Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Situ-The Importance of Early Diagnosis in Bowen Disease, Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Erythroplasia of Queyrat

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second-most-prevalent malignancy in humans. A delayed diagnosis of cSCC leads to heightened invasiveness and positive surgical margins. Bowen's disease (BD) represents an early form of cSCC and presents as a small erythematous, photo-distributed, psoriasiform plaque. Although certain dermoscopy features in BD are quite characteristic, histopathology remains the gold standard for diagnosis and provides a severity-scoring system that assists in guiding appropriate treatment strategies. The classification of precancerous lesions of the vulva and penis has undergone multifarious transformations due to variations in clinical and histopathological characteristics. Presently, erythroplasia of Queyrat is categorized as a clinical variant of penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN). The diagnoses of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and PeIN present significant challenges and typically necessitate one or more biopsies, potentially guided by dermoscopy. Aceto-white testing demonstrates a notably high negative predictive value for genital precancerous lesions. Histopathological examination represents the gold-standard diagnosis in VIN and PeIN, while p16 and p53 immunostainings alongside HPV testing provide crucial diagnostic clues. The histopathologic features, degree of differentiation, and associations with lichen planus, lichen sclerosus, and HPV guide the selection of conservative treatments or surgical excision.

Vulvar Inspection During Cervical Cancer Screening Procedures: The Ugly Reality

ABSTRACT

Vulvar examination during procedures for cervical carcinoma screening (CCS) can be a valid chance for early diagnosis of vulvar diseases and precancerous lesions. With this aim an online questionnaire was sent to the members of the Italian Cervical Carcinoma Screening Group (GISCi) from either first level group (FLG, Pap/human papillomavirus test sampling) or second level group (SLG, colposcopy and treatments) to assess if and how vulvar examination was performed. 86% of FLG and 90.2% of SLG report performing vulvar examination prior to CCS procedures. 15% of SLG cannot manage basic vulvar diseases and they refer patients to specialized center. 54.3% underline lack of standardized protocol in case of vulvar disease detection. Despite most health care professionals report examining the vulva during CCS procedures, vulvar cancer early diagnosis is still challenging.

Feasibility study of focused ultrasound in the treatment of vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with persistent symptoms

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of focused ultrasound (FUS) for the treatment of vulvar low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (VLSIL) with persistent symptoms.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 24 VLSIL patients who underwent FUS treatment. At each follow-up visit, the clinical response was assessed including changes in symptoms and signs. In addition, the histological response was assessed based on the vulvar biopsy results of the 3rd follow-up. Clinical and histological response were assessed to elucidate the efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients completed follow-up and post-treatment pathological biopsies. After treatment, the clinical scores of itching decreased from 2.55 ± 0.51 to 0.77 ± 0.81 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the clinical response rate and histological response rate were 86.4% and 81.8%, respectively. Only two cured patients indicated recurrence in the 3rd and 4th year during the follow-up period and achieved cure after re-treatment. In terms of adverse effects, only one patient developed ulcers after treatment, which healed after symptomatic anti-inflammatory treatment without scarring, and no other treatment complications were found in any patients. None of the patients developed a malignant transformation during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that FUS is feasible, effective, and safe for treating VLSIL patients with persistent symptoms, providing a new solution for the noninvasive treatment of symptomatic VLSIL.

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia long-term follow up and prognostic factors: An analysis of a large historical cohort

INTRODUCTION

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a high-risk preinvasive vulvar lesion and precursor of human papillomavirus-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Due to its rarity, literature data on its malignant potential are scant. The aim of the study is to assess the risk of developing VSCC in patients surgically treated for dVIN not associated with VSCC (solitary dVIN) and the risk of VSCC recurrence in patients treated for dVIN associated with VSCC (dVIN-VSCC) at first diagnosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A historical cohort study was performed in a northern Italy referral center for vulvar neoplasms. All consecutive women surgically treated for histologically confirmed dVIN from 1994 to 2021 were collected. Primary outcome was cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk, secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with VSCC development or recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk differences and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with VSCC development in solitary dVIN and recurrence of dVIN-VSCC.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with dVIN at preoperative biopsy were included: at excisional specimens 44 were solitary dVIN and 32 were dVIN-VSCC. The absolute risk of VSCC development after solitary dVIN treatment was 43.2% with median time to to VSCC diagnosis of 25.4 months (range 3.5-128.0 months). VSCC recurrence absolute risk in treated dVIN-VSCC patients was 31.3% with median time to VSCC recurrence of 52.9 months (range 6.5-94.8 months). At uni- and multivariate regression analyses, only compliant topical ultrapotent corticosteroid treatment after solitary dVIN excision showed an ability to prevent VSCC development. No protective effect by corticosteroid treatment was shown for VSCC recurrence in dVIN-VSCC patients. Smoking was associated with higher cancer recurrence risk in dVIN-VSCC patients on both uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dVIN have a high risk of developing both primary and recurring VSCC. Early recognition, long-term follow up, and compliant ultrapotent topical corticosteroid treatment are recommended.

