Is Lymphocyte C-Reactive Protein Ratio Useful for Predicting Survival in Patients with Non-Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

What is a useful marker for predicting survival in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcoma who have non-inflammatory conditions?

BACKGROUND

The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is a reliable system for identifying patients at high risk of death among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The scoring systems use a combination of C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels. Although patients with high-grade STS are at risk of metastasis and death, even if their mGPS is 0, the prognostic indicators in these patients are unknown. Therefore, we investigated useful prognostic indicators for survival and the development of metastasis in patients with high-grade STS and an mGPS of 0.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with CRP and albumin levels of <1.0 mg/dl and >3.5 g/dl, respectively, indicating an mGPS of 0, were included. The mean follow-up period was 79 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 79.2%. Cox proportional analysis showed that tumor size and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were prognostic variables in multivariate analyses. Patients with higher ANC (ANC>3370/μl) had a worse DSS than those with lower ANC. The 5-year DSS was 74.7% vs. 91.7%, respectively (p = 0.0207). The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 67.2%. Tumor size and ANC remained significant variables for predicting the development of metastasis in the multivariate analysis. Patients with higher ANC had a worse metastasis-free survival than those with lower ANC. The 5-year metastasis-free survival was 59.5% vs. 87.3%, respectively (p = 0.00269).

CONCLUSIONS

When patients with high-grade STS have an mGPS of 0, the ANC and tumor size should be carefully evaluated. A higher neutrophil count and larger tumor size may increase the risk of metastasis development.

The Combined Use of Inflammation Markers, Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, and Sarculator Nomogram in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Multicenter Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Sarculator is a validated nomogram designed to predict overall survival (OS) in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Inflammation plays a critical role in cancer development and progression. There were no reports which investigated the relationship between Sarculator and inflammation.

METHODS

A total of 217 patients with extremity STS were included. The Sarculator-predicted 10-year probability of OS (pr-OS) was stratified into two subgroups: lower risk (10-year pr-OS ≥ 60%) and higher risk (10-year pr-OS < 60%). The modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) varied from 0 to 2.

RESULTS

Out of the 217 patients, 67 were classified as higher risk, while 150 were lower risk. A total of 181 patients had an mGPS of 0, and 36 had a score of 1 or 2. The 5-year OS was 83.3%. When patients were divided into two groups according to the 10-year pr-OS, those with a higher risk had poorer OS than those with a lower risk. Among the patients with a higher risk, those with an mGPS of 1 or 2 had poorer OS compared to those with a score of 0.

CONCLUSIONS

The mGPS could potentially play an important role in identifying patients who are at high risk of death and metastasis in the higher-risk group on the Sarculator.

C‑reactive protein and related predictors in soft tissue sarcoma (Review)

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a useful predictor of poor survival in patients with several types of cancer because inflammation is strongly associated with cancer progression. The production of CRP in hepatocytes appears to be primarily induced at the transcriptional level following the elevation of circulating interleukin-6 (IL-6), which is produced by various cell types, including cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts. Serum CRP levels are associated with serum IL-6 levels in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Additionally, patients with elevated CRP levels had worse oncological outcomes than those with normal CRP levels. It has been attempted to combine CRP levels with other inflammatory or immune markers, and the utility of this has been demonstrated. Therefore, a novel treatment strategy should be developed for patients with STS with elevated CRP levels. The present review aimed to clarify the role of CRP levels and related tools in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with STS.

Comprehensive comparative analysis of the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation biomarkers for patients underwent cardiac surgery

Background

Inflammation plays an integral role in the development of cardiovascular disease, and few studies have identified different biomarkers to predict the prognosis of cardiac surgery. But there is a lack of reliable and valid evidence to determine the optimal systemic inflammatory biomarkers to predict prognosis.

Methods

From December 2015 and March 2021, we collected 10 systemic inflammation biomarkers among 820 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) curve at different time points and C-index was compared at different time points. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to analyze overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to assess independent risk factors for OS. A random internal validation was conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the biomarkers.

Results

The area under the ROC of lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) was 0.655, 0.620 and 0.613 at 1-, 2- and 3-year respectively, and C-index of LCR for OS after cardiac surgery was 0.611, suggesting that LCR may serve as a favorable indicator for predicting the prognosis of cardiac surgery. Patients with low LCR had a higher risk of postoperative complications. Besides, Cox proportional hazard regression analyses indicated that LCR was considered as an independent risk factor of OS after cardiac surgery.

Conclusion

LCR shows promise as a noteworthy representative among the systemic inflammation biomarkers in predicting the prognosis of cardiac surgery. Screening for low LCR levels may help surgeons identify high-risk patients and guide perioperative management strategies.