Pathogenic BRCA Variants as Biomarkers for Risk in Prostate Cancer

Role of MicroRNA-21 in Prostate Cancer Progression and Metastasis: Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Targets

The role of noncoding RNA has made remarkable progress in understanding progression, metastasis, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A better understanding of the miRNAs has enhanced our knowledge of their targeting mainly at the therapy level in solid tumors, such as prostate cancer (PCa). microRNAs (miRNAs) belong to a class of endogenous RNA that deficit encoded proteins. Therefore, the role of miRNAs has been well-coined in the progression and development of PCa. miR-21 has a dual nature in its work both as a tumor suppressor and oncogenic role, but most of the recent studies showed that miR-21 is a tumor promoter and also is involved in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Upregulation of miR-21 suppresses programmed cell death and inducing metastasis and castration resistant in PCa. miR-21 is involved in the different stages, such as proliferation, angiogenesis, migration, and invasion, and plays an important role in the progression, metastasis, and advanced stages of PCa. Recently, various studies directly linked the role of high levels of miR-21 with a poor therapeutic response in the patient of PCa. In the present review, we have explained the molecular mechanisms/pathways of miR-21 in PCa progression, metastasis, and castration resistant and summarized the role of miR-21 in diagnosis and therapeutic levels in PCa. In addition, we have spotlighted the recent therapeutic strategies for targeting different stages of PCa.

DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a distinct molecular signature, including characteristic chromosomal translocations, gene deletions and defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. One crucial pathway involved is homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and it is found in almost 20% of metastatic castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Inherited/germline mutations are associated with a hereditary predisposition to early PCa development and aggressive behavior. BRCA2, ATM and CHECK2 are the most frequently HRD-mutated genes. BRCA2-mutated tumors have unfavorable clinical and pathological characteristics, such as intraductal carcinoma. PARP inhibitors, due to the induction of synthetic lethality, have been therapeutically approved for mCRPC with HRD alterations. Mutations are detected in metastatic tissue, while a liquid biopsy is utilized during follow-up, recognizing acquired resistance mechanisms. The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is another DNA repair mechanism implicated in carcinogenesis, although only 5% of metastatic PCa is affected. It is associated with aggressive disease. PD-1 inhibitors have been used in MMR-deficient tumors; thus, the MMR status should be tested in all metastatic PCa cases. A surrogate marker of defective DNA repair mechanisms is the tumor mutational burden. PDL-1 expression and intratumoral lymphocytes have ambivalent predictive value. Few experimental molecules have been so far proposed as potential biomarkers. Future research may further elucidate the role of DNA damage pathways in PCa, revealing new therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers.

Implementation of BRCA mutations testing in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of different cancer types

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are onco-suppressor genes involved in the DNA repair mechanism. The presence of BRCA1/2 mutations confers a higher risk of developing several cancer types. To date, the FDA approved various PARP inhibitors to treat selected BRCA1/2 mutated oncologic patients. At first, PARP inhibitors were approved for patients with ovarian and breast cancers, and subsequently for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the treatment with chemotherapy. The current guidelines for BRCA testing are very heterogeneous between the different types of tumors regarding the diagnostic algorithm and the type of sample to analyze, such as the blood for the germline mutations and the tumoral tissue for the somatic mutations. Few data have currently been described regarding the detection of BRCA1/2 somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In this review, we propose an overview of the BRCA mutations in FFPE samples of several cancers, including breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. We summarize the types and the frequency of BRCA mutations, the guidelines approved for the test, the molecular assays used for the detection and the PARP inhibitors approved for each tumor type.

