Role of Functional MRI in Liver SBRT: Current Use and Future Directions

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Feasibility of using contrast-free quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for liver sparing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Tumours in the liver often develop on a background of liver cirrhosis and impaired liver function. As a result, radiotherapy treatments are limited by radiation-induced liver disease, parameterised by the liver mean dose (LMD). Liver function is highly heterogeneous, especially in liver cancer, but the use of LMD does not take this into account. One possible way to improve liver treatments is to use quantitative imaging techniques to assess liver health and prioritise the sparing of healthy liver tissue.

Materials and methods

Anatomical T2 and quantitative iron-corrected T1 (cT1) images were made available for 10 patients with liver metastases. Functional liver volumes were automatically segmented on the quantitative images using a threshold. Liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) plans were made using a departmental protocol. Liver-sparing plans were then made by reducing the dose to the functional sub-volume.

Results

The sparing plans achieved a statistically significant ( p = 0.002 ) reduction in the functional liver mean dose, with a mean reduction of 1.4 Gy. The LMD was also significantly different ( p = 0.002 ) but had a smaller magnitude with a mean reduction of 0.7 Gy. There were some differences in the planning target volume D99% ( p = 0.04 ) but the sparing plans remained within the optimal tolerance and the D95% was not significantly different ( p = 0.2 ).

Conclusions

This study has, for the first time, demonstrated the use of cT1 maps in radiotherapy showing significant reductions in dose to the healthy liver. Further work is needed to validate this in liver cancer patients, who would likely benefit most.

Genome-wide analyses of lung cancer after single high-dose radiation at five time points (2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h)

Background: An increasing number of clinicians are experimenting with high-dose radiation. This study focuses on the genomic effects of high-dose single-shot radiotherapy and aims to provide a dynamic map for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We used whole-transcriptome sequencing to understand the evolution at molecular levels in A549 and H1299 exposed to 10 Gy X-rays at different times (2, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h) in comparison with the no radiation group. Ingenuity pathway analysis, ceRNA analysis, enrichment analysis, and cell cycle experiments are performed for molecular analyses and function analyses. Results: Whole-transcriptome sequencing of NSCLC showed a significant dynamic change after radiotherapy within 48 h. MiR-219-1-3p and miR-221-3p, miR-503-5p, hsa-miR-455-5p, hsa-miR-29-3p, and hsa-miR-339-5p were in the core of the ceRNA related to time change. GO and KEGG analyses of the top 30 mRNA included DNA repair, autophagy, apoptosis, and ferroptosis pathways. Regulation of the cell cycle-related transcription factor E2F1 might have a key role in the early stage of radiotherapy (2.6 h) and in the later stage of autophagy (24 and 48 h). Functions involving different genes/proteins over multiple periods implied a dose of 10 Gy was related to the kidney and liver pathway. Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase was evident at 24 h. We also observed the increased expression of CCNB1 at 24 h in PCR and WB experiments. Conclusion: Our transcriptomic and experimental analyses showed a dynamic change after radiation therapy in 48 h and highlighted the key molecules and pathways in NSCLC after high-dose single-shot radiotherapy.