Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Hodgkin Lymphoma-Latest Advances in the Era of Novel Therapies

Successful Treatment of a Patient Presenting with Simultaneous Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Case Report

BACKGROUND Simultaneously occuring diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is extremely rare. Generally, patients with CD20-positive DLBCL receive rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen, while those with HL receive brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (A-AVD) regimen as first-line therapy. Establishing a strategy for treating both lymphoma subtypes concurrently is thus very difficult. We report successful treatment of a patient simultaneously diagnosed with advanced DLBCL and HL. CASE REPORT A 20-year-old man visited the Hematology Department of Kyungpook National University Hospital after the diagnosis of germinal center B-cell DLBCL in the kidney and HL (nodular sclerosis type) in the neck lymph node. His DLBCL was classified as Ann Arbor stage IV with an International Prognostic Index score of 4, a high-risk group. Six cycles of R-CHOP therapy were planned, and central nervous system prophylaxis with intrathecalmethotrexate was added because of the high-risk features of central nervous system involvement. After completing 6 cycles of chemotherapy, without significant adverse events (Deauville score of 1), complete remission was confirmed. Then, the patient decided to undergo consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). He received busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide conditioning regimen, after which auto-SCT was conducted in April 2021. After auto-SCT, the patient was undergoing regular check-ups and doing well, without obvious disease relapse or specific symptoms. He maintained a disease-free status for 40 months to date. CONCLUSIONS Our case showed that R-CHOP regimen was effective not only for DLBCL but also for HL. Notably, consolidative upfront auto-SCT should be considered for a deeper response.

Hypoxia-induced PD-L1 expression and modulation of muscle stem cell allograft rejection

Stem cell therapy has shown immense promise in treating genetic disorders, particularly muscular diseases like Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This study investigates a novel method to enhance the viability of stem cell transplants in DMD by upregulating Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in muscle stem cells (MuSCs) through preconditioning with hypoxia and/or interferon-γ (IFN-γ) to mitigate T cell immune rejection. MuSCs were treated with 5% hypoxia for 72 h and further treated with IFN-γ to enhance PD-L1 expression. Additionally, gain and loss experiments using a PD-L1 inhibitor (BMS-1) were conducted to investigate cellular expression profiles in vitro and cell transplantation outcomes in vivo. Our results showed significant upregulation of PD-L1 in MuSCs under hypoxia and IFN-γ conditions without affecting cellular proliferation and differentiation in vitro. In vivo, these preconditioned MuSCs led to decreased infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in implanted limb muscles of mouse models. Blocking PD-L1 reduced graft survival in muscles treated with MuSCs. Conversely, increased PD-L1 expression and reduced T cell infiltration correlated with improved graft survival, as identified by pre-labeled LacZ + MuSCs following transplantation. This study provides evidence that hypoxia and IFN-γ preconditioning of MuSCs can significantly enhance the efficacy of cell therapy for DMD by mitigating immune rejection. Our strategic approach aimed to improve donor cell survival and function post-transplantation by modifying immune responses towards the donor cells.

Evaluation of outcome and safety profile in high-dose BEAM and Benda-EAM chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients

Introduction

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto- HSCT) preceded by high-dose chemotherapy is a mainstay in relapsed/refractory lymphoma. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse event profile between BEAM and Benda-EAM (BeEAM) regimens and to evaluate prognostic factors for survival in lymphoma patients undergoing auto-HSCT.

Material and methods

We present a single-center retrospective analysis of 82 lymphoma patients (median age 52; IQR 38.2-62.2) who received BEAM (47.6%) or BeEAM (52.4%) followed by auto-HSCT between January 2015 and December 2021.

Results

During the post-HSCT period 58% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia (51.3% vs. 64.3% in BEAM and BeEAM, respectively; p = 0.27), 80.5% mucositis (69.2% vs. 90.7%; p = 0.02), 42.5% bacteremia (50% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.26), and 18.8% pneumonia (31.6% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.01). Patients who received bendamustine required more platelet transfusions (p = 0.02). In the multivariate Cox regression model, C-reactive protein level on the first day of hospitalization (hazard ratio - HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) and days of agranulocytosis (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.00-1.32) were predictors of poorer overall survival (OS), whereas hemoglobin level at the auto-HSCT was a protective factor in terms of OS (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.23-0.78) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45-0.96). The median OS since auto-HSCT was 87 months, while the median PFS was 49 months. No differences in PFS and OS between BEAM and BeEAM regimens were proven.

