Immunophenotypic Analysis of Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia: A EuroFlow Study

Future directions in myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms and acute myeloid leukaemia classification: from blast counts to biology

Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) are neoplastic haematopoietic cell proliferations that are diagnosed and classified based on a combination of morphological, clinical and genetic features. Specifically, the percentage of myeloblasts in the blood and bone marrow is a key feature that has historically separated MDS from AML and, together with several other morphological parameters, defines distinct disease entities within MDS. Both MDS and AML have recurrent genetic abnormalities that are increasingly influencing their definitions and subclassification. For example, in 2022, two new MDS entities were recognised based on the presence of SF3B1 mutation or bi-allelic TP53 abnormalities. Genomic information is more objective and reproducible than morphological analyses, which are subject to interobserver variability and arbitrary numeric cut-offs. Nevertheless, the integration of genomic data with traditional morphological features in myeloid neoplasm classification has proved challenging by virtue of its sheer complexity; gene expression and methylation profiling also can provide information regarding disease pathogenesis, adding to the complexity. New machine-learning technologies have the potential to effectively integrate multiple diagnostic modalities and improve on historical classification systems. Going forward, the application of machine learning and advanced statistical methods to large patient cohorts can refine future classifications by advancing unbiased and robust previously unrecognised disease subgroups. Future classifications will probably incorporate these newer technologies and higher-level analyses that emphasise genomic disease entities over traditional morphologically defined entities, thus promoting more accurate diagnosis and patient risk stratification.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Evaluation by Flow Cytometry

With recent technological advances and significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the updated fifth edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the newly introduced International Consensus Classification (ICC), as well as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022, require the integration of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data, alongside clinical and morphologic findings, for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and guiding therapeutic strategies in AML. Flow cytometry offers rapid and sensitive immunophenotyping through a multiparametric approach and is a pivotal laboratory tool for the classification of AML, identification of therapeutic targets, and monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) post therapy. The association of immunophenotypic features and recurrent genetic abnormalities has been recognized and applied in informing further diagnostic evaluation and immediate therapeutic decision-making. Recently, the evolving role of machine learning models in assisting flow cytometric data analysis for the automated diagnosis and prediction of underlying genetic alterations has been illustrated.

Four Cases of Myeloproliferative Disorders Associated With Down Syndrome: Distinguishing ML-DS From TAM-DS: Distinguishing TAM-DS and ML-DS: Report of 4 Cases

Down syndrome (DS) is defined by an extra copy of chromosome 21 and confers an increased susceptibility to hematological disorders. Transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) and myeloid-leukemia associated with Down syndrome (ML-DS) are two conditions that need to be accurately diagnosed to provide appropriate management. Both TAM and ML-DS are characterized by proliferation of megakaryoblasts carrying a mutation in the GATA1 gene. Here, we report four cases with educational significance, highlighting typical diagnostic features that facilitate the differentiation between these two conditions, thereby assisting clinicians and medical laboratory professionals in effectively managing and monitoring these patients.

Immunophenotypic markers for the evaluation of minimal/measurable residual disease in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia is characterized by heterogeneous biology and clinical behavior. Immunophenotypic characteristics include the expression of megakaryocytic differentiation markers (e.g. CD41, CD42a, CD42b, CD61) associated with immaturity markers (CD34, CD117, HLA-DR) and myeloid markers (e.g. CD13, CD33) and even with lymphoid cross-lineage markers (e.g. CD7, CD56). Although the diagnostic immunophenotype has already been well described, given the rarity of the disease, its immunophenotypic heterogeneity and post-therapeutic instability, there is no consensus on the combination of monoclonal markers to detect minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD). Currently, MRD is an important tool for assessing treatment efficacy and prognostic risk. In this study, we evaluated the immunophenotypic profile of MRD in a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia, to identify which markers, positive or negative, were more stable after treatment and which could be useful for MRD evaluation. The expression profile of each marker was evaluated in sequential MRD samples. In conclusion, the markers evaluated in this study can be combined in an MRD immunophenotypic panel to investigate for megakaryoblastic leukemia. Although this study is retrospective and some data are missing, the information obtained may contribute to prospective studies to validate more specific strategies in the detection of MRD in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia.

Guideline for treating relapsed or refractory myeloid leukemia in children with Down syndrome

Treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloid leukemia in Down syndrome (r/r ML-DS) poses significant challenges, as prognosis is dire and there is no established standard treatment. This guideline provides treatment recommendations based on a literature review and collection of expert opinions, aiming to improve overall and event-free survival of patients. Treatment options include fludarabine and cytarabine (FLA) ± gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), azacytidine (AZA) ± panobinostat, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Preferred approaches are AZA ± panobinostat for cases with low blast count or FLA ± GO for cases with high blast count, followed by HSCT after remission. Further research is crucial for the investigation of targeted therapies (e.g., BH3 mimetics, LSD1, JAK inhibitors).

