Integration of Clinical and CT-Based Radiomic Features for Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer

Radiomic model based on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Purpose

To establish a model combining radiomic and clinicopathological factors based on magnetic resonance imaging to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Method

MRI images and clinicopathologic data of 329 eligible breast cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from August 2018 to August 2022 were included in this study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and imaging examinations were performed before and after NAC. A total of 329 patients were randomly allocated to a training set and a test set at a ratio of 7:3. We mainly studied the following three types of prediction models: radiomic models, clinical models, and clinical-radiomic models. All models were evaluated using subject operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves.

Results

The AUCs of the clinical prediction model, independent imaging model and clinical combined imaging model in the training set were 0.864 0.968 and 0.984, and those in the test set were 0.724, 0.754 and 0.877, respectively. According to DCA and calibration curves, the clinical-radiomic model showed good predictive performance in both the training set and the test set, and we found that we had developed a more concise clinical-radiomic nomogram.

Conclusion

We have developed a clinical-radiomic model by integrating radiomic features and clinical factors to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer patients, thereby contributing to the personalized treatment of patients.

Developing a clinical-radiomic prediction model for 3-year cancer-specific survival in lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The study aims to develop and validate a combined model for predicting 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) by integrating clinical and radiomic parameters.

METHODS

Clinical data and pre-treatment CT images were collected from 102 patients treated with lung SBRT. Multivariate logistic regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to determine the clinical and radiomic factors associated with 3-year CSS. Three prediction models were developed using clinical factors, radiomic factors, and a combination of both. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve. A nomogram was also created to visualize the 3-year CSS prediction.

RESULTS

With a 36-month follow-up, 40 patients (39.2%) died of lung cancer and 62 patients (60.8%) survived. Three clinical factors, including gender, clinical stage, and lymphocyte ratio, along with three radiomic features, were found to be independent factors correlated with 3-year CSS. The area under the curve values for the clinical, radiomic, and combined model were 0.839 (95% CI 0.735-0.914), 0.886 (95% CI 0.790-0.948), and 0.914 (95% CI 0.825-0.966) in the training cohort, and 0.757 (95% CI 0.580-0.887), 0.818 (95% CI 0.648-0.929), and 0.843 (95% CI 0.677-0.944) in the validation cohort, respectively. Additionally, the calibration curve demonstrated good calibration performance and the nomogram created from the combined model showed potential for clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

A clinical-radiomic model was developed to predict the 3-year CSS for lung cancer patients treated with SBRT.

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of open science practices in a contemporary sample of studies developing prognostic models using machine learning methods in the field of oncology.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a systematic review, searching the MEDLINE database between December 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, for studies developing a multivariable prognostic model using machine learning methods (as defined by the authors) in oncology. Two authors independently screened records and extracted open science practices.

RESULTS

We identified 46 publications describing the development of a multivariable prognostic model. The adoption of open science principles was poor. Only one study reported availability of a study protocol, and only one study was registered. Funding statements and conflicts of interest statements were common. Thirty-five studies (76%) provided data sharing statements, with 21 (46%) indicating data were available on request to the authors and seven declaring data sharing was not applicable. Two studies (4%) shared data. Only 12 studies (26%) provided code sharing statements, including 2 (4%) that indicated the code was available on request to the authors. Only 11 studies (24%) provided sufficient information to allow their model to be used in practice. The use of reporting guidelines was rare: eight studies (18%) mentioning using a reporting guideline, with 4 (10%) using the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis statement, 1 (2%) using Minimum Information About Clinical Artificial Intelligence Modeling and Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence, 1 (2%) using Strengthening The Reporting Of Observational Studies In Epidemiology, 1 (2%) using Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, and 1 (2%) using Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Nonrandomized Designs.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of open science principles in oncology studies developing prognostic models using machine learning methods is poor. Guidance and an increased awareness of benefits and best practices of open science are needed for prediction research in oncology.

Identification and validation of radiomic features from computed tomography for preoperative classification of neuroblastic tumors in children

BACKGROUND

To identify radiomic features that can predict the pathological type of neuroblastic tumor in children.

METHODS

Data on neuroblastic tumors in 104 children were retrospectively analyzed. There were 14 cases of ganglioneuroma, 24 cases of ganglioneuroblastoma, and 65 cases of neuroblastoma. Stratified sampling was used to randomly allocate the cases into the training and validation sets in a ratio of 3:1. The maximum relevance-minimum redundancy algorithm was used to identify the top 10 of two clinical features and 851 radiomic features in portal venous-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography images. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to classify tumors in two binary steps: first as ganglioneuroma compared to the other two types, then as ganglioneuroblastoma compared to neuroblastoma.

RESULTS

Based on 10 clinical-radiomic features, the classifier identified ganglioneuroma compared to the other two tumor types in the validation dataset with sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 81.8%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.875. The classifier identified ganglioneuroblastoma versus neuroblastoma with a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 87.5%, and an AUC of 0.854. The overall accuracy of the classifier across all three types of tumors was 80.8%.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic features can help predict the pathological type of neuroblastic tumors in children.