1
|
Camarda AM, Vincini MG, Russo S, Comi S, Emiro F, Bazani A, Ingargiola R, Vischioni B, Vecchi C, Volpe S, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orlandi E, Alterio D. Dosimetric and NTCP analyses for selecting parotid gland cancer patients for proton therapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2024:3008916241252544. [PMID: 38769916 DOI: 10.1177/03008916241252544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE To perform a dosimetric and a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) comparison between intensity modulated proton therapy and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy in a cohort of patients with parotid gland cancers in a post-operative or radical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS From May 2011 to September 2021, 37 parotid gland cancers patients treated at two institutions were eligible. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged ⩾ 18 years, diagnosis of parotid gland cancers candidate for postoperative radiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy, presence of written informed consent for the use of anonymous data for research purposes. Organs at risk (OARs) were retrospectively contoured. Target coverage goal was defined as D95 > 98%. Six NTCP models were selected. NTCP profiles were calculated for each patient using an internally-developed Python script in RayStation TPS. Average differences in NTCP between photon and proton plans were tested for significance with a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Seventy-four plans were generated. A lower Dmean to the majority of organs at risk (inner ear, cochlea, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscles, contralateral parotid and submandibular gland) was obtained with intensity modulated proton therapy vs volumetric modulated arc therapy with statistical significance (p < .05). Ten (27%) patients had a difference in NTCP (photon vs proton plans) greater than 10% for hearing loss and tinnitus: among them, seven qualified for both endpoints, two patients for hearing loss only, and one for tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS In the current study, nearly one-third of patients resulted eligible for proton therapy and they were the most likely to benefit in terms of prevention of hearing loss and tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Camarda
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Emiro
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Bazani
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences,University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang P, Huang X, Xue L, Liao J, Liu J, Yu J, Li T. Nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a cross-sectional study. Front Nutr 2024; 11:1386361. [PMID: 38832098 PMCID: PMC11144905 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1386361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma are notably susceptible to high nutritional risks. If not addressed, this susceptibility can lead to malnutrition, resulting in numerous adverse clinical outcomes. Despite the significance of this issue, there is limited comprehensive research on the topic. Objective The objective of our study was to identify nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we recruited a total of 377 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 tool was used to assess their nutritional risk. These patients were divided into a well-nourished group (n = 222) and a nutritional risk group (n = 155). Potential risk factors were screened out using univariate analysis (p < 0.1). These factors were subsequently analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis (p < 0.05) to identify the nutritional risk factors for these patients. Results Our findings indicated that increasing age (OR = 1.085, 95%CI: 1.053-1.117, p < 0.001), high number of radiation treatments (OR = 1.103, 95%CI: 1.074-1.132, p < 0.001), low BMI (OR = 0.700, 95%CI: 0.618-0.793, p < 0.001), and low albumin levels (OR = 0.852, 95%CI: 0.789-0.921, p < 0.001) are significant nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Conclusion Increasing age, high number of radiation treatments, low BMI, and low albumin levels are significant nutritional risk factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengpeng Wang
- Nursing College of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Xueling Huang
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Li Xue
- Nursing College of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jinlian Liao
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jieying Liu
- Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Jiaxiang Yu
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Ting Li
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rampinelli V, Ferrari M, Mattavelli D, Bonomo P, Lambertoni A, Turri-Zanoni M, D’Angelo E, Alterio D, Cianchetti M, Vischioni B, Rosati R, Tomasoni M, Alparone M, Taboni S, Tomasini D, Maddalo M, Bastia MBDM, Iacovelli NA, Dionisi F, Bignami M, Battaglia P, Bossi P, Deganello A, Piazza C, Schreiber A, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Orlandi E. Treatment of loco-regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area: oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and proposal of a prognostic nomogram. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1157584. [PMID: 37260976 PMCID: PMC10228821 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1157584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The study assessed outcomes and toxicities of different treatment modalities for local and/or regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic area. Methods Patients treated with curative intent for recurrent NPC with salvage surgery, photon-based radiotherapy, proton therapy (PT), with or without chemotherapy, at different Italian referral centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. Adverse events and complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Characteristics of the patients, tumors, treatments, and complications are presented along with uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram is also provided. Results A total of 140 patients treated from 1998 to 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Cases with lower age, comorbidity rate, stage, and shorter disease-free interval (DFI) preferentially underwent endoscopic surgery. More advanced cases underwent re-irradiation, fairly distributed between photon-based radiotherapy and PT. Age and DFI were independent factors influencing overall survival. No independent prognostic effect of treatment modality was observed. No significant difference in the morbidity profile of treatments was observed, with 40% of patients experiencing at least one adverse event classified as G3 or higher. Conclusion Recurrent NPC in a non-endemic area has dissimilar aspects compared to its endemic counterpart, suggesting the need for further studies that can guide the choice of the best treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Rampinelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessia Lambertoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Elisa D’Angelo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Cianchetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Azienda Provinciale Per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberta Rosati
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michele Tomasoni
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Alparone
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Taboni
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marta Maddalo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bignami
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Battaglia
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialities, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Deganello
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS National Cancer Institute (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alberto Schreiber
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Padannayil NM, Sharma DS, Nangia S, Patro KC, Gaikwad U, Burela N. IMPT of head and neck cancer: unsupervised machine learning treatment planning strategy for reducing radiation dermatitis. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:11. [PMID: 36639667 PMCID: PMC9840252 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02201-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation dermatitis is a major concern in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) despite its demonstrated superiority over contemporary photon radiotherapy. In this study, dose surface histogram data extracted from forty-four patients of HNC treated with IMPT was used to predict the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of skin. Grades of NTCP-skin were clustered using the K-means clustering unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithm. A new skin-sparing IMPT (IMPT-SS) planning strategy was developed with three major changes and prospectively implemented in twenty HNC patients. Across skin surfaces exposed from 10 (S10) to 70 (S70) GyRBE, the skin's NTCP demonstrated the strongest associations with S50 and S40 GyRBE (0.95 and 0.94). The increase in the NTCP of skin per unit GyRBE is 0.568 for skin exposed to 50 GyRBE as compared to 0.418 for 40 GyRBE. Three distinct clusters were formed, with 41% of patients in G1, 32% in G2, and 27% in G3. The average (± SD) generalised equivalent uniform dose for G1, G2, and G3 clusters was 26.54 ± 6.75, 38.73 ± 1.80, and 45.67 ± 2.20 GyRBE. The corresponding NTCP (%) were 4.97 ± 5.12, 48.12 ± 12.72 and 87.28 ± 7.73 respectively. In comparison to IMPT, new IMPT-SS plans significantly (P < 0.01) reduced SX GyRBE, gEUD, and associated NTCP-skin while maintaining identical dose volume indices for target and other organs at risk. The mean NTCP-skin value for IMPT-SS was 34% lower than that of IMPT. The dose to skin in patients treated prospectively for HNC was reduced by including gEUD for an acceptable radiation dermatitis determined from the local patient population using an unsupervised MLA in the spot map optimization of a new IMPT planning technique. However, the clinical finding of acute skin toxicity must also be related to the observed reduction in skin dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noufal Manthala Padannayil
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Sapna Nangia
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| | - Kartikeshwar C. Patro
- grid.506152.5Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 400053 India
| | - Utpal Gaikwad
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| | - Nagarjuna Burela
