1
|
Lebrun F, Thariat J, Marty PA, Bailleul H, Quintyn JC. Prospective Study of Corneal Sensitivity in Patients Treated With Proton Therapy for Extraocular Tumors. Cornea 2024:00003226-990000000-00762. [PMID: 39661121 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000003781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several cases of radio-induced neurotrophic keratitis had been observed after proton therapy delivering a mean corneal dose of ≥50 GyRBE. We conducted a prospective exploratory study to assess corneal sensitivity in subsequent patients undergoing proton therapy for cephalic extraocular tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-three patients (85 eyes) treated with high-energy proton therapy were included in this prospective, single-center, observational cohort study. All patients had their corneal sensitivity measured using Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer, before and average 6 months after irradiation. Ocular surface was clinically assessed for stromal opacity, corneal thinning, corneal perforation, superficial punctate keratitis graded according to Oxford classification, and tear break-up time. Cornea and extraocular sensitive innervation structures of cornea were contoured and their dose metrics assessed. RESULTS No severe corneal damage was detected. Corneal sensitivity, superficial punctate keratitis according to Oxford classification, and tear break-up time did not vary significantly after irradiation. The mean value of maximal dose to cornea and extraocular sensory innervation of cornea were 10.7 GyRBE and 42.0 GyRBE, respectively. Doses to cornea and its innervation structures were not associated with significant changes in corneal sensitivity (P = 0.423 and P = 0.614). A dose per fraction greater than 2 GyRBE was significantly associated (P = 0.033) with a decrease of corneal sensitivity after proton therapy. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study showed no excess risk of damage to corneal sensitivity 6 months after proton therapy, as doses to the cornea could be minimized. However, based on prior neurotrophic keratitis cases for corneal doses above 50 GyRBE, further investigation is needed to establish the impact of high-dose proton therapy on corneal sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Lebrun
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen-Normandie, Service d'Ophtalmologie, Unicaen-Universite de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534-ARCHADE, Unicaen-Universite de Normandie, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Pierre-Alban Marty
- Centre Ophtalmologie Du Pays Des Olonnes, Les Sables-d'Olonne, France; and
| | | | - Jean-Claude Quintyn
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen-Normandie, Service d'Ophtalmologie, Unicaen-Universite de Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schafer ES, Rushing T, Crews KR, Annesley C, Colace SI, Kaiser N, Pommert L, Ramsey LB, Sabnis HS, Wong K, Chang BH, Cooper TM, Shah NN, Rheingold SR, Place AE, Chi YY, Bhojwani D, Wayne AS, Bernhardt MB. Optimizing early phase clinical trial washout periods: a report from the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1721-1729. [PMID: 38964343 PMCID: PMC11542989 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Cancer Institute (NCI) issued a 2021 memorandum adopting the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and Friends of Cancer Research (Friends) task force recommendations to broaden clinical study eligibility criteria. They recommended that washout periods be eliminated for most prior cancer therapy and when required to utilize evidence- and/or rationale-based criteria. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) consortium responded to this guidance. METHODS A TACL task force reviewed the consortium's research portfolio, the relevant literature and guidance documents from ASCO-Friends, NCI, and US Food and Drug Administration to make expert consensus and evidence-based recommendations for modernizing, broadening, and codifying TACL-study washout periods while ensuring consistency with pediatric ethics, and federal regulations. TACL's screening log was reviewed to estimate the impact that updated washout periods would have on patient inclusivity and recruitment. RESULTS Over a 19-year period, 42 (14.6% of all screened ineligible patients [n = 287]) patients were identified as excluded from TACL early phase studies exclusively because of not meeting washout criteria. An additional 6 (2.1%) did not meet washout and at least 1 other exclusion criterion. A new TACL washout guidance document was developed and then adopted for use. Where washout criteria were not eliminated, rationale- and/or evidenced-based criteria were established with citation. CONCLUSION In an effort to reduce unnecessary exclusion from clinical trials, TACL created rationale- and/or evidenced-based washout period standards largely following guidance from the NCI and ASCO-Friends recommendations. These new, expanded eligibility criteria are expected to increase access to TACL clinical trials while maintaining safety and scientific excellence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric S Schafer
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Center, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Teresa Rushing
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kristine R Crews
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Colleen Annesley
- Seattle Children’s Hospital Cancer and Blood Disorders Service, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Susan I Colace
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, the Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Nicole Kaiser
- Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lauren Pommert
- Division of Oncology, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura B Ramsey
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Himalee S Sabnis
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bill H Chang
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Todd M Cooper
- Seattle Children’s Hospital Cancer and Blood Disorders Service, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nirali N Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Susan R Rheingold
- Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew E Place
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yueh-Yun Chi
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Deepa Bhojwani
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alan S Wayne
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M Brooke Bernhardt
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boudoux O, Bailleul H, Marty PA, Miguel A, Quintyn JC, Thariat J. Prospective assessment of peripapillary microvasculature using optical coherence tomography angiography in para-optic intracranial and sinonasal tumors treated with proton therapy. J Fr Ophtalmol 2024; 47:104239. [PMID: 38964279 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RION) is rare but may lead to blindness. The mechanisms by which this occurs include endothelial and neuronal damage, but RION has been assessed very little in the case of extraocular tumors treated with high-energy proton therapy, the use of which is expanding worldwide. We assessed peripapillary microvascular changes by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in patients undergoing high-energy proton therapy for para-optic intracranial or head and neck tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective institutional review board approved study, patients receiving>40Gy_RBE maximal PBT dose to their optic nerve between 2018 and 2020 underwent quantitative OCT-A analyses. ImageJ software was used to assess changes in the peripapillary superficial vascular complex (SVC) using vascular area density (VAD), vessel length density (VLD) and fractal dimension (FDsk). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 47 patients (78 eyes) with 29±6 months of follow-up (range 18-42), 29 patients (61.7%) had previously undergone surgery and 18 (32.1%) had microvascular abnormalities prior to proton therapy. Total radiotherapy dose was the most relevant factor in decreased peripapillary microvasculature. Duration of follow-up was associated with lower VAD (P=0.005) and mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFLm) thickness also decreased. There was no significant correlation between OCT-A changes and mean visual defect. CONCLUSION Peripapillary microvasculature changes may occur from tumor compression or surgery and proton therapy for extraocular tumors. OCT-A may provide quantitative and mechanistic insights into RION before the occurrence of clinical symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Boudoux
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
| | - H Bailleul
- Ophthalmology Department, Hôpital Privé de la Baie, Avranches, France
| | - P-A Marty
- Centre ophtalmologique du pays des Olonnes, Olonne-sur-Mer, France
| | - A Miguel
- Ophthalmology Department, Hôpital Privé de la Baie, Avranches, France
| | - J-C Quintyn
- Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - J Thariat
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chacun S, Kodjikian L, Ricard C, Elbany S, Marthelot V, Akesbi J, Devin F, Burillon C, Denis P, Mathis T. Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in a Clinical Setting: The ProDEX Study. Ophthalmol Retina 2024; 8:889-897. [PMID: 38555008 DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies. DESIGN An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series. PARTICIPANTS Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included. METHODS This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious uveitis macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation maculopathy (RM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit. RESULTS According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (P = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) μm (P < 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (> 50 μm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (P < 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (P < 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (P = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (P = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Chacun
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire d'Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Laurent Kodjikian
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France; Laboratoire MATEIS, UMR-CNRS 5510, INSA, Université Lyon, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Cécile Ricard
- StatMed74, Épidémiologiste indépendant, Annecy, France
| | - Sandra Elbany
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire d'Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - Jad Akesbi
- L'Institut Parisien d'Ophtalmologie, Paris, France
| | - François Devin
- Centre Monticelli Paradis, Marseille, France; Groupe Almaviva santé, Clinique Juge, Marseille, France
| | - Carole Burillon
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire d'Édouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Philippe Denis
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Thibaud Mathis
- Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hôpital universitaire de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne, France; Laboratoire MATEIS, UMR-CNRS 5510, INSA, Université Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Azemar N, Fontbonne C, Claude Quintyn J, Lebertz D, Marc Fontbonne J, Thariat J. Assessment of gaze direction during head and neck irradiation and dosimetric impact on the retina, macula and papilla in a cohort of 240 patients with paraoptic tumors. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110342. [PMID: 38782302 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
In a prospective cohort of 240 paraoptic tumors patients treated with protons, there was 10° inter-individual gaze angle variability (up to 30°). In a random 21-patient subset with initial CTs versus and adaptive CTs, 6 (28.57 %) patients had at least twice a 10°-difference in their gaze angle, with > 5 Gy difference on the retina/macula or papilla in 2/21 (9.52 %) and 1/21 (4.76 %) based on cumulative dose from rescans, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Azemar
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France.
