The Feasibility of Stereotactic Body Proton Beam Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

Investigation of interfractional range variation owing to anatomical changes with beam directions based on water equivalent thickness in proton therapy for pancreatic cancer

To assess the interfractional anatomical range variations (ARVs) with beam directions and their impact on dose distribution in intensity modulated proton therapy, we analyzed water equivalent thickness (WET) from 10 patients with pancreatic cancer. The distributions of the interfractional WET difference ($\Delta{\mathrm{WET}}^{\theta }$) across 360° were visualized using polar histograms. Interfractional ARVs were evaluated using the mean absolute error and ΔWET pass rate, indicating the percentage of $\Delta \mathrm{WE}{\mathrm{T}}^{\theta }$ < thresholds. The impact on dose distribution in proton therapy was evaluated based on two treatment plans for 40 Gy(RBE)/5 fractions: 'Plan A', using two beam angles, in which the target was closest to the body surface among four perpendicular directions; and 'Plan B', using two beam angles with small ARVs. Analysis revealed individual variations in angular trends of interfractional ARVs. Three distinct trends were identified: Group 1 exhibited small ARVs around posterior directions; Group 2 exhibited small ARVs except ~60°; Group 3 demonstrated minimal ARVs only ~90°. In dose evaluation, while 150° and 210° were selected in Plan B for 9 out of 10 patients, for the remaining patient, 60° and 90° were chosen. Comparing dose volume histogram parameters for all patients, Plan B significantly reduced target coverage loss while maintaining organ-at-risk sparing comparable to Plan A. These results demonstrated that selecting beam angles with small interfractional ARVs for each patient enhances the robustness of dose distribution, reducing target coverage loss.

Clinical indications for carbon-ion radiotherapy in the UK: A critical review

INTRODUCTION

Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has unique radiobiological properties that cause increased radiobiological effect and tumour control, especially with hypoxic tissues. This critical review aimed to evaluate clinical response to CIRT across all published tumour sites to establish if there is a clinical need for a CIRT centre in the UK.

METHODS

A critical review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature searching was undertaken in November 2022 within the PubMed, Science Direct, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases using the term 'carbon ion radiotherapy' in the title, abstract or author keywords.

RESULTS

After critical appraisal, data was extracted from 78 primary study papers. Strong evidence supported use of CIRT for chondrosarcoma, chordoma, nasopharyngeal, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oral cavity, prostate, rectal and salivary gland tumours. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence base for some other tumour types.

CONCLUSION

The UK's incidence and mortality rates suggest a clinical need for CIRT for chondrosarcoma, chordoma, NSCLC, oral cavity, prostate, and rectal tumours. There is a need to improve survivorship amongst pancreatic, liver, and oesophageal cancer patients. Data published relating to CIRT for these tumours is promising but of lower quality and more research is needed in these areas.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The clinical response to CIRT for certain tumours suggests the need for a carbon-ion centre in the UK. Demand for further research [phase III trials] has been identified, giving the UK opportunity to establish a research centre, with opportunity to treat, contributing to world-renowned research whilst improving patient outcomes.