1
|
Cadenar A, Mancon S, Shariat SF, D'Andrea D. Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer? Curr Opin Urol 2025:00042307-990000000-00218. [PMID: 39820224 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC. RECENT FINDINGS Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC. SUMMARY There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Cadenar
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stecca CE, Chowdhury D, Blais N, Alimohamed N, Wood L, Canil CM, Eigl B, Kulkarni GS, Black PC, Kassouf W, Chung P, North S, Jiang DM, Sridhar SS. 2024 CUA-GUMOC Expert Report: Management of unresectable locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2024; 18:379-390. [PMID: 39641956 PMCID: PMC11623328 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos E. Stecca
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Deepro Chowdhury
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Normand Blais
- Division of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Centre Hospitalier de l’ Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nimira Alimohamed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lori Wood
- Division of Medical Oncology, QEII Health Sciences Center, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Christina M. Canil
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, ON Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Girish S. Kulkarni
- Divisions of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C. Black
- Department of Urological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott North
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Di Maria Jiang
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikala S. Sridhar
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Angrisani A, Bosetti DG, Vogl UM, Castronovo FM, Zilli T. Oligometastatic Urothelial Cancer and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and an Updated Insight of Current Evidence and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3201. [PMID: 39335172 PMCID: PMC11430162 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most commonly used metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (omUC). Despite efforts in defining this disease entity, open questions remain concerning the role of MDT and the use of biomarkers, imaging, and its combination with systemic therapies. The aim of the present systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the current clinical evidence on SBRT for omUC in terms of survival and local control benefits. We also aim to provide updates on controversial areas and future directions in this emerging field. METHODS With a systematic approach, following PRISMA recommendations, we searched two databases to identify and select articles published up until March 2024 reporting the use of SBRT for omUC with or without concomitant systemic therapies. Prospective randomized or non-randomized studies as well as retrospective studies were included. RESULTS Eight studies were selected for data extraction and 293 omUC patients treated with SBRT were collectively analyzed. In metachronous omUC patients, SBRT delivered with ablative doses (BED10 ≥ 78 Gy) was associated with a 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of 50.7% (95% CI 35.1-64.4%). The use of sub-ablative SBRT doses (BED10 = 43.2 Gy) in combination with immunotherapy did not demonstrate significant clinical outcome improvement in two prospective studies. The overall tolerance was good, with only one study reporting toxicity of grade 3 in up to 18% of the patients treated with SBRT in combination with immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is an effective and widely available MDT option in omUC, although this is based on a limited number of studies. Despite the attempt to use SBRT as an immune response trigger in combination with immunotherapy, no significant improvement in survival outcomes has been observed. The integration of new systemic agents with MDT will likely define a new scenario for the treatment of omUC. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42024522381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Angrisani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Davide Giovanni Bosetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- Medical Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Mosè Castronovo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rizzo M, Soares A, Grande E, Bamias A, Kopp RM, Lenci E, Buttner T, Salah S, Grillone F, de Carvalho IT, Tapia JC, Gucciardino C, Pinto A, Mennitto A, Abahssain H, Rescigno P, Myint Z, Takeshita H, Spinelli GP, Popovic L, Vitale MG, Fiala O, Giannatempo P, Zakopoulou R, Carrozza F, Massari F, Monteiro FSM, Pace MP, Giannini M, Roviello G, Porta C, Battelli N, Kanesvaran R, Santoni M. Radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the ARON-2 real-world study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:19802. [PMID: 39187558 PMCID: PMC11347671 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The addition of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) to immunotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has shown promising results. We report the real-world data from the ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) on the impact of conventional (CRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on the outcome of aUC patients receiving pembrolizumab after platinum-based-chemotherapy. Medical records of 837 patients were reviewed from 60 institutions in 20 countries. Two hundred and sixty-two patients (31%) received radiotherapy (cohort A), of whom 193 (23%) received CRT and 69 (8%) received SBRT. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. With a median follow-up of 22.7 months, the median OS was 10.2 months, 6.8 months and 16.0 months in no RT, CRT and SBRT subgroups (p = 0.005), with an 1y-OS rates of 47%, 34% and 61%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1y-OS rate in the SBRT subgroup were significantly higher for both lower (63%) and upper tract UC (68%), for pure urothelial histology (63%) and variant histologies (58%), and for patients with bone (40%) and lymph-node metastases (61%). Median PFS was 4.8 months, 9.6 months and 5.8 months in the CRT, SBRT and no RT subgroups, respectively (p = 0.060). The 1y-PFS rate was significantly higher (48%) in the SBRT population and was confirmed in all patient subsets. The difference in terms of ORR was in favour of SBRT. Our real-world analysis showed that the use of SBRT/pembrolizumab combination may play a role in a subset of aUC patients to increase disease control and possibly overall survival.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Male
