The Vulvar Cancer Risk in Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Systematic Review

DNA Methylation and p53 Immunohistochemistry as Prognostic Biomarkers for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is an inflammatory dermatosis that can progress to human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (HPVi VIN) and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Although LS has a much lower cancer risk compared with HPVi VIN (5% vs 50%, respectively), its incidence is significantly higher. Therefore, there is a clinical need to identify LS patients with an increased cancer risk. Our objective was to study the value of DNA methylation and p53 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as prognostic biomarkers for progression to cancer in patients with LS. Vulvar tissues from 236 patients were selected, including 75 LS and 68 HPVi VIN, both with and without cancer development, 32 VSCC, and 61 healthy vulvar controls. Samples were subjected to p53 IHC and DNA methylation analysis of a 3-gene marker panel containing ZNF582, SST, and miR124-2. Methylation levels and p53 IHC status (mutant or wild-type) were assessed and compared among all disease categories. Odds ratios were determined to identify whether the biomarkers were associated with progression to cancer in patients with LS. The highest methylation levels were found in HPVi VIN and VSCC, followed by LS and healthy vulvar controls. The largest heterogeneity in methylation levels was observed in LS cases. In fact, the 3-marker panel tested positive in 70% of LS, which progressed to VSCC vs only 17% of LS in patients without cancer development (P = .002). Also, mutant p53 IHC was observed more frequently in LS with progression to VSCC compared with nonprogressive LS cases (42% vs 3%, respectively, P = .001). Multivariable analysis identified a mutant p53 status as the only independent risk factor for cancer development in LS (odds ratio: 34.0, 95% CI: 1.4-807.4). In conclusion, DNA methylation testing and p53 IHC show strong potential as prognostic biomarkers for the identification of LS patients at high risk of progression to cancer.

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia long-term follow up and prognostic factors: An analysis of a large historical cohort

INTRODUCTION

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a high-risk preinvasive vulvar lesion and precursor of human papillomavirus-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Due to its rarity, literature data on its malignant potential are scant. The aim of the study is to assess the risk of developing VSCC in patients surgically treated for dVIN not associated with VSCC (solitary dVIN) and the risk of VSCC recurrence in patients treated for dVIN associated with VSCC (dVIN-VSCC) at first diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A historical cohort study was performed in a northern Italy referral center for vulvar neoplasms. All consecutive women surgically treated for histologically confirmed dVIN from 1994 to 2021 were collected. Primary outcome was cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk, secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with VSCC development or recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk differences and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with VSCC development in solitary dVIN and recurrence of dVIN-VSCC.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with dVIN at preoperative biopsy were included: at excisional specimens 44 were solitary dVIN and 32 were dVIN-VSCC. The absolute risk of VSCC development after solitary dVIN treatment was 43.2% with median time to to VSCC diagnosis of 25.4 months (range 3.5-128.0 months). VSCC recurrence absolute risk in treated dVIN-VSCC patients was 31.3% with median time to VSCC recurrence of 52.9 months (range 6.5-94.8 months). At uni- and multivariate regression analyses, only compliant topical ultrapotent corticosteroid treatment after solitary dVIN excision showed an ability to prevent VSCC development. No protective effect by corticosteroid treatment was shown for VSCC recurrence in dVIN-VSCC patients. Smoking was associated with higher cancer recurrence risk in dVIN-VSCC patients on both uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dVIN have a high risk of developing both primary and recurring VSCC. Early recognition, long-term follow up, and compliant ultrapotent topical corticosteroid treatment are recommended.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Recurrence and Progression of HPV-Independent Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVES

