1
|
Hay JL, Wu Y, Schofield E, Kaphingst K, Sussman AL, Guest DD, Hunley K, Li Y, Buller D, Berwick M. Exploring the role of cancer fatalism and engagement with skin cancer genetic information in diverse primary care patients. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6331. [PMID: 38546209 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To broaden the currently limited reach of genomic innovations, research is needed to understand how psychosocial and cultural factors influence reactions to genetic testing in diverse subgroups. Cancer fatalism is important in cancer prevention and deserves theoretical and empirical attention in the context of genomics and behavior change. METHODS The current study employed data from a randomized controlled trial (N = 593) offering skin cancer genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in primary care in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. We examined interrelations of cancer fatalism with demographics, general health beliefs, perceived risk, perceived control, sun protection and skin screening behaviors and cancer worry in the skin cancer context stratified across Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity, and examined cancer fatalism as a moderator of intervention effects on study primary outcomes, including 3-month sun protection, cancer worry and perceived risk. RESULTS Cancer fatalism was significantly related to the perception of control over skin cancer risk behaviors (ps ≤ 0.01) and demographics (ethnicity, education, health literacy; ps < 0.05), but not consistently related to general health beliefs or risk perception. Cancer fatalism did not moderate intervention effects on primary outcomes, except those with higher cancer fatalism randomized to intervention had higher levels of 3-month cancer worry (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS These findings will guide future work considering the role of cancer fatalism in use of genomic technologies in the general population. This work anticipates strategies required to address cancer fatalism as translational genomics becomes more commonly available to diverse general population subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Hay
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yelena Wu
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Elizabeth Schofield
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kim Kaphingst
- Cancer Communication Research, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew L Sussman
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Delores D Guest
- University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Keith Hunley
- Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Yuelin Li
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Marianne Berwick
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu YP, Hamilton JG, Kaphingst KA, Jensen JD, Kohlmann W, Parsons BG, Lillie HM, Wang X, Haaland B, Wankier AP, Grossman D, Hay JL. Increasing Skin Cancer Prevention in Young Adults: the Cumulative Impact of Personalized UV Photography and MC1R Genetic Testing. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:1059-1065. [PMID: 36306029 PMCID: PMC10502947 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02232-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Skin cancer has become increasingly common among young adults; however, this population does not consistently adhere to recommended methods for preventing the disease. Interventions in college settings have relied on appearance-focused appeals and have not been able to examine the cumulative effect of multiple behavior change and skin cancer risk communication strategies. The goal of the current study was to examine the unique and combined impacts of personalized ultraviolet (UV) radiation photographs, genetic testing for skin cancer risk, and general skin cancer prevention education. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: (1) skin cancer prevention education, (2) education + UV photo, (3) education + genetic testing, and (4) education + UV photo + genetic testing. Self-reported sun protection, tanning, and sunburn were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 1 month post-intervention. The findings indicated benefits of the interventions to skin cancer prevention behaviors in the overall sample; however, the combined (UV photo + genetic testing) intervention had the most consistent positive effects on behaviors. Intervention effects were distinct across seasons. These results suggest that interventions containing multiple skin cancer risk communication strategies hold promise in benefitting health-promoting behavior changes in an at-risk, young adult population.Trial Registration Number: NCT03979872; Registered 6/5/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena P Wu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 30 North 1900 East, 4A330-Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jakob D Jensen
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Bridget G Parsons
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Helen M Lillie
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Xuechen Wang
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Williams Building Room 1N410, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Benjamin Haaland
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Williams Building Room 1N410, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Ali P Wankier
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Douglas Grossman
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, 30 North 1900 East, 4A330-Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Rm LL376, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jennifer L Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brady HL, Hamilton JG, Kaphingst KA, Jensen JD, Kohlmann W, Parsons BG, Lillie HM, Wankier AP, Smith HJ, Grossman D, Hay JL, Wu YP. 'I had a bigger cancer risk than I thought…': The experience of receiving personalized risk information as part of a skin cancer prevention intervention in the college setting. Health Expect 2022; 25:2937-2949. [PMID: 36225123 PMCID: PMC9700178 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnoses of both melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers are becoming increasingly common among young adults. Interventions in this population are a priority because they do not consistently follow skin cancer prevention recommendations. OBJECTIVES The goal of the current study was to examine college students' perspectives on and experience with receiving a skin cancer prevention intervention that provided personalized skin cancer risk feedback in the form of an ultraviolet (UV) photograph, the results of genetic testing for common skin cancer risk variants, and/or general skin cancer prevention education. