1
|
Andratschke N, Willmann J, Appelt AL, Day M, Kronborg C, Massaccesi M, Ozsahin M, Pasquier D, Petric P, Riesterer O, De Ruysscher D, M Van der Velden J, Guckenberger M. Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters? Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 49:100871. [PMID: 39444538 PMCID: PMC11497423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024] Open
Abstract
With the emergence of high-precision radiotherapy technologies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), MR guided brachytherapy, image guided intensity modulated photon and proton radiotherapy and most recently daily adaptive radiotherapy, reirradiation is increasingly recognized as a viable treatment option for many patients. This includes those with recurrent, metastatic or new malignancies post initial radiotherapy. The primary challenge in reirradiation lies in balancing tumor control against the risk of severe toxicity from cumulative radiation doses to previously irradiated normal tissue. Although technology for precise delivery has advanced at a fast pace, clinical practice of reirradiation still mostly relies on individual expertise, as prospective evidence is scarce, the level of reporting in clinical studies is not standardized and of low quality - especially with respect to cumulative doses received by organs at risk. A recent ESTRO/EORTC initiative proposed a standardized definition of reirradiation and formulated general requirements for minimal reporting in clinical studies [1]. As a consequence we found it timely to convene for an international and interdisciplinary meeting with experts in the field to summarize the current evidence, identify knowledge gaps and explore which best practices can be derived for safe reirradiation. The meeting was held on 15.06.2023 in Zurich and was endorsed by the scientific societies SASRO, DEGRO and ESTRO. Here, we report on available evidence and research priorities in the field of reirradiation, as discussed during the meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, UK
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Madalyne Day
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Camilla Kronborg
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre O Lambret, Lille, France
- University of Lille, Centrale Lille, CNRS, CRIStAL UMR 9189, Lille, France
| | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School and Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M Van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feddersen TV, Hernandez-Tamames JA, Paulides MM, Kroesen M, van Rhoon GC, Poot DHJ. Magnetic resonance thermometry for hyperthermia in the oropharynx region. Int J Hyperthermia 2024; 41:2352545. [PMID: 38991549 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2024.2352545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT) can measure in-vivo 3D-temperature changes in real-time and noninvasively. However, for the oropharynx region and the entire head and neck, motion potentially introduces large artifacts. Considering long treatment times of 60-90 min, this study aims to evaluate whether MRT around the oropharynx is clinically feasible for hyperthermia treatments and quantify the effects of breathing and swallowing on MRT performance. A 3D-ME-FGRE sequence was used in a phantom cooling down and around the oropharynx of five volunteers over ∼75 min. The imaging protocol consisted of imaging with acceleration (ARC = 2), number of image averages (NEX = 1,2 and 3). For volunteers, the acquisitions included a breath-hold scan and scans with deliberate swallowing. MRT performance was quantified in neck muscle, spinal cord and masseter muscle, using mean average error (MAE), mean error (ME) and spatial standard deviation (SD). In phantom, an increase in NEX leads to a significant decrease in SD, but MAE and ME were unchanged. No significant difference was found in volunteers between the different scans. There was a significant difference between the regions evaluated: neck muscle had the best MAE (=1.96 °C) and SD (=0.82 °C), followed by spinal cord (MAE = 3.17 °C, SD = 0.92 °C) and masseter muscle (MAE = 4.53 °C, SD = 1.16 °C). Concerning the ME, spinal cord did best, then neck muscle and masseter muscle, with values of -0.64 °C, 1.15 °C and -3.05 °C respectively. Breathing, swallowing, and different ways of imaging (acceleration and NEX) do not significantly influence the MRT performance in the oropharynx region. The ROI selected however, leads to significant differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa V Feddersen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juan A Hernandez-Tamames
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Imaging Physics, Applied Physics Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Margarethus M Paulides
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Care & Cure Research Lab of the Electromagnetics Group, Center for Care & Cure Technology (C3Te), Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel Kroesen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard C van Rhoon
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Reactor Institute Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk H J Poot
