Droplet Digital PCR for BCR-ABL1 Monitoring in Diagnostic Routine: Ready to Start?

Comparative analysis of BCR::ABL1 p210 mRNA transcript quantification and ratio to ABL1 control gene converted to the International Scale by chip digital PCR and droplet digital PCR for monitoring patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome, leading to the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene and hyper-proliferation of granulocytes. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is crucial. Digital PCR platforms offer increased precision compared to quantitative PCR but lack comparative studies.

METHODS

Eighty CML patient samples were analyzed in parallel using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) (QXDx™ BCR-ABL %IS Kit) and chip digital PCR (cdPCR) (Dr. PCR™ BCR-ABL1 Major IS Detection Kit).

RESULTS

Overall, qualitative and quantitative agreement was good. Sensitivity analysis showed positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement were both ≥90 %, and the quadratic weighted kappa index for molecular response (MR) level categorization was 0.94 (95 %CI 0.89, 0.98). MR levels subgroup analysis showed perfect categorical agreement on MR level at MR3 or above, while 35.4 % (17/48) of patient samples with MR4 or below showed discordant categorizations. Overall, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for the ratio of %BCR::ABL1/ABL1 converted to the International Scale (BCR::ABL1 IS) was almost perfect quantitative agreement (Lin's CCC=0.99). By subgroups of MR levels, Lin's CCC showed a quantitative agreement of BCR::ABL1 IS decreased as MR deepened.

CONCLUSIONS

Both cdPCR and ddPCR demonstrated comparable performance in detecting BCR::ABL1 transcripts with high concordance in MR3 level or above. Choosing between platforms may depend on cost, workflow, and sensitivity requirements.

Increased expression of keratin 17 in oral lichen planus and its correlation with disease severity

Background/purpose

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease with unknown mechanisms of pathogenesis. Keratin 17 (KRT17) is a protein that regulates numerous cellular processes. This study aimed to explore the expression of KRT17 in OLP and its correlation with the severity of OLP.

Materials and methods

RNA sequencing using epithelium from 5 OLP patients and 5 health control (HC) was performed, followed by functional analysis. The validation cohort of 20 OLP and 20 HC tissues were used to investigate positive area value of KRT17 by immunohistochemical analysis. Reticular, erosive and ulcerative (REU) scores were used for measuring the severity of OLP.

Results

A total of 15493 genes were detected, of which 1492 genes were significantly up-regulated in OLP and 622 were down-regulated. The mRNA expression of KRT17 was elevated by 13.09-fold in OLP compared to that in HC. Pathway analysis demonstrated high KRT17 expression was associated with multiple biological processes. The median of percentage of KRT17 positive area value was 19.30 % in OLP and 0.01 % in HC (P < 0.001). Percentage of KRT17 positive area value was higher in erosive OLP patients (27.25 %) compared to that in non-erosive patients (15.02 %, P = 0.006). REU scores were positively correlated with percentage of KRT17 positive area value (r = 0.628, P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The mRNA expression of KRT17 was elevated in OLP tissues compared to that in HC. KRT17 was positively correlated with the severity of OLP, indicating KRT17 might play a vital role in the pathogenesis of OLP.

Committed change of real-time quantitative PCR to droplet digital PCR for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in tyrosine kinase inhibitor treated CML

OBJECTIVES

We performed a feasibility study of an FDA-approved commercial ddPCR assay to measure BCR::ABL1 in CML patients treated using TKI therapy.

METHODS

Assay performance of standard RQ-PCR and commercially available FDA-approved ddPCR were compared to measure BCR::ABL1 p210 transcripts in RNA samples from 100 CML patients who received TKI therapy.

RESULTS

%BCR::ABL1/ABL1IS levels obtained from both methods were not statistically significant difference after normalization with batch-specific conversion factor (p = 0.0651). The correlation and agreement of %BCR::ABL1/ABL1IS between the two assays were high. Molecular response stratification data showed 56% concordance between RQ-PCR and ddPCR, and 37% higher residual disease detection using ddPCR. Furthermore, 21.21% (7/33) of RQ-PCR undetectable samples were detected by ddPCR, representing high sensitivity to quantify the low abundance of BCR::ABL1 transcripts.

CONCLUSION

ddPCR was proven to be a highly sensitive method with the potential to overcome some limitations of traditional RQ-PCR, and has the potential of being a valuable tool for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in CML during TKI therapy. (163 words).