Conclusions

Conditioning with BEAM and BeEAM regimens is associated with comparable post-transplant outcomes. The toxicity of these regimens is comparable; however, BEAM is associated with a higher risk of pneumonia, while BeEAM is associated with a higher risk of mucositis.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with etoposide +cytarabine plus G-CSF in poor mobilizers with relapsed or refractory lymphoma

Background

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a potentially curative strategy for relapse or refractory(r/r) aggressive lymphoma. However, a proportion of lymphoma patients who are at high risk of mobilization failure fail to mobilize stem cells and cannot proceed to ASCT. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Etoposide combined with Cytarabine (EA) plus G-CSF mobilization in poor mobilizers (PMs) with r/r aggressive lymphoma.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the outcomes of chemo-mobilization based on EA (Etoposide 0.1 g/m2, qd d1~3; AraC 0.5 g/m2, q12h d1~3) in 98 patients with r/r aggressive lymphoma. Of these, 39 patients met the criteria for predicted PMs as proposed by the Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo working group.

Results

Of the 39 PMs, 38(97.4%) patents harvested adequate mobilization (≥2×106 CD34+ cells/kg), while 31(79.5%) patients achieved optimal mobilization (≥5×106 CD34+ cells/kg). Overall, the mean number of CD34+ cells/kg collected was 17.99(range: 1.08~83.07) ×106 with an average of 1.4 apheresis sessions, and the number was 15.86(range: 0.37~83.07) ×106 for the first apheresis, respectively. A single apheresis procedure was sufficient to reach the target yield of adequate mobilization in 35(89.7%) PMs, while 76.9% of PMs achieved optimal collection within two apheresis sessions. We observed acceptable hematological toxicity and antibiotic usage exposure in 26 patients with a mean duration of 3.6 days. No grade 4 infection or mobilization-related mortality was recorded. Most patients underwent ASCT and achieved successful hematopoietic recovery with prompt engraftment duration, except for one NK/T-cell lymphoma patient who succumbed to severe septicemia after receiving conditioning chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that EA plus G-CSF is an effective and tolerable CD34+ stem cell mobilization strategy for patients with r/r lymphoma, including those predicted to be PMs. This regimen could be an option for patients with r/r lymphoma, particularly those undergoing mobilization for salvage ASCT therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced and relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: current applications and future prospects

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) treatment paradigms are undergoing a shift with the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into both first-line and relapsed/refractory (R/R) regimens. In first-line therapy, the synergy between ICIs and chemotherapy may surpass the previous standards of ABVD and BV-AVD established by landmark trials including RATHL and ECHELON-1. In R/R disease, the combination of ICIs with chemotherapy has begun to challenge the paradigm of chemotherapy as a bridge to consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. The clinical advances heralded by ICI offer unique challenges to management. ICI treatment and the associated inflammatory response can make the traditional timing and modalities of treatment response assessment difficult to interpret. In contrast to ABVD and BV-AVD, pembrolizumab-AVD results in PET2 positivity rates that are higher and less predictive of treatment response even when ultimate outcomes may be superior. This suggests that the predictive value of PET2 may be less reliable in the ICI era, prompting a reevaluation of response assessment strategies. Looking forward, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be a promising tool in response-adapted therapy. Its potential to complement or even supersede PET scans in predicting response to ICIs represents a critical advancement. The integration of ctDNA analysis holds the promise of refining response-adapted approaches and enhancing precision in therapeutic decision-making for patients with cHL. This review navigates the evolving landscape of cHL therapy, emphasizing the paradigmatic shift brought about by ICIs. This article explores the impact of combining ICIs with chemotherapy in both relapsed/refractory and first-line settings, scrutinizes the challenges posed to response-adapted therapy by ICIs, and highlights the potential role of ctDNA as an adjunct in refining response-adapted strategies for cHL.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimens and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in various diseases

