Assessment of Radiation-Induced Optic Neuropathy in a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma Patients Treated with Proton Therapy

Proton Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Head and neck (HnN) cancers are among the most common cancers in the world. Proton therapy (PT) is one of the latest advancements in the treatment modalities of cancers. Proton therapy is specifically used to treat HnN cancer patients due to its less toxic effects on the surrounding critical structures. Keeping in view the opportunities for further advancements, there is a lot of literature covering PT in HnN cancer patients. However, few compiled studies are not enough to compare the toxicities, overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and quality of life (QoL) of PT with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The objective of this review is to compile and summarize the literature available on the toxicities, OS, LC, and QoL in HnN cancer patients post PT. We have gathered and summarized the literature found under the keyword "proton therapy for head and neck cancers". Proton therapy is a preferable option over IMRT because it isolates tumors of the HnN, reduces exposure of healthy cells to radiation, and allows accurate tumor scanning using the pencil beam technique. In view of this article, we can say that PT is a preferable mode of radiotherapy for HnN cancer patients in view of its accuracy and lower incidents of acute and late toxicities.

Possible association of dose rate and the development of late visual toxicity for patients with intracranial tumours treated with pencil beam scanned proton therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Rare but severe toxicities of the optic apparatus have been observed after treatment of intracranial tumours with proton therapy. Some adverse events have occurred at unusually low dose levels and are thus difficult to understand considering dose metrics only. When transitioning from double scattering to pencil beam scanning, little consideration was given to increased dose rates observed with the latter delivery paradigm. We explored if dose rate related metrics could provide additional predicting factors for the development of late visual toxicities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radiation-induced intracranial visual pathway lesions were delineated on MRI for all index cases. Voxel-wise maximum dose rate (MDR) was calculated for 2 patients with observed optic nerve toxicities (CTCAE grade 3 and 4), and 6 similar control cases. Additionally, linear energy transfer (LET) related dose enhancing metrics were investigated.

RESULTS

For the index cases, which developed toxicities at low dose levels (mean, 50 GyRBE), some dose was delivered at higher instantaneous dose rates. While optic structures of non-toxicity cases were exposed to dose rates of up to 1 to 3.2 GyRBE/s, the pre-chiasmatic optic nerves of the 2 toxicity cases were exposed to dose rates above 3.7 GyRBE/s. LET-related metrics were not substantially different between the index and non-toxicity cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations reveal large variations in instantaneous dose rates experienced by different volumes within our patient cohort, even when considering the same indications and beam arrangement. High dose rate regions are spatially overlapping with the radiation induced toxicity areas in the follow up images. At this point, it is not feasible to establish causality between exposure to high dose rates and the development of late optic apparatus toxicities due to the low incidence of injury.

A Rare Case of Unilateral Auditory Neuropathy Induced by Proton Therapy

Hearing loss (HL) is one of the most common complications of the treatment in head and neck oncology. Most cases of HL are due to the ototoxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) - resulting usually in a symmetric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) - or radiotherapy. Radiation-induced SNHL is progressive, permanent, and dose-dependent. Total dose and follow-up time are important factors affecting incidence rates. However, the hearing consequences of proton radiation therapy (PRT), a radiation-type therapy especially used in pediatric malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS), remains unclear and poorly documented. We report here a case of a four-year-old patient with unilateral auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) related to PRT. This case highlights the need for appropriate auditory monitoring in patients undergoing PRT for CNS or head and neck malignancies.

Long Term Outcome and Quality of Life of Intracranial Meningioma Patients Treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome, including QoL, of patients with intracranial meningiomas WHO grade 1-3 who were treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy (PBS PT) between 1997 and 2022. Two hundred patients (median age 50.4 years, 70% WHO grade 1) were analyzed. Acute and late side effects were classified according to CTCAE version 5.0. Time to event data were calculated. QoL was assessed descriptively by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and BN20 questionnaires. With a median follow-up of 65 months (range: 3.8-260.8 months) the 5 year OS was 95.7% and 81.8% for WHO grade 1 and grade 2/3, respectively (p < 0.001). Twenty (10%) local failures were observed. Failures occurred significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent in WHO grade 2 or 3 meningioma (WHO grade 1: n = 7, WHO grade 2/3: n = 13), in patients with multiple meningiomas (p = 0.005), in male patients (p = 0.005), and when PT was initiated not as upfront therapy (p = 0.011). There were no high-grade toxicities in the majority (n = 176; 88%) of patients. QoL was assessed for 83 (41.5%) patients and for those patients PT did not impacted QoL negatively during the follow-up. In summary, we observed very few local recurrences of meningiomas after PBS PT, a stable QoL, and a low rate of high-grade toxicity.

Analysis of Early Outcomes of Pencil Beam Proton Therapy Compared with Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Clival Chordoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the early outcomes of the following 2 types of proton therapy: passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and pencil beam proton therapy (PBPT).

METHODS

The consecutive patients who had surgery in our facility were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were identified (PBPT 22 patients [69%]). The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) tumor size was 3.8 ± 1.8 cm, and the most common location was the upper clivus (41%). Four cases (13%) were revision surgeries referred from elsewhere, and 2 cases underwent additional surgery elsewhere to achieve near-total resection before radiation. The cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in 3 patients (9%). The mean (±SD) prescribed dose of PSPT and PBPT was 74 ± 3 Gy and 72 ± 3 Gy, respectively (P = 0.07). The mean (±SD) fractionation of PSPT and PBPT was 39 ± 2 and 36 ± 2, respectively (P = 0.001). Radiation toxicities were recorded in endocrine (11 patients [34%]), ophthalmic (3 patients [9%]), otologic (7 patients [22%]), and radiation necrosis (4 patients [13%]). PSPT was associated with endocrinopathy (odds ratio [OR], 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-59.4, P = 0.008), and radiation dose was associated with otologic toxicity (OR 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.44; P = 0.04). The gross-near total resection group had better progression-free survival than the subtotal resection group regardless of radiation therapy (P = 0.01). Overall, 3-year progression-free survival was 73%, and 5-year overall survival was 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBPT group showed comparable outcome to the PSPT group. The degree of resection was more important than the modality of proton therapy. Further follow-up and cases are necessary to evaluate the benefit of PBPT.

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy: a review

Radiation is a commonly used treatment modality for head and neck as well as CNS tumours, both benign and malignant. As newer oncology treatments such as immunotherapies allow for longer survival, complications from radiation therapy are becoming more common. Radiation-induced optic neuropathy is a feared complication due to rapid onset and potential for severe and bilateral vision loss. Careful monitoring of high-risk patients and early recognition are crucial for initiating treatment to prevent severe vision loss due to a narrow therapeutic window. This review discusses presentation, aetiology, recent advances in diagnosis using innovative MRI techniques and best practice treatment options based on the most recent evidence-based medicine.