Optimizing the Diagnosis and Biomarker Testing for Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach

A new biomarker panel for differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: Results from an exploratory analysis

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) can be challenging due to unclear imaging criteria and difficulty obtaining adequate tissue biopsy. Although serum cancer antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen have been proposed as potential diagnostic aids, their use remains limited by insufficient sensitivity and specificity. This exploratory analysis aimed to identify individual- and combinations of serum biomarkers to distinguish CCA from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic liver disease (CLD) controls using samples from a published study.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, case-control study included patients aged ≥18 years at high-risk of HCC. Serum and ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid-plasma samples were collected prior to any treatment and confirmed diagnosis of HCC or CCA. Fourteen biomarkers (measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassays or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) were subjected to univariate analysis and 13 included in a multivariate analysis (per selected combinations and exhaustive search).

RESULTS

Overall, 55 CCA, 306 HCC, and 733 CLD control samples were analyzed. For distinguishing CCA from HCC, alpha-fetoprotein and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) showed the best individual performance (area under the curve (AUC) 86.6% and 84.4%, respectively); tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) was most able to distinguish CCA from CLD (AUC 94.5%) and from HCC  +  CLD (AUC 88.6%). The combination of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 was the best-performing two-marker panel, with AUC >90% for all comparisons.

CONCLUSION

MMP-2 and TIMP-1 are promising biomarkers that could support differential diagnosis of CCA. Incorporating these assays into the diagnostic algorithm could provide additional diagnostic information in a non-invasive, rapid manner, and could supplement existing diagnostic methods.

Practical considerations for pathological diagnosis and molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma: an expert review for best practices

INTRODUCTION

Advances in precision medicine have expanded access to targeted therapies and demand for molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients in routine clinical practice. However, pathologists face challenges in establishing a definitive intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) diagnosis while preserving sufficient tissue for molecular profiling. Additionally, they frequently face challenges in optimal tissue handling to preserve nucleic acid integrity.

AREAS COVERED

This article first identifies the challenges in establishing a definitive diagnosis of iCCA in a lesional liver biopsy while preserving sufficient tissue for molecular profiling. Then, the authors explore the clinical value of molecular profiling, the basic principles of single gene and next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, and the challenges in tissue sampling for genomic testing. They also propose an algorithm for best practice in tissue management for molecular profiling of CCA.

EXPERT OPINION

Several practical challenges face pathologists during tissue sampling and processing for molecular profiling. Optimized tissue processing, careful tissue handling, and selection of appropriate approaches to molecular testing are essential to ensure that the highest possible quality of diagnostic information is provided in the greatest proportion of cases.

Nucleolin lactylation contributes to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma pathogenesis via RNA splicing regulation of MADD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a fatal malignancy of the biliary system. The lack of a detailed understanding of oncogenic signaling or global gene expression alterations has impeded clinical iCCA diagnosis and therapy. The role of protein lactylation, a newly unraveled post-translational modification that orchestrates gene expression, remains largely elusive in the pathogenesis of iCCA.

METHODS

Proteomics analysis of clinical iCCA specimens and adjacent tissues was performed to screen for proteins aberrantly lactylated in iCCA. Mass spectrometry, macromolecule interaction and cell behavioral studies were employed to identify the specific lactylation sites on the candidate protein(s) and to decipher the downstream mechanisms responsible for iCCA development, which were subsequently validated using a xenograft tumor model and clinical samples.

RESULTS

Nucleolin (NCL), the most abundant RNA-binding protein in the nucleolus, was identified as a functional lactylation target that correlates with iCCA occurrence and progression. NCL was lactylated predominantly at lysine 477 by the acyltransferase P300 in response to a hyperactivity of glycolysis, and promoted the proliferation and invasion of iCCA cells. Mechanistically, lactylated NCL bound to the primary transcript of MAP kinase-activating death domain protein (MADD) and led to efficient translation of MADD by circumventing alternative splicing that generates a premature termination codon. NCL lactylation, MADD translation and subsequent ERK activation promoted xenograft tumor growth and were associated with overall survival in patients with iCCA.

CONCLUSION

NCL is lactylated to upregulate MADD through an RNA splicing-dependent mechanism, which potentiates iCCA pathogenesis via the MAPK pathway. Our findings reveal a novel link between metabolic reprogramming and canonical tumor-initiating events, and uncover biomarkers that can potentially be used for prognostic evaluation or targeted treatment of iCCA.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a highly aggressive liver malignancy with largely uncharacterized pathogenetic mechanisms. Herein, we demonstrated that glycolysis promotes P300-catalyzed lactylation of nucleolin, which upregulates MAP kinase-activating death domain protein (MADD) through precise mRNA splicing and activates ERK signaling to drive iCCA development. These findings unravel a novel link between metabolic rewiring and canonical oncogenic pathways, and reveal new biomarkers for prognostic assessment and targeting of clinical iCCA.

