1
|
Musto P, Engelhardt M, van de Donk NWCJ, Gay F, Terpos E, Einsele H, Fernández de Larrea C, Sgherza N, Bolli N, Katodritou E, Gentile M, Royer B, Derudas D, Jelinek T, Zamagni E, Rosiñol L, Paiva B, Caers J, Kaiser M, Beksac M, Hájek R, Spencer A, Ludwig H, Cavo M, Bladé J, Moreau P, Mateos MV, San-Miguel JF, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, Sonneveld P. European Myeloma Network Group review and consensus statement on primary plasma cell leukemia. Ann Oncol 2025; 36:361-374. [PMID: 39924085 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 01/30/2025] [Indexed: 02/11/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is the most aggressive disorder among plasma cell malignancies, with new diagnostic criteria recently established by the International Myeloma Working Group. Studies have shown that PPCL patients receiving a combination of novel agents, but not eligible for transplantation, may have a median survival up to 2 years, extended to 3 years or more in those undergoing transplant procedures. These findings remain unsatisfactory, particularly if compared with progresses obtained in multiple myeloma. DESIGN A European Myeloma Network (EMN) expert panel reviewed the most recent literature and selected the areas of major concern in the management of PPCL by generating and rank ordering key questions using the criterion of clinical relevance. Multistep procedures were utilized to achieve a consensus on recommendations. The Delphi questionnaire method was used and a consensus of at least 80% was reached for all final statements. RESULTS An extended overview of current biological, clinical, prognostic, and therapeutic aspects of PPCL, including ongoing and close to start clinical trials, is presented. Furthermore, updated guidelines for the management of PPCL and practical recommendations are provided, in the context of current knowledge about this disease, also looking at possible future perspectives to ameliorate the outcome of these patients. CONCLUSIONS PPCL still remains an unmet clinical need. Notwithstanding, some not negligible progresses have been recently achieved. The European Myeloma Network panel strongly support ongoing and planned clinical trials, as well as biological studies based on novel technologies, strategies, and treatment options that could represent breakthroughs we have been waiting for too long.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Musto
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, "Aldo Moro" University School of Medicine, Bari, Italy; Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy.
| | - M Engelhardt
- University of Freiburg Medical Center, Faculty of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - N W C J van de Donk
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Gay
- Division of Hematology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Torino, Turin, Italy; Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - E Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - H Einsele
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Internal Medicine II, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - N Sgherza
- Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | - N Bolli
- Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Section of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - E Katodritou
- Department of Hematology, Theagenion Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - M Gentile
- Hematology Unit, Department of Onco-hematology, A.O. of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy; Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Science, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
| | - B Royer
- Immuno-Hematology Unit, St Louis, APHP, Paris, France
| | - D Derudas
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Center, Oncologic Hospital "A. Businco", Cagliari, Italy
| | - T Jelinek
- Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - E Zamagni
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - L Rosiñol
- Hematology Department, Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Paiva
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, CCUN, IDISNA, CIBER-ONC CB16/12/00369, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J Caers
- Department of Hematology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - M Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Beksac
- Istinye University - Ankara Liv Hospital, Kavaklıdere, Ankara, Turkey
| | - R Hájek
- Department of Haematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - A Spencer
- Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Ludwig
- Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, c/o Department of Medicine I, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Clinic Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Cavo
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Bladé
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - M-V Mateos
- University Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL/CIC/CIBERONC, Salamanca
| | - J F San-Miguel
- Cancer Center, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, CIMA, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M A Dimopoulos
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Therapeutics, Athens, Greece
| | - M Boccadoro
- European Myeloma Network (EMN), Turin, Italy
| | - P Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tembhare PR, Sriram H, Khanka T, Gawai S, Bagal B, Ghogale SG, Deshpande N, Girase K, Patil J, Hasan SK, Shetty D, Ghosh K, Chatterjee G, Rajpal S, Patkar NV, Jain H, Punatar S, Gokarn A, Nayak L, Mirgh S, Jindal N, Sengar M, Khattry N, Subramanian PG, Gujral S. Circulating tumor plasma cells and peripheral blood measurable residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma patients not planned for upfront transplant. Hemasphere 2024; 8:e63. [PMID: 38566804 PMCID: PMC10983024 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Circulating tumor plasma cells (CTPCs) provide a noninvasive alternative for measuring tumor burden in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Moreover, measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in peripheral blood (PBMRD) can provide an ideal alternative to bone marrow MRD, which is limited by its painful nature and technical challenges. However, the clinical significance of PBMRD in NDMM still remains uncertain. Additionally, data on CTPC in NDMM patients not treated with transplant are scarce. We prospectively studied CTPC and PBMRD in 141 NDMM patients using highly sensitive multicolor flow cytometry (HS-MFC). PBMRD was monitored at the end of three cycles (PBMRD1) and six cycles (PBMRD2) of chemotherapy in patients with detectable baseline CTPC. Patients received bortezomib-based triplet therapy and were not planned for an upfront transplant. Among baseline risk factors, CTPC ≥ 0.01% was independently associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.77; p = 0.0047) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.9; p = 0.023) on multivariate analysis. In patients with detectable baseline CTPC, undetectable PBMRD at both subsequent time points was associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.46; p = 0.0037), whereas detectable PBMRD at any time point was associated with short OS (HR = 3.25; p = 0.004). Undetectable combined PBMRD (PBMRD1 and PBMRD2) outperformed the serum-immunofixation-based response. On multivariate analysis, detectable PBMRD at any time point was independently associated with poor PFS (HR = 2.0; p = 0.025) and OS (HR = 3.97; p = 0.013). Thus, our findings showed that CTPC and PBMRD assessment using HS-MFC provides a robust, noninvasive biomarker for NDMM patients not planned for an upfront transplant. Sequential PBMRD monitoring has great potential to improve the impact of the existing risk stratification and response assessment models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant R. Tembhare
