Cognitive Impairment in Older Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Chemotherapy

Longitudinal Trajectories of Self-Reported Cognitive Function and Associated Factors Among Older Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated cognitive decline may result in difficulties in maintaining daily life activities for older patients with cancer. It is, therefore, critical to identify changes in cognitive function throughout illness trajectories.

AIM

To determine the longitudinal patterns and factors associated with cognitive function among older cancer survivors.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the 2012 to 2020 Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging database. A total of 207 cancer survivors aged 60 years and above were included in the analysis. Latent class growth modeling was employed to identify the trajectories of self-reported cognitive function, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with these trajectories.

RESULTS

The cognitive function of older adults with cancer was divided into 2 distinct trajectories, characterized by differences in intercept (8) and slope (0.7): the "low and declining class" and the "high and sustainable class." The proportion of individuals belonging to the "high and sustainable class" (n = 153, 73.9%) was significantly and considerably higher than those in the "low and declining class" (n = 54, 26.1%). Individuals with low and declining cognitive function were more likely to be older, have a lower education level, live in rural areas, have poor handgrip strength, experience depression, and have lower social participation compared to those with high and sustainable cognitive function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings can help health care professionals develop tailored interventions for older cancer survivors with low cognitive function based on their physical and mental health status, as well as their environmental backgrounds.

Digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients: the Cog-Tab-Age feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Elderly cancer patients often experience cognitive difficulties that can affect their quality of life and autonomy. However, they are rarely included in clinical trials, and only one study has explored the feasibility of cognitive training in this population. While digital cognitive training has been successful in improving cognition in younger patients, its feasibility in elderly patients requires evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

This feasibility study primarily focused on evaluating patients' ability to use digital cognitive stimulation (usability). Secondary objectives were to evaluate acceptability, adherence, and satisfaction with regard to digital cognitive stimulation in elderly breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Elderly breast cancer patients at least 70 years old who were receiving cancer treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy) were recruited. Cognitive complaints were evaluated at baseline using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scale (FACT-Cog). Participants were invited to attend three 20-minute sessions of digital cognitive stimulation using HappyNeuron PRESCO software App on tablets, with the first session being supervised by a neuropsychologist and the two others being performed independently either at home or at the cancer center. We hypothesized that participants would spend 10 of the 20 min of the given time with the tablet completing exercises (training time). Thus, the usability of digital cognitive stimulation was defined as completing at least three exercises during the training time (10 min) of one of the two training sessions in autonomy. The proportion of patients who agreed to participate (acceptability) and completion of planned sessions (adherence) were also estimated. Satisfaction was evaluated post-intervention through a self-report questionnaire.

RESULTS

240 patients were initially screened, 60% (n = 145) were eligible and 38% agreed to participate in the study. Included patients (n = 55) had a mean age of 73 ± 3 years, 96% an ECOG score of 0-1 and were undergoing radiotherapy (64%), and/or chemotherapy (47%) and/or targeted therapy (36%) for stage I-II breast cancer (79%). Most patients reported significant cognitive complaints (82%) and 55% had previous experience with digital tools (n = 30). The usability rate was 92%, with 46 out of 50 evaluable participants completing at least three exercises during the training time. The adherence rate was 88%, with 43/50 participants completing all planned sessions. Participants were largely satisfied with the cognitive intervention format (87%). They preferred to complete sessions at the cancer center under the supervision of the neuropsychologist than alone at home (90%).

CONCLUSIONS

The high level of usability, adherence and satisfaction in this study shows for the first time the feasibility of digital cognitive stimulation in cancer patients older than 70 years. However, the intervention should be proposed only to patients reporting cognitive complaints and should be structured and supervised to improve acceptability and adherence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials identifier: NCT04261153, registered on 07/02/2020.

Prognostic impact of neurocognitive disorders in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of neurocognitive disorder (NCD) for 12 month-overall mortality in patients aged 70 or more with a solid cancer.

DESIGN

prospective, observational, multicenter cohort.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We analyzed data from the ELCAPA longitudinal multicenter observational cohort of patients aged 70 or over, referred for a geriatric assessment (GA) before a new cancer treatment modality between January 31st, 2007, and December 29th, 2017. We defined the baseline NCD in four classes: no NCD, mild NCD, moderate NCD, and major NCD, based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, memory complaint, and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score.

STATISTICAL METHODS

We compared the baseline characteristics of patients according to NCD classes, globally and by pairs (with Bonferroni' correction). Prognosis value of NCD classes were analysed by using univariable and then multivariable 12 month survival analysis with age as time-variable and with and without adjustement for the treatment strategy (curative, palliative or exclusive supportive care).

RESULTS

2784 patients with solid-cancer were included, with a median [interquartile range] age of 82 [78;86]. 36% of the patients were free of NCD, 34% had a mild NCD, 17% had a moderate NCD, and 13% had a major NCD. We identified the following independent prognostic factors for 12 month-overall mortality: NCD (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for a major NCD = 1.54 [1.19-1.98] (p < 0.001), type of cancer, metastatic status, inpatient consultation, poor general health (assessed as the level of fatigue and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG-PS]), greater weight loss, palliative treatment, and exclusive supportive care. Additional adjustment for the treatment strategy did not greatly change the strength of the association of a major NCD with 12 month-overall mortality (HR [95%CI] = 1.78 [1.39-2.29] (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the presence of a major NCD has direct prognostic value (independently of other geriatric factors, the type of cancer and the treatment strategy) in older patients with a solid cancer.