Cholangiocarcinoma: Pathologic and Molecular Classification in the Era of Precision Medicine

CONTEXT.—

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous cancer of the bile duct, and its diagnosis is often challenging.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide insights into state-of-the-art approaches for the diagnosis of CCA.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review via PubMed search and authors' experiences.

CONCLUSIONS.—

CCA can be categorized as intrahepatic or extrahepatic. Intrahepatic CCA is further classified into small-duct-type and large-duct-type, whereas extrahepatic CCA is classified into distal and perihilar according to site of origin within the extrahepatic biliary tree. Tumor growth patterns include mass forming, periductal infiltrating, and intraductal tumors. The clinical diagnosis of CCA is challenging and usually occurs at an advanced tumor stage. Pathologic diagnosis is made difficult by tumor inaccessibility and challenges in distinguishing CCA from metastatic adenocarcinoma to the liver. Immunohistochemical stains can assist in differentiating CCA from other malignancies, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, but no distinctive CCA-specific immunohistochemical profile has been identified. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing-based high-throughput assays have identified distinct genomic profiles of CCA subtypes, including genomic alterations that are susceptible to targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Detailed histopathologic and molecular evaluations of CCA by pathologists are critical for correct diagnosis, subclassification, therapeutic decision-making, and prognostication. The first step toward achieving these goals is to acquire a detailed understanding of the histologic and genetic subtypes of this heterogeneous tumor group. Here, we review state-of-the-art approaches that should be applied to establish a diagnosis of CCA, including clinical presentation, histopathology, staging, and the practical use of genetic testing methodologies.

Biliary stem cells in health and cholangiopathies and cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses evidence regarding progenitor populations of the biliary tree in the tissue regeneration and homeostasis, and the pathobiology of cholangiopathies and malignancies.

RECENT FINDINGS

In embryogenesis biliary multipotent progenitor subpopulation contributes cells not only to the pancreas and gall bladder but also to the liver. Cells equipped with a constellation of markers suggestive of the primitive endodermal phenotype exist in the peribiliary glands, the bile duct glands, of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. These cells are able to be isolated and cultured easily, which demonstrates the persistence of a stable phenotype during in vitro expansion, the ability to self-renew in vitro, and the ability to differentiate between hepatocyte and biliary and pancreatic islet fates.

SUMMARY

In normal human livers, stem/progenitors cells are mostly restricted in two distinct niches, which are the bile ductules/canals of Hering and the peribiliary glands (PBGs) present inside the wall of large intrahepatic bile ducts. The existence of a network of stem/progenitor cell niches within the liver and along the entire biliary tree inform a patho-biological-based translational approach to biliary diseases and cholangiocarcinoma since it poses the basis to understand biliary regeneration after extensive or chronic injuries and progression to fibrosis and cancer.

Molecular profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: A practical guide to next-generation sequencing

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are classified as intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal according to the anatomic location within the biliary tract. Each CCA subtype is associated with distinct genomic alterations, including single nucleotide variants, copy number variants, and chromosomal rearrangements or gene fusions, each of which can influence disease prognosis and/or treatment outcomes. Molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful technique for identifying unique gene variants carried by an individual tumor, which can facilitate their accurate diagnosis as well as promote the optimal selection of gene variant-matched targeted treatments. NGS is particularly useful in patients with CCA because between one-third and one-half of these patients have genomic alterations that can be targeted by drugs that are either approved or in clinical development. NGS can also provide information about disease evolution and secondary resistance alterations that can develop during targeted therapy, and thus facilitate assessment of prognosis and choice of alternative targeted treatments. Pathologists play a critical role in assessing the viability of biopsy samples for NGS, and advising treating clinicians whether NGS can be performed and which of the available platforms should be used to optimize testing outcomes. This review aims to provide clinical pathologists and other healthcare professionals with practical step-by-step guidance on the use of NGS for molecular profiling of patients with CCA, with respect to tumor biopsy techniques, pre-analytic sample preparation, selecting the appropriate NGS panel, and understanding and interpreting results of the NGS test.

Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in Italy: A Delphi consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)/biliary tract cancer recommend genomic profiling to guide treatment decisions. Variable access to such profiling across Italy means many oncologists are unfamiliar with when and how to conduct genetic testing and prescribe targeted treatments.

METHODS

A Scientific Board of Italian oncologists who treat CCA (the authors) developed recommendations, based on recent clinical evidence, for using molecular testing in diagnosing, assessing, and treating CCA in Italy. The Delphi process was used to reach consensus on these recommendations among 38 Italian oncologists. Consensus was considered to be met if ≥ 66.7 % of the panel agreed or strongly agreed with each statement.

FINDINGS

Consensus was reached on 28 statements across four themes: (1) epidemiology and risk factors; (2) diagnosis, including molecular diagnosis; (3) treatment selection; and (4) treatment safety.

INTERPRETATION

These recommendations should aid Italian clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment options for their patients.

