Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

Immunotherapy: A Sharp Curve Turn at the Corner of Targeted Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers

Biliary tract cancers continue to increase in incidence and have a high mortality rate. Most of the patients present with advanced-stage disease. The discovery of targetable genomic alterations addressing IDH, FGFR, HER2, BRAFV600 E, and others has led to the identification and validation of novel therapies in biliary cancer. Recent advances demonstrating an improved outcome with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy have established a new first-line care standard. In case of contraindications to the use of checkpoint inhibitors and the absence of targetable alterations, chemotherapy remains to be the standard of care.

Prognosis of patients with advanced bile tract carcinoma: assessment using the modified-Gustave Roussy Immune Score (mGRIm-s) as a clinico-immunological tool

BACKGROUND

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has enhanced survival outcomes for certain patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Pinpointing those who would benefit most from immunotherapy remains elusive. We investigated the predictive value of the modified Gustave Roussy Immune Score (mGRIm-s) in BTC patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

Data from 110 patients at Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, spanning September 2015 to April 2021, were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 38.7 months as of December 2023. Risk factors included low albumin, high lactate dehydrogenase, and an elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. Patients were stratified into low (patients with no risk factors) and high (patients with at least one risk factor) mGRIm-s groups based on these factors.

RESULTS

Survival outcomes post-immunotherapy favored the low mGRIm-s group, with significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (8.50 months vs. 3.70 months and 21.60 months vs. 8.00 months). COX regression confirmed an elevated risk in the high mGRIm-s group. Subgroup analysis highlighted a notable survival advantage for low mGRIm-s patients receiving first-line immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores mGRIm-s's potential in predicting immunotherapy response in BTC, paving the way for more targeted approaches.

Advances in immunotherapy for biliary tract cancers

ABSTRACT

Biliary tract cancers (BTC), a heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis, including gallbladder cancer (GBC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). Although surgery is currently the primary regimen to treat BTC, most BTC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and miss the opportunity of surgical eradication. As a result, non-surgical therapy serves as the main intervention for advanced BTC. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising therapies in a number of solid cancers, and it includes immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) monotherapy or combined therapy, tumor vaccines, oncolytic virus immunotherapy, adoptive cell therapy (ACT), and cytokine therapy. However, these therapies have been practiced in limited clinical settings in patients with BTC. In this review, we focus on the discussion of latest advances of immunotherapy in BTC and update the progress of multiple current clinical trials with different immunotherapies.

Current Standards, Multidisciplinary Approaches, and Future Directions in the Management of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Biliary tract cancers are molecularly and anatomically diverse cancers which include intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic (perihilar and distal) cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder cancer. While recognized as distinct entities, the rarer incidence of these cancers combined with diagnostic challenges in classifying anatomic origin has resulted in clinical trials and guideline recommended strategies being generalized patients with all types of biliary tract cancer. In this review, we delve into the unique aspects, subtype-specific clinical trial outcomes, and multidisciplinary management of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. When resectable, definitive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (sometimes with selective radiation/chemoradiation) is current standard of care. Due to high recurrence rates, there is growing interest in the use of upfront/neoadjuvant therapy to improve surgical outcomes and to downstage patients who may not initially be resectable. Select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are being successfully treated with novel approaches such as liver transplant. In the advanced disease setting, combination gemcitabine and cisplatin remains the standard base for systemic therapy and was recently improved upon with the addition of immune checkpoint blockade to the chemotherapy doublet in the recently reported TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials. Second-line all-comer treatments for these patients remain limited in both options and efficacy, so clinical trial participation should be strongly considered. With increased use of molecular testing, detection of actionable mutations and opportunities to receive indicated targeted therapies are on the rise and are the most significant driver of improved survival for patients with advanced stage disease. Though these targeted therapies are currently reserved for the second or later line, future trials are looking at moving these to earlier treatment settings and use in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition to cross-disciplinary management with surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, patient-centered care should also include collaboration with advanced endoscopists, palliative care specialists, and nutritionists to improve global patient outcomes.

Survival benefit and biomarker of PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy in first-line of advanced biliary tract cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies have shown promise in the first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, the best partner remains to be validated. Moreover, progress on biomarkers predicting the efficacy of ICI in BTC is slow. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and investigate reliable predictive biomarkers of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody combination therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced BTC.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients with advanced BTC who received chemotherapy or anti-PD-1 combination therapy as first-line were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Biomarkers, including peripheral blood inflammation scores, genetic alterations, and tumor microenvironment were investigated.