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a rare yet aggressive precursor lesion of vulvar cancer. Our objectives were to estimate its long-term incidence, the risk of recurrent disease and progression to vulvar cancer, and risk factors thereof.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with HPV-independent VIN between 1991 and 2019 in a selected region were identified from the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Data were collected from the pathology reports. Crude and European age-standardized incidence rates were calculated for 10-year periods. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to determine the cumulative recurrence and cancer incidence, followed by Cox regression analyses to identify associated risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were diagnosed with solitary HPV-independent VIN without prior or concurrent vulvar cancer. The European age-standardized incidence rate increased from 0.09 to 0.69 per 100,000 women-years between 1991-2010 and 2011-2019. A cumulative recurrence and cancer incidence of 29% and 46% were found after 8 and 13 years of follow-up, respectively. Nonradical surgery was identified as the only independent risk factor for recurrent HPV-independent VIN. Risk factors associated with progression to cancer were increasing age and a mutant p53 immunohistochemical staining pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of detected HPV-independent VIN has substantially increased the last decade and the subsequent recurrence and vulvar cancer risks are high. Although HPV-independent VIN may present as a wide morphologic spectrum, surgical treatment should aim for negative resection margins followed by close surveillance, especially for p53 mutant lesions.

Pelvic Exenteration for Recurrent Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is one of the most radical surgical approaches. In earlier times, PE was associated with high morbidity and mortality. Nowadays, due to improved selection of suitable patients, perioperative settings, and postoperative care, patients' outcomes have been optimized. To investigate patients' outcomes and identify possible influencing clinical and histopathological factors, we analysed 17 patients with recurrent vulvar cancer who underwent PE in our department between 2007 and 2022. The median age was 64.9 years, with a difference of 40 years between the youngest and the oldest patient (41 vs. 81 years). The mean overall survival time was 55.7 months; the longest survival time reached up to 164 months. The achievement of complete cytoreduction (p = 0.02), the indication for surgery (curative vs. palliative), and the presence of distant metastases (both p = 0.01) showed a significant impact on overall survival. The presence of lymphatic metastases (p = 0.11) seems to have an influence on overall survival (OS) time. Major complications appeared in 35% of the patients. Our results support the existing data for PE in cases of recurrent vulvar cancer; for a group of selected patients, PE is a treatment option with good overall survival times and acceptable morbidity.

The vulvar microbiome in lichen sclerosus and high-grade intraepithelial lesions

Background

The role of the vulvar microbiome in the development of (pre)malignant vulvar disease is scarcely investigated. The aim of this exploratory study was to analyze vulvar microbiome composition in lichen sclerosus (LS) and vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) compared to healthy controls.

Methods

Women with vulvar lichen sclerosus (n = 10), HSIL (n = 5) and healthy controls (n = 10) were included. Swabs were collected from the vulva, vagina and anal region for microbiome characterization by metagenomic shotgun sequencing. Both lesional and non-lesional sites were examined. Biophysical assessments included trans-epidermal water loss for evaluation of the vulvar skin barrier function and vulvar and vaginal pH measurements.

Results

Healthy vulvar skin resembled vaginal, anal and skin-like microbiome composition, including the genera Prevotella, Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Staphylococcus, Cutibacterium, and Corynebacterium. Significant differences were observed in diversity between vulvar skin of healthy controls and LS patients. Compared to the healthy vulvar skin, vulvar microbiome composition of both LS and vulvar HSIL patients was characterized by significantly higher proportions of, respectively, Papillomaviridae (p = 0.045) and Alphapapillomavirus (p = 0.002). In contrast, the Prevotella genus (p = 0.031) and Bacteroidales orders (p = 0.038) were significantly less abundant in LS, as was the Actinobacteria class (p = 0.040) in vulvar HSIL. While bacteria and viruses were most abundant, fungal and archaeal taxa were scarcely observed. Trans-epidermal water loss was higher in vulvar HSIL compared to healthy vulvar skin (p = 0.043).

Conclusion

This study is the first to examine the vulvar microbiome through metagenomic shotgun sequencing in LS and HSIL patients. Diseased vulvar skin presents a distinct signature compared to healthy vulvar skin with respect to bacterial and viral fractions of the microbiome. Key findings include the presence of papillomaviruses in LS as well as in vulvar HSIL, although LS is generally considered an HPV-independent risk factor for vulvar dysplasia. This exploratory study provides clues to the etiology of vulvar premalignancies and may act as a steppingstone for expanding the knowledge on potential drivers of disease progression.