Acute myeloid leukemia with rare recurring translocations-an overview of the entities included in the international consensus classification

Two different systems exist for subclassification of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid malignancies. The two systems differ in their classification of AML defined by recurrent chromosomal abnormalities. One difference is that the ICC classification defines an AML subset that includes 12 different genetic abnormalities that occur in less than 4% of AML patients. These subtypes exhibit distinct clinical traits and are associated with treatment outcomes, but detailed description of these entities is not easily available and is not described in detail even in the ICC. We searched in the PubMed database to identify scientific publications describing AML patients with the recurrent chromosomal abnormalities/translocations included in this ICC defined patient subset. This patient subset includes AML with t(1;3)(p36.3;q21.3), t(3;5)(q25.3;q35.1), t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3), t(1;22)(p13.3;q13.1), t(5;11)(q35.2;p15.4), t(11;12)(p15.4;p13.3) (involving NUP98), translocation involving NUP98 and other partner, t(7;12)(q36.3;p13.2), t(10;11)(p12.3;q14.2), t(16;21)(p11.2;q22.2), inv(16)(p13.3q24.3) and t(16;21)(q24.3;q22.1). In this updated review we describe the available information with regard to frequency, biological functions of the involved genes and the fusion proteins, morphology/immunophenotype, required diagnostic procedures, clinical characteristics (including age distribution) and prognostic impact for each of these 12 genetic abnormalities.

Too many white cells-TAM, JMML, or something else?

Leukocytosis is a common finding in pediatric patients, and the differential diagnosis can be broad, including benign reactive leukocytosis and malignant myeloproliferative disorders. Transient abnormal myelopoiesis is a myeloproliferative disorder that occurs in young infants with constitutional trisomy 21 and somatic GATA1 mutations. Most patients are observed, but outcomes span the spectrum from spontaneous resolution to life-threatening complications. Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia is a highly aggressive myeloproliferative disorder associated with altered RAS-pathway signaling that occurs in infants and young children. Treatment typically involves hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but certain patients can be observed. Early recognition of these and other myeloproliferative disorders is important and requires a clinician to be aware of these diagnoses and have a clear understanding of their presentations. This paper discusses the presentation and evaluation of leukocytosis when myeloproliferative disorders are part of the differential and reviews different concepts regarding treatment strategies.

The impact of Down syndrome-specific non-malignant hematopoietic regeneration in the bone marrow on the detection of leukemic measurable residual disease

BACKGROUND

Detection of measurable residual disease detection (MRD) by flow cytometry after the first course of chemotherapy is a standard measure of early response in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Myeloid leukemia associated with Down Syndrome (ML-DS) is a distinct form of AML. Differences in steady-state and regenerating hematopoiesis between patients with or without DS are not well understood. This understanding is essential to accurately determine the presence of residual leukemia in patients with ML-DS.

METHODS

A standardized antibody panel defined quantitative antigen expression in 115 follow-up bone marrow (BM) aspirates from 45 patients following chemotherapy for ML-DS or DS precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL-DS) with the "difference from normal (ΔN)" technique. When possible, FISH and SNP/CGH microarray studies were performed on sorted cell fractions.

RESULTS

93% of BM specimens submitted post chemotherapy had a clearly identifiable CD34+ CD56+ population present between 0.06% and 2.6% of total non-erythroid cells. An overlapping CD34+ HLA-DRheterogeneous population was observed among 92% of patients at a lower frequency (0.04%-0.8% of total non-erythroid cells). In B-ALL-DS patients, the same CD34+ CD56+ HLA-DRheterogeneous expression was observed. FACS-FISH/Array studies demonstrated no residual genetic clones in the DS-specific myeloid progenitor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-malignant myeloid progenitors in the regenerating BM of patients who have undergone chemotherapy for either ML-DS or B-ALL-DS express an immunophenotype that is different from normal BM of non-DS patients. Awareness of this DS-specific non-malignant myeloid progenitor is essential to the interpretation of MRD by flow cytometry in patients with ML-DS.