| | - Cathy Fontbonne
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France
| | | | - Dorothee Lebertz
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France; Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Jean Marc Fontbonne
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen F-14000, France; Department of Radiation Therapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fleury E, Pignol JP, Kiliç E, Milder M, van Rij C, Naus N, Yavuzyigitoglu S, den Toom W, Zolnay A, Spruijt K, van Vulpen M, Trnková P, Hoogeman M. Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100605. [PMID: 39050744 PMCID: PMC11268348 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy. We compared fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with proton therapy, including toxicity risks for UM patients. Materials and methods For a total of 66 UM patients from a single center, SRT dose distributions were compared to protons using the same planning CT. Fourteen dose-volume parameters were compared in 2-Gy equivalent dose per fraction (EQD2). Four toxicity profiles were evaluated: maculopathy, optic-neuropathy, visual acuity impairment (Profile I); neovascular glaucoma (Profile II); radiation-induced retinopathy (Profile III); and dry-eye syndrome (Profile IV). For Profile III, retina Mercator maps were generated to visualize the geographical location of dose differences. Results In 9/66 cases, (14 %) proton plans were superior for all dose-volume parameters. Higher T stages benefited more from protons in Profile I, especially tumors located within 3 mm or less from the optic nerve. In Profile II, only 9/66 cases resulted in a better proton plan. In Profile III, better retina volume sparing was always achievable with protons, with a larger gain for T3 tumors. In Profile IV, protons always reduced the risk of toxicity with a median RBE-weighted EQD2 reduction of 15.3 Gy. Conclusions This study reports the first side-by-side imaging-based planning comparison between protons and SRT for UM patients. Globally, while protons appear almost always better regarding the risk of optic-neuropathy, retinopathy and dry-eye syndrome, for other toxicity like neovascular glaucoma, a plan comparison is warranted. Choice would depend on the prioritization of risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Fleury
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emine Kiliç
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Milder
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Naus
- Erasmus Medical Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilhelm den Toom
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andras Zolnay
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Petra Trnková
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tamplin MR, Wang JK, Binkley EM, Garvin MK, Hyer DE, Buatti JM, Boldt HC, Grumbach IM, Kardon RH. Radiation effects on retinal layers revealed by OCT, OCT-A, and perimetry as a function of dose and time from treatment. Sci Rep 2024; 14:3380. [PMID: 38336828 PMCID: PMC10858219 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53830-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become a key method for diagnosing and staging radiation retinopathy, based mainly on the presence of fluid in the central macula. A robust retinal layer segmentation method is required for identification of the specific layers involved in radiation-induced pathology in individual eyes over time, in order to determine damage driven by radiation injury to the microvessels and to the inner retinal neurons. Here, we utilized OCT, OCT-angiography, visual field testing, and patient-specific dosimetry models to analyze abnormal retinal layer thickening and thinning relative to microvessel density, visual function, radiation dose, and time from radiotherapy in a cross-sectional cohort of uveal melanoma patients treated with 125I-plaque brachytherapy. Within the first 24 months of radiotherapy, we show differential thickening and thinning of the two inner retinal layers, suggestive of microvessel leakage and neurodegeneration, mostly favoring thickening. Four out of 13 eyes showed decreased inner retinal capillary density associated with a corresponding normal inner retinal thickness, indicating early microvascular pathology. Two eyes showed the opposite: significant inner retinal layer thinning and normal capillary density, indicating early neuronal damage preceding a decrease in capillary density. At later time points, inner retinal thinning becomes the dominant pathology and correlates significantly with decreased vascularity, vision loss, and dose to the optic nerve. Stable multiple retinal layer segmentation provided by 3D graph-based methods aids in assessing the microvascular and neuronal response to radiation, information needed to target therapeutics for radiation retinopathy and vision loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Tamplin
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Iowa City VA Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jui-Kai Wang
- Iowa City VA Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Elaine M Binkley
- Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Mona K Garvin
- Iowa City VA Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - John M Buatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - H Culver Boldt
- Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Isabella M Grumbach
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Iowa City VA Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Randy H Kardon
- Iowa City VA Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa City, IA, USA.
