and JAK-STAT pathways. Inflammatory signaling has been associated with pro-tumorigenic features, but also with favorable response to treatment, including to immune checkpoint inhibition. In this study, we aim to explore relations between inflammatory signaling, markers of replication stress, and immune cell infiltration in breast cancer. Expression levels of cGAS-STING signaling components (STING, phospho-TBK1, and phospho-STAT1), replication stress markers (γH2AX and pRPA), replication stress-related proto-oncogenes (Cyclin E1 and c-Myc) and immune cell markers (CD20, CD4, and CD57) are determined immunohistochemically on primary breast cancer samples (n = 380). RNA-sequencing data from TCGA (n = 1082) and METABRIC (n = 1904) are used to calculate cGAS-STING scores. pTBK1, pSTAT1 expression and cGAS-STING pathway scores are all increased in triple-negative breast cancers compared to other subtypes. Expression of γH2AX, pRPA, Cyclin E1, c-Myc, and immune cell infiltration positively correlate with p-STAT1 expression (P < 0.001). Additionally, we observe significant positive associations between expression of pTBK1 and γH2AX, pRPA, c-Myc, and number of CD4+ cells and CD20+ cells. Also, cGAS-STING scores are correlated with genomic instability metrics, such as homologous recombination deficiency (P < 0.001) and tumor mutational burden (P < 0.01). Moreover, data from the I-SPY2 clinical trial (n = 71) confirms that higher cGAS-STING scores are observed in breast cancer patients who responded to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In conclusion, the cGAS-STING pathway is highly expressed in TNBCs and is correlated with genomic instability and immune cell infiltration.

Checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor + low-dose hydroxyurea efficiently kills BRAF inhibitor- and immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant melanomas

Treatment of melanomas with targeted and immunotherapies has proven effective, but resistance to both treatments is a common outcome leaving a high proportion of patients without effective alternative treatment options. Replication stress is a common feature of melanomas, and this is effectively targeted using a combination of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) inhibitor and low-dose hydroxyurea (LDHU). This combination also promotes inflammatory and anti-tumour immune responses in vivo. Melanoma cell lines resistant to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) retain their sensitivity to CHK1i + LDHU, with sensitivity similar to that of parental tumours. In vivo, BRAFi-resistant and BRAFi-sensitive parental tumours produce an identical immune response with treatment.

Combined inhibition of Wee1 and Chk1 as a therapeutic strategy in multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by an abnormal clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells. Despite the introduction of novel agents that have significantly improved clinical outcome, most patients relapse and develop drug resistance. MM is characterized by genomic instability and a high level of replicative stress. In response to replicative and DNA damage stress, MM cells activate various DNA damage signaling pathways. In this study, we reported that high CHK1 and WEE1 expression is associated with poor outcome in independent cohorts of MM patients treated with high dose melphalan chemotherapy or anti-CD38 immunotherapy. Combined targeting of Chk1 and Wee1 demonstrates synergistic toxicities on MM cells and was associated with higher DNA double-strand break induction, as evidenced by an increased percentage of γH2AX positive cells subsequently leading to apoptosis. The therapeutic interest of Chk1/Wee1 inhibitors' combination was validated on primary MM cells of patients. The toxicity was specific of MM cells since normal bone marrow cells were not significantly affected. Using deconvolution approach, MM patients with high CHK1 expression exhibited a significant lower percentage of NK cells whereas patients with high WEE1 expression displayed a significant higher percentage of regulatory T cells in the bone marrow. These data emphasize that MM cell adaptation to replicative stress through Wee1 and Chk1 upregulation may decrease the activation of the cell-intrinsic innate immune response. Our study suggests that association of Chk1 and Wee1 inhibitors may represent a promising therapeutic approach in high-risk MM patients characterized by high CHK1 and WEE1 expression.

Perspectives and mechanisms for targeting mitotic catastrophe in cancer treatment

Mitotic catastrophe is distinct from other cell death modes due to unique nuclear alterations characterized as multi and/or micronucleation. Mitotic catastrophe is a common and virtually unavoidable consequence during cancer therapy. However, a comprehensive understanding of mitotic catastrophe remains lacking. Herein, we summarize the anticancer drugs that induce mitotic catastrophe, including microtubule-targeting agents, spindle assembly checkpoint kinase inhibitors, DNA damage agents and DNA damage response inhibitors. Based on the relationships between mitotic catastrophe and other cell death modes, we thoroughly evaluated the roles played by mitotic catastrophe in cancer treatment as well as its advantages and disadvantages. Some strategies for overcoming its shortcomings while fully utilizing its advantages are summarized and proposed in this review. We also review how mitotic catastrophe regulates cancer immunotherapy. These summarized findings suggest that the induction of mitotic catastrophe can serve as a promising new therapeutic approach for overcoming apoptosis resistance and strengthening cancer immunotherapy.

The DNA Damage Response and Inflammation in Cancer

Genomic stability in normal cells is crucial to avoid oncogenesis. Accordingly, multiple components of the DNA damage response (DDR) operate as bona fide tumor suppressor proteins by preserving genomic stability, eliciting the demise of cells with unrepairable DNA lesions, and engaging cell-extrinsic oncosuppression via immunosurveillance. That said, DDR sig-naling can also favor tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Indeed, DDR signaling in cancer cells has been consistently linked to the inhibition of tumor-targeting immune responses. Here, we discuss the complex interactions between the DDR and inflammation in the context of oncogenesis, tumor progression, and response to therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that DDR is intimately connected to the emission of immunomodulatory signals by normal and malignant cells, as part of a cell-extrinsic program to preserve organismal homeostasis. DDR-driven inflammation, however, can have diametrically opposed effects on tumor-targeting immunity. Understanding the links between the DDR and inflammation in normal and malignant cells may unlock novel immunotherapeutic paradigms to treat cancer.