DNA repair deficiency as circulating biomarker in prostate cancer

Deleterious aberrations in DNA repair genes are actionable in approximately 25% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) patients. Homology recombination repair (HRR) is the DNA damage repair (DDR) mechanism most frequently altered in prostate cancer; of note BRCA2 is the most frequently altered DDR gene in this tumor. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors showed antitumor activity with a improvement in overall survival in mCRPC carrying somatic and/or germline alterations of HHR. Germline mutations are tested on peripheral blood samples using DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes, while the somatic alterations are assessed by extracting DNA from a tumor tissue sample. However, each of these genetic tests have some limitations: the somatic tests are related to the sample availability and tumor heterogeneity, while the germline testing are mainly related to the inability to detect somatic HRR mutations. Therefore, the liquid biopsy, a non-invasive and easily repeatable test compared to tissue test, could identified somatic mutation detected on the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from a plasma. This approach should better represent the heterogeneity of the tumor compared to the primary biopsy and maybe helpful in monitoring the onset of potential mutations involved in treatment resistance. Furthermore, ctDNA may inform about timing and potential cooperation of multiple driver genes aberration guiding the treatment options in patients with mCRPC. However, the clinical use of ctDNA test in prostate cancer compared to blood and tissue testing are currently very limited. In this review, we summarize the current therapeutic indications in prostate cancer patients with DDR deficiency, the recommendation for germline and somatic-genomic testing in advanced PC and the advantages of the use liquid biopsy in clinical routine for mCRPC.

SGOL2 promotes prostate cancer progression by inhibiting RAB1A ubiquitination

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent genitourinary malignant cancer in men worldwide. Patients with prostate cancer who progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or metastatic CRPC have significantly poorer survival. Advanced prostate cancer is a clinical challenge due to the lack of effective treatment strategies. In the field of oncology, SGOL2 was an emerging and differentially expressed molecule, which enhanced the proliferation of cell populations in vitro in our studies. Mass spectrum and Co-IP validated the interaction of SGOL2 and RAB1A in a protein-protein manner. We further investigated the role of SGOL2 in the regulatory mechanism of RAB1A in prostate cancer cell lines. Furthermore, SGOL2 regulated RAB1A expression by inhibiting its ubiquitination. Rescue Experiments demonstrated that SGOL2 promoted prostate cancer cell proliferation and migration by upregulating RAB1A expression. Finally, we found that SGOL2 and RAB1A may regulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) in prostate cancer. In conclusion, our findings concluded that SGOL2 stabilized RAB1A expression to promote prostate cancer development. Both of them were of great importance in TME modulation.

The synthetic lethality of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs in cancer treatment

Continuous cell division is a hallmark of cancer, and the underlying mechanism is tumor genomics instability. Cell cycle checkpoints are critical for enabling an orderly cell cycle and maintaining genome stability during cell division. Based on their distinct functions in cell cycle control, cell cycle checkpoints are classified into two groups: DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication stress checkpoints. The DNA damage checkpoints (ATM-CHK2-p53) primarily monitor genetic errors and arrest cell cycle progression to facilitate DNA repair. Unfortunately, genes involved in DNA damage checkpoints are frequently mutated in human malignancies. In contrast, genes associated with DNA replication stress checkpoints (ATR-CHK1-WEE1) are rarely mutated in tumors, and cancer cells are highly dependent on these genes to prevent replication catastrophe and secure genome integrity. At present, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) operate through “synthetic lethality” mechanism with mutant DNA repair pathways genes in cancer cells. However, an increasing number of patients are acquiring PARP inhibitor resistance after prolonged treatment. Recent work suggests that a combination therapy of targeting cell cycle checkpoints and PARPs act synergistically to increase the number of DNA errors, compromise the DNA repair machinery, and disrupt the cell cycle, thereby increasing the death rate of cancer cells with DNA repair deficiency or PARP inhibitor resistance. We highlight a combinational strategy involving PARP inhibitors and inhibition of two major cell cycle checkpoint pathways, ATM-CHK2-TP53 and ATR-CHK1-WEE1. The biological functions, resistance mechanisms against PARP inhibitors, advances in preclinical research, and clinical trials are also reviewed.

