Machine Learning for the Detection and Segmentation of Benign Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Systematic Review

Brain tumor detection using proper orthogonal decomposition integrated with deep learning networks

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The central organ of the human nervous system is the brain, which receives and sends stimuli to the various parts of the body to engage in daily activities. Uncontrolled growth of brain cells can result in tumors which affect the normal functions of healthy brain cells. An automatic reliable technique for detecting tumors is imperative to assist medical practitioners in the timely diagnosis of patients. Although machine learning models are being used, with minimal data availability to train, development of low-order based models integrated with machine learning are a tool for reliable detection.

METHODS

In this study, we focus on comparing a low-order model such as proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) coupled with convolutional neural network (CNN) on 2D images from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to effectively identify brain tumors. The explainability of the coupled POD-CNN prediction output as well as the state-of-the-art pre-trained transfer learning models such as MobileNetV2, Inception-v3, ResNet101, and VGG-19 were explored.

RESULTS

The results showed that CNN predicted tumors with an accuracy of 99.21% whereas POD-CNN performed better with about 1/3rd of computational time at an accuracy of 95.88%. Explainable AI with SHAP showed MobileNetV2 has better prediction in identifying the tumor boundaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of POD with CNN is carried for the first time to detect brain tumor detection with minimal MRI scan data. This study facilitates low-model approaches in machine learning to improve the accuracy and performance of tumor detection.

Current status and quality of radiomics studies for predicting outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pre-treatment prediction of reperfusion and long-term prognosis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients is crucial for effective treatment and decision-making. Recent studies have demonstrated that the inclusion of radiomics data can improve the performance of predictive models. This paper reviews published studies focused on radiomics-based prediction of reperfusion and long-term prognosis in AIS patients.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to September 9, 2023, for studies on radiomics-based prediction of AIS patient outcomes. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the phase classification criteria, the radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool, and the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Two separate meta-analyses were performed of these studies that predict long-term prognosis and reperfusion in AIS patients.

Results

Sixteen studies with sample sizes ranging from 67 to 3,001 were identified. Ten studies were classified as phase II, and the remaining were categorized as phase 0 (n = 2), phase I (n = 1), and phase III (n = 3). The mean RQS score of all studies was 39.41%, ranging from 5.56 to 75%. Most studies (87.5%, 14/16) were at high risk of bias due to their retrospective design. The remaining two studies were categorized as low risk and unclear risk, respectively. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) was 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.92] for predicting the long-term prognosis and 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86) for predicting reperfusion in AIS.

Conclusion

Radiomics has the potential to predict immediate reperfusion and long-term outcomes in AIS patients. Further external validation and evaluation within the clinical workflow can facilitate personalized treatment for AIS patients. This systematic review provides valuable insights for optimizing radiomics prediction systems for both reperfusion and long-term outcomes in AIS patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023461671, identifier CRD42023461671.

Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Recent studies have reported that machine learning (ML), with a relatively strong capacity for processing non-linear data and adaptive ability, could improve the accuracy and efficiency of prediction. The article summarizes the published studies on ML models that predict motor function 3-6 months post-stroke.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochorane and Web of Science as of April 3, 2023 for studies on ML prediction of motor function in stroke patients. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). A random-effects model was preferred for meta-analysis using R4.2.0 because of the different variables and parameters.

Results

A total of 44 studies were included in this meta-analysis, involving 72,368 patients and 136 models. Models were categorized into subgroups according to the predicted outcome Modified Rankin Scale cut-off value and whether they were constructed based on radiomics. C-statistics, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. The random-effects model showed that the C-statistics of all models were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79; 0.83) in the training set and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80; 0.85) in the validation set. According to different Modified Rankin Scale cut-off values, C-statistics of ML models predicting Modified Rankin Scale>2(used most widely) in stroke patients were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78; 0.84) in the training set, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81; 0.87) in the validation set. C-statistics of radiomics-based ML models in the training set and validation set were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78; 0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83; 0.90), respectively.

Conclusion

ML can be used as an assessment tool for predicting the motor function in patients with 3-6 months of post-stroke. Additionally, the study found that ML models with radiomics as a predictive variable were also demonstrated to have good predictive capabilities. This systematic review provides valuable guidance for the future optimization of ML prediction systems that predict poor motor outcomes in stroke patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022335260, identifier: CRD42022335260.

Radiomics and machine learning for predicting the consistency of benign tumors of the central nervous system: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Predicting the consistency of benign central nervous system (CNS) tumors prior to surgery helps to improve surgical outcomes. This review summarizes and analyzes the literature on using radiomics and/or machine learning (ML) for consistency prediction.

METHOD

The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) database was screened for studies published in English from January 1st 2000. Data was extracted according to the PRISMA guidelines and quality of the studies was assessed in compliance with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2).

RESULTS

Eight publications were included focusing on pituitary macroadenomas (n = 5), pituitary adenomas (n = 1), and meningiomas (n = 2) using a retrospective (n = 6), prospective (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1) study design with a total of 763 patients for the consistency prediction. The studies reported an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71-0.99 for their respective best performing model regarding the consistency prediction. Of all studies, four articles validated their models internally whereas none validated their models externally. Two articles stated making data available on request with the remaining publications lacking information with regard to data availability.

CONCLUSIONS

The research on consistency prediction of CNS tumors is still at an early stage regarding the use of radiomics and different ML techniques. Best-practice procedures regarding radiomics and ML need to be followed more rigorously to facilitate the comparison between publications and, accordingly, the possible implementation into clinical practice in the future.

Applications of Machine Learning in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review

Objective: To summarize the available literature on using machine learning (ML) for palliative care practice as well as research and to assess the adherence of the published studies to the most important ML best practices. Methods: The MEDLINE database was searched for the use of ML in palliative care practice or research, and the records were screened according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: In total, 22 publications using machine learning for mortality prediction (n = 15), data annotation (n = 5), predicting morbidity under palliative therapy (n = 1), and predicting response to palliative therapy (n = 1) were included. Publications used a variety of supervised or unsupervised models, but mostly tree-based classifiers and neural networks. Two publications had code uploaded to a public repository, and one publication uploaded the dataset. Conclusions: Machine learning in palliative care is mainly used to predict mortality. Similarly to other applications of ML, external test sets and prospective validations are the exception.

Impact of Denoising on Deep-Learning-Based Automatic Segmentation Framework for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Planning

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the segmentation accuracy of organs at risk (OARs) when denoised computed tomography (CT) images are used as input data for a deep-learning-based auto-segmentation framework. Methods: We used non-contrast enhanced planning CT scans from 40 patients with breast cancer. The heart, lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and liver were manually delineated by two experienced radiation oncologists in a double-blind manner. The denoised CT images were used as input data for the AccuContourTM segmentation software to increase the signal difference between structures of interest and unwanted noise in non-contrast CT. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and the results were compared with those of conventional deep-learning-based auto-segmentation without denoising. Results: The average DSC outcomes were higher than 0.80 for all OARs except for the esophagus. AccuContourTM-based and denoising-based auto-segmentation demonstrated comparable performance for the lungs and spinal cord but showed limited performance for the esophagus. Denoising-based auto-segmentation for the liver was minimal but had statistically significantly better DSC than AccuContourTM-based auto-segmentation (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Denoising-based auto-segmentation demonstrated satisfactory performance in automatic liver segmentation from non-contrast enhanced CT scans. Further external validation studies with larger cohorts are needed to verify the usefulness of denoising-based auto-segmentation.