FINDINGS

Sixty-four patients were recruited and divided into four treatment groups: chemotherapy, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy, anti-PD-1 plus targeted therapy, and triple group (anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy and targeted therapy). The median OS was 7.9, 11.3, 12.8, and 28.7 months, respectively. Compared to chemotherapy, mOS significantly prolonged in the triple group (p = 0.031). It showed that patients with five different peripheral blood inflammation scores had significantly prolonged mOS (p < 0.05). Genetic testing results suggested that patients with poor survival all had TP53 mutations and higher levels of KRAS and ERBB2 mutations. Low FOXP3/CD8 ratio was associated with prolonged OS (p = 0.029). With CD4-low, CD8-high, CD56-positive, CD163-high, FOXP3-high and MPO-high in TME as one factor, we calculated PLUS score according to the number of factors. The high-PLUS (>2) group showed significantly superior OS (p = 0.003).

INTERPRETATION

First-line anti-PD-1 combination therapy was superior to chemotherapy, and triple therapy significantly improved survival. Peripheral blood immune-inflammation score, FOXP3/CD8 ratio, and PLUS have potential as biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of first-line anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced BTC.

Case Report: Camrelizumab combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignant tumors, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Currently, radical surgical resection is the preferred treatment for ICC. However, most patients are only diagnosed at an advanced stage and are therefore not eligible for surgery. Herein, we present a case of advanced ICC in which radical surgery was not possible due to tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery. Six treatment cycles with a gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with camrelizumab immunotherapy achieved a partial response and successful tumor conversion, as tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery was no longer evident. The patient subsequently underwent successful radical surgical resection, including hepatectomy, caudate lobe resection, and cholecystectomy combined with lymph node dissection. Cases of patients with advanced ICC undergoing surgical resection after combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy are rare. The GEMOX regimen combined with camrelizumab demonstrated favorable antitumor efficacy and safety, suggesting that it might be a potential feasible and safe conversion therapy strategy for patients with advanced ICC.

Lacking Immunotherapy Biomarkers for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has recently been incorporated into the spectrum of biliary tract cancer (BTC) treatment. The identification of predictive response biomarkers is essential in order to identify those patients who may benefit most from this novel treatment option. Here, we propose a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of PD-1, PD-L1, and other immune-related biomarker expression levels in patients with BTC.

METHODS

Prisma guidelines were followed for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Eligible studies were searched on PubMed. Studies published between 2017 and 2022, reporting data on PD-1/PD-L1 expression and other immune-related biomarkers in patients with BTC, were considered eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 61 eligible studies were identified. Despite the great heterogeneity between 39 studies reporting data on PD-L1 expression, we found a mean PD-L1 expression percentage (by choosing the lowest cut-off per study) of 25.6% (95% CI 21.0 to 30.3) in BTCs. The mean expression percentages of PD-L1 were 27.3%, 21.3%, and 27.4% in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCAs-15 studies), perihilar-distal CCAs (p/dCCAs-7 studies), and gallbladder cancer (GBC-5 studies), respectively. Furthermore, 4.6% (95% CI 2.38 to 6.97) and 2.5% (95% CI 1.75 to 3.34) of BTCs could be classified as TMB-H and MSI/MMRd tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION

From our analysis, PD-L1 expression was found to occur approximately in 26% of BTC patients, with minimal differences based on anatomical location. TMB-H and MSI molecular phenotypes occurred less frequently. We still lack a reliable biomarker, especially in patients with mismatch-proficient tumors, and we must need to make an effort to conceive new prospective biomarker discovery studies.

An age-group analysis on the efficacy of chemotherapy in older adult patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: a Japanese cancer registry cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of chemotherapy in older adult patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains to be established, despite the fact that the majority of patients diagnosed with BTC tend to be aged ≥ 70 years. In this study, we used three databases to examine the effectiveness of chemotherapy in a large patient population aged ≥ 70 years with metastatic BTC.