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 38 college students who received a skin cancer prevention intervention. The interview covered students' feelings about their personal skin cancer risk information, the impact of the intervention on their skin cancer risk perceptions, actions or intentions to act with regard to their sun protection practices and feedback for improvement of the intervention content or delivery. RESULTS Participants reported that different intervention components contributed to increased awareness of their sun protection behaviours, shifts in cognitions about and motivation to implement sun protection strategies and reported changes to their skin cancer prevention strategies. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that college students are interested in and responsive to these types of multicomponent skin cancer preventive interventions. Further, students demonstrate some motivation and intentionality toward changing their skin cancer risk behaviour in the short term. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Participants involved in this study were members of the public (undergraduate students) who were involved in a skin cancer prevention intervention, then participated in semistructured interviews, which provided the data analysed for this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah L. Brady
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Jada G. Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral SciencesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA,Department of MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA,Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Jakob D. Jensen
- Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA,Department of DermatologyUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Bridget G. Parsons
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Helen M. Lillie
- Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Ali P. Wankier
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Heather J. Smith
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Douglas Grossman
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA,Department of DermatologyUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Jennifer L. Hay
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral SciencesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Yelena P. Wu
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA,Department of DermatologyUniversity of Utah Health Sciences CenterSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Communicating Personal Melanoma Polygenic Risk Information: Participants’ Experiences of Genetic Counseling in a Community-Based Study. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101581. [PMID: 36294720 PMCID: PMC9605561 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized polygenic risk information may be used to guide risk-based melanoma prevention and early detection at a population scale, but research on communicating this information is limited. This mixed-methods study aimed to assess the acceptability of a genetic counselor (GC) phone call in communicating polygenic risk information in the Melanoma Genomics Managing Your Risk randomized controlled trial. Participants (n = 509) received personalized melanoma polygenic risk information, an educational booklet on melanoma prevention, and a GC phone call, which was audio-recorded. Participants completed the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Survey 1-month after receiving their risk information (n = 346). A subgroup took part in a qualitative interview post-study completion (n = 20). Survey data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS, and thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted using NVivo 12.0 software. The survey showed a high level of acceptability for the GC phone call (mean satisfaction score overall: 4.3 out of 5, standard deviation (SD): 0.6) with differences according to gender (mean score for women: 4.4, SD: 0.6 vs. men: 4.2, SD: 0.7; p = 0.005), health literacy (lower literacy: 4.1, SD: 0.8; average: 4.3, SD: 0.6; higher: 4.4, SD: 0.6: p = 0.02) and polygenic risk group (low risk: 4.5, SD: 0.5, SD: average: 4.3, SD: 0.7, high: 4.3, SD: 0.7; p = 0.03). During the GC phone calls, the discussion predominately related to the impact of past sun exposure on personal melanoma risk. Together our findings point to the importance of further exploring educational and support needs and preferences for communicating personalized melanoma risk among population subgroups, including diverse literacy levels.
Collapse
|
5
|
Interest and Utility of MC1R Testing for Melanoma Risk in Dermatology Patients with a History of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. J Skin Cancer 2022; 2022:4046554. [PMID: 35959144 PMCID: PMC9357806 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4046554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Public access to genetic information is increasing, and community dermatologists may progressively encounter patients interested in genetic testing for melanoma risk. Clarifying potential utility will help plan for this inevitability. We determined interest and uptake of genetic risk feedback based on melanocortin receptor gene (MC1R) variants, immediate (two weeks) responses to risk feedback, and test utility at three months in patients (age ≥ 18, with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer). Participants (N = 50) completed a baseline survey and were invited to consider MC1R testing via the study website. Testing interest and uptake were assessed through registration of test decision, request of a saliva test kit, and kit return (all yes/no). Immediate responses to risk feedback included feedback-relevant thoughts, emotions, communication, and information seeking after result receipt; test utility outcomes included family and physician communication and information seeking. Results indicated good retention at both time points (76%; 74%). Half (48%) logged onto the study website, and of these, most (92%) chose testing and (95%) returned a saliva sample. After two weeks, most (94%) had read all the risk feedback information and distress was low (M = 8.81, 7–28, SD = 2.23). Many (69%) had talked with their family about the results. By three months, most had spoken with family (92%) and physicians (80%) about skin cancer risk. Physician communication was higher (70%) in those tested versus those not tested (40%, p = 0.02). The substantial interest and promising outcomes associated with MC1R genetic testing in dermatology patients inform intervention strategies to enhance benefits and minimize risks of skin cancer genetic testing.
