Determinants of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Pancreatic Cancer

Comparative sequencing study of mismatch repair and homology-directed repair genes in endometrial cancer and breast cancer patients from Kazakhstan

Endometrial cancer has been associated with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, especially in the context of the hereditary Lynch Syndrome. More recently, pathogenic variants in genes of homology-directed repair (HDR) have also been suggested to contribute to a subset of endometrial cancers. In the present hospital-based study, we investigated the relative distribution of pathogenic MMR or HDR gene variants in a series of 342 endometrial cancer patients from the Oncology Clinic in Almaty, Kazakhstan. In comparison, we also sequenced 178 breast cancer patients from the same population with the same gene panel. Identified variants were classified according to ClinVar, ESM1b, and AlphaMissense prediction tools. We found 10 endometrial cancer patients (2.9%) carrying pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in MMR genes (7 MSH6, 1 MSH2, 2 MUTYH), while 14 endometrial cancer patients (4.1%) carried pathogenic variants in HDR genes (4 BRCA2, 3 BRCA1, 3 FANCM, 2 SLX4, 1 BARD1, 1 BRIP1). In the breast cancer series, we found 8 carriers (4.5%) of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in MMR genes (2 MSH2, 2 MSH6, 4 MUTYH) while 12 patients (6.7%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic HDR gene variants (5 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 BRIP1, 1 ERRC4, 1 FANCM, 1 SLX4). One patient who developed breast cancer first and endometrial cancer later carried a novel frameshift variant in MSH6. Our results indicate that MMR and HDR gene variants with predicted pathogenicity occur at substantial frequencies in both breast and endometrial cancer patients from the Kazakh population.

Pancreatic Cancer: BRCA Targeted Therapy and Beyond

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the US by 2030, despite accounting for only 5% of all cancer diagnoses. Germline gBRCA1/2-mutated PDAC represents a key subgroup with a favorable prognosis, due at least in part to additional approved and guideline-endorsed therapeutic options compared with an unselected PDAC cohort. The relatively recent incorporation of PARP inhibition into the treatment paradigm for such patients has resulted in renewed optimism for a biomarker-based approach to the management of this disease. However, gBRCA1/2 represents a small subgroup of patients with PDAC, and efforts to extend the indication for PARPi beyond BRCA1/2 mutations to patients with PDAC and other genomic alterations associated with deficient DNA damage repair (DDR) are ongoing, with several clinical trials underway. In addition, despite an array of approved therapeutic options for patients with BRCA1/2-associated PDAC, both primary and acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapies and PARPi presents a significant challenge in improving long-term outcomes. Herein, we review the current treatment landscape of PDAC for patients with BRCA1/2 and other DDR gene mutations, experimental approaches under investigation or in development, and future directions.

The Landscape and Therapeutic Targeting of BRCA1, BRCA2 and Other DNA Damage Response Genes in Pancreatic Cancer

Genes participating in the cellular response to damaged DNA have an important function to protect genetic information from alterations due to extrinsic and intrinsic cellular insults. In cancer cells, alterations in these genes are a source of genetic instability, which is advantageous for cancer progression by providing background for adaptation to adverse environments and attack by the immune system. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been known for decades to predispose to familial breast and ovarian cancers, and, more recently, prostate and pancreatic cancers have been added to the constellation of cancers that show increased prevalence in these families. Cancers associated with these genetic syndromes are currently treated with PARP inhibitors based on the exquisite sensitivity of cells lacking BRCA1 or BRCA2 function to inhibition of the PARP enzyme. In contrast, the sensitivity of pancreatic cancers with somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and with mutations in other homologous recombination (HR) repair genes to PARP inhibitors is less established and the subject of ongoing investigations. This paper reviews the prevalence of pancreatic cancers with HR gene defects and treatment of pancreatic cancer patients with defects in HR with PARP inhibitors and other drugs in development that target these molecular defects.

Genetics, Genomics and Emerging Molecular Therapies of Pancreatic Cancer

The number of cases of pancreatic cancers in 2019 in Poland was 3852 (approx. 2% of all cancers). The course of the disease is very fast, and the average survival time from the diagnosis is 6 months. Only <2% of patients live for 5 years from the diagnosis, 8% live for 2 years, and almost half live for only about 3 months. A family predisposition to pancreatic cancer occurs in about 10% of cases. Several oncogenes in which somatic changes lead to the development of tumours, including genes BRCA1/2 and PALB2, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, MLL3, TGFBR2, ARID1A and SF3B1, are involved in pancreatic cancer. Between 4% and 10% of individuals with pancreatic cancer will have a mutation in one of these genes. Six percent of patients with pancreatic cancer have NTRK pathogenic fusion. The pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer can in many cases be characterised by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-cell inability to effectively repair DNA. It is estimated that from 24% to as many as 44% of pancreatic cancers show HRD. The most common cause of HRD are inactivating mutations in the genes regulating this DNA repair system, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, but also PALB2, RAD51C and several dozen others.

Next-generation sequencing of homologous recombination genes could predict efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

With the widespread use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical practice, an increasing number of biomarkers that predict a response to anti-tumor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been identified. However, validated biomarkers that can be used to detect a response to platinum-based chemotherapy remain unavailable. Several studies have suggested that homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) may occur in response to platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and breast cancer. However, currently there is a lack of proven and reliable HRD markers that can be used to screen for patients who may benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy, especially in NSCLC.

