1
|
Koch EAT, Heppt MV, Berking C. The Current State of Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Am J Clin Dermatol 2024:10.1007/s40257-024-00872-1. [PMID: 38907174 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00872-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
Uveal melanoma (UM) is genetically a distinct tumor compared to cutaneous melanoma (CM), and due to its low mutational burden, it is far less perceptible to the immune system. Thus, treatments that have revolutionized the treatment of CM remain widely inefficient in metastatic UM or only demonstrate effectiveness in a small subpopulation of patients. To this end, the therapeutic benefit of immune checkpoint blockade is very limited and may come at the expense of severe immune-related adverse events that could potentially affect all organ systems. Notably, tebentafusp, an entirely novel class of anti-cancer drugs, has received official authorization for the treatment of metastatic UM. It is the first agent that demonstrated a survival advantage in a randomized controlled trial of metastatic UM patients. Despite the survival benefit and approval, the restriction of tebentafusp to HLA-A*02:01-positive patients and the low objective response rate indicate the persistent need for additional therapies. Thus, liver-directed therapies are commonly used for tumor control of hepatic metastases and represent a central pillar of the daily management of liver-dominant disease. Further, promising data from targeted therapies independent of MEK-inhibitors, such as the combination of darovasertib and crizotinib, raise hope for additional options in metastatic UM in the future. This narrative review provides a timely and comprehensive overview of the current treatment landscape for metastatic UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), CCC Erlangen-EMN, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yamada K, Takeuchi M, Fukumoto T, Suzuki M, Kato A, Mizuki Y, Yamada N, Kaneko T, Mizuki N, Horita N. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic uveal melanoma: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7887. [PMID: 38570507 PMCID: PMC10991441 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55675-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Several studies have evaluated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for metastatic uveal melanoma; however, the efficacy of ICIs in the previous studies varied greatly. In this systematic review, we searched for prospective or retrospective studies on single or dual-ICIs for metastatic uveal melanoma treatment. A random-effect model meta-analysis with generic inverse-variance was conducted, and 36 articles representing 41 cohorts of 1414 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were included. The pooled outcomes were as follows: objective response rate (ORR) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 3.7-7.5%; I2, 36%), disease control rate (DCR) was 32.5% (95% CI 27.2-37.7%; I2, 73%), median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.7-2.9 months; I2, 26%), and median overall survival (OS) was 11.2 months (95% CI 9.6-13.2 months; I2, 74%). Compared to single-agent ICI, dual ICI led to better ORR (single-agent: 3.4% [95% CI 1.8-5.1]; dual-agent: 12.4% [95% CI 8.0-16.9]; P < 0.001), DCR (single-agent: 29.3%, [95% CI 23.4-35.2]; dual-agent: 44.3% [95% CI 31.7-56.8]; P = 0.03), and OS (single-agent: 9.8 months [95% CI 8.0-12.2]; dual-agent: 16.3 months [95% CI 13.5-19.7]; P < 0.001). Our analysis provided treatment outcomes as described above. Dual-ICIs appear better than single-agent ICIs for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayoko Yamada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Masaki Takeuchi
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Fukumoto
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Minako Suzuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Ai Kato
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Yuki Mizuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Norihiro Yamada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kaneko
- Department of Pulmonology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Mizuki
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Horita
- Chemotherapy Center, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ko B, Tao K, Brennan L, Rakhade S, Chan CX, Moone JY, Zhu R, Sher A, Wang S, Bracero Y, Fullerton B, McLellan B, Geskin LJ, Saenger YM. Evaluating the efficacy of combination and single-agent immunotherapies in real-world patterns of disease progression and survival of metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:134-141. [PMID: 38181115 PMCID: PMC10906191 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to describe survival outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting receiving combination and single-agent immunotherapy outside the clinical trial context. We conducted a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting. Survival was calculated using log-rank test. Contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test. CD8 + T-cell densities were measured using quantitative immunofluorescence and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. The median overall survival (OS) for 132 patients was 45.3 months. Brain metastasis did not confer a higher risk of death relative to liver and/or bone disease (39.53 versus 30.00 months, respectively; P = 0.687). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was the most common first-line treatment, received by 49.2% of patients. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 and combination anti-PD-1 plus CTLA-4 (39.4 months versus undefined; P = 0.643). Patients treated with combination therapy were more likely to be alive without progression at the last follow-up than those who received monotherapy (70.4% versus 49.2%; P = 0.0408). Median OS was 21.8 months after initiation of second-line therapy after anti-PD-1 monotherapy. CD8+ T-cell densities were higher in patients who achieved disease control on first-line immunotherapy ( P = 0.013). In a real-world setting, patients with metastatic melanoma have excellent survival rates, and treatment benefit can be achieved even after progression on first-line therapy. Combination immunotherapy may produce more favorable long-term outcomes in a real-world setting. High pretreatment CD8+ T-cell infiltration correlates with immunotherapy efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Ko
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kevin Tao
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Lachlan Brennan
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Swanand Rakhade
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Cynthia X. Chan
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | | | - Richard Zhu
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Ariel Sher
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Samuel Wang
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Yadriel Bracero