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Han G, Cui L, Sun C, Yu L, Liu S. Efficacy of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab regimen in advanced colorectal cancer after deep hyperthermia: a single-center retrospective study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1259713. [PMID: 38125935 PMCID: PMC10732353 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1259713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin + leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil) plus bevacizumab regimen after deep hyperthermia in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods A total of 80 colorectal cancer patients treated at our hospital were selected as research subjects. According to the random number table method, patients were divided into a control group (mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab) and a combination group (mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab after deep hyperthermia treatment), with 40 patients in each group. After six cycles of treatment, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), levels of serum tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores, and the occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups. Results After six cycles of treatment, the ORR in the combination group was higher than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The DCR in the combination group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). The serum CEA levels in the control and combination groups after treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the serum CEA and VEGF levels in the combination group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.001). The KPS scores in both groups after treatment were higher than those before treatment, and the KPS scores in the combination group after treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.001). The incidence of fatigue and pain in the combination group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab after deep hyperthermia is effective in advanced colorectal cancer patients, which can effectively improve their quality of life, and the adverse events are controllable and tolerable. A randomized or prospective trial will be required to further prove these data and explore its potentiality, especially if compared to conventional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shenzha Liu
- Department of Oncology, Jingjiang People’s Hospital Affiliated with Yangzhou University, Jingjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drizdal T, van Rhoon GC, Fiser O, Vrba D, van Holthe N, Vrba J, Paulides MM. Assessment of the thermal tissue models for the head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning. J Therm Biol 2023; 115:103625. [PMID: 37429086 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare different thermal tissue models for head and neck hyperthermia treatment planning, and to assess the results using predicted and measured applied power data from clinical treatments. METHODS Three commonly used temperature models from literature were analysed: "constant baseline", "constant thermal stress" and "temperature dependent". Power and phase data of 93 treatments of 20 head and neck patients treated with the HYPERcollar3D applicator were used. The impact on predicted median temperature T50 inside the target region was analysed with maximum allowed temperature of 44 °C in healthy tissue. The robustness of predicted T50 for the three models against the influence of blood perfusion, thermal conductivity and the assumed hotspot temperature level was analysed. RESULTS We found an average predicted T50 of 41.0 ± 1.3 °C (constant baseline model), 39.9 ± 1.1 °C (constant thermal stress model) and 41.7 ± 1.1 °C (temperature dependent model). The constant thermal stress model resulted in the best agreement between the predicted power (P = 132.7 ± 45.9 W) and the average power measured during the hyperthermia treatments (P = 129.1 ± 83.0 W). CONCLUSION The temperature dependent model predicts an unrealistically high T50. The power values for the constant thermal stress model, after scaling simulated maximum temperatures to 44 °C, matched best to the average measured powers. We consider this model to be the most appropriate for temperature predictions using the HYPERcollar3D applicator, however further studies are necessary for developing of robust temperature model for tissues during heat stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Drizdal
- Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
| | - Gerard C van Rhoon
- Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ondrej Fiser
- Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - David Vrba
- Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Netteke van Holthe
- Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Vrba
- Dept. of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Nam. Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic
| | - Margarethus M Paulides
- Hyperthermia Unit, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Combined Hyperthermia and Re-Irradiation in Non-Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030742. [PMID: 36765699 PMCID: PMC9913630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic literature review summarizes clinical studies and trials involving combined non-ablative hyperthermia and re-irradiation in locoregionally recurrent cancer except breast cancer. METHODS One database and one registry, MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov, respectively, were searched for studies on combined non-ablative hyperthermia and re-irradiation in non-breast cancer patients. Extracted study characteristics included treatment modalities and re-irradiation dose concepts. Outcomes of interest were tumor response, survival measures, toxicity data and palliation. Within-study bias assessment included the identification of conflict of interest (COI). The final search was performed on 29 August 2022. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included in the final analysis, reporting on 603 patients with eight major tumor types. Twelve articles (52%) were retrospective studies. Only one randomized trial was identified. No COI statement was declared in 11 studies. Four of the remaining twelve studies exhibited significant COI. Low study and patient numbers, high heterogeneity in treatment modalities and endpoints, as well as significant within- and across-study bias impeded the synthesis of results. CONCLUSION Outside of locoregionally recurrent breast cancer, the role of combined moderate hyperthermia and re-irradiation can so far not be established. This review underscores the necessity for more clinical trials to generate higher levels of clinical evidence for combined re-irradiation and hyperthermia.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zanoli M, Dobšíček Trefná H. The hot-to-cold spot quotient for SAR-based treatment planning in deep microwave hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:1421-1439. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2136411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Zanoli
