1
|
Chakraborty MA, Khan AJ, Cahlon O, Xu AJ, Braunstein LZ, Powell SN, Choi JI. Proton Reirradiation for High-Risk Recurrent or New Primary Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5722. [PMID: 38136268 PMCID: PMC10742022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral component of multidisciplinary breast cancer care. Given how commonly radiotherapy is used in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients with recurrences have received previous radiotherapy. Patients with new primary breast cancer may also have received previous radiotherapy to the thoracic region. Curative doses and comprehensive field photon reirradiation (reRT) have often been avoided in these patients due to concerns for severe toxicities to organs-at-risk (OARs), such as the heart, lungs, brachial plexus, and soft tissue. However, many patients may benefit from definitive-intent reRT, such as patients with high-risk disease features such as lymph node involvement and dermal/epidermal invasion. Proton therapy is a potentially advantageous treatment option for delivery of reRT due to its lack of exit dose and greater conformality that allow for enhanced non-target tissue sparing of previously irradiated tissues. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of proton therapy for patients with breast cancer requiring reRT, the currently available literature and how it compares to historical photon reRT outcomes, treatment planning considerations, and questions in this area warranting further study. Given the dosimetric advantages of protons and the data reported to date, proton therapy is a promising option for patients who would benefit from the added locoregional disease control provided by reRT for recurrent or new primary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A. Chakraborty
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Atif J. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Lior Z. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grambozov B, Kalantari F, Beheshti M, Stana M, Karner J, Ruznic E, Zellinger B, Sedlmayer F, Rinnerthaler G, Zehentmayr F. Pretreatment 18-FDG-PET/CT parameters can serve as prognostic imaging biomarkers in recurrent NSCLC patients treated with reirradiation-chemoimmunotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 185:109728. [PMID: 37301259 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Our study aimed to assess whether quantitative pretreatment 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters could predict prognostic clinical outcome of recurrent NSCLC patients who may benefit from ablative reirradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients with recurrent NSCLC of all UICC stages who underwent ablative thoracic reirradiation were analyzed. Twenty-nine (60%) patients received immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in addition to reirradiation. Twelve patients (25%) received reirradiation only and seven (15%) received chemotherapy and reirradiation. Pretreatment 18-FDG-PET/CT was mandatory in initial diagnosis and recurrence, based on which volumetric and intensity quantitative parameters were measured before reirradiation and their impact on overall survival, progression-free survival, and locoregional control was assessed. RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 16.7 months, the median OS was 21.8 months (95%-CI: 16.2-27.3). On multivariate analysis, OS and PFS were significantly influenced by MTV (p < 0.001 for OS; p = 0.006 for PFS), TLG (p < 0.001 for OS; p = 0.001 for PFS) and SUL peak (p = 0.0024 for OS; p = 0.02 for PFS) of the tumor and MTV (p = 0.004 for OS; p < 0.001 for PFS) as well as TLG (p = 0.007 for OS; p = 0.015 for PFS) of the metastatic lymph nodes. SUL peak of the tumor (p = 0.05) and the MTV of the lymph nodes (p = 0.003) were only PET quantitative parameters that significantly impacted LRC. CONCLUSION Pretreatment tumor and metastastic lymph node MTV, TLG and tumor SUL peak significantly correlated with clinical outcome in recurrent NSCLC patients treated with reirradiation-chemoimmunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brane Grambozov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Forough Kalantari
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Markus Stana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Josef Karner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Elvis Ruznic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Barbara Zellinger
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria; radART - Institute for Research and Development on Advanced Radiation Technologies, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; Cancer Cluster Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franz Zehentmayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria; radART - Institute for Research and Development on Advanced Radiation Technologies, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janopaul-Naylor JR, Cao Y, McCall NS, Switchenko JM, Tian S, Chen H, Stokes WA, Kesarwala AH, McDonald MW, Shelton JW, Bradley JD, Higgins KA. Definitive intensity modulated proton re-irradiation for lung cancer in the immunotherapy era. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1074675. [PMID: 36733369 PMCID: PMC9888533 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1074675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction As immunotherapy has improved distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), isolated locoregional recurrences have increased. However, management of locoregional recurrences can be challenging. We report our institutional experience with definitive intent re-irradiation using Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT). Method Retrospective cohort study of recurrent or second primary NSCLC or LS-SCLC treated with IMPT. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for time-to-event analyses. Results 22 patients were treated from 2019 to 2021. After first course of radiation (median 60 Gy, range 45-70 Gy), 45% received adjuvant immunotherapy. IMPT re-irradiation began a median of 28.2 months (8.8-172.9 months) after initial radiotherapy. The median IMPT dose was 60 GyE (44-60 GyE). 36% received concurrent chemotherapy with IMPT and 18% received immunotherapy after IMPT. The median patient's IMPT lung mean dose was 5.3 GyE (0.9-13.9 GyE) and 5 patients had cumulative esophagus max dose >100 GyE with 1-year overall survival (OS) 68%, 1-year local control 80%, 1-year progression free survival 45%, and 1-year DMFS 60%. Higher IMPT (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7, p=0.01) and initial radiotherapy mean lung doses (HR 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.6, p=0.04) were associated with worse OS. Two patients developed Grade 3 pneumonitis or dermatitis, one patient developed Grade 2 pneumonitis, and seven patients developed Grade 1 toxicity. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Discussion Definitive IMPT re-irradiation for lung cancer can prolong disease control with limited toxicity, particularly in the immunotherapy era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R. Janopaul-Naylor
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Yichun Cao
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Neal S. McCall
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sibo Tian
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Haijian Chen
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - William A. Stokes
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Aparna H. Kesarwala
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Mark W. McDonald
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Joseph W. Shelton
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jeffrey D. Bradley
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kristin A. Higgins
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|