Opioids and Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Systematic Review

Cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in China and the US

Breast cancer is one of the tumors with the highest prevalence rate among women in the world, and its BRCA1/2 gene is a common mutation site. Talazoparib, as a targeted PARP inhibitor, can effectively control the occurrence and development of breast cancer with BRCA1/2 gene mutation, and play a therapeutic role. Based on the findings from the Phase III EMBRACE trial (NCT01945775 clinical trial), our analysis reveals that the talazoparib group demonstrated a significant extension in progression-free survival, along with improved response markers and patient-reported outcomes when compared to conventional therapies. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of talazoparib for treating advanced breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and HER2 negativity, considering the perspectives of health services in China and the United States. The results obtained will serve as a valuable reference for promoting rational drug utilization and enhancing medical resource efficiency. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Talazoparib more scientifically and provide clinicians with chemotherapy options, this paper developed a Markov model based on the EMBRACA clinical trial (clinical Trails.gov No., NCT01945775) to simulate the survival events of breast cancer patients in the Talazoparib group and the standard treatment group. The state transition probability and clinical data of breast cancer patients during treatment were extracted from the phase III EMBRACA clinical trial. The cost data generated during the treatment process comes from local hospital pricing, other references, and expert consultation. This article uses US dollars to calculate the treatment cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Health outcomes are expressed in Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). In addition, Outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which robustness was evaluated by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. This article establishes a Markov model for single-item sensitivity analysis. The results show that the economic benefits of using Talazoparib as a new treatment strategy in both China and the United States are higher than other drugs, and it is cost-effective. Compared to the control group, the incremental cost incurred by the Talazoparib treatment group in China was $2484.48/QALY, with an incremental QALY of 1.5. However, Talazoparib in the United States holds a dominant position, saving costs of $10,223.43 and increasing QALYs by 1.5. The clinical treatment effect of Talazoparib group in BRCA1/2 mutant advanced breast cancer patients is better than that of the standard treatment group, and the progression free survival period is significantly prolonged. From the perspective of medical and health services in China and the United States, the Talazoparib group is more economical than the standard treatment group in treating patients with BRCA1/2 mutant advanced breast cancer.

Opioid analgesics for nociceptive cancer pain: A comprehensive review

Pain is one of the most burdensome symptoms in people with cancer, and opioid analgesics are considered the mainstay of cancer pain management. For this review, the authors evaluated the efficacy and toxicities of opioid analgesics compared with placebo, other opioids, nonopioid analgesics, and nonpharmacologic treatments for background cancer pain (continuous and relatively constant pain present at rest), and breakthrough cancer pain (transient exacerbation of pain despite stable and adequately controlled background pain). They found a paucity of placebo-controlled trials for background cancer pain, although tapentadol or codeine may be more efficacious than placebo (moderate-certainty to low-certainty evidence). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs including aspirin, piroxicam, diclofenac, ketorolac, and the antidepressant medicine imipramine, may be at least as efficacious as opioids for moderate-to-severe background cancer pain. For breakthrough cancer pain, oral transmucosal, buccal, sublingual, or intranasal fentanyl preparations were identified as more efficacious than placebo but were more commonly associated with toxicities, including constipation and nausea. Despite being recommended worldwide for the treatment of cancer pain, morphine was generally not superior to other opioids, nor did it have a more favorable toxicity profile. The interpretation of study results, however, was complicated by the heterogeneity in the study populations evaluated. Given the limited quality and quantity of research, there is a need to reappraise the clinical utility of opioids in people with cancer pain, particularly those who are not at the end of life, and to further explore the effects of opioids on immune system function and quality of life in these individuals.

Perioperative opioids and survival outcomes in resectable head and neck cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Opioids are a mainstay in pain control for oncologic surgery. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the associations of perioperative opioid use with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resectable head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2022 was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies investigating perioperative opioid use for patients with HNC undergoing surgical resection and its association with OS and DFS were included.

RESULTS

Three thousand three hundred seventy-eight studies met initial inclusion criteria, and three studies representing 562 patients (intraoperative opioids, n = 463; postoperative opioids, n = 99) met final exclusion criteria. One study identified that high intraoperative opioid requirement in oral cancer surgery was associated with decreased OS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.995-3.149) but was not an independent predictor of decreased DFS. Another study found that increased intraoperative opioid requirements in treating laryngeal cancer was demonstrated to have a weak but statistically significant inverse relationship with DFS (HR = 1.001, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 1.001, p = 0.02). The last study identified that patients with chronic opioid after resection of oral cavity cancer had decreased DFS (HR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.6) compared to those who were not chronically using opioids postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

An association may exist between perioperative opioid use and OS and DFS in patients with resectable HNC. Additional investigation is required to further delineate this relationship and promote appropriate stewardship of opioid use with adjunctive nonopioid analgesic regimens.