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| | - Ben Fullerton
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York
| | - Beth McLellan
- Division of Dermatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx
| | - Larisa J. Geskin
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yvonne M. Saenger
- Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wessely A, Koch EAT, Vera J, Berking C, Heppt MV. Identifizierung von Biomarkern und neuen therapeutischen Zielen beim Aderhautmelanom: Identifying biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets in uveal melanoma. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:29-33. [PMID: 38212929 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15225_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDas Uveamelanom (UM) ist eine seltene Krebserkrankung, obwohl es der häufigste Tumor des Auges bei Erwachsenen ist. Die Patienten werden meist in Hautkrebszentren zur Behandlung der metastasierten Erkrankung vorgestellt. Es gibt jedoch erhebliche genetische, biologische und klinische Unterschiede zum kutanen Melanom. Die bei metastasiertem UM am häufigsten eingesetzten Therapien sind Tebentafusp und die kombinierte Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade, die beide niedrige Ansprechraten aufweisen und mit hohen Behandlungskosten und erheblichen immunbedingten Toxizitäten verbunden sein können. Daher ist es von größter Bedeutung, einerseits Biomarker und klinische Profile zu identifizieren, die das Ansprechen auf die Behandlung vorhersagen können und andererseits neue therapeutische Ziele zu finden. Der Einsatz der Immuncheckpoint‐Blockade zeigte in einer Reihe retrospektiver Studien günstigere Ergebnisse bei Patienten mit extrahepatischer Metastasierung und normalen Laktatdehydrogenase‐Werten im Serum, so dass ihr Einsatz in dieser Subgruppe sinnvoller scheint. Um neue Zielmoleküle für Medikamente zu identifizieren, werden wir die Expression und Relevanz von Transkriptionsfaktoren der Neuralleiste in Bioproben von Patienten mit Next‐Generation‐Sequenzierung der dritten Generation analysieren. Computeralgorithmen und netzwerkbasierte Analysen werden die Identifizierung von Zielstrukturen für Medikamente erleichtern, die anschließend in Kurzzeit‐Zellkulturen von Patienten validiert werden. Dieser Ansatz wird dazu beitragen, neue und personalisierte Behandlungen für das UM zu finden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Wessely
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Elias A T Koch
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julio Vera
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Hautklinik, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koch EAT, Petzold A, Wessely A, Dippel E, Eckstein M, Gesierich A, Gutzmer R, Hassel JC, Knorr H, Kreuzberg N, Leiter U, Loquai C, Meier F, Meissner M, Mohr P, Pföhler C, Rahimi F, Schadendorf D, Schlaak M, Thoms KM, Ugurel S, Utikal J, Weichenthal M, Schuler-Thurner B, Berking C, Heppt MV. Liver-directed treatment is associated with improved survival and increased response to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic uveal melanoma: results from a retrospective multicenter trial. Front Med 2023; 17:878-888. [PMID: 37432641 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-023-0993-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Metastases of uveal melanoma (UM) spread predominantly to the liver. Due to low response rates to systemic therapies, liver-directed therapies (LDT) are commonly used for tumor control. The impact of LDT on the response to systemic treatment is unknown. A total of 182 patients with metastatic UM treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were included in this analysis. Patients were recruited from prospective skin cancer centers and the German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Two cohorts were compared: patients with LDT (cohort A, n = 78) versus those without LDT (cohort B, n = 104). Data were analyzed for response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The median OS was significantly longer in cohort A than in cohort B (20.1 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0016) and a trend towards improved PFS was observed for cohort A (3.0 vs. 2.5 months; P = 0.054). The objective response rate to any ICB (16.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.0073) and combined ICB (14.1% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.017) was more favorable in cohort A. Our data suggest that the combination of LDT with ICB may be associated with a survival benefit and higher treatment response to ICB in patients with metastatic UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias A T Koch
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anne Petzold
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Wessely
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edgar Dippel
- Department of Dermatology, Ludwigshafen Medical Center, 67059, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Gesierich
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center Minden, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken AöR, Ruhr University, Bochum Campus Minden, 32423, Minden, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Harald Knorr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nicole Kreuzberg
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skin Cancer Center at the Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Köln Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72056, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Loquai
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center Dresden and National Center for Tumor Diseases & Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Markus Meissner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Goethe University, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Department of Dermatology, Elbeklinikum, 21614, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Claudia Pföhler
- Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical School, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Farnaz Rahimi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Munich University Hospital (LMU), 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Max Schlaak
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai-Martin Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37075, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany, 45147
| | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, and DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beatrice Schuler-Thurner
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carola Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus V Heppt
- Department of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Area of Nürnberg (CCC ER-EMN), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Uniklinikum Erlangen, Östliche Stadtmauerstraße 30, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|