- Female
- Aged
- Middle Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Urologic Neoplasms/mortality
- Urologic Neoplasms/therapy
- Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Radiosurgery/methods
- Retrospective Studies
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Adult
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Treatment Outcome
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Progression-Free Survival
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimma Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico Di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Andrey Soares
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group - LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ray Manneh Kopp
- Clinical Oncology, Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Edoardo Lenci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Thomas Buttner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Samer Salah
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Grillone
- Medical Oncology Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero Pugliese Ciaccio, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Renato Dulbecco", Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Jose Carlos Tapia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alvaro Pinto
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Maggiore Della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | - Halima Abahssain
- Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, Medical Oncology Unit, National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Centre for Cancer, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Zin Myint
- Division of Medical Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536-0293, USA
| | - Hideki Takeshita
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- Territorial Oncology Operative Complex Unit - Casa Della Salute di Aprilia - ASL Latina, Latina, Italy
| | - Lazar Popovic
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Ondrej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Francesco Carrozza
- Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Department Oncology and Haematology AUSL, Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico Di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matteo Santoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abufaraj M, Al Karmi J, Bdeir A. Is there a role for metastasis-directed therapy in bladder cancer? Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:273-280. [PMID: 38587010 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article aims to comprehensively review and critique the existing literature on the role of metastatic-directed therapy in patients with metastatic bladder cancer, particularly in oligometastatic disease state. RECENT FINDINGS The role of metastasectomy in metastatic bladder cancer is still controversial. Several studies have demonstrated improved outcomes, particularly in a highly selected patients with small metastatic lesions or with lung or brain metastases, whereas others show no significant survival benefit. Combining metastasectomy with systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy and chemotherapy, has also shown benefits. Metastasis-directed radiotherapy is evolving as a potentially effective approach with minimal toxicity in achieving local control and improving survival, particularly in patients with oligometastatic disease. The evidence regarding the impact of several factors such as performance status, metastatic burden, and the presence of visceral metastases on outcomes is mixed. Concurrent treatment with systemic therapy may potentiate the effectiveness of metastasis-directed therapy. SUMMARY In patients with metastatic deposits amenable to surgical resection, metastasectomy stands as a promising avenue. Metastatic-directed radiotherapy has demonstrated local control and improved survival in the evolving landscape of oligometastatic bladder cancer management. Further, well designed multicenter prospective studies are needed to support these findings and better understand the synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments, especially immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital
| | - Joud Al Karmi
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Adan Bdeir
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Svedman FC, Holmsten K, Jawdat F, Hailom W, Alm D, Grozman V, Ullén A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is beneficial for a subgroup of patients with urothelial cancer and solitary metastatic disease: a single institution real-world experience. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:74. [PMID: 38880908 PMCID: PMC11181669 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02465-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) include systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antibody-drug-conjugates, and targeted therapy. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) may be an intermediate state between localized and generalized cancer. The best treatment strategy for OMD and oligoprogressive (OPD) disease is poorly studied in mUC but local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could be an option to avoid or delay systemic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of SBRT given in a real-world patient population. METHODS All patients with mUC treated with SBRT at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2009 and 2022 were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment data, SBRT dosimetry data and treatment outcome were collected retrospectively. The study endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and feasibility of SBRT. RESULTS In total 39 patients were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 25.6 months. The LCR was 82%. PFS and OS were 4.1 and 26.2 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated; all patients but one (treatment related pain) completed the planned SBRT. Number of metastases irradiated with SBRT was significantly associated with outcome; patients with only one irradiated lesion had more favourable PFS compared to individuals with 2 or more metastases (HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.81-9.38, p = 0.001). A subgroup of patients (15%) achieved a sustained long-term survival benefit and never required systemic treatments after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was well tolerated and associated with high LCR. A subpopulation of patients with single metastatic lesion achieved long-term OS and never required subsequent systemic treatment after SBRT. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to discover treatment predictive biomarkers and to investigate the role of SBRT in oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Costa Svedman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
| | - Karin Holmsten
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Capio S:t Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Faith Jawdat
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Wehazit Hailom
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Daniel Alm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Poon DMC, Ho LY, Kwong YM. Avelumab maintenance therapy for node-positive muscle invasive bladder cancer: a report of two cases. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1397738. [PMID: 38863626 PMCID: PMC11165194 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with nodal involvement is associated with poor prognosis and high mortality. Treatment of node-positive MIBC is complex due to disease heterogeneity and a lack of evidence-based treatment options, especially alternatives to radical cystectomy. We describe a bladder-sparing management approach involving systemic therapy followed by maintenance therapy, illustrated with two cases of node-positive MIBC. Case presentation Two patients with node-positive MIBC received upfront gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), and avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) maintenance therapy. Both patients achieved complete remission without recurrence or distant metastasis post-avelumab maintenance therapy. At the last follow-up, Patient 1 (45-year-old male) was in remission for over two years, and Patient 2 (57-year-old male) was in complete remission for over one year post-chemotherapy. Avelumab treatment was well-tolerated, with no immune-related adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) was maintained. Conclusion Both cases showed a good response and extended remission on avelumab maintenance, supporting its use in conjunction with local consolidation therapy as a bladder-preserving approach in node-positive MIBC. Further research, such as the ongoing INSPIRE trial, is required to refine treatment strategies for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. C. Poon
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Lap Yin Ho
- J ABLE Medical Center, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yiu Ming Kwong
- Urology Center, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu MA, Li JW, Runcie K. Management of Oligometastatic and Locally Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:496-503. [PMID: 38602581 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01523-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize and evaluate the literature on treatment approaches for oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS There is no clear definition for oligometastatic urothelial cancers due to limited data. Studies focusing on oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer have been primarily retrospective. Treatment options include local therapy with surgery or radiation, and generalized systemic therapy such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancers remain challenging to manage, and treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy is nearly always a component of current care in the form of chemotherapy, but the role of immunotherapy has not been explored. Consideration of surgical and radiation options may improve outcomes, and no studies have compared directly between the two localized treatment options. The development of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers may also enhance the treatment landscape in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Liu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jennifer W Li
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Karie Runcie