The association between perioperative opioids and breast cancer recurrence: a narrative review of the literature

Background and Objective

Opioid use disorder is an evolving crisis, and 17.2% of postsurgical patients continue to fill an opioid prescription one year after surgery. Preclinical studies suggest perioperative opioid use, defined here as opioids used in the setting of operative pain, may be linked to inferior oncologic outcomes. If this were true, opioid minimization strategies for surgical patients may reduce opioid-related deaths in more than one way. This review aims to describe the association between perioperative opioid use and breast cancer recurrence.

Methods

On November 1, 2021, we searched the Ovid and EMBASE databases for the terms "breast neoplasm", "opioid analgesics", "neoplasm recurrence", and "neoplasm metastasis". Of the 350 articles retrieved, 11 met our inclusion criteria. The review was undertaken using the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) checklist for quality.

Key Content and Findings

Clinical studies report no clear association between perioperative opioid use and local or distant breast cancer recurrence. Mixed results were found when assessing perioperative opioid use and overall survival. Multiple studies paradoxically found opioid use to be associated with lower recurrence rates, despite higher mortality rates. Most studies showed no difference in recurrence or survival in breast cancer surgery patients who did or did not receive opioid-containing analgesia, although most findings were limited by study design and low event rates in patients with breast cancer.

Conclusions

The lack of a clear connection between perioperative opioid use and breast cancer recurrence contradicts some preclinical data, which describes mechanisms through which opioids upregulate tumor proliferation which might worsen oncologic outcomes. Existing clinical literature is limited to mostly retrospective studies in patients with predominantly early-stage breast cancers, with low event rates. Given the worsening opioid epidemic and preclinical study findings, opioid minimization strategies should still be explored. Future work should be prospective and examine cancer recurrence in high-risk patients with more advanced tumor pathologies.

Examining the interrelationships between mindfulness-based interventions, depression, inflammation, and cancer survival

Depression is highly prevalent in those diagnosed with cancer and is also associated with poorer prognostic outcomes. Mindfulness-based interventions are effective in reducing depressive symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with cancer. The objective of this review was to investigate whether mindfulness practices can improve survival and, if so, what mechanisms of action may contribute to these outcomes. Although no long-term studies have investigated this hypothesis, the current literature supports an inflammatory basis for depression, implicating proinflammatory cytokines and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction as contributing factors. Markers of inflammation, such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and cortisol, are all found at elevated concentrations in many depressed individuals. These exact mechanisms are associated with higher mortality in patients with cancer. Mindfulness has been studied for its effects on cytokine and cortisol levels, and there are promising data to support that the intervention can measurably decrease inflammation. Therefore, it is conceivable that mindfulness programs can affect survival in this population. There are limited data on the long-term effects of mindfulness on depression and inflammatory markers in patients with cancer, and there are potential barriers to the implementation of mindfulness-based interventions as part of a comprehensive treatment plan. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore these questions through longitudinal studies to establish a survival correlation. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:490-502.

Opioids and cancer survival: are we looking in the wrong place?

There is a controversial narrative in the anaesthetic literature suggesting that anaesthetic technique (including opioids) may be detrimental to survival after tumour resection. The initial observations were retrospective. Several prospective studies are ongoing; one in breast cancer has reported no adverse outcome. The evidence for an effect of opioids stems from three pieces of information: (1) opioids depress the immune system, (2) opioids potentially promote angiogenesis, and (3) opioids potentially support tumour growth. Although the evidence for (2)/(3) is unclear, combinations of these effects are beneficial to tumours and potentially promote metastatic reseeding. Accepted wisdom suggests that opioid effects are driven by opioid receptor activation but the presence of opioid receptors on immune cells for example is unlikely. Immune cells, vascular endothelium and a range of tumour cells express Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) receptors (for Gram-negative bacterial wall components), and there is growing evidence for opioids interacting with this alternative receptor; and for some there is paradoxical naloxone sensitivity. Is the focus on opioid receptors and cancer the wrong target? TLR4 receptor activation produces immune activation, stimulates angiogenesis, and supports tumour survival. We know that some opioids are more immune suppressive than others (there is no such comparative information for angiogenesis and tumour survival); this may correlate with TLR4 activation. If there are clusters of opioids that have more opioid than TLR4 profiles and vice versa, this may influence outcome. If this is the case, then evidence-based advice could be given for perioperative use in the oncology-anaesthesia setting.

Immunological Insights into Opioid-Free Anaesthesia in Oncological Surgery: A Scoping Review

Purpose of Review

The influence of opioids on outcomes after cancer surgery when used, or avoided, intraoperatively remains unclear. There is a need to conduct a scoping review to explore the wider context and provide direction for future research. The review will examine the current state of evidence in humans, with a focus on immunological biomarkers and clinically relevant cancer outcomes in trials comparing opioid-free to opioid-based general anaesthesia.

Recent Findings

There is limited research on this subject area, which is mainly focused on breast cancer. The most frequently evaluated immunological parameter is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Cancer outcomes are mainly focused on recurrence.

Summary

The central knowledge gap is understanding how the cellular effects of opioids translate into longer-term patient outcomes. The major challenge for future research is accounting for the immunomodulatory effects of a wide range of confounding factors, which have yet to be clarified.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11912-022-01300-5.