Prevalence and associated factors of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in older breast cancer survivors

AIMS

To examine the prevalence and associated factors of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in older breast cancer survivors (BCS).

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Cochrance Library, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, without language restrictions, for studies published from the establishment of the database to September 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

Two researchers independently examined the full texts, data extraction and quality assessment, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Scale.

RESULTS

The seven included studies showed that the estimated prevalence of CRCI in older BCS ranged from 18.6% to 27% on objective neuropsychological tests and from 7.6% to 49% on subjective cognitive assessments. The areas most affected were attention, memory, executive functioning and processing speed. CRCI was associated with 10 factors in six categories, including sociodemographic (e.g. age, education level), physiological (e.g. sleep disorders, fatigue and comorbidities), psychological (e.g. anxiety, depression), treatment modalities (e.g. chemotherapy cycles, chemotherapy regimens), genetic (e.g. APOE2, APOE4) and lifestyle factor (e.g. physical inactivity).

CONCLUSION

CRCI is multifactorial and has a relatively high prevalence. However, the results of subjective and objective cognitive examinations were inconsistent, possibly due to variations in tools used to evaluate different definitions of CRCI. Nevertheless, as there are few published studies of older BCS, this conclusion still require verification by well-designed studies in the future.

IMPACT

We found that the prevalence of CRCI in older adults is relatively high and multifactorial, providing evidence for further health care for this population.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

There was no patient or public involvement.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 polymorphism is associated with chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in patients with breast cancer who receive chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a common but easily overlooked condition that markedly affects the quality of life (QOL) of patients with breast cancer. The rs671 is a common gene polymorphism of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) in Asia that is involved in aldehyde metabolism and may be closely related to CRCI. However, no study has yet summarised the association between ALDH2 and CRCI.

METHODS

This study enrolled one hundred and twenty-four patients diagnosed with breast cancer according to the pathology results, genotyped for ALDH2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) to explore these. The mini-mental state exam (MMSE), verbal fluency test (VFT), and digit span test (DST) results were compared in these patients before and after chemotherapy (CT).

RESULTS

We found that patients with ALDH2 gene genotypes of rs671_GG, rs886205_GG, rs4648328_CC, and rs4767944_TT polymorphisms were more likely to suffer from cognitive impairment during chemotherapy. A trend toward statistical significance was observed for rs671_GG of DST (z = 2.769, p = 0.006), VFT (t = 4.624, P<0.001); rs886205_GG of DST (z = 3.663, P<0.001); rs4648328_CC of DST (z = 2.850, p = 0.004), VFT (t = 3.477, p = 0.001); and rs4767944_TT of DST (z = 2.967, p = 0.003), VFT (t = 2.776, p = 0.008). The cognitive indicators of these patients significantly decreased after chemotherapy (p < 0.05). The difference in ALDH2 rs671 was most obvious.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed what kinds of ALDH2 genotyped patients that are more likely to develop CRCI. In the future, it may be possible to infer the risk of CRCI by detecting the single-nucleotide locus of ALDH2 that is conducive to strengthening clinical interventions for these patients and improving their QOL. More importantly, this study has important implications for Asian women with breast cancer as ALDH2 rs671 is a common polymorphism in Asians.

Quality of Life in Underrepresented Cancer Populations

This series of six articles (five original articles and one review) is presented by international leaders in health disparities research [...]

The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Treatment Toxicity, Treatment Completion, and Survival among Older Adults Receiving Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Although cognitive impairment is common among older adults, the relationship between cognitive impairment and its effect on cancer outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine how toxicity risk, treatment completion, and survival may be impacted by chemotherapy in patients exhibiting evidence of cognitive impairment. Despite an absence of clear parallels between the severity of cognitive impairment and cancer outcomes, we found statistically significant relationships with survival in several studies and with toxicity in one study. An overall lack of robust evidence indicates the need for further research on the role of cognitive impairment in predicting survival, treatment completion, and toxicity among older adults receiving chemotherapy.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment (CI) is common among older adults with cancer, but its effect on cancer outcomes is not known. This systematic review sought to identify research investigating clinical endpoints (toxicity risk, treatment completion, and survival) of chemotherapy treatment in those with baseline CI. A systematic search of five databases (inception to March 2021) was conducted. Eligible studies included randomized trials, prospective studies, and retrospective studies in which the sample or a subgroup were older adults (aged ≥ 65) screened positive for CI prior to receiving chemotherapy. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Twenty-three articles were included. Sample sizes ranged from n = 31 to 703. There was heterogeneity of cancer sites, screening tools and cut-offs used to ascertain CI, and proportion of patients with CI within study samples. Severity of CI and corresponding proportion of each level within study samples were unclear in all but one study. Among studies investigating CI in a qualified multivariable model, statistically significant findings were found in 4/6 studies on survival and in 1/1 study on nonhematological toxicity. The lack of robust evidence indicates a need for further research on the role of CI in predicting survival, treatment completion, and toxicity among older adults receiving chemotherapy, and the potential implications that could shape treatment decisions.