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Harshini Sriram
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Twinkle Khanka
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sanghamitra Gawai
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Bhausaheb Bagal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sitaram G. Ghogale
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nilesh Deshpande
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Karishma Girase
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Jagruti Patil
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Syed Khaizer Hasan
- Hasan Laboratory, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Dhanalaxmi Shetty
- Department of Cancer Cytogenetics, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Kinjalka Ghosh
- Department of Biochemistry, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Gaurav Chatterjee
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sweta Rajpal
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nikhil V. Patkar
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Hasmukh Jain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sachin Punatar
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Anant Gokarn
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Lingaraj Nayak
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sumeet Mirgh
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Nishant Jindal
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Manju Sengar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Navin Khattry
- Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Papagudi G. Subramanian
- Department of Hematopathology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityNavi MumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| | - Sumeet Gujral
- Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial CentreHBNI UniversityMumbaiMaharashtraIndia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nogués-Castell J, Feu-Basilio S, Felguera García Ó, Fernández de Larrea C, Oliver-Caldés A, Balagué Ponz O, Fassi JM. Bilateral orbital plasmacytomas as first sign of extramedullary progression post CAR-T therapy: case report and literature review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1217714. [PMID: 37637047 PMCID: PMC10450026 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1217714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is an aggressive and rare form of plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by peripheral blood expression, poor prognosis, and high relapse rates. Extramedullary plasmacytomas are common in this entity and can affect various organs and soft tissues. Chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is a novel immunotherapy for hematological malignancies with promising results. However, it is not indicated for PCL, and experience in this condition is limited. This case is a rare presentation of bilateral orbital plasmacytomas after CAR-T therapy in a patient with PCL history. Case presentation We present the case of a 51-year-old female patient with a history of previous primary PCL treated with CAR-T therapy achieving complete response and without evidence of systemic progression. Six months after the treatment, she developed subacute proptosis and ptosis on the left eye.An orbital CT scan was performed and showed an orbital tumor in both eyes. A surgical biopsy with histological examination revealed plasma cells, consistent with a plasmacytoma. PET-CT and MRI confirmed the presence of tumors in both orbits. The patient was treated with dexamethasone and chemotherapy along with palliative radiation therapy to the left orbit which had a good response. Conclusion Orbital involvement in multiple myeloma and PCL is rare, with plasmacytomas being more common in other parts of the body. In this report, we present a case of a patient with PCL history, treated with multiple therapeutic lines including CAR-T therapy, who presented bilateral orbital plasmacytomas as the first sign of extramedullary progression after the treatment. This case should be considered by specialist to be aware that the orbits are a possible location of extramedullary progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Nogués-Castell
- Institut Clínic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Feu-Basilio
- Institut Clínic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Felguera García
- Institut Clínic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Fernández de Larrea
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Aina Oliver-Caldés
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Amyloidosis and Myeloma Unit, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Balagué Ponz
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jessica Matas Fassi
- Institut Clínic d’Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut D’ Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaudhary RK, Patil P, Ananthesh L, Gowdru Srinivasa M, Mateti UV, Shetty V, Khanal P. Identification of signature genes and drug candidates for primary plasma cell leukemia: An integrated system biology approach. Comput Biol Med 2023; 162:107090. [PMID: 37295388 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is one of the rare cancer which is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of plasma cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow. The aggressive behavior of the disease and high mortality rate among PCL patients makes it a thirst area to be explored. METHODS The dataset for PCL was obtained from the GEO database and was analyzed using GEO2R for differentially expressed genes. Further, the functional enrichment analysis was carried out for DEGs using DAVID. The protein-protein interactions (PPI) for DEGs were obtained using STRING 11.5 and were analyzed in Cytoscape 3.7.2. to obtain the key hub genes. These key hub genes were investigated for their interaction with suitable drug candidates using DGIdb, DrugMAP, and Schrodinger's version 2022-1. RESULTS Out of the total of 104 DEGs, 39 genes were up-regulated whereas 65 genes were down-regulated. A total of 11 biological processes, 2 cellular components, and 5 molecular functions were enriched along with the 7 KEGG pathways for the DEGs. Further, a total of 11 hub genes were obtained from the PPI of DEGs of which TP53, MAPK1, SOCS1, MBD3, and YES1 were the key hub genes. Oxaliplatin, mitoxantrone, and ponatinib were found to have the highest binding affinity towards the p53, MAPK1, and YES1 proteins respectively. CONCLUSION TP53, MAPK1, SOCS1, MBD3, and YES1 are the signature hub genes that might be responsible for the aggressive prognosis of PCL leading to poor survival rate. However, p53, MAPK1, and YES1 can be targeted with oxaliplatin, mitoxantrone, and ponatinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raushan Kumar Chaudhary
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India.
