Activation of Vitamin D Receptor Pathway Enhances Differentiating Capacity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations

Loss of the vitamin D receptor triggers senescence in chronic myeloid leukemia via DDIT4-mediated DNA damage

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematopoietic malignancy driven by the fusion gene BCR::ABL1. Drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), due to BCR::ABL1 mutations and residual leukemia stem cells (LSCs), remains a major challenge in CML treatment. Here, we revealed the requirement of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) in the progression of CML. VDR was upregulated by BCR::ABL1 and highly expressed in CML cells. Interestingly, VDR knockdown inhibited the proliferation of CML cells driven by both BCR::ABL1 and TKI-resistant BCR::ABL1 mutations. Mechanistically, VDR transcriptionally regulated DDIT4 expression; reduced DDIT4 levels upon VDR knockdown triggered DNA damage and senescence via p53 signaling activation in CML cells. Furthermore, VDR deficiency not only suppressed tumor burden and progression in primary CML mice but also reduced the self-renewal capacity of CML-LSCs. Together, our study demonstrated that targeting VDR is a promising strategy to overcome TKI resistance and eradicate LSCs in CML.

Vitamin C and D supplementation in acute myeloid leukemia

Recent studies have highlighted the role of vitamin C and D in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In 2018, we changed our practices to add both vitamins to the supportive care for all consecutive patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients treated before and after this change in practice. From 2015 to 2020, 431 patients were included, 262 of whom received no supplementation and 169 of whom received vitamin supplementation. Vitamin C and vitamin D was administered from day 10 of chemotherapy until hematologic recovery from induction and consolidation. Most patients presented at diagnosis with low levels of vitamin C and D. Upon recovery from induction, vitamin D levels among the vitamin C/D group significantly increased compared with those at diagnosis, and pretransplant levels were significantly higher in the vitamin C/D group compared with the control group (median of 33 vs 19 ng/mL; P < .0001). During induction, the rates of bacterial or fungal infection, hemorrhage, or macrophage activation syndrome were lower in the vitamin C/D group, whereas there was no difference in response rate, relapse incidence, and overall survival (OS). However, the multivariate analysis for OS showed a significant interaction between vitamin C/D and NPM1 mutation, meaning that vitamin C/D supplementation was significantly and independently associated with better OS in patients with NPM1 mutations (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.90; P = .019) compared with patients with wild-type NPM1 (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.68-1.51; P = .95). In conclusion, vitamin C/D supplementation is safe and could influence the outcomes of patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.

Overexpressed fibroblast growth factor receptors increase 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-dependent differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells

Many malignancies are driven by mutations within the gene for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1). Previously, we have shown that signal transduction from the FOP2-FGFR1 fusion protein in acute myeloid leukemia KG1 cells is responsible for a low level of expression of the vitamin D receptor gene. In this paper, we address whether other fibroblast growth factor receptors regulate the vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene. We used the human myeloid leukemia U937 and HL60 cells, the bone cancer cell line U2OS, and cell transfection methods to answer the question. For myeloid leukemia cells, overexpression of FGFRs 1-3 genes caused a shift towards monocytic differentiation; this was extracellular regulated kinase (Erk) 1,2-dependent. Overexpression of FGFRs 1-3 genes also upregulated expression of the VDR gene, further sensitizing these cells to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-induced monocyte differentiation. When we increased expression in bone cells, fibroblast growth factor receptors did not upregulate VDR gene expression, nor influence the activity of VDR. Fibroblast growth factor receptors are overexpressed in many neoplasms. Therefore, it may be reasonable to use vitamin D analogs to treat these cancers, to activate VDR and drive cell differentiation.

Vitamin D Derivatives in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Matter of Selecting the Right Targets

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive and often fatal hematopoietic malignancy. A very attractive way to treat myeloid leukemia, called “differentiation therapy”, was proposed when in vitro studies showed that some compounds are capable of inducing differentiation of AML cell lines. One of the differentiation-inducing agents, all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), which can induce granulocytic differentiation in AML cell lines, has been introduced into clinics to treat patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) in which a PML-RARA fusion protein is generated by a chromosomal translocation. ATRA has greatly improved the treatment of APL. Since 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25D) is capable of inducing monocytic differentiation of leukemic cells, the idea of treating other AMLs with vitamin D analogs was widely accepted. However, early clinical trials in which cancer patients were treated either with 1,25D or with analogs did not lead to conclusive results. Recent results have shown that AML types with certain mutations, such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations, may be the right targets for differentiation therapy using 1,25D, due to upregulation of vitamin D receptor (VDR) pathway.

Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The Future of Immunotherapy and Natural Products

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an essential role in the development, proliferation, and survival of leukemic blasts in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Within the bone marrow and peripheral blood, various phenotypically and functionally altered cells in the TME provide critical signals to suppress the anti-tumor immune response, allowing tumor cells to evade elimination. Thus, unraveling the complex interplay between AML and its microenvironment may have important clinical implications and are essential to directing the development of novel targeted therapies. This review summarizes recent advancements in our understanding of the AML TME and its ramifications on current immunotherapeutic strategies. We further review the role of natural products in modulating the TME to enhance response to immunotherapy.

Vitamin D and Cancer: An Historical Overview of the Epidemiology and Mechanisms

This is a narrative review of the evidence supporting vitamin D’s anticancer actions. The first section reviews the findings from ecological studies of cancer with respect to indices of solar radiation, which found a reduced risk of incidence and mortality for approximately 23 types of cancer. Meta-analyses of observational studies reported the inverse correlations of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] with the incidence of 12 types of cancer. Case-control studies with a 25(OH)D concentration measured near the time of cancer diagnosis are stronger than nested case-control and cohort studies as long follow-up times reduce the correlations due to changes in 25(OH)D with time. There is no evidence that undiagnosed cancer reduces 25(OH)D concentrations unless the cancer is at a very advanced stage. Meta-analyses of cancer incidence with respect to dietary intake have had limited success due to the low amount of vitamin D in most diets. An analysis of 25(OH)D-cancer incidence rates suggests that achieving 80 ng/mL vs. 10 ng/mL would reduce cancer incidence rates by 70 ± 10%. Clinical trials have provided limited support for the UVB-vitamin D-cancer hypothesis due to poor design and execution. In recent decades, many experimental studies in cultured cells and animal models have described a wide range of anticancer effects of vitamin D compounds. This paper will review studies showing the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, dedifferentiation, and invasion together with the sensitization to proapoptotic agents. Moreover, 1,25-(OH)₂D₃ and other vitamin D receptor agonists modulate the biology of several types of stromal cells such as fibroblasts, endothelial and immune cells in a way that interferes the apparition of metastases. In sum, the available mechanistic data support the global protective action of vitamin D against several important types of cancer.