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hana Dobšíček Trefná
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matković A, Kordić A, Jakovčević A, Šarolić A. Complex Permittivity of Ex-Vivo Human, Bovine and Porcine Brain Tissues in the Microwave Frequency Range. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2580. [PMID: 36359425 PMCID: PMC9689776 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12112580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate knowledge about the dielectric properties of biological tissues in the microwave frequency range may lead to advancement of biomedical applications based on microwave technology. However, the published data are very scarce, especially for human brain tissues. The aim of this work was to measure and report the complex permittivity of brain white matter, grey matter and cerebellum. Complex permittivity was measured on human, bovine and porcine brain tissues in the microwave frequency range from 0.5 to 18 GHz using an open-ended coaxial probe. The results present a valuable addition to the available data on the brain tissue complex permittivity. Some noticeable variations between the results lead to several conclusions. Complex permittivity variation within the same tissue type of the individual species was comparable to interspecies variation. The difference was prominent between human brains obtained from autopsies, while bovine brains obtained from healthy animals showed very similar complex permittivity. We hypothesize that the difference might have been caused by the basic pathologies of the patients, where the associated therapies could have affected the brain water content. We also examined the effect of excised tissue degradation on its complex permittivity over the course of three days, and the results suggest the gradual dehydration of the samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anton Kordić
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Antonia Jakovčević
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Redr J, Pokorny T, Drizdal T, Fiser O, Brunat M, Vrba J, Vrba D. Microwave Hyperthermia of Brain Tumors: A 2D Assessment Parametric Numerical Study. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:6115. [PMID: 36015874 PMCID: PMC9416291 DOI: 10.3390/s22166115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Due to the clinically proven benefit of hyperthermia treatments if added to standard cancer therapies for various tumor sites and the recent development of non-invasive temperature measurements using magnetic resonance systems, the hyperthermia community is convinced that it is a time when even patients with brain tumors could benefit from regional microwave hyperthermia, even if they are the subject of a treatment to a vital organ. The purpose of this study was to numerically analyze the ability to achieve a therapeutically relevant constructive superposition of electromagnetic (EM) waves in the treatment of hyperthermia targets within the brain. We evaluated the effect of the target size and position, operating frequency, and the number of antenna elements forming the phased array applicator on the treatment quality. In total, 10 anatomically realistic 2D human head models were considered, in which 10 circular hyperthermia targets with diameters of 20, 25, and 30 mm were examined. Additionally, applicators with 8, 12, 16, and 24 antenna elements and operating frequencies of 434, 650, 915, and 1150 MHz, respectively, were analyzed. For all scenarios considered (4800 combinations), the EM field distributions of individual antenna elements were calculated and treatment planning was performed. Their quality was evaluated using parameters applied in clinical practice, i.e., target coverage (TC) and the target to hot-spot quotient (THQ). The 12-antenna phased array system operating at 434 MHz was the best candidate among all tested systems for HT treatments of glioblastoma tumors. The 12 antenna elements met all the requirements to cover the entire target area; an additional increase in the number of antenna elements did not have a significant effect on the treatment quality.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bodis S, Ghadjar P, van Rhoon G. Oncologic Thermoradiotherapy: Need for Evidence, Harmonisation, and Innovation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102418. [PMID: 35626026 PMCID: PMC9139232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The road of acceptance of oncologic thermotherapy/hyperthermia as a synergistic modality in combination with standard oncologic therapies is still bumpy [...]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Bodis
- Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (IT’IS), 8004 Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department Radiation Oncology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Gerard van Rhoon
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|