Conditioning regimens employed in autologous stem cell transplantation have been proven useful in various hematological disorders and underlying malig nancies; however, despite being efficacious in various instances, negative consequences have also been recorded. Multiple conditioning regimens were extracted from various literature searches from databases like PubMed, Google scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Conditioning regimens for each disease were compared by using various end points such as overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and leukemia free survival (LFS). Variables were presented on graphs and analyzed to conclude a more efficacious conditioning regimen. In multiple myeloma, the most effective regimen was high dose melphalan (MEL) given at a dose of 200/mg/m2. The comparative results of acute myeloid leukemia were presented and the regimens that proved to be at an admirable position were busulfan (BU) + MEL regarding OS and BU + VP16 regarding LFS. In case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), BU, fludarabine, and etoposide (BuFluVP) conferred good disease control not only with a paramount improvement in survival rate but also low risk of recurrence. However, for ALL, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy was preferred in the context of better OS and LFS. With respect to Hodgkin's lymphoma, mitoxantrone (MITO)/MEL overtook carmustine, VP16, cytarabine, and MEL in view of PFS and vice versa regarding OS. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients were administered MITO (60 mg/m2) and MEL (180 mg/m2) which showed promising results. Lastly, amyloidosis was considered, and the regimen that proved to be competent was MEL 200 (200 mg/m2). This review article demonstrates a comparison between various conditioning regimens employed in different diseases.

Anti-PD1 Consolidation in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma at High Risk of Relapse after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Real-Life Study

(1) Background: Consolidation therapy is an emerging strategy for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) at high risk of failing salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). (2) Objectives: To assess the safety and effectiveness of PD1-blockade consolidation for these high-risk patients. (3) Design: Multi-center retrospective analysis. (4) Methods: We identified 26 patients given anti-PD1 consolidation, from June 2016 to May 2020. (5) Results: Patients displayed the following risk factors: refractory disease (69%), relapse < 12 months from upfront therapy (15%), ≥2 lines of salvage therapy (73%), extranodal disease (65%). Nineteen patients (73%) had ≥3 of these factors. In addition, 16 patients (61%) also displayed PET-positive (Deauville ≥ 4) disease before ASCT. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), never graded > 3, occurred in 12 patients (46.15%) and mainly included skin rashes (41.7%), transaminitis (33.3%), and thyroid hypofunction (25%). Patients completed a median of 13 courses (range 6−30). At a median follow-up of 25.8 months post-ASCT, the median progression-free (PFS) was 42.6 months, with a 2-year PFS and overall survival rates of 79% and 87%, respectively. (6) Conclusions: Post-ASCT consolidation with anti-PD1 is feasible and effective. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal treatment length and patients’ subsets more likely to benefit from this approach.

Herpesvirus Screening in Childhood Hematopoietic Transplant Reveals High Systemic Inflammation in Episodes of Multiple Viral Detection and an EBV Association with Elevated IL-1β, IL-8 and Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality among hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Unlike Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV) and Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Human Herpesvirus (HHV) 6, HHV7 and HHV8 are not routinely monitored in many centers, especially in the pediatric population of low–medium income countries. We screened EBV, HCMV, HHV6, HHV7 and HHV8 in 412 leukocytes-plasma paired samples from 40 pediatric patients assisted in a tertiary hospital in Mexico. Thirty-two underwent allo-HSCT, whereas eight received auto-HSCT. Overall viral detection frequencies in allo- and auto-HSCT were: EBV = 43.7% and 30.0%, HCMV = 5.0% and 6.7%, HHV6 = 7.9% and 20.0% and HHV7 = 9.7% and 23.3%. HHV8 was not detected in any sample. Interestingly, HHV6 and HHV7 were more frequent in auto-HSCT, and HHV6 was observed in all episodes of multiple detection in auto-HSCT patients. We found EBV DNA in plasma samples, whereas HCMV, HHV6 and HHV7 DNA were predominantly observed in leukocytes, indicative of their expansion in cellular compartments. We also found that IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-8 were significantly increased in episodes in which multiple viruses were simultaneously detected, and samples positive for EBV DNA and graft-versus-host disease had a further increase of IL-1β and IL-8. In conclusion, the EBV, HCMV, HHV6 and HHV7 burdens were frequently detected in allo- and auto-HSCT, and their presence associated with systemic inflammation.