Collapse
|
6
|
Allen CG, Turbitt E, Smit AK, Passero LE, Olstad DL, Hatch A, Landry L, Roberts MC. Precision Public Health Initiatives in Cancer: Proceedings from the Transdisciplinary Conference for Future Leaders in Precision Public Health. BMC Proc 2022; 16:4. [PMID: 35799197 PMCID: PMC9261247 DOI: 10.1186/s12919-022-00234-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision public health is an emergent field that requires transdisciplinary collaborations and leverages innovative approaches to improve population health. These opportunities have inspired a new generation of precision public health researchers. Despite burgeoning interest in precision public health, there are limited opportunities for researchers to convene and continue the momentum of this field. METHODS The Transdisciplinary Conference for Future Leaders in Precision Public Health was the among the first events to bring together international researchers and practitioners to learn, network, and agenda set for the future of the field. The conference took place virtually on October 14 and 15, 2021. RESULTS The conference spanned two days and featured a keynote address, speakers from public health disciplines who are international leaders in precision-based research, networking opportunities, a poster session, and research agenda setting activities. CONCLUSION The conference was a critical first step to creating a shared international conversation about precision public health, especially among early-stage investigators. This allowed attendees to continue building their individual skills and international collaborations to support the growth of the field of precision public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erin Turbitt
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amelia K Smit
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Ashley Hatch
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shen EC, Srinivasan S, Passero LE, Allen CG, Dixon M, Foss K, Halliburton B, Milko LV, Smit AK, Carlson R, Roberts MC. Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review. Front Genet 2022; 13:865384. [PMID: 35860476 PMCID: PMC9289280 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies suggest that 1-3% of the general population in the United States unknowingly carry a genetic risk factor for a common hereditary disease. Population genetic screening is the process of offering otherwise healthy patients in the general population testing for genomic variants that predispose them to diseases that are clinically actionable, meaning that they can be prevented or mitigated if they are detected early. Population genetic screening may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality from these diseases by informing risk-specific prevention or treatment strategies and facilitating appropriate participation in early detection. To better understand current barriers, facilitators, perceptions, and outcomes related to the implementation of population genetic screening, we conducted a systematic review and searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for articles published from date of database inception to May 2020. We included articles that 1) detailed the perspectives of participants in population genetic screening programs and 2) described the barriers, facilitators, perceptions, and outcomes related to population genetic screening programs among patients, healthcare providers, and the public. We excluded articles that 1) focused on direct-to-consumer or risk-based genetic testing and 2) were published before January 2000. Thirty articles met these criteria. Barriers and facilitators to population genetic screening were organized by the Social Ecological Model and further categorized by themes. We found that research in population genetic screening has focused on stakeholder attitudes with all included studies designed to elucidate individuals' perceptions. Additionally, inadequate knowledge and perceived limited clinical utility presented a barrier for healthcare provider uptake. There were very few studies that conducted long-term follow-up and evaluation of population genetic screening. Our findings suggest that these and other factors, such as prescreen counseling and education, may play a role in the adoption and implementation of population genetic screening. Future studies to investigate macro-level determinants, strategies to increase provider buy-in and knowledge, delivery models for prescreen counseling, and long-term outcomes of population genetic screening are needed for the effective design and implementation of such programs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020198198.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Shen
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.,UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Swetha Srinivasan
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Lauren E Passero
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Department of Public Health Science, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Madison Dixon
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Science, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kimberly Foss
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Brianna Halliburton
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Laura V Milko
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Amelia K Smit
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Carlson
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|