1
|
Nicosia L, Mariano L, Pellegrino G, Ferrari F, Pesapane F, Bozzini AC, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Pupo D, Mazzarol G, De Camilli E, Sangalli C, Venturini M, Pizzamiglio M, Cassano E. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Lobular In Situ Neoplasm: High-Risk Lesions Challenging Breast Cancer Prevention. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:837. [PMID: 38398228 PMCID: PMC10886664 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study investigates the histopathological outcomes, upgrade rates, and disease-free survival (DFS) of high-risk breast lesions, including atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH or DIN1b) and lobular in situ neoplasms (LIN), following Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy (VABB) and surgical excision. The study addresses the challenge posed by these lesions due to their association with synchronous or adjacent Breast Cancer (BC) and increased future BC risk. The research, comprising 320 patients who underwent stereotactic VABB, focuses on 246 individuals with a diagnosis of ADH (120) or LIN (126) observed at follow-up. Pathological assessments, categorized by the UK B-coding system, were conducted, and biopsy samples were compared with corresponding excision specimens to determine upgrade rates for in situ or invasive carcinoma. Surgical excision was consistently performed for diagnosed ADH or LIN. Finally, patient follow-ups were assessed and compared between LIN and ADH groups to identify recurrence signs, defined as histologically confirmed breast lesions on either the same or opposite side. The results reveal that 176 (71.5%) patients showed no upgrade post-surgery, with ADH exhibiting a higher upgrade rate to in situ pathology than LIN1 (Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia, ALH)/LIN2 (Low-Grade Lobular in situ Carcinoma, LCIS) (38% vs. 20%, respectively, p-value = 0.002). Considering only patients without upgrade, DFS at 10 years was 77%, 64%, and 72% for ADH, LIN1, and LIN2 patients, respectively (p-value = 0.92). The study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, recognizing the evolving role of VABB. It emphasizes the need for careful follow-up, particularly for lobular lesions, offering valuable insights for clinicians navigating the complex landscape of high-risk breast lesions. The findings advocate for heightened awareness and vigilance in managing these lesions, contributing to the ongoing refinement of clinical strategies in BC care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Luciano Mariano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduate School of Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federica Ferrari
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (S.F.); (V.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (S.F.); (V.B.)
| | - Davide Pupo
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Giovanni Mazzarol
- Division of Pathology, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (E.D.C.)
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Division of Pathology, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.M.); (E.D.C.)
| | - Claudia Sangalli
- Data Management, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit, ASST Settelaghi, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy;
| | - Maria Pizzamiglio
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, (IEO) European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (F.F.); (F.P.); (A.C.B.); (D.P.); (M.P.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bellini C, Nori Cucchiari J, Di Naro F, De Benedetto D, Bicchierai G, Franconeri A, Renda I, Bianchi S, Susini T. Breast Lesions of Uncertain Malignant Potential (B3) and the Risk of Breast Cancer Development: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3521. [PMID: 37444630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) are frequently diagnosed in the era of breast cancer (BC) screening and their management is controversial. They are generally removed surgically, but some international organizations and guidelines for breast research suggest follow-up care alone or, more recently, propose vacuum-assisted excision (VAE). The risk of upgrade to BC is known, but very little data exist on its role as risk factor for future BC development. We analyzed 966 B3 lesions diagnosed at our institution, 731 of which had long-term follow-up available. Surgical removal was performed in 91%, VAE in 3.8%, and follow-up in 5.2% of cases. The B3 lesions included flat epithelial atypia (FEA), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular intraepithelial neoplasia (LIN), atypical papillary lesions (PLs), radial scars (RSs), and others. Overall, immediate upgrade to BC (invasive or in situ) was 22.7%. After long-term follow-up, 9.2% of the patients were diagnosed with BC in the same or contralateral breast. The highest risk was associated with ADH diagnosis, with 39.8% of patients upgraded and 13.6% with a future BC diagnosis (p < 0.0001). These data support the idea that B3 lesions should be removed and provide evidence to suggest annual screening mammography for women after a B3 diagnosis because their BC risk is considerably increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Bellini
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nori Cucchiari
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Federica Di Naro
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Diego De Benedetto
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Bicchierai
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Franconeri
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Irene Renda
- Breast Unit, Gynecology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Pathology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Tommaso Susini