| | - Prakash Patil
- Central Research Laboratory (CRL), K.S. Hegde Medical Academy (KSHEMA), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru, 575018, Karnataka, India
| | - L Ananthesh
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India
| | - Mahendra Gowdru Srinivasa
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India
| | - Uday Venkat Mateti
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India.
| | - Vijith Shetty
- Department of Medical Oncology, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy (KSHEMA), Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Hospital, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India
| | - Pukar Khanal
- Department of Pharmacology, NGSM Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (NGSMIPS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, 575018, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jurczyszyn A, Olszewska-Szopa M, Vesole DH. The Current State of Knowledge About Evolution of Multiple Myeloma to Plasma Cell Leukemia. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:188-193. [PMID: 36593169 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Plasma cell leukemia is a rare form of multiple myeloma (MM). In contrast to de novo primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is very uncommon presentation of MM, there is increasing frequency of transformation to secondary plasma cell leukemia (sPCL) with increasing survival of patients (MM). The molecular basis of sPCL remains poorly understood sPCL is particularly aggressive and is associated with an extremely poor prognosis, constituting a major unmet medical need. High-quality data in sPCL regarding presentation, treatment and outcomes is limited. Herein we review the current state of knowledge on sPCL diagnostics, molecular biology, clinical characteristics, prognosis and reported treatment outcomes and the emergence of the new therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artur Jurczyszyn
- Hematology Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
| | - Magdalena Olszewska-Szopa
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - David H Vesole
- Department of Medicine, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dubey H, Goel H, Verma S, Gupta S, Tanwar K, Rahul E, Kapoor G, Vasantharaman J, Ranjan A, Tanwar P, Chopra A. Clinicopathological and laboratory parameters of plasma cell leukemia among Indian population. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BLOOD RESEARCH 2022; 12:190-195. [PMID: 36742277 PMCID: PMC9890187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell neoplasm distinguished by extensive clonal expansion of plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB). PCL is divided into two subtypes: primary (pPCL) originates de novo without preceding multiple myeloma, while secondary (sPCL) comprises a leukemic modification that occurs as a late manifestation from previous multiple myeloma (MM). pPCL and sPCL are clinically and biologically two different entities. The molecular mechanisms of the development of PCL, either primary or secondary, remain poorly understood. We aim to present 5 years of data on clinical profiles and treatment outcomes of pPCL and sPCL patients treated at our cancer hospital in India and to find a predictive parameter of the development of PCL in cases of MM. METHODS In this study, we retrospectively reviewed and evaluated the clinicopathological features, laboratory parameters, immunophenotypic profile, and patient outcomes of 17 PCL cases diagnosed among 180 plasma cell dyscrasia patients during the study period to establish a correlation between pPCL & sPCL for diagnosis and management of PCL. RESULTS A total of 17 PCL patients were diagnosed among 180 plasma cell dyscrasia patients during the study period. Among PCL patients, 9 cases had pPCL (52.94% of all PCL patients), and 8 cases had sPCL (47.06% of all PCL patients). Peculiar differences were seen between the two PCL types. Both types of PCL had a younger age at the time of diagnosis, having elevated BM plasma cell infiltration percentage, frequent anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated beta-2-microglobulin (B2M) levels, raised LDH levels, and positive M-protein in both serum and urine. In addition, SFLC assay and Immunofixation assay showed higher κ and lower λ in pPCL compared with sPCL (P<0.05). Higher Renal insufficiency was also observed in pPCL compared to sPCL (P=0.335). The survival and response to treatment of PCL patients remain considerably poor, sPCL exhibit shorter overall survival (OS) than pPCL with (median 1.75 months vs. 7 months respectively, P=0.1682). Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) needs to be diagnosed early and requires prompt initiation of treatment before patients get complications. CONCLUSION Our study characterizes the clinical and laboratory features of pPCL and sPCL and may aid physicians in prognosticating the course of disease of their patients. However, future multicentre studies are the need of the hour to develop accurate diagnostic criteria and establish the efficacy of therapeutic regimens.
Collapse
|