Changing the Treatment Paradigm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy

The Usefulness of Serum Interleukin-6 as a Predictor of Response to Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

In atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev) combination treatment, both drugs act on the immune system. Previously, we reported that immunological changes after Atezo/Bev administration for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) revealed significant alterations in interleukin (IL)-6, soluble IL-2 receptor, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and programmed cell death-1 levels. Among these variable factors, serum levels of IL-6 can be easily measured on a commercial basis. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the utility of serum IL-6 as a predictor of tumor response to Atezo/Bev treatment for uHCC.

METHOD

The study included 44 patients with HCC treated with Atezo/Bev. Blood samples were collected before and 3 weeks after treatment, and tumor response was assessed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography 6 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Significant changes in serum IL-6 levels were observed in patients treated with Atezo/Bev as first-line therapy but not in those treated with it as second-line or later-line therapy. In patients treated with Atezo/Bev as first-line therapy, serum IL-6 levels increased significantly after treatment in patients with a complete or partial response but not in patients with stable or progressive disease. Furthermore, compared to other tumor markers such as alpha-fetoprotein, Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein, and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, serum IL-6 levels exhibited the highest sensitivity in predicting tumor response during the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

In patients with uHCC treated with Atezo/Bev, serum IL-6 levels could serve as a potential predictor of tumor response. Elevated levels after treatment may indicate a favorable tumor response and prognosis.

Analysis of Factors Predicting the Real-World Efficacy of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab have shown promising results for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in clinical trials. In this study, the real-world efficacy and safety of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in treating advanced HCC were evaluated.

Methods

In this retrospective study of patients at a Korean tertiary cancer center, 111 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C HCC received atezolizumab and bevacizumab as first-line therapy from May 2022 to June 2023. We assessed the progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events.

Results

Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC and Child-Pugh class A liver function were included in the study. The median PFS was 6.5 months, with an ORR of 27% and a DCR of 63%. Several factors, including the albumin-bilirubin grade, age, C-reactive protein and α-fetoprotein in immunotherapy score, macrovascular invasion, lung metastases, and combined radiotherapy, were found to significantly influence PFS (p<0.05). Patients with peritoneal seeding showed an higher ORR. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in clinical trials.

Conclusions

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab demonstrated real-world efficacy in the treatment of advanced HCC, with ORRs and DCRs aligning with those observed in clinical trials. Variations in PFS and ORR based on specific risk factors highlight the potential of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in precision medicine for advanced HCC.

The Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion

Vascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma involves tumor plugs in the main trunk of the portal vein, bile ducts, and veins, and it indicates poor prognosis. It is often associated with portal hypertension, which requires evaluation and management. Treatment includes hepatic resection, systemic pharmacotherapy, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Recurrence rates post-hepatic resection are high, and systemic drug therapy often has limited therapeutic potential in patients with a poor hepatic reserve. Single therapies are generally inadequate, necessitating combining multiple therapies with adjuvant and systemic pharmacotherapy before and after hepatectomy. This narrative review will provide an overview of the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Beyond the Border of Advanced Stage Therapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the deadliest emergent health issue around the globe. The stronger oncogenic effect, proteins, and weakened immune response are precisely linked with a significant prospect of developing HCC. Several conventional systemic therapies, antiangiogenic therapy, and immunotherapy techniques have significantly improved the outcomes for early-, intermediate-, and advanced-stage HCC patients, giving new hope for effective HCC management and prolonged survival rates. Innovative therapeutic approaches beyond conventional treatments have altered the landscape of managing HCC, particularly focusing on targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The advancement in HCC treatment suggested by the Food and Drug Administration is multidimensional treatment options, including multikinase inhibitors (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab, and cabozantinib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, ipilimumab, and nivolumab), in monotherapy and in combination therapy to increase life expectancy of HCC patients. This review highlights the efficacy of multikinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in monotherapy and combination therapy through the analysis of phase II, and III clinical trials, targeting the key molecular pathways involved in cellular signaling and immune response for the prospective treatment of advanced and unresectable HCC and discusses the upcoming combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Finally, the hidden challenges with pharmacological therapy for HCC, feasible solutions for the future, and implications of possible presumptions to develop drugs for HCC treatment are reported.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Drug Therapeutic Status, Advances and Challenges