Reflectance confocal microscopy as a non-invasive imaging tool in vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and lichen sclerosus: A descriptive morphological study in patients and healthy volunteers

Incorrect and delayed diagnosis of vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (vHSIL) and lichen sclerosus (LS) increases malignant progression risks and negatively impacts prognosis and quality of life. There is a need to improve diagnosis and monitoring. Reflectance confocal microscopy is a non-invasive imaging tool that visualizes skin structures at cellular resolution. The objectives were to explore feasibility and patient acceptability of vulvar RCM imaging and to identify RCM characteristics that are discriminative for vulvar HSIL and LS. This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational clinical trial in patients with vHSIL and LS compared to healthy volunteers. RCM images and vulvar tissue samples were obtained. Five (5) patients with vHSIL, 10 patients with LS and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled. In total, 100 image series of vulvar skin were obtained, including lesional and nonlesional sites. The RCM technique was considered acceptable for application by patients and healthy controls. Healthy vulvar skin was characterized by a homogenous, normal honeycomb patterned epidermis and a clear epidermal-dermal junctions. Vulvar HSIL and LS displayed an atypical honeycomb pattern of the epidermis and lymphocytic influx with presence of melanophages. Distinct features specifically observed in LS included the presence of hyalinised vessels and sclerotic areas in the dermis. RCM is a non-invasive imaging technique that is feasible and clinically acceptable to apply on vulvar skin, both in patients with premalignant lesions and healthy controls. Recognition and validation of disease-specific characteristics could make reflectance confocal microscopy a clinical tool to non-invasively aid identification of vulvar premalignancies.

GATA3 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic adjunct for differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: utility and limitations

Herein, the authors evaluate the diagnostic utility and limitations of GATA3 immunohistochemistry for the distinction of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) from its potential mimics. Immunohistochemical studies for GATA3, p53, and p16 were performed on 124 pathologic vulvar tissues, inclusive of dVIN (n = 21), vulvar aberrant maturation (n = 10), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (n = 44), and 49 non-neoplastic vulvar dermatoses of various types. GATA3 expression was scored using a modification of previously proposed criteria: pattern 0 (no significant loss of basal layer staining, >75% staining), pattern 1 (25-75% staining), and pattern 2 (<25% staining). With the exception of lichen sclerosus, 8% of which showed pattern 1 or 2 staining, all other non-neoplastic lesions showed pattern 0 expression. Aberrant GATA3 expression (i.e., patterns 1 or 2) was present in 90% of dVIN cases (2 [9.5%], 3 [14.3%], 16 [76.2%] with patterns 0, 1, and 2 respectively), 90% of vulvar aberrant maturation cases (1 [10%],7 [70%], 2 [20%] with patterns 0, 1, and 2 respectively), and 15.9% of HSIL cases (84.1% pattern 0; 2.3% pattern 1; 13.6% pattern 2). All HSIL cases were p16 positive, including the 7 pattern 1 and 2 cases. All cases of dVIN-like HSIL were pattern 0, and all (n = 2) cases of HSIL-like (basaloid) dVIN were pattern 2 (both of the latter cases displayed complete absence of epidermal staining). Only 1 dVIN case was both pattern 0 and p53-wild-type. We conclude that GATA3 is useful for the distinction of dVIN from non-neoplastic dermatoses and from HSIL, but is best used as part of a panel that includes p53 and p16 to mitigate its limitations.

ORF1p Is a Potential Novel Diagnostic Marker for Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Accurate diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) can be challenging as histomorphologic features may be subtle and overlap with nondysplastic lesions. In practice, aberrant p53 expression supports the diagnosis, but a substantial percentage retains wild-type p53. Recently, the retrotransposon long interspersed nuclear element 1 has been detected in distinct cancer types. We have now investigated the expression of the long interspersed nuclear element 1 encoded protein ORF1p in dysplastic and nondysplastic vulvar samples to assess its diagnostic value. Specimens of dVIN (n=29), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (n=26), inflammatory vulvar lesions (n=20), lichen sclerosus (n=22), and normal vulvar epithelia (n=29) were included. ORF1p and p53 expression was determined using immunohistochemistry. The majority of dVIN [27/29 (93%)] and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [20/26 (77%)] showed distinct (i.e. moderate or strong) ORF1p expression in the basal and suprabasal or all epithelial layers, respectively. Of note, ORF1p was present in all 4 cases of dVIN with wild-type p53 staining pattern. In contrast, ORF1p was negative or weakly expressed in most inflammatory lesions [14/20 (70%)] and lichen sclerosus [18/22 (82%), P <0.001]. Normal control epithelium exhibited negative staining in all cases. In conclusion, ORF1p might be a useful diagnostic marker for dVIN, especially in cases with retained wild-type p53.

