1
|
Chung HW, Park KS, Lim I, Noh WC, Yoo YB, Nam SE, So Y, Lee EJ. PET/MRI and Novel Targets for Breast Cancer. Biomedicines 2024; 12:172. [PMID: 38255277 PMCID: PMC10813582 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer, with its global prevalence and impact on women's health, necessitates effective early detection and accurate staging for optimal patient outcomes. Traditional imaging modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) play crucial roles in local-regional assessment, while bone scintigraphy and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) aid in evaluating distant metastasis. Despite the proven utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in various cancers, its limitations in breast cancer, such as high false-negative rates for small and low-grade tumors, have driven exploration into novel targets for PET radiotracers, including estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, fibroblast activation protein, and hypoxia. The advent of PET/MRI, which combines metabolic PET information with high anatomical detail from MRI, has emerged as a promising tool for breast cancer diagnosis, staging, treatment response assessment, and restaging. Technical advancements including the integration of PET and MRI, considerations in patient preparation, and optimized imaging protocols contribute to the success of dedicated breast and whole-body PET/MRI. This comprehensive review offers the current technical aspects and clinical applications of PET/MRI for breast cancer. Additionally, novel targets in breast cancer for PET radiotracers beyond glucose metabolism are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Woo Chung
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (H.W.C.); (Y.S.)
| | - Kyoung Sik Park
- Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (W.C.N.); (Y.B.Y.); (S.E.N.)
- Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea
| | - Ilhan Lim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), 75 Nowon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 07812, Republic of Korea;
| | - Woo Chul Noh
- Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (W.C.N.); (Y.B.Y.); (S.E.N.)
| | - Young Bum Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (W.C.N.); (Y.B.Y.); (S.E.N.)
| | - Sang Eun Nam
- Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (W.C.N.); (Y.B.Y.); (S.E.N.)
| | - Young So
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea; (H.W.C.); (Y.S.)
| | - Eun Jeong Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, 156 Sinnae-ro, Jungnang-gu, Seoul 02053, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Linders DGJ, Deken MM, van Dam MA, Wasser MNJM, Voormolen EMC, Kroep JR, van Dongen GAMS, Vugts D, Oosterkamp HM, Straver ME, van de Velde CJH, Cohen D, Dibbets-Schneider P, van Velden FHP, Pereira Arias-Bouda LM, Vahrmeijer AL, Liefers GJ, de Geus-Oei LF, Hilling DE. 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET/CT Imaging of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer for Predicting Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4980. [PMID: 37894346 PMCID: PMC10605041 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 20% of invasive ductal breast malignancies are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. These patients receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) including HER2-targeting therapies. Up to 65% of patients achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). These patients might not have needed surgery. However, accurate preoperative identification of a pCR remains challenging. A radiologic complete response (rCR) on MRI corresponds to a pCR in only 73% of patients. The current feasibility study investigates if HER2-targeted PET/CT-imaging using Zirconium-89 (89Zr)-radiolabeled trastuzumab can be used for more accurate NAT response evaluation. METHODS HER2-positive breast cancer patients scheduled to undergo NAT and subsequent surgery received a 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT both before (PET/CT-1) and after (PET/CT-2) NAT. Qualitative and quantitative response evaluation was performed. RESULTS Six patients were enrolled. All primary tumors could be identified on PET/CT-1. Four patients had a pCR and two a pathological partial response (pPR) in the primary tumor. Qualitative assessment of PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 83.3% of the standard-of-care MRI. Quantitative assessment showed a difference between the SUVR on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔSUVR) in patients with a pPR and pCR of -48% and -90% (p = 0.133), respectively. The difference in tumor-to-blood ratio on PET/CT-1 and PET/CT-2 (ΔTBR) in patients with pPR and pCR was -79% and -94% (p = 0.133), respectively. Three patients had metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis that were all identified on PET/CT-1. All three patients achieved a nodal pCR. Qualitative assessment of the lymph nodes with PET/CT resulted in an accuracy of 66.7%, compared to 50% of the MRI. CONCLUSIONS NAT response evaluation using 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT is feasible. In the current study, qualitative assessment of the PET/CT images is not superior to standard-of-care MRI. Our results suggest that quantitative assessment of 89Zr-trastuzumab PET/CT has potential for a more accurate response evaluation of the primary tumor after NAT in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. G. J. Linders
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - M. M. Deken
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - M. A. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - M. N. J. M. Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E. M. C. Voormolen
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J. R. Kroep
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G. A. M. S. van Dongen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D. Vugts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. M. Oosterkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. Straver
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, 2512 VA The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - C. J. H. van de Velde
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - D. Cohen
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P. Dibbets-Schneider
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F. H. P. van Velden
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L. M. Pereira Arias-Bouda
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, 2353 GA Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - A. L. Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - G. J. Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
| | - L. F. de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - D. E. Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands (D.E.H.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caracciolo M, Castello A, Urso L, Borgia F, Marzola MC, Uccelli L, Cittanti C, Bartolomei M, Castellani M, Lopci E. Comparison of MRI vs. [ 18F]FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Evaluation of Primary Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Literature Review and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5355. [PMID: 37629397 PMCID: PMC10455346 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three bibliographic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles published up to the 6 June 2023, starting from 2012. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of 76 studies were identified and screened, while 14 articles were included in our systematic review after a full-text assessment. The total number of patients included was 842. Eight out of fourteen studies (57.1%) were prospective, while all except one study were conducted in a single center. In the majority of the included studies (71.4%), 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI scans were adopted. Three out of fourteen studies (21.4%) used both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI and only two used 1.5 T. [18F]FDG was the radiotracer used in every study included. All patients accepted surgical treatment after NAC and each study used pathological complete response (pCR) as the reference standard. Some of the studies have demonstrated the superiority of [18F]FDG PET/CT, while others proved that MRI was superior to PET/CT. Recent studies indicate that PET/CT has a better specificity, while MRI has a superior sensitivity for assessing pCR in BC patients after NAC. The complementary value of the combined use of these modalities represents probably the most important tool to improve diagnostic performance in this setting. Overall, larger prospective studies, possibly randomized, are needed, hopefully evaluating PET/MR and allowing for new tools, such as radiomic parameters, to find a proper place in the setting of BC patients undergoing NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Caracciolo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Angelo Castello
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Urso
- Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Francesca Borgia
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Marzola
- Department of Nuclear Medicine PET/CT Centre, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, 45100 Rovigo, Italy
| | - Licia Uccelli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Corrado Cittanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Massimo Castellani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS—Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|