Identification of SPRYD4 as a tumour suppressor predicts prognosis and correlates with immune infiltration in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive solid tumour with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 7% to 20%. It is, therefore, urgent to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve the outcomes of patients with CCA. SPRY-domain containing protein 4 (SPRYD4) contains SPRY domains that modulate protein-protein interaction in various biological processes; however, its role in cancer development is insufficiently explored. This study is the first to identify that SPRYD4 is downregulated in CCA tissues using multiple public datasets and a CCA cohort. Furthermore, the low expression of SPRYD4 was significantly associated with unfavourable clinicopathological characteristics and poor prognosis in patients with CCA, indicating that SPRYD4 could be a prognosis indicator of CCA. In vitro experiments revealed that SPRYD4 overexpression inhibited CCA cells proliferation and migration, whereas the proliferative and migratory capacity of CCA cells was enhanced after SPRYD4 deletion. Moreover, flow cytometry showed that SPRYD4 overexpression triggered the S/G2 cell phase arrest and promoted apoptosis in CCA cells. Furthermore, the tumour-inhibitory effect of SPRYD4 was validated in vivo using xenograft mouse models. SPRYD4 also showed a close association with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and important immune checkpoints including PD1, PD-L1 and CTLA4 in CCA. In conclusion, this study elucidated the role of SPRYD4 during CCA development and highlighted SPRYD4 as a novel biomarker and tumour suppressor in CCA.

New molecular mechanisms in cholangiocarcinoma: signals triggering interleukin-6 production in tumor cells and KRAS co-opted epigenetic mediators driving metabolic reprogramming

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is still a deadly tumour. Histological and molecular aspects of thioacetamide (TAA)-induced intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) in rats mimic those of human iCCA. Carcinogenic changes and therapeutic vulnerabilities in CCA may be captured by molecular investigations in bile, where we performed bile proteomic and metabolomic analyses that help discovery yet unknown pathways relevant to human iCCA.

Methods

Cholangiocarcinogenesis was induced in rats (TAA) and mice (Jnk^Δhepa + CCl₄ + DEN model). We performed proteomic and metabolomic analyses in bile from control and CCA-bearing rats. Differential expression was validated in rat and human CCAs. Mechanisms were addressed in human CCA cells, including Huh28-KRAS^G12D cells. Cell signaling, growth, gene regulation and [U-¹³C]-D-glucose-serine fluxomics analyses were performed. In vivo studies were performed in the clinically-relevant iCCA mouse model.

Results

Pathways related to inflammation, oxidative stress and glucose metabolism were identified by proteomic analysis. Oxidative stress and high amounts of the oncogenesis-supporting amino acids serine and glycine were discovered by metabolomic studies. Most relevant hits were confirmed in rat and human CCAs (TCGA). Activation of interleukin-6 (IL6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways, and key genes in cancer-related glucose metabolic reprogramming, were validated in TAA-CCAs. In TAA-CCAs, G9a, an epigenetic pro-tumorigenic writer, was also increased. We show that EGFR signaling and mutant KRAS^G12D can both activate IL6 production in CCA cells. Furthermore, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH), the rate-limiting enzyme in serine-glycine pathway, was upregulated in human iCCA correlating with G9a expression. In a G9a activity-dependent manner, KRAS^G12D promoted PHGDH expression, glucose flow towards serine synthesis, and increased CCA cell viability. KRAS^G12D CAA cells were more sensitive to PHGDH and G9a inhibition than controls. In mouse iCCA, G9a pharmacological targeting reduced PHGDH expression.

Conclusions

In CCA, we identified new pro-tumorigenic mechanisms: Activation of EGFR signaling or KRAS mutation drives IL6 expression in tumour cells; Glucose metabolism reprogramming in iCCA includes activation of the serine-glycine pathway; Mutant KRAS drives PHGDH expression in a G9a-dependent manner; PHGDH and G9a emerge as therapeutic targets in iCCA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02386-2.

An Expert, Multidisciplinary Perspective on Best Practices in Biomarker Testing in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy that arises from the intrahepatic biliary tree and is associated with a poor prognosis. Until recently, the treatment landscape of advanced/metastatic iCCA has been limited primarily to chemotherapy. In recent years, the advent of biomarker testing has identified actionable genetic alterations in 40%-50% of patients with iCCA, heralding an era of precision medicine for these patients. Biomarker testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has since become increasingly relevant in iCCA; however, several challenges and gaps in standard image-guided liver biopsy and processing have been identified. These include variability in tissue acquisition relating to the imaging modality used for biopsy guidance, the biopsy method used, number of passes, needle choice, specimen preparation methods, the desmoplastic nature of the tumor, as well as the lack of communication among the multidisciplinary team. Recognizing these challenges and the lack of evidence-based guidelines for biomarker testing in iCCA, a multidisciplinary team of experts including interventional oncologists, a gastroenterologist, medical oncologists, and pathologists suggest best practices for optimizing tissue collection and biomarker testing in iCCA.