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for ~90% of liver neoplasms. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Although there have been rapid developments in the treatment of HCC over the past decade, the incidence and mortality rates of HCC remain a challenge. With the widespread use of the hepatitis B vaccine and antiviral therapy, the etiology of HCC is shifting more toward metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Early-stage HCC can be treated with potentially curative strategies such as surgical resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation, improving long-term survival. However, most HCC patients, when diagnosed, are already in the intermediate or advanced stages. Molecular targeted therapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, has been a revolution in HCC systemic treatment. Systemic treatment of HCC especially for patients with compromised liver function is still a challenge due to a significant resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, tumor heterogeneity, lack of oncogenic addiction, and lack of effective predictive and therapeutic biomarkers.

Successful multidisciplinary treatment with complete response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in a 90-year-old patient with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the first-line regimen in Japan for hepatocellular carcinoma following the results of the IMbrave 150 trial. However, the safety and efficiency of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in older patients, especially in the oldest-old patients aged over 80 years, have not been thoroughly studied and is still controversial. Eighteen months ago, a 90-year-old woman underwent a laparoscopic hepatectomy (S6) for her primary hepatocellular carcinoma (S6, 2 cm). Nine months after the first surgery, she received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (S8, 2 cm). The subsequent recurrence (S3, 1 cm; S5, 2 cm; S8, 1 cm) was uncovered by radiological assessment 1 year after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment. We then initiated chemotherapy treatment with lenvatinib at 8 mg daily. Despite reducing the lenvatinib dosage, the adverse event of severe fatigue and asitia did not resolve; therefore, the regimen of atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination therapy was changed to be started. After the first 2 months, tumor regression was observed on computed tomography; the patient tolerated the atezolizumab + bevacizumab combination regimen over 8 months for 10 cycles without any adverse effects. She finally showed a complete response; no recurrence developed 1 year after the complete response. Therefore, older adult patients may benefit highly from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab with appropriate patient selection.

Impact of body composition for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between body composition and prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

METHODS

This cohort study analysed 119 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We investigated the association between body composition and progression-free survival and overall survival. Body composition was quantified by the visceral fat index, subcutaneous fat index, and skeletal muscle index. A high or low index score was defined as that above or below the median of these indices.

RESULTS

Poor prognosis was observed in the low visceral fat index and low subcutaneous fat index groups. The mean progression-free survival in the low visceral fat index and low subcutaneous fat index groups vs. the other groups were 194 and 270 days, respectively [95% confidence interval (CI), 153-236 and 230-311 days, respectively; P = 0.015], while the mean overall survival was 349 vs. 422 days, respectively (95% CI, 302-396 and 387-458 days, respectively; P = 0.027). In the multivariate analysis, both a low subcutaneous fat index and low visceral fat index were statistically associated with lower progression-free and overall survival rates [hazard ratio (HR) 1.721; 95% CI, 1.101-2.688; P = 0.017; and HR 2.214; 95% CI, 1.207-4.184; P = 0.011, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Low visceral fat index and subcutaneous fat index scores were independent predictors of poor prognosis in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Disease-Free Interval and Tumor Stage Complementarily Predict the Biological Behavior of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently used treatment algorithms were originally established based on the clinical outcomes of the initial treatment for primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and no strong evidence exists yet to suggest if these algorithms could also be applicable to patients with recurrent HCC after surgery. As such, this study sought to explore an optimal risk stratification method for cases of recurrent HCC for better clinical management.

METHODS

Among the 1616 patients who underwent curative resection for HCC, the clinical features and survival outcomes of 983 patients who developed recurrence were examined in detail.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis confirmed that both the disease-free interval (DFI) from the previous surgery and tumor stage at recurrence were significant prognostic factors. However, the prognostic impact of DFI seemed different according to the tumor stages at recurrence. While curative-intent treatment showed strong influence on survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; P < 0.001] regardless of the DFI in patients with stage 0 or stage A disease at recurrence, early recurrence (< 6 months) was a poor prognostic marker in patients with stage B disease. The prognosis of patients with stage C disease was exclusively influenced by the tumor distribution or choice of treatment than by the DFI.

CONCLUSIONS

The DFI complementarily predicts the oncological behavior of recurrent HCC, with its predictive value differing depending on the tumor stage at recurrence. These factors should be considered for selection of the optimal treatment in patients with recurrent HCC after curative-intent surgery.

