|
1
|
Lippert T, Ross S, Pattilachan T, Christodoulou M, Gratsianskiy D, Rosemurgy A, Sucandy I. Initial clinical outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Is it safe and effective? J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:102-108. [PMID: 38739865 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe our outcomes of robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the largest single institutional series in the Western hemisphere to date. METHODS Between 2016 and 2022, we prospectively followed all patients who underwent robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS In total, 23 patients underwent robotic resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, 18 receiving concomitant hepatectomy. The median age was 73 years. Operative time was 470 min with an estimated blood loss of 150 mL. No intraoperative conversions to open or other intraoperative complications occurred. Median length of stay was 5 days. Four postoperative complications occurred. Three readmissions occurred within 30 days with one 90-day mortality. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients and R1 in 13% of patients. At a median follow-up of 27 months, 15 patients were alive without evidence of disease, two patients with local recurrence at 1 year, and six were deceased. CONCLUSIONS Utilization of the robotic platform for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible with excellent perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trenton Lippert
- College of Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- AdventHealth Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Iswanto Sucandy
- AdventHealth Digestive Health Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Ielpo B, Rosso E, d'Addetta MV, Abad M, Vellalta G, Sanchez-Velazquez P, Burdio F. Robotic Approach for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma IIIA Type: Step-by-Step Procedure. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3084-3085. [PMID: 38315334 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14956-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a challenging technique to be performed by minimally invasive approach being the type III among the most complex procedure. Nowadays, the robotic approach is gaining increasing interest among the surgical community, and more and more series describing robotic liver resection have been reported. However, few cases of minimally invasive Bismuth type IIIA cholangiocarcinoma have been reported. Robotic approach allows for a better dissection and suture thanks to the flexible and precise instruments movements, overcoming some of the limitations of the laparoscopic technique. Therefore, robotic technique can facilitate some of the critical steps of a technically demanding procedure, such as the extended right hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Bismuth IIIA type. METHODS In this multimedia video we describe, for the first time in the literature, a full robotic surgical step-by-step technique with some tips and tricks for treating a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Bismuth IIIA type, performing a radical extended right hemihepatectomy, including segment I combined with regional lymphadenectomy anf left bile duct reconstruction. A 55-year-old woman with obstructive jaundice (10 mg/dl) was referred to our center. The endobiliary brushing confirmed adenocarcinoma, and MRI/CT showed a focal perihilar lesion of 2 cm, including the main biliary duct bifurcation and extending up to the right duct (Bismuth Type IIIA hilar cholangiocarcinoma). After endoscopic biliary stents placement and 6 weeks after right portal vein embolization, the future liver remnant, including segments II and III, reached an enough hypertrophy volume with a ratio of 30%. A right hemihepatectomy with caudate lobe, including standard standard lymphadenectomy and left biliary duct reconstruction was performed. RESULTS The operation lasted 670 min with an estimated blood loss of 350 ml. Postoperative pathological examination revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma pT1N0 with 15 retrieved nodes and free margins. The patient experienced a type A biliary fistula and was discharged on the 21st postoperative day without abdominal drainage. CONCLUSIONS Through the tips and tricks presented in this multimedia article, we show the advantages of the robotic approach for performing correctly one of the most complex surgeries.1-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Ielpo
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Unité des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif et Endocrine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Maria Vittoria d'Addetta
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mayra Abad
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Vellalta
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Sanchez-Velazquez
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernando Burdio
- Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Parc Salut Mar, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Andraus W, Tustumi F, Santana AC, Pinheiro RSN, Waisberg DR, Lopes LD, Arantes RM, Santos VR, de Martino RB, D'Albuquerque LAC. Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A critical review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:139-145. [PMID: 38310060 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCC) is a dismal malignancy. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment for patients with unresectable phCCC. The present review aimed to gather the current pieces of evidence for liver transplantation and liver resection as a treatment for phCCC and to build better guidance for clinical practice. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS. The related references were searched manually. Inclusion criteria were: reports in English or Portuguese literature that a) patients with confirmed diagnosis of phCCC; b) patients treated with a curative intent; c) patients with the outcomes of liver resection and liver transplantation. Case reports, reviews, letters, editorials, conference abstracts and papers with full-text unavailability were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS Most of the current literature is based on observational retrospective studies with low grades of evidence. Liver resection has better long-term outcomes than systemic chemotherapy or palliation therapy and liver transplantation is a good alternative for selected patients with unresectable phCCC. All candidates for resection or transplantation should be medically fit and free of intrahepatic or extrahepatic diseases. As a general rule, patients presenting with a tumor having a longitudinal size > 3 cm or extending below the cystic duct, lymph node disease, confirmed extrahepatic dissemination; intraoperatively diagnosed metastatic disease; a history of other malignancies within the last five years, and did not complete chemoradiation regimen and were medically unfit should not be considered for transplantation. Some of these criteria should be individually assessed. Liver transplantation or resection should only be considered in highly experienced hepatobiliary centers, and any decision-making must be based on a multidisciplinary evaluation. CONCLUSIONS phCCC is a complex condition with high morbidity. Surgical therapies, including hepatectomy and liver transplantation, are the best option for better long-term disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wellington Andraus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Francisco Tustumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Chagas Santana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel Reis Waisberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Liliana Ducatti Lopes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rubens Macedo Arantes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vinicius Rocha Santos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Guadagni S, Comandatore A, Furbetta N, Di Franco G, Carpenito C, Bechini B, Vagelli F, Ramacciotti N, Palmeri M, Di Candio G, Morelli L. Robotic Hepatectomy plus Biliary Reconstruction for Bismuth Type III and Type IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: State of the Art and Literature Review. J Pers Med 2023; 14:12. [PMID: 38276227 PMCID: PMC10817587 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Bismuth type III and IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma (III-IV HC), surgical resection is the only chance for long-term survival. As the surgical procedure is complex and Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) may be particularly suitable in this setting, the aim of this study is to evaluate the potential benefits of RAS in III-IV HC in terms of post-operative outcomes. METHODS We conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA checklist for article selection. We searched the PubMed database and included only studies with clinical data about the treatment of III-IV HC using RAS. RESULTS A total of 12 papers involving 50 patients were included. All cases were Bismuth IIIa (n = 18), IIIb (n = 27) or IV type (n = 5) and underwent hepatectomy with biliary confluence resection and reconstruction. The mean operative time was 500 minutes with a conversion rate of 4%. The mean hospital stay was 12.2 days, and the morbidity and 30-day mortality rate were 61.9% and 2%, respectively. Over a mean follow up period of 10.1 months, 9/18 cases experienced recurrence (50%). CONCLUSIONS RAS for III-IV HC is safe and feasible, at least if performed by experienced surgeons on selected cases. The oncological outcomes appear acceptable, given the aggressiveness of this pathology, but further studies are needed to fully elucidate the exact role of robotics in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Guadagni
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Annalisa Comandatore
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Niccolò Furbetta
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Cristina Carpenito
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Bianca Bechini
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Filippo Vagelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Niccolò Ramacciotti
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Matteo Palmeri
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Giulio Di Candio
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (S.G.); (A.C.); (G.D.F.); (C.C.); (B.B.); (F.V.); (N.R.); (M.P.); (G.D.C.); (L.M.)
- EndoCAS (Center for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Magistri P, Pang NQ, Guidetti C, Caracciolo D, Odorizzi R, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Di Sandro S, Di Benedetto F. Robotic approach for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: from Bismuth 1 to vascular resection. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107002. [PMID: 37599146 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of minimally invasive surgical approaches for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) has been relatively slow compared to other indications. This is due to the complexity of the disease and the need of advanced skills for the reconstructive phase. The robot may contribute to close the gap between open and minimally invasive surgery in patients with Klastkin tumors. STUDY DESIGN We report details of our experience with robotic approach in patients affected by pCCA. In particular selection criteria, ERAS management, technical tips and robotic setup are discussed. Finally, results from our cohort are reported. A video clip of a patient that underwent left hepatectomy with en-bloc caudatectomy and portal vein resection at the confluence with end-to-end reconstruction for a pCCA 3-b according to Bismuth-Corlette classification with full robotic approach is enclosed. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent robotic resection of pCCA over the three-year interval with a median follow-up interval of 18.7 months. The pre-operative Bismuth-Corlette classification was 1 for two patients (14.2%) and 2 for one patient (7.1%), 3-a for three (21.4%) patients, 3-b for four (28.6%) patients and 4 for four (28.6%) patients. Median estimated blood loss was 150 ml (range 50-800 ml) and median operative time was 490 min (range 390-750 min). The median length of hospital stay after the index operation was 6 days (range 3-91). Final histology revealed a median of 19 (range 11-40) lymph nodes retrieved, with 92.9% R0 resections. 90-days mortality was nihil and 3-year survival exceeds 50%. CONCLUSION With adequate preparation, outcomes of robotic approach to pCCA can be safe and in line with the current international benchmark outcomes, as showed in this study, when performed in expert high volume centers for complex major hepatectomy and robotic HPB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ning Qi Pang
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Caracciolo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Odorizzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Modena "Policlinico", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|