- grid.506152.5Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, 100 Feet Road Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Normal, the Radiosensitive, and the Ataxic in the Era of Precision Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246252. [PMID: 36551737 PMCID: PMC9776433 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: radiotherapy is a cornerstone of cancer treatment. When delivering a tumoricidal dose, the risk of severe late toxicities is usually kept below 5% using dose-volume constraints. However, individual radiation sensitivity (iRS) is responsible (with other technical factors) for unexpected toxicities after exposure to a dose that induces no toxicity in the general population. Diagnosing iRS before radiotherapy could avoid unnecessary toxicities in patients with a grossly normal phenotype. Thus, we reviewed iRS diagnostic data and their impact on decision-making processes and the RT workflow; (2) Methods: following a description of radiation toxicities, we conducted a critical review of the current state of the knowledge on individual determinants of cellular/tissue radiation; (3) Results: tremendous advances in technology now allow minimally-invasive genomic, epigenetic and functional testing and a better understanding of iRS. Ongoing large translational studies implement various tests and enriched NTCP models designed to improve the prediction of toxicities. iRS testing could better support informed radiotherapy decisions for individuals with a normal phenotype who experience unusual toxicities. Ethics of medical decisions with an accurate prediction of personalized radiotherapy's risk/benefits and its health economics impact are at stake; (4) Conclusions: iRS testing represents a critical unmet need to design personalized radiotherapy protocols relying on extended NTCP models integrating iRS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wickert R, Tessonnier T, Deng M, Adeberg S, Seidensaal K, Hoeltgen L, Debus J, Herfarth K, Harrabi SB. Radiotherapy with Helium Ions Has the Potential to Improve Both Endocrine and Neurocognitive Outcome in Pediatric Patients with Ependymoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235865. [PMID: 36497348 PMCID: PMC9736041 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymomas are the third most-frequent pediatric brain tumors. To prevent local recurrence, the resection site should be irradiated. Compared to photon radiation treatment, proton therapy often achieves even better results regarding target coverage and organ-sparing. Due to their physical properties, helium ions could further reduce side effects, providing better protection of healthy tissue despite similar target coverage. In our in silico study, 15 pediatric ependymoma patients were considered. All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapeutic treatment with active-scanned protons at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Both helium ion and highly conformal IMRT plans were calculated to evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage of ion beam therapy compared to the current state-of-the-art photon-based treatments. To estimate the potential clinical benefit of helium ions, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated. Target coverage was comparable in all three modalities. As expected, the integral dose absorbed by healthy brain tissue could be significantly reduced with protons by up to -48% vs. IMRT. Even compared to actively scanned protons, relative dose reductions for critical neuronal structures of up to another -39% were achieved when using helium ions. The dose distribution of helium ions is significantly superior when compared to proton therapy and IMRT due to the improved sparing of OAR. In fact, previous studies could clearly demonstrate that the dosimetric advantage of protons translates into a measurable clinical benefit for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Given the dose-response relationship of critical organs at risk combined with NTCP calculation, the results of our study provide a strong rationale that the use of helium ions has the potential to even further reduce the risk for treatment related sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Wickert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi B. Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fang K, Lee C, Chuang H, Huang T, Chien C, Tsai W, Fang F. Acute radiation dermatitis among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with proton beam therapy: Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes. Int Wound J 2022; 20:499-507. [PMID: 35880316 PMCID: PMC9885453 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A high incidence of severe acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) has been reported for cancer patients treated by proton beam therapy (PBT). This observational study investigated the prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of ARD among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated with PBT. Fifty-seven patients with newly diagnosed NPC and treated with PBT were enrolled. ARD was recorded weekly based on the criteria of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 at treatment visits (1st to 7th weeks) and 1 week (8th week) and 1 month (11th week) after the completion of PBT. The maximum ARD grade was 1, 2, and 3 in 26 (45.6%), 24 (42.1%), and 7 (12.3%) of the patients, respectively. The peak incidence of grade 2 and 3 ARD was observed during the period of the 6th to 8th weeks. Treatment of ARD included topical corticosteroid alone in 24 (42.1%) patients, topical corticosteroid plus silver sulfadiazine in 33 (57.9%) patients, and non-adhering silicone dressing to cover severe skin wound area in 25 (43.8%) patients. In the 11th week, most grade 2 and 3 ARD had disappeared and 93.0% of the patients had ARD of grade 1 or lower. In the binary logistic regression model, we identified habitual smoking (odds ratio [OR]: 5.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-18.8, P = .012) and N2 to N3 nodal status (OR: 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6-15.4, P = .006) as independent predictors of grade 2 and 3 ARD. The results show ARD is a major concern for patients with NPC treated with PBT, especially those with habitual smoking or advanced nodal status. Topical corticosteroid, silver sulfadiazine, and non-adhering silicone dressing are effective for treating ARD induced by PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko‐Chun Fang