Current Preoperative Management of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Overview

Vulvar carcinoma is a rare cancer affecting the genital tract, constituting 4% of gynecological tumors. Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is the most common type. Diagnosis relies on biopsy during vulvoscopy, plus imaging such as ultrasonography (USG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). This review aims to lay out a thorough overview as to the current preoperative management of VSCC, both in case of vulvar and lymph node involvement. The data research was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library from 2010 to 2024. The selection criteria included only original articles. Seventeen studies were assessed for eligibility. A concordance rate of 62.3% for vHSIL and 65.2% for carcinoma at vulvoscopy, with a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 40%, PPV (Positive Predictive Value) of 37% and NPV (Negative Predictive Value) of 98% in identifying malignant lesions was found. Regarding the reliability of PET for staging and assessing lymph node involvement, a mean SUV (Standardized Uptake Value) for malignant vulvar lesions of 8.4 (range 2.5-14.7) was reported. In the case of MRI, useful for the evaluation of loco-regional infiltration and lymph node involvement, the ratio of the short-to-long-axis diameter and the reader's diagnostic confidence for the presence of lymph node metastasis yielded accuracy of 84.8% and 86.9%, sensitivity of 86.7% and 87.5%, specificity of 81.3% and 86.2%, PPV of 89.7% and 87.5% and NPV of 76.5% and 86.2%, respectively. A long lymph node axis >10 mm and a short diameter >5.8 mm were found to be predictors of malignancy. At USG, instead, the two main characteristics of potentially malignant lymph nodes are cortical thickness and short axis length; the combination of these ultrasound parameters yielded the highest accuracy in distinguishing between negative and positive lymph nodes. Despite the heterogeneity of the included studies and the lack of randomized clinical trials, this review provides a broad overview of the three imaging tools used for the presurgical management of VSCC. Nowadays, although MRI and PET represent the gold standard, ultrasound evaluation is taking on a growing role, as long as it is carried out by expert sonographer. The management of this rare disease should be always performed by a multidisciplinary team in order to precisely stage the tumor and determine the most suitable treatment approach.

Human papillomavirus genotyping in high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: A multicentric Italian study

This study aimed to analyze the human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype distribution in a large cohort of high-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) (vaginal HSIL, VaIN2/3) patients from two Italian referral centers. We included all patients with histologically confirmed VaIN2/3 from the Department of Surgical Sciences, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy, and Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy, between 2003 and 2022. After the histological evaluation of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, we performed HPV genotyping with VisionArray HPV Chip 1.0. We detected HPV DNA in 94.4% of VaIN2/3 (168/178), with HPV 16 as the most prevalent genotype, accounting for 51.8% of all infections, 41.2% of VaIN2 and 77.6% of VaIN3 cases. Other frequent genotypes were HPV 58 (8.3%, 10.9% of VaIN2 and 2.0% of VaIN3), HPV 73 (5.4%, 5.0% of VaIN2 and 6.1% of VaIN3), and HPV 31 (5.4%, 6.7% of VaIN2 and 2.0% of VaIN3). 73.2% of VaIN2/3 had a single HPV genotype infection and 26.8% a multiple infection (20.8% a double infection, 4.8% a triple infection, and 1.2% a quadruple infection). Single infection was more frequently present in VaIN3 than VaIN2 (81.6% vs. 69.8%). 69.1% of single infections and 73.3% of multiple infections had one or more genotypes covered by nine-valent HPV vaccine. HPV vaccination is expected to have a large impact on reducing the incidence of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Vulvar biopsy: Punch biopsy or cervical forceps biopsy?

