Integrative Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiling of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma for Characterization of Metabolites and Intact Lipid Species Related to the Metastatic Potential

In-depth analysis of immune cell landscapes reveals differences between lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths globally, with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) being major subtypes. Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of lung cancer, but understanding the underlying mechanisms of immune dysregulation is crucial for the development of effective therapies. This study aimed to investigate the distinctive cellular features of LUAD and LUSC and identify potential biomarkers associated with the pathogenesis and clinical outcomes of each subtype.

Methods

We used digital cytometry techniques to analyze the RNA-Seq data of 1128 lung cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The abundance of cell subtypes and ecotypes in LUAD and LUSC patients was quantified. Univariate survival analysis was used to investigate their associations with patient overall survival (OS). Differential gene expression analysis and gene co-expression network construction were carried out to explore the gene expression patterns of LUSC patients with distinct survival outcomes. Scratch wound-healing assay, colony formation assay, and transwell assay were used to validate the candidate drugs for LUSC treatment.

Results

We found differential expression of cell subtypes between LUAD and LUSC, with certain cell subtypes being prognostic for survival in both subtypes. We also identified differential gene expression and gene co-expression modules associated with macrophages.3/PCs.2 ratio in LUSC patients with distinct survival outcomes. Furthermore, ecotype ratios were found to be prognostic in both subtypes and machine learning models showed that certain cell subtypes, such as epithelial.cells.1, epithelial.cells.5, and endothelial.cells.2 are important for predicting LUSC. Ginkgolide B and triamterene can inhibit the proliferation, invasion, and migration of LUSC cell lines.

Conclusion

We provide insight into the distinctive cellular features of LUAD and LUSC, and identify potential biomarkers associated with the pathogenesis and clinical outcomes of each subtype. Ginkgolide B and triamterene could be promising drugs for LUSC treatment.

1H-NMR metabolomics analysis identifies hypoxanthine as a novel metastasis-associated metabolite in breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in females, mainly because of metastasis. Oncometabolites, produced via metabolic reprogramming, can influence metastatic signaling cascades. Accordingly, and based on our previous results, we propose that metabolites from highly metastatic breast cancer cells behave differently from less-metastatic cells and may play a significant role in metastasis. For instance, we aim to identify these metabolites and their role in breast cancer metastasis. Less metastatic cells (MCF-7) were treated with metabolites secreted from highly metastatic cells (MDA-MB-231) and the gene expression of three epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers including E-cadherin, N-cadherin and vimentin were examined. Some metabolites secreted from MDA-MB-231 cells significantly induced EMT activity. Specifically, hypoxanthine demonstrated a significant EMT effect and increased the migration and invasion effects of MCF-7 cells through a hypoxia-associated mechanism. Hypoxanthine exhibited pro-angiogenic effects via increasing the VEGF and PDGF gene expression and affected lipid metabolism by increasing the gene expression of PCSK-9. Notably, knockdown of purine nucleoside phosphorylase, a gene encoding for an important enzyme in the biosynthesis of hypoxanthine, and inhibition of hypoxanthine uptake caused a significant decrease in hypoxanthine-associated EMT effects. Collectively for the first time, hypoxanthine was identified as a novel metastasis-associated metabolite in breast cancer cells and represents a promising target for diagnosis and therapy.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer through urine metabolomic signatures: A large-scale validated study

PURPOSE

Currently, there are no accurate markers for predicting potentially lethal prostate cancer (PC) before biopsy. This study aimed to develop urine tests to predict clinically significant PC (sPC) in men at risk.

METHODS

Urine samples from 928 men, namely, 660 PC patients and 268 benign subjects, were analyzed by gas chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrophotometry (GC/Q-TOF MS) metabolomic profiling to construct four predictive models. Model I discriminated between PC and benign cases. Models II, III, and GS, respectively, predicted sPC in those classified as having favorable intermediate risk or higher, unfavorable intermediate risk or higher (according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groupings), and a Gleason sum (GS) of ≥ 7. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

RESULTS

In Models I, II, III, and GS, the best AUCs (0.94, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively; training cohort, N = 603) involved 26, 24, 26, and 22 metabolites, respectively. The addition of five clinical risk factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, patient age, previous negative biopsy, digital rectal examination, and family history) significantly improved the AUCs of the models (0.95, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.87, respectively). At 90% sensitivity, 48%, 47%, 50%, and 36% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. These models were successfully validated against an independent validation cohort (N = 325). Decision curve analysis showed a significant clinical net benefit with each combined model at low threshold probabilities. Models II and III were more robust and clinically relevant than Model GS.

CONCLUSION

This urine test, which combines urine metabolic markers and clinical factors, may be used to predict sPC and thereby inform the necessity of biopsy in men with an elevated PC risk.

Inosine: A bioactive metabolite with multimodal actions in human diseases

The nucleoside inosine is an essential metabolite for purine biosynthesis and degradation; it also acts as a bioactive molecule that regulates RNA editing, metabolic enzyme activity, and signaling pathways. As a result, inosine is emerging as a highly versatile bioactive compound and second messenger of signal transduction in cells with diverse functional abilities in different pathological states. Gut microbiota remodeling is closely associated with human disease pathogenesis and responses to dietary and medical supplementation. Recent studies have revealed a critical link between inosine and gut microbiota impacting anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial responses in a context-dependent manner. In this review, we summarize the latest progress in our understanding of the mechanistic function of inosine, to unravel its immunomodulatory actions in pathological settings such as cancer, infection, inflammation, and cardiovascular and neurological diseases. We also highlight the role of gut microbiota in connection with inosine metabolism in different pathophysiological conditions. A more thorough understanding of the mechanistic roles of inosine and how it regulates disease pathologies will pave the way for future development of therapeutic and preventive modalities for various human diseases.