Methods

NGS was used to screen for gene mutations, including homologous recombination (HR) genes and common driver gene mutations in NSCLC. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify potential clinicopathological or gene mutation factors associated with survival in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, while Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test was performed to assess the effect of HR gene mutations on progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In a retrospective cohort of 129 patients with advanced NSCLC, 54 who received platinum-based chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenic therapy were included in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses showed that HR gene mutations were associated with platinum-based chemotherapy sensitivity. Efficacy results indicated that the objective response rates (ORR) for patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1/2 wild type were 75% and 30.4% (p=0.041), while the median PFS was 7.5 and 5.5 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-1.00; p=0.084), respectively. The ORRs of patients with HR gene mutations and HR gene wild type were 60% and 23.6% (p=0.01), and the median PFS was 7.5 and 5.2 months (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.97; p=0.033), respectively.

Conclusions

HR gene mutations show potential as promising biomarkers that may predict sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic NSCLC.

PARPis and Other Novel, Targeted Therapeutics in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with a mere ∼10% of patients in the United States surviving 5 years from the time of diagnosis. Until recently, the treatment for advanced PDAC differed little based on patient or tumor characteristics. However, recent breakthroughs have identified subgroups of patients who benefit from novel, biomarker-driven therapies. We review the data and role for PARP inhibitors and for other biomarker-directed therapies, including for patients with NTRK fusions, NRG1 fusions, mismatch repair deficiency, and KRAS p.G12C mutations.

The Homologous Recombination Deficiency Scar in Advanced Cancer: Agnostic Targeting of Damaged DNA Repair

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most recognized tumor-suppressor genes involved in double-strand DNA break repair through the homologous recombination (HR) system. Widely known for its role in hereditary cancer, HR deficiency (HRD) has turned out to be critical beyond breast and ovarian cancer: for prostate and pancreatic cancer also. The relevance for the identification of these patients exceeds diagnostic purposes, since results published from clinical trials with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) have shown how this type of targeted therapy can modify the long-term evolution of patients with HRD. Somatic aberrations in other HRD pathway genes, but also indirect genomic instability as a sign of this DNA repair impairment (known as HRD scar), have been reported to be relevant events that lead to more frequently than expected HR loss of function in several tumor types, and should therefore be included in the current diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. However, the optimal strategy to identify HRD and potential PARPi responders in cancer remains undefined. In this review, we summarize the role and prevalence of HRD across tumor types and the current treatment landscape to guide the agnostic targeting of damaged DNA repair. We also discuss the challenge of testing patients and provide a special insight for new strategies to select patients who benefit from PARPi due to HRD scarring.

The Next Frontier in Pancreatic Cancer: Targeting the Tumor Immune Milieu and Molecular Pathways

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with abysmal prognosis. It is currently the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality, despite being the 11th most common cancer. Chemotherapy is standard of care in all stages of pancreatic cancer, yet survival, particularly in the advanced stages, often remains under one year. We are turning to immunotherapies and targeted therapies in PDAC in order to directly attack the core features that make PDAC notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While the initial studies of these agents in PDAC have generally been disappointing, we find optimism in recent preclinical and early clinical research. We find that despite the immunosuppressive effects of the PDAC tumor microenvironment, new strategies, such as combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with vaccine therapy or chemokine receptor antagonists, help elicit strong immune responses. We also expand on principles of DNA homologous recombination repair and highlight opportunities to use agents, such as PARP inhibitors, that exploit deficiencies in DNA repair pathways. Lastly, we describe advances in direct targeting of driver mutations and metabolic pathways and highlight some technological achievements such as novel KRAS inhibitors.

Platinum-based chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: impact of mutations in the homologous recombination repair and Fanconi anemia genes

Background

Mutations in homologous recombination (HR) and Fanconi anemia (FA) genes may predispose to pancreatic cancer (PC) and enable the prediction of sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. FOLFIRINOX is a standard treatment option for non-selected PC patients and could be effective due to undiagnosed DNA repair deficiency. Here, we aimed to determine the frequency of mutations in genes involved in the HR and FA pathways, evaluate their clinical implications, and determine the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of PC patients treated with platinum.

Methods

We performed targeted DNA sequencing of 30 genes (ABRAXAS1, ATM, ATR, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDKN2A, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCC, FANCF, FANCG, FANCI, FANCL, FANCM, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, PTEN, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD52, RAD54B, RBBP8, RINT1, SLX4, and XRCC2) for 543 PC patients.

Results

In BRCA/PALB2-mutated patients with advanced PC (33 patients, 6.1%), the PFS and OS were higher for first-line platinum therapy than for non-platinum therapy [PFS: HR = 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.10-0.81, p = 0.02; OS: HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.08-1.16, p = 0.08]. Among 93 patients (17.1%) with mutations in other HR/FA genes, no statistically significant difference in PFS and OS was observed between first-line platinum therapy and non-platinum therapy (PFS: HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.43-1.62, p = 0.59; OS: HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.28-1.22, p = 0.15). For patients with early PC, no prognostic value was observed for BRCA1/2, PALB2, or other HR/FA genes mutations. Moreover, a personal history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer was identified as the only independent predictor of the risk of BRCA/PALB2 mutations (HR = 5.83, 95% CI = 2.16-15.73, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Mutations in the BRCA1/2 and PALB2 genes increase the sensitivity of PC to platinum agents. Thus, alterations in these genes in PC patients must be determined prior to anticancer therapy.