The CXCL10/CXCR3 Pathway Contributes to the Synergy of Thermal Ablation and PD-1 Blockade Therapy against Tumors

Immunostimulatory effects of thermal ablation: Challenges and future prospects

ABSTRACT

This literature explores the immunostimulatory effects of thermal ablation in the tumor microenvironment, elucidating the mechanisms such as immunogenic cell death, tumor-specific antigens, and damage-associated molecular patterns. Furthermore, it outlines critical issues associated with thermal ablation-induced immunostimulatory challenges and offers insights into future research avenues and potential therapeutic strategies.

Contribution of immune cells in synergistic anti-tumor effect of ablation and immunotherapy

Thermal ablation results in the damage of tumor tissue, which leads to localized necrosis and incites a significant inflammatory response, accompanied by the infiltration of numerous immune cells. Nevertheless, depending solely on the singular approach of thermal ablation frequently is difficult in eliciting a robust anti-tumor response. Research suggests that integrating immune modulators into conventional ablation techniques has the potential to enhance the elicited immune response, finally initiating synergistic effect without significantly elevated risk profiles. This article comprehensively analyses the immunological effects resulting from post-ablation alone and its synergy with immunotherapies, and accentuates the heterogeneous alterations noted in immune cells across distinct malignancies. Collectively, the article delves into the theoretical framework and advancements in clinical trials concerning the combined thermal ablation and immunotherapy for treating malignant tumors.

Harnessing Hyperthermia: Molecular, Cellular, and Immunological Insights for Enhanced Anticancer Therapies

Hyperthermia, the raising of tumor temperature (≥39°C), holds great promise as an adjuvant treatment for cancer therapy. This review focuses on 2 key aspects of hyperthermia: its molecular and cellular effects and its impact on the immune system. Hyperthermia has profound effects on critical biological processes. Increased temperatures inhibit DNA repair enzymes, making cancer cells more sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation. Elevated temperatures also induce cell cycle arrest and trigger apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, hyperthermia modifies the expression of heat shock proteins, which play vital roles in cancer therapy, including enhancing immune responses. Hyperthermic treatments also have a significant impact on the body's immune response against tumors, potentially improving the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Mild systemic hyperthermia (39°C-41°C) mimics fever, activating immune cells and raising metabolic rates. Intense heat above 50°C can release tumor antigens, enhancing immune reactions. Using photothermal nanoparticles for targeted heating and drug delivery can also modulate the immune response. Hyperthermia emerges as a cost-effective and well-tolerated adjuvant therapy when integrated with immunotherapy. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for the selection of patient-specific treatments and the guidance of future experimental studies.

Distinct immunoreactions after a primary tumor microwave ablation using different heating parameters in a VX2 tumor model

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation of solid tumors in situ can activate the immune system and produce a specific immune response against the tumor. Microwave ablation (MWA) with different parameters can ablate tumors with similar sizes and cause different local inflammatory effects. Our aim was to determine the immunological effects induced by different energy modes of MWA for a primary tumor.

METHODS

Seventy rabbits with VX2 tumors that were implanted subcutaneously underneath the right second nipple were treated with high-power MWA (40 W for 1 min), low-power MWA (20 W for 2 min), or surgical resection or were left without treatment (control). Survival time was evaluated by log-rank test. On day 14 after ablation, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry were used to evaluate the T-cell immune responses. In addition, the cytokine patterns were identified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Tumor eradication was achieved completely in the MWA groups, as proven by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide diaphorase staining. Compared with the three treatment groups, the control group had a significantly higher number of pulmonary metastases and worse survival; however, no significant difference was observed among the three treatment groups. More intra-tumoral and systemic CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were induced in the MWA groups than in the control group. Compared with operation, MWA induced more systemic CD4+ T-cells. More intra-tumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and systemic CD4+ T-cells were induced by high-power MWA than by low-power MWA. Moreover, MWA increased the interleukin 2 (IL2) and IL12 levels and decreased the IL4, IL6, and IL10 levels. Importantly, the serum IL12 level was significantly higher after high-power MWA than after low-power MWA.

CONCLUSION

High-power MWA enhanced the type 1 T helper immune response and may be selected for the treatment of solid tumors. Future studies are needed to confirm our results.

Friend or Foe? Locoregional Therapies and Immunotherapies in the Current Hepatocellular Treatment Landscape

Over the last several decades, a number of new treatment options for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been developed. While treatment decisions for some patients remain clear cut, a large numbers of patients have multiple treatment options, and it can be hard for multidisciplinary teams to come to unanimous decisions on which treatment strategy or sequence of treatments is best. This article reviews the available data with regard to two treatment strategies, immunotherapies and locoregional therapies, with a focus on the potential of locoregional therapies to be combined with checkpoint inhibitors to improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC. In this review, the available data on the immunomodulatory effects of locoregional therapies is discussed along with available clinical data on outcomes when the two strategies are combined.