METHODS

Using a large Japanese database that combined three data sources (Osaka Cancer Registry, Japan's Diagnosis Procedure Combination, the hospital-based cancer registry database), we extracted the data from patients pathologically diagnosed with metastatic BTC, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, in 30 designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs). A cohort of patients with comparable backgrounds was identified using propensity score matching. The log-rank test was used to examine how chemotherapy affected overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 2,622 registered patients with BTC in 30 DCCHs, 207 older adult patients aged > 70 years with metastatic BTC were selected. Chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of older adult patients, according to propensity score matching (chemotherapy, 6.4 months vs. best supportive care, 1.8 months, P value < 0.001). The number of patients receiving chemotherapy tends to decrease with age. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) (GS) combination therapy were frequently performed in the chemotherapy group for patients under 80 years of age (70-74 years, 61.7%; 75-79 years, 62.8%). In contrast, monotherapy including GEM and S-1 was more frequently performed in age groups over 80 years (80-84 years, 56.2%; 85-89 years, 77.7%; ≥90 years, 100%). In the chemotherapy group among older adult patients aged < 85 years, the median OS was significantly longer according to age-group analysis of the 5-year age range following propensity score matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adult patients with metastatic BTC who received chemotherapy, prolonged survival was observed. Chemotherapy may be a viable option for patients with metastatic BTC who are aged < 85 years.

Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of biliary tract (BTC) cancer remains relatively limited, especially in the setting of advanced BTC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown some effects in a variety of solid tumors, but their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced BTC are still elusive, which require in-depth analysis.

METHODS

The clinical information of 129 patients diagnosed with advanced BTC between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with chemotherapy, while a portion of them (64 patients) were treated with ICIs, the other 64 patients were not. Therefore, we divided the patients into two groups, SC (standard chemotherapy) and CI (chemotherapy in combined with immunotherapy), then we analyzed the benefit of adding ICIs according to efficacy, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and the influence of various factors and effectiveness.

RESULTS

The mean PFS was 9.67 months for CI group and 6.83 months for SC group. The PFS was prolonged by 2.84 months with ICI addition, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 3.114, 95% CI: 1.06-4.74, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was 32.81% (21/64) for the CI group versus 10.77% (7/65) for the SC group, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.69% (51/64) versus 67.69% (44/65), respectively. Regression analysis showed that factors such as changes in CA19-9, the level of PD-L1 expression, tobacco and alcohol, and the neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio all influenced PFS (p < 0.05 for all these factors). For the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), the highest grade 3-4 adverse effects were thrombocytopenia in 7.75% (10/129) and neutropenia in 3.1% (4/129), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 32.8% (21/64), and all were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that ICIs combined with chemotherapy exhibited good antitumor activity with acceptable safety and could be recommended as first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC.

Cholangiocarcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract, with aggressive behavior, and portends a poor prognosis. Traditionally, it is classified according to its site of involvement as intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. A host of genetic and epigenetic factors have been involved in its pathogenesis. Chemotherapy has remained the standard first-line treatment over the last decade, with a disappointing median overall survival of 11 months for locally advanced and metastatic CCA. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of many pancreaticobiliary malignancies, offering durable responses with a safe therapeutic profile. To date, there have been no significant advances in the management of CCA. Novel immunotherapeutic methods, such as cancer vaccines, adoptive cell therapy, and combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents, are currently under investigation and may improve prognosis with overall survival. Efforts to find robust biomarkers for response to treatment along with multiple clinical trials are also ongoing in this regard. In this review, we present an overview of the current advances and the future perspectives of immunotherapy in the management of CCA.

Targeting Angiogenesis in the Era of Biliary Tract Cancer Immunotherapy: Biological Rationale, Clinical Implications, and Future Research Avenues

Although biliary tract cancers are traditionally considered rare in Western countries, their incidence and mortality rates are rising worldwide. A better knowledge of the genomic landscape of these tumor types has broadened the number of molecular targeted therapies, including angiogenesis inhibitors. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) could potentially change the first-line therapeutic approach, but monotherapy with ICIs has shown disappointing results in CCA. Several clinical trials are evaluating combination strategies that include immunotherapy together with other anticancer agents with a synergistic activity. The tumor microenvironment (TME) composition plays a pivotal role in the prognosis of BTC patients. The accumulation of immunosuppressive cell types, such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and regulatory T-cells, together with the poor infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells, is known to predispose to a poor prognosis owing to the establishment of resistance mechanisms. Likewise, angiogenesis is recognized as a major player in modulating the TME in an immunosuppressive manner. This is the mechanistic rationale for combination treatment schemes blocking both immunity and angiogenesis. In this scenario, this review aims to provide an overview of the most recent completed or ongoing clinical trials combining immunotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors with/without a chemotherapy backbone.