Repurposing of Commercially Existing Molecular Target Therapies to Boost the Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is now standard of care for several metastatic epithelial cancers and prolongs life expectancy for a significant fraction of patients. A hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) induced by intrinsic oncogenic signaling induces an immunosuppressive niche that protects the tumor cells, limiting the durability and efficacy of ICB therapies. Addition of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKi) as potential modulators of an unfavorable local immune environment has resulted in moderate life expectancy improvement. Though the combination strategy of ICB and RTKi has shown significantly better results compared to individual treatment, the benefits and adverse events are additive whereas synergy of benefit would be preferable. There is therefore a need to investigate the potential of inhibitors other than RTKs to reduce malignant cell survival while enhancing anti-tumor immunity. In the last five years, preclinical studies have focused on using small molecule inhibitors targeting cell cycle and DNA damage regulators such as CDK4/6, CHK1 and poly ADP ribosyl polymerase (PARP) to selectively kill tumor cells and enhance cytotoxic immune responses. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the available drugs that attenuate immunosuppression and overcome hostile TME that could be used to boost FDA-approved ICB efficacy in the near future.

Exploiting DNA Replication Stress as a Therapeutic Strategy for Breast Cancer

Proliferating cells rely on DNA replication to ensure accurate genome duplication. Cancer cells, including breast cancer cells, exhibit elevated replication stress (RS) due to the uncontrolled oncogenic activation, loss of key tumor suppressors, and defects in the DNA repair machinery. This intrinsic vulnerability provides a great opportunity for therapeutic exploitation. An increasing number of drug candidates targeting RS in breast cancer are demonstrating promising efficacy in preclinical and early clinical trials. However, unresolved challenges lie in balancing the toxicity of these drugs while maintaining clinical efficacy. Furthermore, biomarkers of RS are urgently required to guide patient selection. In this review, we introduce the concept of targeting RS, detail the current therapies that target RS, and highlight the integration of RS with immunotherapies for breast cancer treatment. Additionally, we discuss the potential biomarkers to optimizing the efficacy of these therapies. Together, the continuous advances in our knowledge of targeting RS would benefit more patients with breast cancer.

Anti-cancer immune responses to DNA damage response inhibitors: Molecular mechanisms and progress toward clinical translation

DNA damage response inhibitors are widely used anti-cancer agents that have potent activity against tumor cells with deficiencies in various DNA damage response proteins such as BRCA1/2. Inhibition of other proteins in this pathway including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, or ATM can sensitize cancer cells to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and such combinations are currently being tested in clinical trials for treatment of many malignancies including breast, ovarian, rectal, and lung cancer. Unrepaired DNA damage induced by DNA damage response inhibitors alone or in combination with radio- or chemotherapy has a direct cytotoxic effect on cancer cells and can also engage anti-cancer innate and adaptive immune responses. DNA damage-induced immune stimulation occurs by a variety of mechanisms including by the cGAS/STING pathway, STAT1 and downstream TRAIL pathway activation, and direct immune cell activation. Whether or not the relative contribution of these mechanisms varies after treatment with different DNA damage response inhibitors or across cancers with different genetic aberrations in DNA damage response enzymes is not well-characterized, limiting the design of optimal combinations with radio- and chemotherapy. Here, we review how the inhibition of key DNA damage response enzymes including PARP, DNA-PK, WEE1, CHK1/2, ATR, and ATM induces innate and adaptive immune responses alone or in combination with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or immunotherapy. We also discuss current progress in the clinical translation of immunostimulatory DNA-damaging treatment regimens and necessary future directions to optimize the immune-sensitizing potential of DNA damage response inhibitors.

Novel Therapeutic Approaches with DNA Damage Response Inhibitors for Melanoma Treatment

Targeted therapies against components of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and immunotherapies, which block immune checkpoints, have shown important clinical benefits in melanoma patients. However, most patients develop resistance, with consequent disease relapse. Therefore, there is a need to identify novel therapeutic approaches for patients who are resistant or do not respond to the current targeted and immune therapies. Melanoma is characterized by homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) gene mutations and by high replicative stress, which increase the endogenous DNA damage, leading to the activation of DDR. In this review, we will discuss the current experimental evidence on how DDR can be exploited therapeutically in melanoma. Specifically, we will focus on PARP, ATM, CHK1, WEE1 and ATR inhibitors, for which preclinical data as single agents, taking advantage of synthetic lethal interactions, and in combination with chemo-targeted-immunotherapy, have been growing in melanoma, encouraging the ongoing clinical trials. The overviewed data are suggestive of considering DDR inhibitors as a valid therapeutic approach, which may positively impact the future of melanoma treatment.

Impact of DNA Damage Response-Targeted Therapies on the Immune Response to Tumours

The DNA damage response (DDR) maintains the stability of a genome faced with genotoxic insults (exogenous or endogenous), and aberrations of the DDR are a hallmark of cancer cells. These cancer-specific DDR defects present new therapeutic opportunities, and different compounds that inhibit key components of DDR have been approved for clinical use or are in various stages of clinical trials. Although the therapeutic rationale of these DDR-targeted agents initially focused on their action against tumour cells themselves, these agents might also impact the crosstalk between tumour cells and the immune system, which can facilitate or impede tumour progression. In this review, we summarise recent data on how DDR-targeted agents can affect the interactions between tumour cells and the components of the immune system, both by acting directly on the immune cells themselves and by altering the expression of different molecules and pathways in tumour cells that are critical for their relationship with the immune system. Obtaining an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms behind how DDR-targeted therapies affect the immune system, and their crosstalk with tumour cells, may provide invaluable clues for the rational development of new therapeutic strategies in cancer.