Computer classification and construction of a novel prognostic signature based on moonlighting genes in prostate cancer

Advanced prostate cancer (PRAD) patients have poor prognosis and rising morbidity despite the ongoing iteration of molecular therapeutic agents. As newly discovered proteins with several functions, Moonlighting proteins have showed an important role in tumor progression but has not been extensively investigated in PRAD. Our study aimed to identify moonlighting-related prognostic biomarkers and prospective PRAD therapy targets. 103 moonlighting genes were gathered from previous literatures. A PRAD classification and multivariate Cox prognostic signature were constructed using dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Subsequently, we tested our signature’s potential to predict biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) using GSE21032, a prostate cancer dataset from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The performance of this signature was demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier (KM), receiver operator characteristic (ROC), areas under ROC curve (AUC), and calibration curves. Additionally, immune infiltration investigation was conducted to determine the impact of these genes on immune system. This signature’s influence on drug susceptibility was examined using CellMiner’s drug database. Both training and validation cohorts demonstrated well predictive capacity of this 9-gene signature for PRAD. The 3-year AUCs for TCGA-PRAD and GSE21032 were 0.802 and 0.60 respectively. It can effectively classify patients into various biochemical recurrence risk groups. These genes were also assessed to be connected with tumor mutation burden (TMB), immune infiltration and therapy. This work created and validated a moonlighting gene signature, revealing fresh perspectives on moonlighting proteins in predicting prognosis and improving treatment of PRAD.

PARP Inhibitors in Advanced Prostate Cancer in Tumors with DNA Damage Signatures

Simple Summary

This review paper seeks to summarize the current literature on the role of PARP Inhibitors in Advanced Prostate Cancer in tumors with defects in genes associated with DNA damage repair. It will give particular attention to the role of PARPi in tumors with non-BRCA DNA damage repair genes. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature on PARPi and their activity treating BRCA and non BRCA tumors with DNA damage signatures.

Abstract

Since 2010, significant progress has been made in the treatment of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). While these advancements have improved survival, mCRPC remains a lethal disease, with a precision medicine framework that is lagging behind compared to other cancers. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) studies in prostate cancer (PCa) have focused primarily on the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, specifically BRCA1 and BRCA2. While homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) can be prompted by germline or somatic BRCA1/2 genetic mutations, it can also exist in tumors with intact BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. While the sensitivity of PARPi in tumors with non-BRCA DNA damage signatures is not as well established, it has been suggested that genomic alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes other than BRCA may confer synthetic lethality with PARPI in mCRPC. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature on PARPi and their activity treating BRCA and non BRCA tumors with DNA damage signatures.

Design, Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Screening of New Thiazole Derivatives as Potential Anticancer Agents through VEGFR-2 Inhibition

Z-configurated isomers are kinetically preferred molecules. Compounds with Z-configuration are contained in many natural products, biologically active compounds and as synthons for organic synthesis. Two series of new thiazole-based analogs were synthesized from appropriate starting materials hydrazinecarbothioamide derivatives (Z)-2a,b to be evaluated for their inhibitory activity towards VEGFR-2. The prepared thiazole compounds 3a-5b were screened for their cytotoxic potency against the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line and their percentage inhibition against VEGFR-2. Compound 4d exhibited good VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity. A DNA flow cytometry analysis was conducted, and compound 4d demonstrated cell cycle arrest at the G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle profile and an apoptosis-inducing effect by increasing the percentage of pre-G1 phase. Compound 4d was further evaluated for its apoptosis-inducing effect by studying the effect on mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and p53 activation. It was found to boost the level of p53 and reduce the level of MMP compared with the untreated control cells.

Race and prostate cancer: genomic landscape

In the past 20 years, new insights into the genomic pathogenesis of prostate cancer have been provided. Large-scale integrative genomics approaches enabled researchers to characterize the genetic and epigenetic landscape of prostate cancer and to define different molecular subclasses based on the combination of genetic alterations, gene expression patterns and methylation profiles. Several molecular drivers of prostate cancer have been identified, some of which are different in men of different races. However, the extent to which genomics can explain racial disparities in prostate cancer outcomes is unclear. Future collaborative genomic studies overcoming the underrepresentation of non-white patients and other minority populations are essential.