1
|
van der Sluis L, van Dieren JM, van der Post RS, Bisseling TM. Current advances and challenges in Managing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer (HDGC): a narrative review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2024; 22:21. [PMID: 39379994 PMCID: PMC11462652 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-024-00293-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
More than 25 years ago, CDH1 pathogenic variants (PVs) were identified as the primary cause of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), an inherited cancer syndrome that increases the lifetime risk of developing diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). Since DGC is associated with a poor prognosis, a prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) is currently the gold standard for reducing the risk of DGC in CDH1 PV carriers. However, as germline genetic testing becomes more widespread, many CDH1 PV carriers have been identified, including in families with lower penetrance levels or without a history of gastric cancer (GC). When including these families, recent findings suggest that the cumulative lifetime risk of developing advanced DGC is much lower than previously thought and is now estimated to be 13-19%. This lower risk, combined with the fact that around one third of the CDH1 PV carriers decline PTG due to potential lifelong physical and psychological consequences, raises critical questions about the current uniformity in recommending PTG to all CDH1 PV carriers. As a result, there is a growing need to consider alternative strategies, such as endoscopic surveillance. However, despite the currently lower estimated risk of infiltrative (advanced) DGC, almost every PTG specimen shows the presence of small low-stage (pT1a) signet ring cell (SRC) lesions of which the behaviour is unpredictable but often are considered indolent or premalignant stages of DGC. Therefore, the primary goal of surveillance should be to identify atypical, deeper infiltrating lesions rather than every SRC lesion. Understanding the progression from indolent to more infiltrative lesions, and recognizing their endoscopic and histological features, is crucial in deciding the most suitable management option for each individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L van der Sluis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M van Dieren
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - T M Bisseling
- Department of Gastroenterology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Decourtye-Espiard L, Guilford P. Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:719-735. [PMID: 36740198 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a dominantly inherited cancer syndrome characterized by a high incidence of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) and lobular breast cancer (LBC). HDGC is caused by germline mutations in 2 genes involved in the epithelial adherens junction complex, CDH1 and CTNNA1. We discuss the genetics of HDGC and the variability of its clinical phenotype, in particular the variable penetrance of advanced DGC and LBC, both within and between families. We review the pathology of the disease, the mechanism of tumor initiation, and its natural history. Finally, we describe current best practice for the clinical management of HDGC, including emerging genetic testing criteria for the identification of new families, methods for endoscopic surveillance, the complications associated with prophylactic surgery, postoperative quality of life, and the emerging field of HDGC chemoprevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyvianne Decourtye-Espiard
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Parry Guilford
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li W, Cai H, Ren L, Yang Y, Yang H, Liu J, Li S, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Tan W, Du G, Wang J. Sphingosine kinase 1 promotes growth of glioblastoma by increasing inflammation mediated by the NF- κB /IL-6/STAT3 and JNK/PTX3 pathways. Acta Pharm Sin B 2022; 12:4390-4406. [PMID: 36562002 PMCID: PMC9764134 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most challenging malignant tumor of the central nervous system because of its high morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rate. Currently, mechanisms of GBM are still unclear and there is no effective drug for GBM in the clinic. Therefore, it is urgent to identify new drug targets and corresponding drugs for GBM. In this study, in silico analyses and experimental data show that sphingosine kinase 1 (SPHK1) is up-regulated in GBM patients, and is strongly correlated with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival. Overexpression of SPHK1 promoted the proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and clonogenicity of GBM cells, while silencing SPHK1 had the opposite effect. SPHK1 promoted inflammation through the NF-κB/IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway and led to the phosphorylation of JNK, activating the JNK-JUN and JNK-ATF3 pathways and promoting inflammation and proliferation of GBM cells by transcriptional activation of PTX3. SPHK1 interacted with PTX3 and formed a positive feedback loop to reciprocally increase expression, promote inflammation and GBM growth. Inhibition of SPHK1 by the inhibitor, PF543, also decreased tumorigenesis in the U87-MG and U251-MG SPHK1 orthotopic mouse models. In summary, we have characterized the role and molecular mechanisms by which SPHK1 promotes GBM, which may provide opportunities for SPHK1-targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Li
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Hongqing Cai
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China,State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Liwen Ren
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yihui Yang
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Hong Yang
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Jinyi Liu
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Sha Li
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Yizhi Zhang
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Xiangjin Zheng
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Wei Tan
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China,School of Pharmacy, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China,Xinjiang Institute of Materia Medica, Urumqi 830004, China
| | - Guanhua Du
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China,Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +86 10 63165184.
| | - Jinhua Wang
- The State Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substance and Function of Natural Medicines, Beijing 100050, China,Key Laboratory of Drug Target Research and Drug Screen, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100050, China,Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +86 10 63165184.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bougen-Zhukov N, Decourtye-Espiard L, Mitchell W, Redpath K, Perkinson J, Godwin T, Black MA, Guilford P. E-Cadherin-Deficient Cells Are Sensitive to the Multikinase Inhibitor Dasatinib. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1609. [PMID: 35406381 PMCID: PMC8996982 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The CDH1 gene, encoding the cell adhesion protein E-cadherin, is one of the most frequently mutated genes in gastric cancer and inactivating germline CDH1 mutations are responsible for the cancer syndrome hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). CDH1-deficient gastric cancers exhibit high AKT serine/threonine kinase 3 (AKT3) expression, but specific drugs against this AKT isoform are not available. We therefore used two publicly available datasets to identify AKT3-associated genes which could be used to indirectly target AKT3. Reactome analysis identified an enrichment of extracellular matrix remodelling genes in AKT3-high gastric cancers. Of the 51 genes that were significantly correlated with AKT3 (but not AKT1), discoidin domain receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (DDR2) showed the strongest positive association. Treatment of isogenic human cells and mouse gastric and mammary organoids with dasatinib, a small molecule inhibitor of multiple kinases including SRC, BCR-ABL and DDR2, preferentially slowed the growth and induced apoptosis of E-cadherin-deficient cells. Dasatinib treatment also preferentially slowed the growth of gastric and mammary organoids harbouring both Cdh1 and Tp53 mutations. In organoid models, dasatinib treatment was associated with decreased phosphorylation of total AKT, with a stronger effect seen in Cdh1-deficient organoids. Treatment with combinations of dasatinib and an inhibitor of AKT, MK2206, enhanced the effect of dasatinib in breast MCF10A cells. In conclusion, targeting the DDR2-SRC-AKT3 axis with dasatinib represents a promising approach for the chemoprevention and chemotherapy of gastric and breast cancers lacking E-cadherin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Parry Guilford
- Centre for Translational Cancer Research (Te Aho Matatū), Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; (N.B.-Z.); (L.D.-E.); (W.M.); (K.R.); (J.P.); (T.G.); (M.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Diffuse gastric cancer: Emerging mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877:188719. [PMID: 35307354 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is globally the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Patients with diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) particularly have a poor prognosis that only marginally improved over the last decades, as conventional chemotherapies are frequently ineffective and specific therapies are unavailable. Early-stage DGC is characterized by intramucosal lesions of discohesive cells, which can be present for many years before the emergence of advanced DGC consisting of highly proliferative and invasive cells. The mechanisms underlying the key steps of DGC development and transition to aggressive tumors are starting to emerge. Novel mouse- and organoid models for DGC, together with multi-omic analyses of DGC tumors, revealed contributions of both tumor cell-intrinsic alterations and gradual changes in the tumor microenvironment to DGC progression. In this review, we will discuss how these recent findings are leading towards an understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for DGC initiation and malignancy, which may provide opportunities for targeted therapies.
Collapse
|