- Division of Neuro-Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lebrun F, Marty PA, Quintyn JC, Thariat J, Bailleul H. [High energy proton therapy for extraocular tumors, neurotrophic keratitis and functional consequence: A series of 3 cases]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2023; 46:841-850. [PMID: 37625997 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2023.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High energy proton therapy (HEP) is a form of radiation therapy using protons for extraocular tumors. Its ballistic properties are theoretically advantageous, but the real impact on the surrounding ocular tissues during cerebral and ENT irradiation is poorly documented. We describe three consecutive patients with corneal damage following such irradiation. MATERIALS/METHODS Post-proton therapy neurotrophic keratitis (NK) is defined as corneal hypo/anesthesia responsible for an alteration of corneal trophicity and graded according to the Mackie classification, in terms of a prospective ophthalmological follow-up protocol for all patients with extraocular tumors treated with HEP. RESULTS Among 193 patients treated with HEP between 2018 and 2021 for extraocular tumors, three patients developed severe neurotrophic keratitis, i.e. 1.6% of treated patients. According to the Mackie classification, the three patients showed grade 3 NK less than one year after the conclusion of their HEP. These three patients underwent amniotic membrane grafting. They were placed on autologous serum eye drops. Two of the three patients had to be eviscerated. The dose to the cornea was greater than 50 Gray (Gy)_Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in the three cases. DISCUSSION The diagnosis and etiological origin of neurotrophic keratitis are often difficult to establish. In these cases, the imputability of radiation therapy, proton therapy in our cases, in the development of neurotrophic keratitis was plausible based on the dosimetry of the patients, all of whom had anterior tumors with a poor prognosis requiring high tumoricidal doses. CONCLUSION Further studies to establish the impact of proton therapy on corneal sensitivity are necessary. However, this feedback and the multidisciplinary management of tumors can help to limit the risk of some complications of radiation therapy. Early diagnosis allows for appropriate management and could possibly minimize the anatomical and functional ocular complications of neurotrophic keratitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Lebrun
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Caen-Normandie, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France.
| | - P-A Marty
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Caen-Normandie, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France
| | - J-C Quintyn
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Caen-Normandie, avenue de la Côte-de-Nacre, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France
| | - J Thariat
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire/IN2P3-CNRS UMR 6534-ARCHADE, Unicaen-Université de Normandie, Centre François-Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France
| | - H Bailleul
- Hôpital privé de la Baie-d'Avranches, 50300 Avranches, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martel A, Gastaud L, Bonnetaud C, Nahon-Esteve S, Washetine K, Bordone O, Salah M, Tanga V, Fayada J, Lespinet V, Allegra M, Lalvee S, Zahaf K, Baillif S, Bertolotto C, Mograbi B, Lassalle S, Hofman P. Need for a Dedicated Ophthalmic Malignancy Clinico-Biological Biobank: The Nice Ocular MAlignancy (NOMA) Biobank. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082372. [PMID: 37190299 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Ophthalmic malignancies include various rare neoplasms involving the conjunctiva, the uvea, or the periocular area. These tumors are characterized by their scarcity as well as their histological, and sometimes genetic, diversity. Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. UM raises three main challenges highlighting the specificity of ophthalmic malignancies. First, UM is a very rare malignancy with an estimated incidence of 6 cases per million inhabitants. Second, tissue biopsy is not routinely recommended due to the risk of extraocular dissemination. Third, UM is an aggressive cancer because it is estimated that about 50% of patients will experience metastatic spread without any curative treatment available at this stage. These challenges better explain the two main objectives in the creation of a dedicated UM biobank. First, collecting UM samples is essential due to tissue scarcity. Second, large-scale translational research programs based on stored human samples will help to better determine UM pathogenesis with the aim of identifying new biomarkers, allowing for early diagnosis and new targeted treatment modalities. Other periocular malignancies, such as conjunctival melanomas or orbital malignancies, also raise specific concerns. In this context, the number of biobanks worldwide dedicated to ocular malignancies is very limited. The aims of this article were (i) to describe the specific challenges raised by a dedicated ocular malignancy biobank, (ii) to report our experience in setting up such a biobank, and (iii) to discuss future perspectives in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Martel