Clinical and biomarker analyses of sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

The prognosis of biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains unsatisfactory. This single-arm, phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR2000036652) investigated the efficacy, safety, and predictive biomarkers of sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTCs. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR); multi-omics biomarkers were assessed as exploratory objective. Thirty patients were enrolled and received treatment, the median OS and PFS were 15.9 months and 5.1 months, the ORR was 36.7%. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33.3%), with no reported deaths nor unexpected safety events. Predefined biomarker analysis indicated that patients with homologous recombination repair pathway gene alterations or loss-of-function mutations in chromatin remodeling genes presented better tumor response and survival outcomes. Furthermore, transcriptome analysis revealed a markedly longer PFS and tumor response were associated with higher expression of a 3-gene effector T cell signature or an 18-gene inflamed T cell signature. Sintilimab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin meets pre-specified endpoints and displays acceptable safety profile, multiomics potential predictive biomarkers are identified and warrant further verification.

New Challenges in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Liver Transplantation, Locoregional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a neoplasm with high mortality that represents 15% of all primary liver tumors. Its worldwide incidence is on the rise, and despite important advances in the knowledge of molecular mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment, overall survival has not substantially improved in the last decade. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone therapy for CCA. Unfortunately, complete resection is only possible in less than 15-35% of cases, with a risk of recurrence greater than 60%. Liver transplantation (LT) has been postulated as an effective therapeutic strategy in those intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) smaller than 3 cm. However, the low rate of early diagnosis in non-resectable patients justifies the low applicability in clinical practice. The evidence regarding LT in locally advanced iCCA is scarce and based on small, retrospective, and, in most cases, single-center case series. In this setting, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be useful in identifying a subgroup of patients with biologically less aggressive tumors in whom LT may be successful. The results of LT in pCCA are promising, however, we need a very careful selection of patients and adequate experience in the transplant center. Locoregional therapies may be relevant in unresectable, liver-only CCA. In iCCA smaller than 2 cm, particularly those arising in patients with advanced chronic liver disease in whom resection or LT may not be feasible, thermal ablation may become a reliable alternative. The greatest advances in the management of CCA occur in systemic treatment. Immunotherapy associated with chemotherapy has emerged as the gold standard in the first-line treatment. Likewise, the most encouraging results have been obtained with targeted therapies, where the use of personalized treatments has shown high rates of objective and durable tumor response, with clear signs of survival benefit. In conclusion, the future of CCA treatment seems to be marked by the development of new treatment strategies but high-quality, prospective studies that shed light on their use and applicability are mandatory.

Conversion therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: A case report and literature review

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly malignant biliary tumor. Patients with unresectable and advanced ICC have a poor prognosis with current gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Combination therapy strategies based on immunotherapy have achieved promising results in various tumor types.

Case presentation

We reported a patient with unresectable ICC who received lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy and subsequently underwent radical liver resection. A 46-year-old male with a history of chronic hepatitis B and hypertension was diagnosed with ICC. Multiple liver tumors with ring-like enhancement were detected on abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Enlarged lymph nodes were found in the hilar and retroperitoneal areas. The tumor was clinically staged as T2N1M0 (stage IIIB). Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in combination with GP chemotherapy were adopted as first-line treatments for the patient. After six cycles of scheduled treatment, the diameter of the largest liver lesion and the number of liver lesions were markedly reduced. The level of the tumor marker CA19-9 decreased to a normal range. A partial response according to the mRECIST criteria was achieved without severe toxicities. Non-anatomical liver resection (segment 4b, 5,6 + segment 7 + segment 8), cholecystectomy and hilar lymph node dissection were performed one month after stopping combination therapy. Pathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of moderate-to-poorly differentiated ICC with lymph node metastasis. The patient has survived 15 months following resection of the tumors, with no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Conclusion

Lenvatinib and anti-PD1 antibody pembrolizumab in combination with GP chemotherapy provided promising antitumor efficacy with reasonable tolerability, which may be a potentially feasible and safe conversion therapy strategy for patients with initially unresectable and advanced ICC.