[Comparison of BCR::ABL (P210) mRNA levels detected by dPCR and qPCR methods in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia]

Objective: To compare digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) measurements of BCR::ABL (P210) mRNA expression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) . Methods: In this non-interventional, cross-sectional study, BCR::ABL (P210) mRNA was simultaneously measured by dPCR and qPCR in peripheral blood samples collected from patients with CML who underwent tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and who achieved at least a complete cytogenetic response from September 2021 to February 2023 at Peking University People's Hospital. The difference, correlation, and agreement between the two methods were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman's correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Results: In total, 459 data pairs for BCR::ABL mRNA expression measured by dPCR and qPCR from 356 patients with CML were analyzed. There was a significant difference in BCR::ABL mRNA expression between the two methods (P<0.001). When analyzed by the depth of the molecular response (MR), a significant difference only existed for patients with ≥MR4.5 (P<0.001). No significant difference was observed for those who did not achieve a major MR (no MMR; P=0.922) or for those who achieved a major MR (MMR; P=0.723) or MR4 (P=0.099). There was a moderate correlation between the BCR::ABL mRNA expression between the two methods (r=0.761, P<0.001). However, the correlation gradually weakened or disappeared as the depth of the MR increased (no MMR: r=0.929, P<0.001; MMR: r=0.815, P<0.001; MR4: r=0.408, P<0.001; MR4.5: r=0.176, P=0.176). In addition, the agreement in BCR::ABL mRNA expression between the two methods in those with MR4.5 was weaker than other groups (no MMR: ▉= 0.042, P=0.846; MMR:▉=0.054, P=0.229; MR4:▉=-0.020, P=0.399; MR4.5:▉=-0.219, P<0.001) . Conclusions: dPCR is more accurate than qPCR for measuring BCR::ABL (P210) mRNA expression in patients with CML who achieve a stable deep MR.

Molecular BCR::ABL1 Quantification and ABL1 Mutation Detection as Essential Tools for the Clinical Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Results from a Brazilian Single-Center Study

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a well-characterized oncological disease in which virtually all patients possess a translocation (9;22) that generates the tyrosine kinase BCR::ABL1 protein. This translocation represents one of the milestones in molecular oncology in terms of both diagnostic and prognostic evaluations. The molecular detection of the BCR::ABL1 transcription is a required factor for CML diagnosis, and its molecular quantification is essential for assessing treatment options and clinical approaches. In the CML molecular context, point mutations on the ABL1 gene are also a challenge for clinical guidelines because several mutations are responsible for tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, indicating that a change may be necessary in the treatment protocol. So far, the European LeukemiaNet and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have presented international guidelines on CML molecular approaches, especially those related to BCR::ABL1 expression. In this study, we show almost three years' worth of data regarding the clinical treatment of CML patients at the Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil. These data primarily comprise 155 patients and 532 clinical samples. BCR::ABL1 quantification by a duplex-one-step RT-qPCR and ABL1 mutations detection were conducted. Furthermore, digital PCR for both BCR::ABL1 expression and ABL1 mutations were conducted in a sub-cohort. This manuscript describes and discusses the clinical importance and relevance of molecular biology testing in Brazilian CML patients, demonstrating its cost-effectiveness.

Development and validation of sensitive BCR::ABL1 fusion gene quantitation using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

BCR::ABL1 fusion has significant prognostic value and is screened for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) disease monitoring as a part of routine molecular testing. To overcome the limitations of the current standard real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), we designed and validated a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay to quantify BCR::ABL1 and ABL1 transcript copy numbers.

METHODS

After PCR amplification of the target sequence, deep sequencing was performed using an Illumina Nextseq 550Dx sequencer and in-house-designed bioinformatics pipeline. The Next-generation Quantitative sequencing (NQ-seq) assay was validated for its analytical performance, including precision, linearity, and limit of detection, using serially diluted control materials. A comparison with conventional RQ-PCR was performed with 145 clinical samples from 77 patients.

RESULTS

The limit of detection of the NQ-seq was the molecular response (MR) 5.6 [BCR::ABL1 0.00028% international scale (IS)]. The NQ-seq exhibited excellent precision and linear range from MR 2.0 to 5.0. The IS value from the NQ-seq was highly correlated with conventional RQ-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the NQ-seq is an effective tool for monitoring BCR::ABL1 transcripts in CML patients with high sensitivity and reliability. Prospective assessment of the unselected large series is required to validate the clinical impact of this NGS-based monitoring strategy.

Transferring measurable residual disease measurement in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia from quantitative real-time PCR to digital droplet PCR

BACKGROUND

Since the measurement of measurable residual disease (MRD) is part of clinical routine examination for children affected with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), continuous efforts are made to improve its method, applicability and accuracy. Whereas quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is considered as the gold standard for MRD detection and endowed with international guidelines for implementation and evaluation, these do not yet exist for digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). However, advantages are seen in droplet partitioning for MRD measurement to allow absolute quantification without depending on reference samples.