HPV-independent, p53-wild-type vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: a review of nomenclature and the journey to characterize verruciform and acanthotic precursor lesions of the vulva

Vulvar squamous cell carcinomas and their precursors are currently classified by the World Health Organization based on their association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). HPV independent lesions often harbor driver alterations in TP53, usually seen in the setting of chronic vulvar inflammation. However, a group of pre-invasive vulvar squamous lesions is independent from both HPV and mutant TP53. The lesions described within this category feature marked acanthosis, verruciform growth and altered squamous maturation, and over the last two decades several studies have added to their characterization. They have a documented association with verrucous carcinoma and conventional squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, suggesting a precursor role. They also harbor recurrent genomic alterations in several oncogenes, mainly PIK3CA and HRAS, indicating a neoplastic nature. In this review, we provide a historical perspective and a comprehensive description of these lesions. We also offer an appraisal of the terminology used over the years, going from Vulvar Acanthosis with Altered Differentiation and Verruciform Lichen Simplex Chronicus to Differentiated Exophytic Vulvar Intraepithelial Lesion and Vulvar Aberrant Maturation, the latter term having been recently proposed by the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Diseases. In line with the recognition of these lesions by the 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours as a neoplastic precursor, we herein propose the term HPV-independent, p53-wild-type verruciform acanthotic Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (HPVi(p53wt) vaVIN), which better conveys not only the pathology but also the neoplastic nature and the biologic risk inherent to these uncommon and challenging lesions. We outline strict morphologic and immunohistochemical criteria for its diagnosis and distinction from mimickers. Immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 should be performed routinely in the diagnostic work-up of these lesions, and the morphologic alternative term vaVIN should be reserved for instances in which p16/HPV/p53 status is unknown. We also discuss management considerations and the need to further explore precursors within and beyond the spectrum of verruciform acanthotic vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Simple Summary

The spectrum of vulvar disorders is wide and varies from infections, dermatoses, manifestations of hormonal and systemic conditions to vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and invasive cancer. It is not always possible to distinguish vulvar lesions on the basis of macroscopical aspects and the distribution of changes. For definite diagnosis of a vulvar lesion, a biopsy is needed. However, in practice, the decision to perform a biopsy is often delayed due to a lack of specificity of symptoms at the early stages of the neoplastic disease. The aim of this article is to provide clinicians, both gynecologists and dermatologists, with the main features of vulvar precancerous lesions, in order to recognize and treat them on time, thus preventing vulvar cancer. Clinical appearance of VIN is variable with significant variations present in color, surface, and topography. Evaluation of all VIN lesions should be conducted very carefully, because an underlying early invasive squamous cancer appears to be present in a significant percentage of patients.

Abstract

The spectrum of vulvar lesions ranges from infective and benign dermatologic conditions to vulvar precancer and invasive cancer. Distinction based on the characteristics of vulvar lesions is often not indicative of histology. Vulvoscopy is a useful tool in the examination of vulvar pathology. It is more complex than just colposcopic examination and presumes naked eye examination accompanied by magnification, when needed. Magnification can be achieved using a magnifying glass or a colposcope and may aid the evaluation when a premalignant or malignant lesion is suspected. It is a useful tool to establish the best location for biopsies, to plan excision, and to evaluate the entire lower genital system. Combining features of vulvar lesions can help prediction of its histological nature. Clinically, there are two distinct premalignant types of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: HPV-related VIN, more common in young women, multifocal and multicentric; VIN associated with vulvar dermatoses, more common in older women and usually unicentric. For definite diagnosis, a biopsy is required. In practice, the decision to perform a biopsy is often delayed due to a lack of symptoms at the early stages of the neoplastic disease. Clinical evaluation of all VIN lesions should be conducted very carefully, because an underlying early invasive squamous cancer may be present.