Pediatric Non-Down Syndrome Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia With Unusual Immunophenotype

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) characterized by abnormal megakaryoblasts expressing platelet-specific surface antigens. 4%-16% of childhood AMLs are AMKL. Childhood AMKL is usually associated with Down syndrome (DS). It is 500 times more common in patients with DS when compared to the general population. In contrast, non-DS-AMKL is much rarer. We describe a case of de novo non-DS-AMKL in a teenage girl child who presented with a history of excessive tiredness, fever, abdominal pain for three months, and vomiting for four days. She had lost appetite, and weight. On examination she was pale; there was no clubbing, hepatosplenomegaly or lymphadenopathy. There were no dysmorphic features or neurocutaneous markers. Laboratory tests showed bicytopenia (Hb: 6.5g/dL, total WBC count: 700/µL, platelet count: 216,000/ µL, Reticulocyte %: 0.42) and 14% blasts on the peripheral blood smear. Platelet clumps and anisocytosis were also noted. Bone marrow aspirate showed a few hypocellular particles with dilute cell trails but showed 42% blasts. Mature megakaryocytes showed marked dyspoiesis. Flow cytometry on bone marrow aspirate showed myeloblasts and megakaryoblasts. Karyotyping showed 46 XX. Hence, a final diagnosis of non-DS-AMKL was established. She was treated symptomatically. However, she was discharged on request. Interestingly, the expression of erythroid markers such as CD36 and lymphoid markers like CD7 is usually seen in DS-AMKL and not in non-DS-AMKL. AMKL is treated with AML-directed chemotherapies. Although complete remission rates are similar to other AML subtypes, overall survival is only about 18-40 weeks.

Unmanipulated haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric de novo acute megakaryoblastic leukemia without Down syndrome in China: A single-center study

Background

AMKL without DS is a rare but aggressive hematological malignant disease in children, and it is associated with inferior outcomes. Several researchers have regarded pediatric AMKL without DS as high-risk or at least intermediate-risk AML and proposed that upfront allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first complete remission might improve long-term survival.

Patients and method

We conducted a retrospective study with twenty-five pediatric (< 14 years old) AMKL patients without DS who underwent haploidentical HSCT in the Peking University Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital from July 2016 to July 2021. The diagnostic criteria of AMKL without DS were adapted from the FAB and WHO: ≥ 20% blasts in the bone marrow, and those blasts expressed at least one or more of the platelet glycoproteins: CD41, CD61, or CD42. AMKL with DS and therapy related AML was excluded. Children without a suitable closely HLA-matched related or unrelated donor (donors with more than nine out of 10 matching HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ loci), were eligible to receive haploidentical HSCT. Definition was adapted from international cooperation group. All statistical tests were conducted with SPSS v.24 and R v.3.6.3.

Results

The 2-year OS was 54.5 ± 10.3%, and the EFS was 50.9 ± 10.2% in pediatric AMKL without DS undergoing haplo-HSCT. Statistically significantly better EFS was observed in patients with trisomy 19 than in patients without trisomy 19 (80 ± 12.6% and 33.3 ± 12.2%, respectively, P = 0.045), and OS was better in patients with trisomy 19 but with no statistical significance (P = 0.114). MRD negative pre-HSCT patients showed a better OS and EFS than those who were positive (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Eleven patients relapsed post HSCT. The median time to relapse post HSCT was 2.1 months (range: 1.0-14.4 months). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 46.1 ± 11.6%. One patient developed bronchiolitis obliterans and respiratory failure and died at d + 98 post HSCT.

Conclusion

AMKL without DS is a rare but aggressive hematological malignant disease in children, and it is associated with inferior outcomes. Trisomy 19 and MRD negative pre-HSCT might contribute to a better EFS and OS. Our TRM was low, haplo-HSCT might be an option for high-risk AMKL without DS.

Leukemogenesis in infants and young children with trisomy 21

Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a greater than 100-fold increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (ML) and an approximately 30-fold increased risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) before their fifth birthday. ML-DS originates in utero and typically presents with a self-limiting, neonatal leukemic syndrome known as transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) that is caused by cooperation between trisomy 21-associated abnormalities of fetal hematopoiesis and somatic N-terminal mutations in the transcription factor GATA1. Around 10% of neonates with DS have clinical signs of TAM, although the frequency of hematologically silent GATA1 mutations in DS neonates is much higher (~25%). While most cases of TAM/silent TAM resolve without treatment within 3 to 4 months, in 10% to 20% of cases transformation to full-blown leukemia occurs within the first 4 years of life when cells harboring GATA1 mutations persist and acquire secondary mutations, most often in cohesin genes. By contrast, DS-ALL, which is almost always B-lineage, presents after the first few months of life and is characterized by a high frequency of rearrangement of the CRLF2 gene (60%), often co-occurring with activating mutations in JAK2 or RAS genes. While treatment of ML-DS achieves long-term survival in approximately 90% of children, the outcome of DS-ALL is inferior to ALL in children without DS. Ongoing studies in primary cells and model systems indicate that the role of trisomy 21 in DS leukemogenesis is complex and cell context dependent but show promise in improving management and the treatment of relapse, in which the outcome of both ML-DS and DS-ALL remains poor.