- Department of EducationKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Hung Lee
- Department of DermatologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Hui‐Ching Chuang
- Department of OtolaryngologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan,Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tai‐Lin Huang
- Department of Hematology and OncologyKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Yen Chien
- Department of OtolaryngologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan,Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Wen‐Ling Tsai
- Department of Cosmetics and Fashion StylingCenter for Environmental Toxin and Emerging‐Contaminant Research, Cheng Shiu UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Fu‐Min Fang
- Department of MedicineChang Gung University College of MedicineTaoyuanTaiwan,Department of Radiation OncologyKaohsiung Chang‐Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lower-Neck Sparing Using Proton Therapy in Patients with Uninvolved Neck Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is It Safe? J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123297. [PMID: 35743368 PMCID: PMC9225079 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Undifferentiated carcinoma of the nasopharynx (NPC) is a rare disease, which usually occurs in the Asian population. Due to its anatomic location, it is characterised by rich lymph node drainage and has a high incidence of cervical node metastasis. However, cervical nodal metastasis commonly involves retropharyngeal nodes and level II nodes, followed by level III nodes. In recent years, innovations in terms of systemic treatments and radiotherapy techniques have improved oncological outcome and treatment-related toxicities. Therefore, there is a growing interest in de-intensification strategies of reducing volumes and treatment-related side effects, especially in patients with NPC with N0–N1-stage disease. Proton therapy could represent a valid alternative to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in the management of NPC in this setting. With this Commentary, we aim to explore the feasibility of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in upper-neck irradiation of NPC N1-stage disease. We selected an NPC patient with N1 disease and compared the original IMRT plan with the IMPT plan in terms of dosimetric parameters. IMPT offers a minimal dosimetric advantage over IMRT in the bilateral lower-neck sparing. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the significance of these proposed suggestions and their applicability in non-endemic areas.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mirandola A, Russo S, Bonora M, Vischioni B, Camarda AM, Ingargiola R, Molinelli S, Ronchi S, Rossi E, Vai A, Iacovelli NA, Thariat J, Ciocca M, Orlandi E. A Patient Selection Approach Based on NTCP Models and DVH Parameters for Definitive Proton Therapy in Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112678. [PMID: 35681661 PMCID: PMC9179408 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In this work, we aim to provide selection criteria based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models and additional explanatory dose-volume histogram parameters suitable for identifying locally advanced sinonasal cancer patients with orbital invasion benefitting from proton therapy. (2) Methods: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, and two advanced radiation techniques were compared: intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Plans were optimized with a simultaneous integrated boost modality: 70 and 56 Gy(RBE) in 35 fractions were prescribed to the high risk/low risk CTV. Several endpoints were investigated, classified for their severity and used as discriminating paradigms. In particular, when NTCP models were already available, a first selection criterion based on the delta-NTCP was adopted. Additionally, an overall analysis in terms of DVH parameters was performed. Furthermore, a second selection criterion based on a weighted sum of the ΔNTCP and ΔDVH was adopted. (3) Results: Four patients out of 22 (18.2%) were suitable for IMPT due to ΔNTCP > 3% for at least one severe toxicity, 4 (18.2%) due to ΔNTCP > 20% for at least three concurrent intermediate toxicities and 16 (72.7%) due to the mixed sum of ΔNTCP and ΔDVH criterion. Since, for some cases, both criteria were contemporary fulfilled, globally 17/22 patients (77.3%) would benefit from IMPT. (4) Conclusions: For this rare clinical scenario, the use of a strategy including DVH parameters and NTCPs when comparing VMAT and IMPT is feasible. We showed that patients affected by sinonasal cancer could profit from IMPT compared to VMAT in terms of optical and central nervous system organs at risk sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0382-078-514
| | - Stefania Russo
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | - Maria Bonora
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| | - Anna Maria Camarda
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| | - Rossana Ingargiola
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | - Sara Ronchi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| | - Eleonora Rossi
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Françoise Baclesse Center ARCHADE, Normandy University, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.R.); (S.M.); (E.R.); (A.V.); (M.C.)
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Clinical Department, CNAO National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (M.B.); (B.V.); (A.M.C.); (R.I.); (S.R.); (E.O.)
| |
Collapse
|