The Impact of Frailty Screening on Radiation Treatment Modification

Falls among geriatric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk across cancer types

BACKGROUND

Falls represent a significant health concern among the older adults, particularly geriatric cancer patients, due to their increased susceptibility from both age-related and cancer treatment-related factors. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize global data on the prevalence and risk of falls in this population to inform targeted fall prevention strategies.

METHODS

Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 2024. Articles were screened using Nested Knowledge software by two independent reviewers. Eligible studies included those involving geriatric cancer patients aged 60 years or older reporting on fall prevalence. Quality assessment was performed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models with R software.

RESULTS

From 1,365 identified studies, 86 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 180,974 participants. The pooled prevalence of falls was 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 100%). Country- and cancer-type-specific analyses revealed variability in fall prevalence, with breast cancer patients showing the highest prevalence. The comparative risk analysis did not show a statistically significant difference in fall risk between cancer patients and non-cancer controls.

CONCLUSION

Falls are a prevalent and concerning issue among geriatric cancer patients, with substantial variability influenced by cancer type and study design. Personalized fall prevention strategies tailored to cancer-specific risk factors are essential. Further research is warranted to explore the complex interplay of cancer treatments, frailty, and fall risk in this vulnerable population.

Geriatric Assessment Tools in Head and Neck Radiation Oncology: An Unmet Need

The geriatric population faces unique challenges in cancer treatment due to higher rates of comorbidities, which can complicate the risk-benefit analysis of treatment regimens and overall treatment decisions for both physicians and patients. This is especially true for head and neck cancers (HNC) since these patients experience significant treatment-related morbidity. Currently, there are several geriatric assessment (GA) tools available to predict outcomes in older cancer patients treated with surgery or chemotherapy, but no such tool exists to assess the frailty of geriatric patients undergoing radiation therapy for HNC. In this review, we discuss the available geriatric tools, especially those meant for cancer patients, their limitations in HNC patients, and an additional limitation of predicting radiation (RT) treatment outcomes in this challenging group of patients. We also present preliminary data for a new GA tool for HNC patients that can predict premature termination (PT) of treatment or extended treatment (ET) time.

Comparison of three frailty scales for prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus following major abdominal surgery in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To determine whether frailty can predict prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) in older abdominal surgical patients; and to compare predictive ability of the FRAIL scale, the five-point modified frailty index (mFI-5) and Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) for PPOI.

METHODS

Patients (aged ≥ 65 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery at our institution between April 2022 to January 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Frailty was evaluated with FRAIL, mFI-5 and GFI before operation. Data on demographics, comorbidities, perioperative management, postoperative recovery of bowel function and PPOI occurrence were collected.

RESULTS

The incidence of frailty assessed with FRAIL, mFI-5 and GFI was 18.2%, 38.4% and 32.5% in a total of 203 patients, respectively. Ninety-five (46.8%) patients experienced PPOI. Time to first soft diet intake was longer in patients with frailty assessed by the three scales than that in patients without frailty. Frailty diagnosed by mFI-5 [Odds ratio (OR) 3.230, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.572-6.638, P = 0.001] or GFI (OR 2.627, 95% CI 1.307-5.281, P = 0.007) was related to a higher risk of PPOI. Both mFI-5 [Area under curve (AUC) 0.653, 95% CI 0.577-0.730] and GFI (OR 2.627, 95% CI 1.307-5.281, P = 0.007) had insufficient accuracy for the prediction of PPOI in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients diagnosed as frail on the mFI-5 or GFI are at an increased risk of PPOI after major abdominal surgery. However, neither mFI-5 nor GFI can accurately identify individuals who will develop PPOI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200058178). The date of first registration, 31/03/2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/ .