- Ophthalmology Department, Nice University Hospital, 06001 Nice, France
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging in Nice (IRCAN), Team 4, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06189 Nice, France
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Oncology Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Christelle Bonnetaud
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | | | - Kevin Washetine
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Olivier Bordone
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Myriam Salah
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Virginie Tanga
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Julien Fayada
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Virginie Lespinet
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Maryline Allegra
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Salome Lalvee
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Katia Zahaf
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Stephanie Baillif
- Ophthalmology Department, Nice University Hospital, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Corine Bertolotto
- C3M, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Côte d'Azur University, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Baharia Mograbi
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging in Nice (IRCAN), Team 4, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06189 Nice, France
| | - Sandra Lassalle
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging in Nice (IRCAN), Team 4, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06189 Nice, France
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Paul Hofman
- Institute of Research on Cancer and Aging in Nice (IRCAN), Team 4, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06189 Nice, France
- Hospital-Integrated Biobank (BB-0033-00025), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, CEDEX 1, 06001 Nice, France
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire (FHU) OncoAge, Côte d'Azur University, 06000 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Melphalan intra-arterial chemotherapy for choroidal melanoma chemoreduction. Int J Retina Vitreous 2022; 8:55. [PMID: 35978407 PMCID: PMC9386917 DOI: 10.1186/s40942-022-00404-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has been used to treat multiple cancers including liver metastasis from uveal and cutaneous melanoma but not as primary tumor treatment. We report the compassionate use of chemoreduction with intra-arterial melphalan before ruthenium brachytherapy to salvage an eye with choroidal melanoma. Case presentation A 61-year-old female patient complained of decreased vision and central-temporal scotoma in OS (left eye) for 1 month. Visual acuity was 20/20 in right eye (OD) and 20/125 OS. Anterior segment examination and intraocular pressure were unremarkable in both eyes, as was fundus examination of the OD. Fundus examination of OS revealed a brown, solid tumor partially obscuring the temporal optic disc margin and extending to the equatorial fundus midzone. Serous retinal detachment was present over the lesion and around it. Ultrasonography revealed a solid choroidal tumor with a largest basal diameter (LBD) of 13.0 mm and thickness of 10.4 mm. The tumor presented acoustic hollowness and a superimposing retinal detachment. After metastatic screening was negative, the patient underwent intra-arterial chemotherapy with melphalan. Three weeks later, her visual acuity was 20/200 and there was noticeable tumor regression to 11.9 mm (LBD) by 7.9 mm (thickness) allowing brachytherapy to be performed. Ten weeks after brachytherapy (13 weeks after IAC), visual acuity was HM due to biopsy-related vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Tumor dimensions were 9.9 (LBD) mm and 6.5 mm (thickness) and PPV was performed to remove VH. Six weeks after PPV (20 weeks after IAC), her visual acuity was 20/200 and further reduction of tumor dimensions was observed: largest basal diameter was 8.9 mm and thickness was 4.9 mm. Conclusion This case illustrates the feasibility of combining induction IAC prior to ruthenium brachytherapy for large choroidal melanoma. More studies are warranted to confirm these early preliminary findings.
Collapse
|