Immune microenvironment of cholangiocarcinoma: Biological concepts and treatment strategies

Cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by a poor prognosis with limited treatment and management options. Chemotherapy using gemcitabine with cisplatin is the only available first-line therapy for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, although it offers only palliation and yields a median survival of < 1 year. Recently there has been a resurgence of immunotherapy studies focusing on the ability of immunotherapy to inhibit cancer growth by impacting the tumor microenvironment. Based on the TOPAZ-1 trial, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the combination of durvalumab and gemcitabine with cisplatin as the first-line treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. However, immunotherapy, like immune checkpoint blockade, is less effective in cholangiocarcinoma than in other types of cancer. Although several factors such as the exuberant desmoplastic reaction are responsible for cholangiocarcinoma treatment resistance, existing literature on cholangiocarcinoma cites the inflammatory and immunosuppressive environment as the most common factor. However, mechanisms activating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment contributing to cholangiocarcinoma drug resistance are complicated. Therefore, gaining insight into the interplay between immune cells and cholangiocarcinoma cells, as well as the natural development and evolution of the immune tumor microenvironment, would provide targets for therapeutic intervention and improve therapeutic efficacy by developing multimodal and multiagent immunotherapeutic approaches of cholangiocarcinoma to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we discuss the role of the inflammatory microenvironment-cholangiocarcinoma crosstalk and reinforce the importance of inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment, thereby highlighting the explanatory and therapeutic shortcomings of immunotherapy monotherapy and proposing potentially promising combinational immunotherapeutic strategies.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Targeted Treatment and Immunotherapy for Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancer is one of the most aggressive and fatal tumours. Gemcitabine with cisplatin chemotherapy has long been the first-line treatment, but the prognosis is poor. In recent years, targeted treatment and immunotherapy have produced encouraging outcomes requiring a thorough review and meta-analysis.

METHOD

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four databases, starting from the inception dates of databases to 11 January 2022. This study comprised randomised clinical trials and cohort studies that used immunotherapy or targeted treatment as the first line of treatment for patients with biliary tract cancer.

RESULTS

From the 888 studies extracted, 33 trials were examined and found to meet the criteria. These included 3087 patients, 16 single-arm trials, 13 RCTs, one nRCT, a prospective single-arm pilot study, and a clinical setting in the real world. From 2010 to 2020, 33 studies were conducted using targeted treatment or immunologic therapies as first-line treatments for BTC patients, and 18 of those studies had positive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment can provide survival benefits by improving the objective response rate for patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer. The potential for combination therapy to become a new trend in clinical treatment is promising but needs further clinical evaluation.

Gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common cancer of the biliary tract, characterized by a very poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages owing to its aggressive behaviour and limited therapeutic options. Early detection at a curable stage remains challenging because patients rarely exhibit symptoms; indeed, most GBCs are discovered incidentally following cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. Long-standing chronic inflammation is an important driver of GBC, regardless of the lithiasic or non-lithiasic origin. Advances in omics technologies have provided a deeper understanding of GBC pathogenesis, uncovering mechanisms associated with inflammation-driven tumour initiation and progression. Surgical resection is the only treatment with curative intent for GBC but very few cases are suitable for resection and most adjuvant therapy has a very low response rate. Several unmet clinical needs require to be addressed to improve GBC management, including discovery and validation of reliable biomarkers for screening, therapy selection and prognosis. Standardization of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesion nomenclature, as well as surgical specimen processing and sampling, now provides reproducible and comparable research data that provide a basis for identifying and implementing early detection strategies and improving drug discovery. Advances in the understanding of next-generation sequencing, multidisciplinary care for GBC, neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, and novel systemic therapies including chemotherapy and immunotherapies are gradually changing the treatment paradigm and prognosis of this recalcitrant cancer.

Analysis of gene expression levels and their impact on survival in 31 cancer-types patients identifies novel prognostic markers and suggests unexplored immunotherapy treatment options in a wide range of malignancies

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy has dramatically improved cancer treatment by inhibiting or activating specific cell receptors, thus unleashing the host anti-tumor response. However, the engagement of the three main immune checkpoints so far identified, CTLA4, PD-1 and PD-L1, is effective in a fraction of patients, therefore novel targets must be identified and tested.