METHODS

In this study, 17 MRD targets of nine patients with childhood B-ALL were analyzed with qPCR and ddPCR, respectively. All patients were assigned to high risk group and had hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CD19 antibody therapy for relapse prevention. Starting with the sequences and guidelines of qPCR and optimizing the protocol for ddPCR, the MRD targets could also be measured precisely with this novel method, using the same primer and probe sets as for qPCR.

RESULTS

The already established MRD protocol of qPCR could be transferred to ddPCR and all 17 MRD targets were measured in dilution series reaching comparable Limit of detection levels with both PCR methods.

CONCLUSIONS

With a given qPCR protocol and some experience in conventional MRD monitoring, it is conceivable to transfer the procedure of MRD measurement to ddPCR technology. Our data is in line with other studies which are summarized and discussed here as well to facilitate the transfer of MRD diagnostics to ddPCR.

Measurable residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia is characterized by a single genetic abnormality resulting in a fusion gene whose mRNA product is easily detected and quantified by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis. Measuring residual disease was originally introduced to identify patients relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation but rapidly adopted to quantify responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is now an essential tool for the management of patients and is used to influence treatment decisions. In this review we track this development including the international collaboration to standardize results, discuss the integration of molecular monitoring with other factors that affect patients' management, and describe emerging technology. Four case histories describe varying scenarios in which the accurate measurement of residual disease identified patients at risk of disease progression and allowed appropriate investigations and timely clinical intervention.

Next-generation sequencing for MRD monitoring in B-lineage malignancies: from bench to bedside

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is considered the strongest relevant predictor of prognosis and an effective decision-making factor during the treatment of hematological malignancies. Remarkable breakthroughs brought about by new strategies, such as epigenetic therapy and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) therapy, have led to considerably deeper responses in patients than ever, which presents difficulties with the widely applied gold-standard techniques of MRD monitoring. Urgent demands for novel approaches that are ultrasensitive and provide sufficient information have put a spotlight on high-throughput technologies. Recently, advances in methodology, represented by next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based clonality assays, have proven robust and suggestive in numerous high-quality studies and have been recommended by some international expert groups as disease-monitoring modalities. This review demonstrates the applicability of NGS-based clonality assessment for MRD monitoring of B-cell malignancies by summarizing the oncogenesis of neoplasms and the corresponding status of immunoglobulin (IG) rearrangements. Furthermore, we focused on the performance of NGS-based assays compared with conventional approaches and the interpretation of results, revealing directions for improvement and prospects in clinical practice.

Impact of BCR::ABL1 transcript type on RT-qPCR amplification performance and molecular response to therapy

Several studies have reported that chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients expressing e14a2 BCR::ABL1 have a faster molecular response to therapy compared to patients expressing e13a2. To explore the reason for this difference we undertook a detailed technical comparison of the commonly used Europe Against Cancer (EAC) BCR::ABL1 reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay in European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) reference laboratories (n = 10). We found the amplification ratio of the e13a2 amplicon was 38% greater than e14a2 (p = 0.015), and the amplification efficiency was 2% greater (P = 0.17). This subtle difference led to measurable transcript-type dependent variation in estimates of residual disease which could be corrected by (i) taking the qPCR amplification efficiency into account, (ii) using alternative RT-qPCR approaches or (iii) droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), a technique which is relatively insensitive to differences in amplification kinetics. In CML patients, higher levels of BCR::ABL1/GUSB were identified at diagnosis for patients expressing e13a2 (n = 67) compared to e14a2 (n = 78) when analysed by RT-qPCR (P = 0.0005) but not ddPCR (P = 0.5). These data indicate that widely used RT-qPCR assays result in subtly different estimates of disease depending on BCR::ABL1 transcript type; these differences are small but may need to be considered for optimal patient management.

Revealing the Mysteries of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Quantitative PCR through Next-Generation Sequencing and Systemic Metabolomic Profiling

The efforts made in the last decade regarding the molecular landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have created the possibility of obtaining patients’ personalized treatment. Indeed, the improvement of accurate diagnosis and precise assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) increased the number of new markers suitable for novel and targeted therapies. This progress was obtained thanks to the development of molecular techniques starting with real-time quantitative PCR (Rt-qPCR) passing through digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) up to the new attractive metabolomic approach. The objective of this surge in technological advances is a better delineation of AML clonal heterogeneity, monitoring patients without disease-specific mutation and designing customized post-remission strategies based on MRD assessment. In this context, metabolomics, which pertains to overall small molecules profiling, emerged as relevant access for risk stratification and targeted therapies improvement. In this review, we performed a detailed overview of the most popular modern methods used in hematological laboratories, pointing out their vital importance for MRD monitoring in order to improve overall survival, early detection of possible relapses and treatment efficacy.