Links between Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Hormones, Genetic Susceptibility and Medical Interventions

Investigation of the causal relationship between breast cancer and thyroid cancer: a set of two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

PURPOSE

A potential association between breast (BC) and thyroid cancer (TC) has been observed. We investigated if the relationship between BC and TC is causal using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) in Asian and European populations.

METHODS

BC-linked single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were acquired from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium and Biobank Japan. The most recent TC GWAS data were obtained from the FinnGen Project and National Biobank of Korea. We assessed the potential causal relationship between BC and TC using various MR methods, including inverse-variance-weighting (IVW). Sensitivity, heterogeneity, and pleiotropic tests were performed to assess reliability.

RESULTS

We found a bidirectional causal association between BC and TC within Europeans (IVW, TC on BC: odds ratio [OR] 1.090, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012-1.173, P = 0.023; BC on TC: OR 1.265, 95% CI: 1.158-1.381, P < 0.001). A one-way causal relationship between BC susceptibility and TC risk was found in Asians (IVW BC on TC: OR 2.274, 95% CI: 2.089-2.475, P < 0.001). Subsequently, we identified a noteworthy bidirectional causal relationship between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC and TC (IVW, TC on ER-positive BC: OR 1.104, 95% CI: 1.001-1.212, P = 0.038; ER-positive BC on TC: OR 1.223, 95%CI: 1.072-1.395, P = 0.003), but not ER-negative BC and TC in Europeans.

CONCLUSION

We revealed a reciprocal causal association between ER-positive BC and TC. These findings establish a theoretical framework for the simultaneous surveillance and treatment of BC and TC.

A review of complex hormone regulation in thyroid cancer: novel insights beyond the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis

Like the ovaries and prostate, the thyroid exhibits characteristic hormone secretion and regulation. Thyroid cancer (TC), especially differentiated thyroid carcinoma, has typical sex-specific and age-specific hormone-driven clinical features. Previous research has primarily focused on the effects of thyroid stimulating hormone, thyroid hormones, and estrogens on the onset and progression of TC, while the roles of growth hormone (GH), androgens, and glucocorticoids have largely been overlooked. Similarly, few studies have investigated the interactions between hormones and hormone systems. In fact, numerous studies of patients with acromegaly have shown that serum levels of GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) may be associated with the onset and progression of TC, although the influences of age, sex, and other risk factors, such as obesity and stress, remain unclear. Sex hormones, the GH/IGF axis, and glucocorticoids are likely involved in the onset and progression of TC by regulating the tumor microenvironment and metabolism. The aim of this review was to clarify the roles of hormones and hormone systems in TC, especially papillary thyroid carcinoma, as references for further investigations.

Risk of second primary thyroid cancer in cancer survivors

A risk factor for thyroid cancer (TC) may be a history of former cancer and cancer therapy. The precise risk of a second primary thyroid carcinoma has not yet been revealed. In this study, we evaluated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of second primary thyroid cancer (SPTC) with consideration of different conditions and further analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients. The cohort was selected from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program between 1975 and 2019. The standardized incidence ratios, morbidity risk, clinicopathological features, and survival of second primary thyroid carcinoma were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance covariates. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to assess the survival outcomes. Overall, 7066 patients with SPTC and 83,113 patients with primary TC were identified. The SIR of TC in tumor patients was 1.51/10,000, statistically higher than the natural population (0.94/10,000, P < 0.05). The most significant tumors contributing to the increased SIRs of SPTC were acute lymphocytic leukemia (3.49/10,000), Hodgkin's lymphoma-nodal (3.29/10,000), salivary gland cancer (3.23/10,000), and kidney and renal pelvis cancer (3.05/10,000). The incidence of TC increased significantly in tumor patients who received radiotherapy/chemotherapy before age 35. The age at diagnosis of the SPTC was much older than the primary TC (64.01 vs. 49.55 years, p < 0.001). The SPTC had a higher percentage of histological grades 3/4 (23.14% vs. 15.19%, p < 0.001). Survival analyses demonstrated a worse prognosis for the SPTC group compared to the primary TC group. But after PSM, the survival outcomes of the two groups tended to be equivalent (P = 0.584). The SIRs of TC are higher in tumor patients. The most significant factors contributing to the increased risk of SPTC were some specific former tumors and acceptance of radiotherapy/ chemotherapy before age 35. There was no significant difference in survival between SPTC and primary TC.

Radiation Therapy Changed the Second Malignancy Pattern in Rectal Cancer Survivors

Background and Objectives: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer patients. It can bring radio exposure together with the survival benefit. Cancer survivors are generally at an increased risk for second malignancies, and survivors receiving RT may have higher risks than survivors not receiving RT. Whether the risk of an all-site second malignancy may increase after RT is still debated. This study aims to compare the second malignancy pattern in rectal cancer survivors after RT. Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used for analysis. In total, 49,961 rectal cancer patients (20-84 years of age) were identified between 2000 and 2012 from 18 SEER registries. All patients underwent surgery. The occurrence of second malignancies diagnosed after rectal cancer diagnosis was compared in patients who received and did not receive RT. The standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used. SEER*Stat was used to generate the 95% CIs for the SIR statistics using the exact method. Results: Of the total 49,961 patients, 5582 developed second malignancies. For all-site second primary malignancies, the age-adjusted SIRs were 1.14 (95% CI 1.1-1.18) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.04) in the no RT and RT groups, respectively. In 23,192 patients from the surgery-only group, 2604 had second malignancies, and in 26,769 patients who received RT, 2978 developed second malignancies. With respect to every site, the risk of secondary prostate cancer was significantly lower in the RT group (SIR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.33-0.46) than that in the surgery-only group (SIR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.12). Moreover, the risk of thyroid cancer was significantly higher in the RT group (SIR = 2.80, 95% CI 2.2-3.51) than that in the surgery-only group (SIR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.99-1.66). Conclusions: RT may change the second malignancy pattern in rectal cancer survivors; the risk of prostate cancer decreased, and the risk of thyroid cancer increased most significantly.