METHODS

We focused our attention on the following nine highly relevant immune checkpoint (ICR) receptors: CTLA4, PD1, PD-L1, LAG3, TIM3, OX40, GITR, 4-1BB and TIGIT. All of them are targets of existing drugs currently under clinical scrutiny in several malignancies. Their expression levels were evaluated in patient tissues of 31 different cancer types vs. proper controls, in a total of 15,038 individuals. This analysis was carried out by interrogating public databases available on GEPIA2 portal and UALCAN portal. By the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) their ability to effectively discriminate patients form controls was then investigated. Expression of the nine ICRs was also related to overall survival in 31 cancer types and expressed as Hazard Ratio, on the GEPIA2 portal and validated, for melanoma patients, in patients-datasets available on PROGgene V2 portal.

RESULTS

Significant differential expression was observed for each ICR molecule in many cancer types. A 7-molecules profile was found to specifically discriminate melanoma patients from controls, while two different 6-molecules profiles discriminate pancreatic cancer patients and Testicular Germ Cell Tumors from matched controls. Highly significant survival improvement was found to be related to the expression levels of all nine ICRs in a wide spectrum of malignancies. For melanoma analysis, the relation with survival observed in TCGA datasets was validated in independent GSE melanoma datasets.

CONCLUSION

Analysis the nine ICR molecules demonstrates that their expression patterns may be considered as markers of disease and strong survival predictors in a variety of malignancies frequently associated to poor prognosis. Thus, the present findings are strongly advocating that exploratory clinical trials are worth to be performed, using available drugs, targeting these molecules.

The role of DNA damage repair (DDR) system in response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy

As our understanding of the mechanisms of cancer treatment has increased, a growing number of studies demonstrate pathways through which DNA damage repair (DDR) affects the immune system. At the same time, the varied response of patients to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has prompted the discovery of various predictive biomarkers and the study of combination therapy. Here, our investigation explores the interactions involved in combination therapy, accompanied by a review that summarizes currently identified and promising predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that are useful for classifying oncology patients. In addition, this work, which discusses immunogenicity and several components of the tumor immune microenvironment, serves to illustrate the mechanism by which higher response rates and improved efficacy of DDR inhibitors (DDRi) in combination with ICIs are achieved.

PD-1+ T-Cells Correlate with Nerve Fiber Density as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Recent studies have identified Nerve Fiber Density (NFD) as a prognostic biomarker for Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). In the field of CCA treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is increasing but not all patients respond. Good biomarkers to predict response to ICI are lacking. The present study investigates the immune cell composition and expression of checkpoint molecules in relation to NFD in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients. Our study identified NFD to correlate with PD-1+ T cells as a biomarker indicative for a good prognosis.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a hepatobiliary malignancy, with a dismal prognosis. Nerve fiber density (NFD)—a novel prognostic biomarker—describes the density of small nerve fibers without cancer invasion and is categorized into high numbers and low numbers of small nerve fibers (high vs low NFD). NFD is different than perineural invasion (PNI), defined as nerve fiber trunks invaded by cancer cells. Here, we aim to explore differences in immune cell populations and survival between high and low NFD patients. Approach and Results: We applied multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) on 47 pCCA patients and investigated immune cell composition in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of high and low NFD. Group comparison and oncological outcome analysis was performed. CD8+PD-1 expression was higher in the high NFD than in the low NFD group (12.24 × 10⁻⁶ vs. 1.38 × 10⁻⁶ positive cells by overall cell count, p = 0.017). High CD8+PD-1 expression was further identified as an independent predictor of overall (OS; Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.41; p = 0.031) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR = 0.40; p = 0.039). Correspondingly, the median OS was 83 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 18–48) in patients with high CD8+PD-1+ expression compared to 19 months (95% CI: 5–93) in patients with low CD8+PD-1+ expression (p = 0.018 log rank). Furthermore, RFS was significantly lower in patients with low CD8+PD-1+ expression (14 months (95% CI: 6–22)) compared to patients with high CD8+PD-1+ expression (83 months (95% CI: 17–149), p = 0.018 log rank). Conclusions: PD-1+ T-cells correlate with high NFD as a prognostic biomarker and predict good survival; the biological pathway needs to be investigated.