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Calleris G, von Deimling M, Kesch C, Soria F, Gontero P, Ploussard G, Laukhtina E, Pradere B. Definitions, outcomes and perspectives for oligometastatic bladder cancer: towards a standardized terminology. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:217-224. [PMID: 38426242 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic (om) cancer is considered as a transitional state in between locally confined disease and widespread metastases, accessible to a multimodal treatment, combining systemic and local therapy. In urothelial bladder cancer (BCa), the definitions and the approaches to this condition are poorly standardised and mainly based on retrospective data. We aim to portray the framework for uro-oncologic terminology in omBCa and go through the latest evidence and the future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Retrospective and registry data support the potential benefits of multimodality treatment for carefully selected omBCa patients, especially following a good response to systemic treatment. In 2023, a Delphi consensus has defined omBCa, allowing maximum three metastatic lesions, theoretically amenable to radical local treatment. In de-novo omBCa, surgical treatment of primary tumour might improve overall survival (OS), according to a matched registry analysis; also, consolidative radiotherapy was associated with better OS in two recent cohorts. Furthermore, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has shown high local control rates and promising OS (14.9-51 months) in a meta-analysis; benefits might be more pronounced for single-site omBCa and nodal or lung lesions. SUMMARY From a clinical perspective, in de-novo omBCa, the local treatment of primary and metastatic sites might improve disease control and survival, in selected patients; in the oligorecurrent setting, MDT achieves good local symptom control with limited side effects; in selected cases, it could convey a survival benefit, too. From a research perspective, well designed prospective evidence is eagerly awaited, based on recently adopted shared definitions for omBCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Polytechnic and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashley S, Choudhury A, Hoskin P, Song Y, Maitre P. Radiotherapy in metastatic bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:47. [PMID: 38244091 PMCID: PMC10799782 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review available and emerging evidence of radiotherapy for symptom management and disease control in metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS A literature search and subsequent cross-referencing were carried out for articles in the PubMed and Scopus databases using terms 'radiotherapy' OR 'palliative radiation therapy' with 'metastatic bladder cancer' OR 'advanced bladder cancer' between 1990 and 2023, excluding articles with no English translation. RESULTS Palliative radiotherapy is an effective and accessible treatment for the alleviation of haematuria and pain due to the primary and metastatic disease. With growing recognition of oligometastatic disease state at diagnosis, response, or progression, radiotherapy can consolidate response by ablating residual or resistant lesions. Experience with other primary cancers supports positive impact of radiotherapy on disease control, quality of life, and survival in oligometastatic stage, without significant adverse effects. Alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth receptor inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, the immunomodulatory potential of radiotherapy is being explored in combination with these systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy is an effective, safe, and accessible treatment modality for palliation as well as disease control in various clinical settings of metastatic bladder cancer. Its role in oligometastatic stage in combination with systemic therapy is expected to expand with emerging evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Ashley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - YeePei Song
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bamias A, Stenzl A, Zagouri F, Andrikopoulou A, Hoskin P. Defining Oligometastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 55:28-37. [PMID: 37662704 PMCID: PMC10468799 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Unlike other cancers, the concept of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in bladder cancer (BC) has not been systematically investigated. There is therefore a need to develop universally accepted definitions and guidelines for the management of oligometastatic BC (OMBC). Objective To conduct a systematic review to assist a European consensus group in producing a definition of OMBC and to provide recommendations on staging and local therapies. Evidence acquisition The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Abstracts for articles focused on BC that addressed the issue of OMBC and provided a definition of oligometastatic status were selected. We collected data on the number of metastases, the number of metastases per organ, the number of organs involved, and metastatic sites that were excluded. Evidence synthesis Sixteen eligible articles were retrieved (9 retrospective series involving 330 patients, 4 reviews, 1 consensus statement, 1 guideline paper, and 1 ongoing prospective phase 2 trial). A maximum of three to five metastatic lesions were compatible with the definition of OMBC. The number of organs involved and lesion size were not universally included in the OMBC definitions. OMD categories studied included synchronous OMBC, oligorecurrence, and oligoprogression. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography was used in addition to conventional imaging for OMD detection. Surgery and radiotherapy were both used. Systemic chemotherapy was also used in all studies. Conclusions There is little information on OMBC in the literature. Our systematic review revealed that only three to five metastatic sites amenable to surgery or radiotherapy that respond to systemic therapy is the setting most frequently chosen for a combination of systemic treatment and metastases-directed therapy. This setting could represent a basis for future prospective studies on OMBC. Patient summary Oligometastatic bladder cancer is a disease state in which favorable outcomes can be expected after a treatment combination of systemic therapy, plus surgery and/or radiotherapy for sites of bladder cancer metastasis. Our systematic review showed a lack of meaningful evidence to define this disease state. There is an urgent need to develop organized research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic GU Cancer Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Hellenic GU Cancer Group, Athens, Greece
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|