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of our study is to investigate the rate of non-contributory biopsies between punch biopsy(PB) and cervical forceps biopsy(CFB) for a vulvar lesion seen in consultation. The secondary objective of our study is to evaluate the rate of underestimation of a more severe lesion for patients who have undergone vulvar excision.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a retrospective, descriptive, and comparative study conducted at three centers. The study population consisted of patients who underwent vulvar biopsy between 2017 and 2022 in a gynecological surgery consultation at two French hospitals, as well as a city office. The biopsy techniques used were punch or cervical forceps biopsy. Quantitative variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, while Pearson's or Fisher's Xi2 tests were used for qualitative variables. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

We conducted a retrospective study of 179 vulvar biopsies, of which 100 were punch biopsies and 79 were cervical forceps biopsies, from a total of 107 patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of non-contributory biopsies between the PB and CB groups (p = 1). When analyzing the secondary endpoint of our study, which included 68 patients who underwent vulvectomy after vulvar biopsy, we found that 66 patients (97%) had a good correlation between the pathology of the vulvar biopsy and that of the vulvectomy specimen.

CONCLUSION

Vulvar biopsy techniques using punch or cervical forceps appear to have similar diagnostic performance and are associated with comparable and low rates of underestimation of invasive lesions.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) consensus statement on the management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) developed consensus statements on pre-invasive vulvar lesions in order to improve the quality of care for patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). The management of VaIN varies according to the grade of the lesion: VaIN 1 (low grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL)) can be subjected to follow-up, while VaIN 2-3 (high-grade vaginal SIL) should be treated. Treatment needs individualization according to the patient's characteristics, disease extension and previous therapeutic procedures. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and should be performed if invasion cannot be excluded. Total vaginectomy is used only in highly selected cases of extensive and persistent disease. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser may be used as both an ablation method and an excisional one. Reported cure rates after laser excision and laser ablation are similar. Topical agents are useful for persistent, multifocal lesions or for patients who cannot undergo surgical treatment. Imiquimod was associated with the lowest recurrence rate, highest human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, and can be considered the best topical approach. Trichloroacetic acid and 5-fluorouracil are historical options and should be discouraged. For VaIN after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, laser vaporization and topical agents are not the best options, since they cannot reach epithelium buried in the vaginal scar. In these cases surgical options are preferable. Brachytherapy has a high overall success rate but due to late side effects should be reserved for poor surgical candidates, having multifocal disease, and with failed prior treatments. VaIN tends to recur and ensuring patient adherence to close follow-up visits is of the utmost importance. The first evaluation should be performed at 6 months with cytology and an HPV test during 2 years and annually thereafter. The implementation of vaccination against HPV infection is expected to contribute to the prevention of VaIN and thus cancer of the vagina. The effects of treatment can have an impact on quality of life and result in psychological and psychosexual issues which should be addressed. Patients with VaIN need clear and up-to-date information on a range of treatment options including risks and benefits, as well as the need for follow-up and the risk of recurrence.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) Consensus Statement on the Management of Vaginal Intraepithelial Neoplasia

ABSTRACT

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) developed consensus statements on pre-invasive vulvar lesions in order to improve the quality of care for patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). The management of VaIN varies according to the grade of the lesion: VaIN 1 (low grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL)) can be subjected to follow-up, while VaIN 2-3 (high-grade vaginal SIL) should be treated. Treatment needs individualization according to the patient's characteristics, disease extension and previous therapeutic procedures. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and should be performed if invasion cannot be excluded. Total vaginectomy is used only in highly selected cases of extensive and persistent disease. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser may be used as both an ablation method and an excisional one. Reported cure rates after laser excision and laser ablation are similar. Topical agents are useful for persistent, multifocal lesions or for patients who cannot undergo surgical treatment. Imiquimod was associated with the lowest recurrence rate, highest human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, and can be considered the best topical approach. Trichloroacetic acid and 5-fluorouracil are historical options and should be discouraged. For VaIN after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, laser vaporization and topical agents are not the best options, since they cannot reach epithelium buried in the vaginal scar. In these cases surgical options are preferable. Brachytherapy has a high overall success rate but due to late side effects should be reserved for poor surgical candidates, having multifocal disease, and with failed prior treatments. VaIN tends to recur and ensuring patient adherence to close follow-up visits is of the utmost importance. The first evaluation should be performed at 6 months with cytology and an HPV test during 2 years and annually thereafter. The implementation of vaccination against HPV infection is expected to contribute to the prevention of VaIN and thus cancer of the vagina. The effects of treatment can have an impact on quality of life and result in psychological and psychosexual issues which should be addressed. Patients with VaIN need clear and up-to-date information on a range of treatment options including risks and benefits, as well as the need for follow-up and the risk of recurrence.

Comment on Kesić et al. Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers 2022, 14, 1822

We have read with great interest the paper by Kesić, V. et al. entitled "Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia" [...].

Reply to De Giorgi et al. Comment on "Kesić et al. Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cancers 2022, 14, 1822"

We thank you and your co-authors for the comment [...].