- Breast Unit, Gynecology Section, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elfgen C, Leo C, Kubik-Huch RA, Muenst S, Schmidt N, Quinn C, McNally S, van Diest PJ, Mann RM, Bago-Horvath Z, Bernathova M, Regitnig P, Fuchsjäger M, Schwegler-Guggemos D, Maranta M, Zehbe S, Tausch C, Güth U, Fallenberg EM, Schrading S, Kothari A, Sonnenschein M, Kampmann G, Kulka J, Tille JC, Körner M, Decker T, Lax SF, Daniaux M, Bjelic-Radisic V, Kacerovsky-Strobl S, Condorelli R, Gnant M, Varga Z. Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Virchows Arch 2023:10.1007/s00428-023-03566-x. [PMID: 37330436 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-023-03566-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The heterogeneous group of B3 lesions in the breast harbors lesions with different malignant potential and progression risk. As several studies about B3 lesions have been published since the last Consensus in 2018, the 3rd International Consensus Conference discussed the six most relevant B3 lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial atypia (FEA), classical lobular neoplasia (LN), radial scar (RS), papillary lesions (PL) without atypia, and phyllodes tumors (PT)) and made recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Following a presentation of current data of each B3 lesion, the international and interdisciplinary panel of 33 specialists and key opinion leaders voted on the recommendations for further management after core-needle biopsy (CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). In case of B3 lesion diagnosis on CNB, OE was recommended in ADH and PT, whereas in the other B3 lesions, vacuum-assisted excision was considered an equivalent alternative to OE. In ADH, most panelists (76%) recommended an open excision (OE) after diagnosis on VAB, whereas observation after a complete VAB-removal on imaging was accepted by 34%. In LN, the majority of the panel (90%) preferred observation following complete VAB-removal. Results were similar in RS (82%), PL (100%), and FEA (100%). In benign PT, a slim majority (55%) also recommended an observation after a complete VAB-removal. VAB with subsequent active surveillance can replace an open surgical intervention for most B3 lesions (RS, FEA, PL, PT, and LN). Compared to previous recommendations, there is an increasing trend to a de-escalating strategy in classical LN. Due to the higher risk of upgrade into malignancy, OE remains the preferred approach after the diagnosis of ADH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constanze Elfgen
- Breast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Leo
- Breast Center, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Muenst
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Noemi Schmidt
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Cecily Quinn
- Irish National Breast Screening Program & Department of Histopathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital Dublin and School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sorcha McNally
- Radiology Department, St. Vincent University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria Bernathova
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Michael Fuchsjäger
- Division of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Martina Maranta
- Department of Gynecology, County Hospital Chur, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Zehbe
- Radiology Section, Breast Center Stephanshorn, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Uwe Güth
- Breast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Schrading
- Department of Radiology, County Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Ashutosh Kothari
- Breast Surgery Unit, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Gert Kampmann
- Centro di Radiologia e Senologia Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Janina Kulka
- Department of Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Thomas Decker
- Breast Pathology, Reference Centers Mammography Münster, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Sigurd F Lax
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Graz II, Graz, and School of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Martin Daniaux
- BrustGesundheitZentrum Tirol, University Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- University of Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
- Breast Unit, Helios University Hospital, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Varga Z, Sinn P, Lebeau A. [B3 lesions of the breast: histological, clinical, and epidemiological aspects : Update]. PATHOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 44:5-16. [PMID: 36635403 PMCID: PMC9877091 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
B3 lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous group of lesions with uncertain malignant potential encompassing a broad spectrum of histologically distinct alterations that often pose challenging decisions if diagnosed on the preoperative core or vacuum biopsies. B3 lesions are mostly detected due to mammographic calcifications or mass lesions and, in most cases, encompass a spectrum of atypical lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, classic lobular neoplasia, flat epithelial atypia, papillomas, fibroepithelial tumors, and rarely other lesions such as mucocele-like lesions, atypical apocrine lesions, and rare stromal proliferations. The use of immunohistochemical stains (estrogen receptors, basal cytokeratin, myoepithelial markers, and stromal marker panel) is useful in the differentiation of these lesions and allowing proper classification. Regarding clinical management of B3 lesions, the radiological-pathological correlation of the given entity plays the most important key element for the proper next diagnostic and therapeutic step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Schmelzbergstr. 12, 8091 Zürich, Schweiz
| | - Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland ,Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Lübeck, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|