Two cases of hepatocellular carcinoma successfully treated by carbon ion radiotherapy after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment

We herein report two cases of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that were successfully treated by carbon ion radiotherapy after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment. Case 1, an 84-year-old man, was diagnosed with HCC (maximum diameter: 11 cm) with portal invasion and presented HCC rupture. After obtaining hemostasis with transcatheter embolization, three cycles of atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy were administered, and marked shrinkage of the HCC was confirmed. However, he developed jaundice, liver damage and cerebral subcortical hemorrhage. Thus, atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy was discontinued. Total bilirubin, transaminase levels, and physical activity improved well with prednisolone, an antihypertensive agent, and rehabilitation. Thus, treatment with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) was added, and the treatment effect at 4 months after CIRT was judged as a complete response (CR) according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Case 2, a 68-year-old man, was diagnosed with HCC (maximum diameter: 14 cm). Hepatic resection was difficult because the residual liver volume after treatment would be insufficient. Five cycles of atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy were performed, and marked shrinkage of the HCC to a maximum diameter of 9 cm was confirmed. The treatment was converted to CIRT, and atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy resumed one month after CIRT. The treatment effect at 3 months after CIRT was judged as CR according to mRECIST. Although conversion therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab therapy, including surgery and radiofrequency ablation, have been reported, CIRT may be a promising new tool for conversion therapy for HCC.

The Clinical Impact of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy New-FP for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Preserved Liver Function

Background: Systemic treatments are recommended for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in preserved liver function. However, their effects are unsatisfactory in some tumor conditions, particularly macrovascular invasion (MVI) including major portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). We compared the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) regimens New-FP and sorafenib for various tumor conditions in preserved liver function. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of 1709 patients with HCC who were treated with New-FP or sorafenib. Survival was assessed after propensity score matching. Subgroup analyses were conducted: cohort 1 (no MVI or extrahepatic spread (EHS)), cohort 2 (MVI only), cohort 3 (EHS only), cohort 4 (MVI and EHS), and cohort 5 (major PVTT). Results: The New-FP group had a longer median survival time (MST) than the sorafenib in the whole analysis (18 vs. 9 months; p < 0.0001). New-FP demonstrated a longer MST compared with sorafenib in cohort 2 and cohort 4. In cohort 5, the MST of the New-FP group was 16 months, while that of sorafenib was 6 months (p < 0.0001). For major PVTT-HCC, the response rate of New-FP was 73.0%. The MST of patients who achieved complete response with New-FP was 59 months. Conclusions: HAIC using New-FP is promising for patients with MVI- and major PVTT-HCC in preserved liver function.

Evaluating the Role of Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Treatment Impact of Lenvatinib and Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab on Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Simple Summary

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy has high response rates in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) has been reported to be useful as an imaging biomarker for detecting β-catenin mutations. We evaluated whether pretreatment in the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI could predict the therapeutic effect of lenvatinib (n = 33) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 35). The visual assessment and relative enhancement ratio (RER) of the largest HCC lesions were evaluated using the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI. In the lenvatinib group, progression-free survival (PFS) was not differently stratified using EOB-MRI. In the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, the heterogeneous type had significantly shorter PFS than the homogenous type, and the hyperintensity (RER ≥ 0.9) type had significantly shorter PFS than the hypointensity type. Hence, the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI was useful for predicting the therapeutic effect of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy on unresectable HCC.

Abstract

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy has high response rates in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) has been reported to be useful as an imaging biomarker for detecting β-catenin mutations. We evaluated whether the pretreatment of the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI could predict the therapeutic effect of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Methods: This study included 68 patients (lenvatinib group (n = 33) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (n = 35)). The visual assessment and relative enhancement ratio (RER) of the largest HCC lesions were evaluated using the hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI. Results: The hyperintensity type (RER ≥ 0.9) was 18.2% in the lenvatinib group and 20.0% in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. In the lenvatinib group, progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the heterogeneous and homogenous types (p = 0.688) or between the hyperintensity and hypointensity types (p = 0.757). In the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, the heterogeneous type had significantly shorter PFS than the homogenous type (p = 0.007), and the hyperintensity type had significantly shorter PFS than the hypointensity type (p = 0.012). Conclusions: The hepatobiliary phase of EOB-MRI was useful for predicting the therapeutic effect of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy on unresectable HCC.