1
|
Bratu LD, Schenker M, Stovicek PO, Schenker RA, Mehedințeanu AM, Berisha TC, Donoiu A, Mogoantă SȘ. Retrospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and Chemoradiotherapy Neoadjuvant Treatment in Relation to Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:656. [PMID: 38674302 PMCID: PMC11052151 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective: In the therapeutic strategy of rectal cancer, radiotherapy has consolidated its important position and frequent use in current practice due to its indications as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, definitive, or palliative treatment. In recent years, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been established as the preferred regimen compared to concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In relation to better outcomes, the percentage of patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant treatment is higher in the case of TNT. This study aimed to analyze the response to TNT compared to neoadjuvant CRT regarding pCR rate and the change in staging after surgical intervention. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study on 323 patients with rectal cancer and finally analyzed the data of 201 patients with neoadjuvant treatment, selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients received CRT neoadjuvant therapy or TNT neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFOX or CAPEOX. Results: Out of 157 patients who underwent TNT treatment, 19.74% had pathological complete response, whereas in the group with CRT (n = 44), those with pCR were 13.64%. After neoadjuvant treatment, the most frequent TNM classifications were ypT2 (40.30%) and ypN0 (79.10%). The statistical analysis of the postoperative disease stage, after neoadjuvant therapy, showed that the most frequent changes were downstaging (71.14%) and complete response (18.41%). Only four patients (1.99%) had an upstaging change. The majority of patients (88.56%) initially presented clinical evidence of nodal involvement whereas only 20.9% of the patients still presented regional disease at the time of surgical intervention. Conclusions: By using TNT, a higher rate of stage reduction is obtained compared to the neoadjuvant CRT treatment. The post-neoadjuvant-treatment imagistic evaluation fails to accurately evaluate the response. A better response to TNT was observed in young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Dragoș Bratu
- Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania (T.C.B.); (A.D.)
- Sf. Nectarie Oncology Center, 200347 Craiova, Romania; (R.A.S.); (A.M.M.)
| | - Michael Schenker
- Sf. Nectarie Oncology Center, 200347 Craiova, Romania; (R.A.S.); (A.M.M.)
- Department of Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Puiu Olivian Stovicek
- Sf. Nectarie Oncology Center, 200347 Craiova, Romania; (R.A.S.); (A.M.M.)
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Nursing, Târgu Jiu Subsidiary, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Tradian Ciprian Berisha
- Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania (T.C.B.); (A.D.)
- Sf. Nectarie Oncology Center, 200347 Craiova, Romania; (R.A.S.); (A.M.M.)
| | - Andreas Donoiu
- Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania (T.C.B.); (A.D.)
- 3rd General Surgery Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, 200642 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Stelian Ștefăniță Mogoantă
- 3rd General Surgery Clinic, Emergency County Hospital, 200642 Craiova, Romania;
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flom E, Schultz KS, Pantel HJ, Leeds IL. The Predictors of Complete Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer during the Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Era: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5853. [PMID: 38136397 PMCID: PMC10742121 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The modern rectal cancer treatment paradigm offers additional opportunities for organ preservation, most notably via total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and consideration for a watch-and-wait (WW) surveillance-only approach. A major barrier to widespread implementation of a WW approach to rectal cancer is the potential discordance between a clinical complete response (cCR) and a pathologic complete response (pCR). In the pre-TNT era, the identification of predictors of pCR after neoadjuvant therapy had been previously studied. However, the last meta-analysis to assess the summative evidence on this important treatment decision point predates the acceptance and dissemination of TNT strategies. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess preoperative predictors of pCR after TNT to guide the ideal selection criteria for WW in the current era. An exhaustive literature review was performed and the electronic databases Embase, Ovid, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane were comprehensively searched up to 27 June 2023. Search terms and their combinations included "rectal neoplasms", "total neoadjuvant therapy", and "pathologic complete response". Only studies in English were included. Randomized clinical trials or prospective/retrospective cohort studies of patients with clinical stage 2 or 3 rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent at least 8 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in addition to chemoradiotherapy with pCR as a measured study outcome were included. In this systematic review, nine studies were reviewed for characteristics positively or negatively associated with pCR or tumor response after TNT. The results were qualitatively grouped into four categories: (1) biochemical factors; (2) clinical factors; (3) patient demographics; and (4) treatment sequence for TNT. The heterogeneity of studies precluded meta-analysis. The level of evidence was low to very low. There is minimal data to support any clinicopathologic factors that either have a negative or positive relationship to pCR and tumor response after TNT. Additional data from long-term trials using TNT is critical to better inform those considering WW approaches following a cCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Flom
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Kurt S Schultz
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Haddon J Pantel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Ira L Leeds
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|